We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Updated at 12:50pm
TEXAS SENATOR TED Cruz has won Republican caucuses in Alaska by a slim margin over Donald Trump today.
It was Cruz’s third victory in the Super Tuesday primary and caucus votes in a dozen states against seven wins for Trump.
Alaska in the far west was the last state to report its results.
However, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump still took a giant step toward securing the White House nominations of their parties, thumping rivals in the majority of Super Tuesday primaries.
Bellicose billionaire Trump weathered a barrage of attacks from fellow Republicans to win seven of 11 states, coming within striking distance of becoming the Republican nominee to replace President Barack Obama.
Clinton also racked up seven wins with her strategy of embracing President Barack Obama appearing to pay dividends.
She beat rival Bernie Sanders handily across a host of southern US states – Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Tennessee and Texas – winning big among African-American voters and reversing a 2008 primary loss in Virginia.
The former secretary of state also claimed Massachusetts, in a close race.
Sanders notched wins in his tiny home state of Vermont, Oklahoma, Colorado and in Minnesota, but he now trails heavily.
Both Trump and Clinton signaled their focus is beginning to shift to the general election.
In victory remarks, Clinton attacked Trump’s pledge to “make America great again.”
“America never stopped being great!” she said to cheers from supporters in Miami.
“It’s clear tonight that the stakes in this election have never been higher, and the rhetoric we’re hearing on the other side has never been lower.”
Trump painted Clinton – the former first lady, senator and secretary of state – as a Washington insider, who cannot address a furious electorate’s desire for change.
“She’s been there for so long. I mean if she hasn’t straightened it out by now, she’s not going to straighten it out in the next four years,” he said.
A recent CNN/ORC poll found that both Clinton and Sanders would easily defeat Trump if the general election – set for 8 November – were held now.
But few are likely to underestimate the 69-year-old Trump after his primary rout.
Republican unease
Super Tuesday was the most pivotal day of the US presidential primary season so far, with half the Republican delegates and a third of Democratic delegates needed to win the nominations up for grabs.
Trump’s victories were widespread, from Alabama and Georgia in the deep south, to Massachusetts in the northeast, to the vital battleground state of Virginia.
The scope and scale of the victories will sow terror among establishment Republicans, who fear the party of Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan could face general electoral annihilation.
While Trump’s rivals Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz struggled to make the case they can still win, Trump tried to defuse an intra-party feud that may be the only serious obstacle remaining on his path to the nomination.
He offered an olive branch to party leaders who are fighting a rearguard action, making the case he can unify and grow the party.
“I think we’ll be more inclusive and more unified. I think we’ll be a much bigger party,” Trump said, easing up on his hallmark bombast.
However, any way you look at it, it was Trump’s night, as he won big and his two top rivals did well enough to stay in the race and thus keep their supporters divided, said Sabato’s Crystal Ball, a political newsletter published by the University of Virginia.
“Happiness for Donald Trump is a divided opposition. He’s got precisely that and it’s going nowhere for the time being,” the newsletter said.
This is great. The larger the donor pool the more lives saved.
This is great news! I’m now eligible to donate- I’m happy to give.
Welcome news. I gave blood regularly in Ireland but still banned in France because I lived in the UK in the early nineties.
@David Stapleton: is that still the case that you can’t donate blood uf you lived in the UK in the 90s?
@Lisa Jones: If we are talking about France, then indeed, that’s why I wrote it.
@David Stapleton: not meaning to pry, but can I ask why you are not allowed donate blood in France if you lived in the UK in the 90s? Never heard of it and am curious.
@Joe_X: I think it was to do with the mad cow disease outbreak there at the time.
@Lisa Jones: They lifted that ban in 2019. If you lived in the UK then, you can now donate in Ireland.
Here’s the official update:
https://www.giveblood.ie/can-i-give-blood/keeping-blood-safe/vcjd/
@David Stapleton: I think that is changed. I gave blood regularly in Glasgow and then here they said they wouldn’t take it. Saw in the news recently that view has been reviewed
@Dorothy Kavanagh: that’s great news, thanks. I’ll definitely look into it.
@Joe_X: Mad Cow disease in the UK. Even Ireland banned people from giving blood, but the ban in France is/was still in effect, though one commenter said they think that the French ban has been rescinded too. I’ll have to look into it.
Not a single mention of the man that brought the IBTS to court multiple times to get this policy brought in. Tomás Heneghan has been battling the IBTS for 7 years to get them to stop their discrimination against gay and bisexual men. His actions forced them to first allow gay men to donate if they hadn’t had sex for a year and he continued the legal action until they are now being treated the same as everyone else.
This is a long time coming. It begs the question – who in IBTS stood over this totally non-medical rule for blood donations for so many decades until they’ve been badgered into fixing it in 2022? If they’re making childish decisions like this, are blood donating services really safe? Who’s really at the wheel?
have your say