Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Still from 'Shakira - Can't Remember to Forget You ft. Rihanna' YouTube

Column Passionate or possessive? Shakira forbidden from appearing in videos with men

International megastar Shakira has revealed that she no longer appears in music videos with male co-stars, because boyfriend Gerard Piqué has banned it, writes Lisa McInerney.

SO IT TURNS out it’s not only Shakira’s breasts that are humble; the international megastar revealed in last Friday’s Billboard interview that she is no longer permitted to appear in music videos with male co-stars, because boyfriend Gerard Piqué, in a fit of pique (sorry), has banned it.

There is a light at the end of the tunnel for fans who enjoy straight pop stars holidaying in same-sex relationships, though. In the absence of a burly dude to caress her, Shakira has enlisted the services of noted good sport Rihanna, who Piqué approves of wholeheartedly. Possibly because he thinks lesbianism is a kind of foreplay. An exhibition to whet your palette while you check if there are any XXL condoms left in your wallet, that kind of thing.

The video for Shakira’s “event single” Can’t Remember To Forget You is most certainly a thing of beauty, even if it runs on so familiar a concept as to be relatively tiresome. Beautiful lady rolls around on bed, humps wall, is joined by other beautiful lady, humps walls in sync. Shakira is, as always, gorgeous, and the similarly striking Rihanna adds her branded snarl to give proceedings an edge. Then they take their tops off and have a cuddle. If you’re 15, you’re gonna love it. (I’m a little jaded because I watch a lot of dance music videos and honestly, every time a dancer doesn’t take their top off in a dance music video, we sound the klaxons and hide behind the couch). It’s not pornographic, exactly, but you really don’t want to be watching this one with your mam: “Is that that nice Rhododendron girl? My, that’s a big cigar.”

The possessive partner trope

But back to the reason for the topless cuddle: it’s there, Shakira coos, to placate Piqué, because “He’s very territorial. Since he no longer lets me do videos with men… I have to do them with women.” Not content with making her boyfriend sound like a conquistador, she continues, “It’s more than implied in our relationship that I can’t do videos like I used to. It’s out of the question — which I like, by the way. I like that he protects his turf and he values me, in a way that the only person that he would ever let graze my thigh would be Rihanna.” Now, I know Señor Piqué isn’t the only footballer to come across like a hormonal mix of Hernando Cortés, Veruca Salt and Tony from West Side Story, but to hear this from the mouth of his own missus? He sounds positively primeval.

The possessive partner is one of those tropes that’s used for romantic effect in bodice-rippers and problematic codswallop written by Stephenie Meyer and E.L. James, but it’s not an archetype to aspire to in reality. Search for “possessive partner” on Google and you don’t get directions for BDSM play and Interflora numbers; you get article after article on how to deal with a domineering loved one. Someone who tries to control their partner’s life to the extent where he or she has to examine very minor decisions in the context of whether it will cause offence, lead to an argument or end in a violent altercation is far from romantic. It’s exhausting, upsetting and potentially dangerous.

“Possessive” is a lot closer to “abusive” than it is to “starry-eyed”.

Shakira is a hyper-successful artist who’s sold over 125 million records. She’s got a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. She’s a philanthropist and activist who’s passionate about childhood education. She has addressed governments. She has been honoured by the UN. She recorded her first album when she was 13 years old. Shakira is not the kind of person you would think to allow her partner dominion over her professional life.

Should they have kept it to themselves?

Any successful relationship requires a little bit of compromise, and there is nothing inherently terrible about Piqué confiding in his girlfriend that her raunchy promos with male dancers make him uncomfortable. Hey, it’s understandable; no one’s perfect, no one’s 100 per cent self-assured all the time. He’s a decade younger. And let’s be generous here and suggest that there’s nothing entirely appalling about him suggesting she use Rihanna as a substitute, so long as we can roll our eyes at the notion that “girl-on-girl action” is primarily designed to appeal to straight men, rather than, y’know, girls. Perhaps it’s long been a fantasy of his, who knows? Perhaps Shak is happy to indulge him.

It would have been so much better had the lovers decided to keep this to themselves.

Giggling about how Piqué forbids her to employ male co-stars because he “values” her too much promotes the seriously dodgy notion that love can only truly be expressed through control. That may seem a delicious little conceit when you’re a 37-year-old, endlessly ambitious superstar, a cute fantasy that you have a big strong man who’ll mind you when you get home from dominating the music industry or fighting educational imbalance and prejudice. It’s not so helpful if it gets through to a 19-year-old fan who thinks being locked in on a Saturday night or bawled out in front of friends is just a demonstration of undying passion.

That’s assuming that Shakira’s comments are meant to be taken light-heartedly, though this isn’t the first time she’s portrayed Piqué as a domineering, kind-of-douche. In a January interview with Glamour magazine, Shakira said that she felt the pressure to stay superstar-thin had been alleviated somewhat because Piqué “prefers meat over bone”. From one kind of pressure to another, then. Let’s hope that Shakira is simply spouting the kind of heavily romanticised guff one is prone to when one is in love, in which case we feel justified wishing she’d button it. The alternative doesn’t bear thinking about.

Read more of Lisa McInerney’s columns here >

Read: Shakira is preggers… what can her songs teach her baby about life?

Read: Rihanna asked to leave Abu Dhabi mosque after posing for photographs

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
83 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Emma O'Neill
    Favourite Emma O'Neill
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 7:23 PM

    So now charities are having corporate mergers? And I was thinking they were money making exercises for the board!

    82
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute An_Beal_Bocht
    Favourite An_Beal_Bocht
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 7:52 PM

    I don’t understand the need for charities particularly if you have proper socially conscious governance. Surely charities were a 19th century thing before the introduction of the old age pension, social security, social housing, national health services etc

    55
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tweety McTweeter
    Favourite Tweety McTweeter
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 7:57 PM

    That would require more taxes. People don’t like more taxes

    13
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute mickmc
    Favourite mickmc
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 8:10 PM

    Corporate boards and corporate salaries for failed FF TD’s.

    31
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jho Harris
    Favourite Jho Harris
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 7:53 PM

    Who wil get the lucrative deal to rebrand these two money pits.

    50
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tom McHale
    Favourite Tom McHale
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 8:06 PM

    Unfortunately too many charity founders/managers have merely used charities as a means of creating personal income & wealth for their own greedy selves.. with a small percentage of the money actually going where it should be going…. charities are a murky world in this country.

    46
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Symbolism
    Favourite Symbolism
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 8:08 PM

    Just the job for Pat Hickey

    41
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Markonline
    Favourite Markonline
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 8:03 PM

    Where does the great John O’She fit into all this? Did we ever find out how much money he was on before he took off into the sunset?

    39
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Cormac Ryan
    Favourite Cormac Ryan
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 8:10 PM

    @Markonline: and the rest of his family

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tbones
    Favourite Tbones
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 7:57 PM

    Charities smaraties. Id love to meet someone these charities have ever actually helped other than the people who run them.

    38
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alanine Pipeline
    Favourite Alanine Pipeline
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 7:07 PM

    Oxfam were the start of so much – in Oxford ….

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alanine Pipeline
    Favourite Alanine Pipeline
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 7:22 PM

    ahead of their time – founded during WW2 – 50 shops here…

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eamon Mac Gowan
    Favourite Eamon Mac Gowan
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 8:55 PM

    I wouldn’t give either of them a cent, why should I make charity fat cats even richer?

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ian Moloney
    Favourite Ian Moloney
    Report
    Feb 14th 2017, 10:12 PM

    It seems very uncharitable that the fat cats get paid a fortune , pensions etc and the exploited shop workers don’t get paid a penny.

    12
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds