Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
He was on a stellar career path in the US Air Force, since he joined after college in 1962.
The Lieutenant Colonel from the suburbs of Pittsburgh had helped get American prisoners out of North Vietnam, was stationed in Okinawa, Japan, and worked at the Pentagon for four years.
In 1980, three jobs came up, he recalls, speaking to TheJournal.ie by phone from his home in Virginia.
They included US Commander in Iceland, and Deputy Base Commander at RAF Bentwaters in Suffolk. He chose Iceland, he got Suffolk.
And in the early hours of St Stephens Day, 35 years ago, he was thrust into the centre of what would become one of the most mysterious, controversial episodes in UK and American military history – “Britain’s Roswell”, the Rendlesham Forest Incident.
‘It’s like the pupil of an eye looking at you, winking’
A recreation of one of the lights seen by Colonel Halt and his team. Unsolved Mysteries / NBCUnsolved Mysteries / NBC / NBC
At around 3am on Christmas night, 1980, two Air Force police officers were on patrol around the perimeter of RAF Bentwaters, which along with RAF Woodbridge forms “twin” UK-US bases on the edge of the 1,400-acre Rendlesham Forest in Suffolk.
According to a later report by Halt, they “saw unusual lights outside the back gate at RAF Woodbridge.”
The two men, joined by another, went into the woods to investigate.
The individuals reported seeing a strange glowing object in the forest. The object was described as being metallic in appearance and triangular in shape, approximately two to three metres across the base, and approximately two metres high.
It illuminated the entire forest with a white light. The object itself had a pulsing red light on top and a bank of blue lights underneath. The object was hovering or on legs.
As the patrolmen approached the object, it manoeuvred through the trees and disappeared. At this time, the animals on a nearby farm went into a frenzy.
The following day, according to Halt, a team went out with Geiger counters to measure radioactivity in the forest, and claimed to find significant damage to trees.
They also claim to have found three equidistant circular “landing marks.”
On the night of 27 December, the base’s Christmas party was interrupted by one of the patrolmen shouting “It’s back!”
This time, Deputy Base Commander Halt went out to the woods himself, to investigate.
He brought Geiger counters, a piece of lighting equipment called a “star scope”, a photographer, a small group of the men under his command, and crucially – a tape recorder.
The 18-minute voice recording was made over a period of hours that night, and contains some extraordinary observations:
While performing a methodical search of the woods and investigating marks on trees and indentations on the ground, the group was suddenly struck by a light on the horizon, as Halt recounts in the recording.
We’re about 150 to 200 yards from the site. Everything else is just deathly calm. There is no doubt about it, there’s some type of strange, flashing red light ahead.
It’s coming this way. It is definitely coming this way. Pieces of it are shooting off, there is no doubt about it. This is weird.
The red light that exploded “like fireworks” was replaced by “three star-like objects”, two to Halt’s north, and one to his south.
It looks like an eye winking at you, it’s still moving from side to side, and when we put the star scope on it, it sort of has a hollow centre, right, a dark centre.
It’s like the pupil of an eye looking at you, winking. And the flash is so bright to the starscope that it almost burns your eye.
The night culminated in what Halt called an “unreal” close encounter.
3.05: We see strange, strobe-like flashes to the…almost sporadic, but there’s definitely something there, some kind of phenomena.
Hey, here he comes from the south, he’s coming toward us now. Now we’re observing what appears to be a beam coming down to the ground. This is unreal.
‘Burn it. Your life, and mine, will never be the same.’
Chuck Halt in his famous appearance on Unsolved Mysteries. Unsolved Mysteries / NBCUnsolved Mysteries / NBC / NBC
There are hundreds of UFO reports in Britain every year. In 2009 alone, the year the UK government got rid of its UFO hotline, there were 640 separate reports up to the end of November – 13 a week.
In one email, a teaching assistant from Dorset claims a fireball the size of a football flew through her kitchen window and landed in a plastic bag full of crisp packets.
Two others, reporting flying objects in Kent and North Yorkshire, began “I am a bit embarrassed about reporting this,” and “Can’t believe I am writing this…”
Unless there is evidence of a potential threat to the United Kingdom from an external source, and to date no UFO report has revealed such evidence, we do not attempt to identify the precise nature of each sighting reported to us.
The MoD does not have any expertise or role in respect of ‘UFO/flying saucer’ matters or the question of the existence or otherwise of extraterrestrial life forms, about which it remains totally open-minded.
I should add that, to date, the MoD knows of no evidence which substantiates the existence of these alleged phenomena.
What makes the Rendlesham Forest incident stand out from thousands of other UFO reports in the ensuing three decades, is the involvement and documentation of on-duty US military, including a serving Air Force Lt Colonel.
Ian Ridpath, an astronomy writer and BBC journalist who has covered the Rendlesham Forest incident since the beginning, explained its appeal in an email to TheJournal.ie:
This case was materially different from others because of the quality and number of the witnesses.
Also, it was a highly unusual sighting since it described a flashing light low to the ground, whereas most are up in the sky.
Hence it was clear that a simple celestial solution was not possible for that part of the sighting.
One thing added more credibility to the case for an extraterrestrial explanation than anything else – Chuck Halt’s memo and his voice.
UFO reports, the ones that can’t be quickly dismissed as shooting stars or hot-air balloons, normally consist of a cluster of sightings by members of the public.
People walking their dogs, or a couple on their way home from the pub, and at best they’re accompanied by very blurry, amateur photographs, or wholly ambiguous video.
But here was an official memo, on US Air Force letterhead, written by a serving Lt Colonel, and addressed to the UK Ministry of Defence, and an 18-minute real-time recording of his observations.
UK National Archives
UK National Archives
The tape was released in later years, unbeknownst to Halt, by someone he says “thought it was funny.”
After that, it all hit the fan if you know what I mean.
The document remained secret for more than two years, before a Freedom of Information request saw it published.
“My memo was never intended to go public,” he tells TheJournal.ie.
A copy found its way to Third Air Force, and somebody talked, and it got released.
I did everything I could to keep it from being released, because the then Commander was a friend of mine, and he called me and said ‘I’m going to release it,’ and my comment to him was, ‘Please, don’t. Burn it. Your life, and mine, will never be the same.’
And then, on Sunday 2 October 1983, the News of the World did this:
The memo, it turns out, had been released just a few months earlier, to a group called CAUS (Citizens Against UFO Secrecy), who filed a Freedom of Information request in the US.
The source of the rest of the story was later revealed to have been Larry Warren, a former Air Force police officer who has himself become a controversial figure over the past 35 years.
Among many other claims, Warren says a Major General walked up to the spacecraft, touched it, and communicated with aliens in the woods.
Halt is adamant about that and other stories told in Left at the East Gate – the account of the incident written by Warren and Peter Robbins in 1997, telling TheJournal.ie:
It’s garbage. It should be classified as fiction, it’s so far off base.
(We asked Warren and Robbins to respond to this, but they didn’t).
Advertisement
In fact, what forced Chuck Halt to break his official silence after 11 years, was what he calls the “tremendous amount of disinformation” circulating about the events of Christmas night, 1980.
I still didn’t say much publicly until people started putting out all kinds of garbage and nonsense…
So much disinformation out there and people bugging me about what happened – I finally decided, it’s time to tell the truth.
Halt also claims that, after many years of allegedly being lied to, he found out that “some of the young Airmen involved were hypnotised and drugged.”
So in 1991, he retired as a Colonel in the US Air Force after 29 years of service, and went on Unsolved Mysteries, then close to the height of its popularity, and attracting 15 million viewers across America.
The man who had wanted to be in Iceland during Christmas 1980, who pleaded with his superior to burn his memo, who stayed quiet for more than a decade, went primetime.
And, to borrow an expression, he wasn’t alone.
Baron Peter Hill-Norton, in later years. Sirius DisclosureSirius Disclosure
In recent decades, Halt has been joined by a wave of UFO believers whose positions of authority and responsibility (if not their claims) have given the movement more of what it most sorely lacks – credibility.
Among them are Ed Mitchell, former NASA astronaut and one of 12 humans to have walked on the moon, Paul Hellyer, former Canadian Defence Minister, Nick Pope, who worked on “aerial phenomena” at the UK Defence Ministry, before becoming a journalist, and Peter Hill-Norton, a former British five-star Navy Admiral and Chief of the Defence Staff.
As a member of the House of Lords, Baron Hill-Norton was perhaps the leading voice of Ufology within the British establishment.
He regularly asked parliamentary questions and wrote hundreds of letters to a series of ministers, challenging the state’s refusal to investigate or comment on alleged UFO sightings.
The official position of successive UK governments is, in short, that investigating sightings simply in order to debunk them, isn’t worth it.
We believe that rational explanations, such as aircraft lights or natural phenomena, could be found for [the sightings] if resources were diverted for this purpose, but it is not the function of the MoD to provide this kind of aerial identification service.
It would be an inappropriate use of defence resources if we were to do so.
In explaining why they shut down the UFO hotline in 2009, the MoD said:
…In over fifty years, no UFO report has revealed any evidence of a potential threat to the United Kingdom…There is no Defence benefit in such investigation.
Peter Hill-Norton, however, persistently challenged the somewhat circular logic of this position, and used the Rendlesham Forest incident as a prime example.
In 1997, he wrote to Junior Defence Minister John Gilbert.
UK National Archives
UK National Archives
British authorities may have closed the book on the events of December 1980, but others have made their own efforts to find a rational explanation.
Ian Ridpath, the BBC journalist who went to Rendlesham Forest in 1983, and has returned many times since, offers a number of natural and prosaic possible causes for the “unexplained lights” that Chuck Halt wrote about.
In essence, he has argued that:
Some of the lights were the result of an “exceptionally brilliant meteor” seen by others in southern England on Christmas night
The “landing marks” were not cleanly cut or equidistant, but rather just the result of rabbit diggings
The radiation levels measured weren’t actually peculiarly high.
One of the most extraordinary claims surrounding the incident was that of Jim Penniston, one of the three men who went into the woods on Christmas night.
Soon afterwards, he drew a set of sketches of the craft, on the request of Base Commander Ted Conrad.
Under hypnosis in 1994, he claimed to have touched the spacecraft, which was adorned with elaborate coded hieroglyphics, and telepathically downloaded a data set in binary code.
He also said he had encountered beings who were not extraterrestrial, but rather human time travellers from the future.
Ridpath points to a Sci-Fi channel movie called Official Denial, which was released in November 1993.
It features a landing on an Air Force base, an abduction, and, just like Penniston’s hypnosis, culminates in the revelation, “They are us.”
If he saw the film, Penniston’s “memory” could have been heavily influenced by it, but even if he didn’t, a wide range of scientific studies have established that false memories can readily be created or even implanted during hypnosis.
As for the lights seen on 27 December, when Halt brought his team out to the woods, Ridpath found a startlingly simple explanation for this almost as soon as he arrived in 1983, and talked to a local woodsman named Vincent Thurkettle.
Once Vince the forester had alerted me to the existence of the lighthouse in the same line of sight as the flashing UFO, I expected the case to die rapidly.
Neither of us expected that it would grow into a celebrated classic.
As shown in the map below, the Orford Ness Lighthouse, on the Suffolk coast, shines in the direction of the farmhouse close to where Halt reported seeing a “beam”, and on to the purported landing site on the edge of Rendlesham Forest.
Google Maps
Google Maps
Aftermath
A lot has changed over the past 35 years. The twin bases at Bentwaters and Woodbridge are shut down, replaced by a military museum and Bentwaters Park – a filming location used in the making of episodes of Top Gear, as well as the Hollywood blockbuster Furious 6.
The UK Forestry Commission, which owns Rendlesham Forest, now operates a UFO walking trail there.
“To help your children round the UFO Trail, why not look for the strange symbols on the posts and decode the message with help from our Alien Trail Leaflet”, reads the website.
Peter Hill-Norton died in 2004, but at least one member of the Lords appears to have shown an interest in the Rendlesham Incident, in his stead.
In July, former Conservative party PR man, and Telegraph newspaper executive Baron Guy Black posed a parliamentary question about unexplained radar sightings in the area of the twin bases in December 1980.
The flood of enquiries about that winter may have slowed somewhat, but they’re still coming, and could undergo a resurgence in the next few months.
Earlier this year, the UK Defence Ministry announced that its 18 remaining UFO files – some of which concern Rendlesham – would be released to the National Archives by “late 2015 or early 2016.”
As for Chuck Halt, now 75 years of age and recently “completely retired,” he is still as adamant as ever, if not more so.
He returned to Suffolk this summer, and tells TheJournal.ie he plans to release a new book on Rendlesham in the spring of 2016, which he says will reveal new and startling evidence on the incident.
In a sworn affidavit five years ago, he famously doubled down on his claims:
I believe the objects that I saw at close quarter were extraterrestrial in origin and that the security services of both the United States and the United Kingdom have attempted – both then and now – to subvert the significance of what occurred at Rendlesham Forest and RAF Bentwaters by the use of well-practised methods of disinformation.
His persistent claims were met sternly by retired Colonel Ted Conrad, the base commander at Bentwaters, who told David Clarke that his former colleague “should be ashamed.”
Col Halt can believe as he wishes. I’ve already disputed to some degree what he reported.
However, he should be ashamed and embarrassed by his allegation that his country and England both conspired to deceive their citizens over this issue. He knows better.
Looking back over the case he has reported and followed and documented for 32 years, journalist Ian Ridpath sounds almost disappointed.
I recall thinking when I started my investigation that if this case failed to pan out then I could never, ever take a UFO case seriously again.
It didn’t, and I haven’t.
Chuck Halt, however, has a message for the skeptics out there.
I was a non-believer, I never really gave it a second thought before the incident.
But I’ve got so much material from so many people, and talked to very credible people, people that do not want their names used, that are in very influential positions, including some that are as high in the government as you can get.
I can tell you, we are not alone. I can guarantee you that.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Zelenskyy tells Fox News relationship with Trump can still be salvaged
Updated
5 hrs ago
29.5k
Baltoney
Two young men die, two others seriously injured in single-vehicle crash in Donegal
3 hrs ago
24.9k
Oval Office
Zelenskyy leaves White House summit after Trump claims he's 'not ready for peace'
Updated
13 hrs ago
96.0k
591
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 153 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 105 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 137 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 106 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 79 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 78 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 127 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 60 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 75 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 82 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 39 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 43 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 25 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 87 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 97 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 69 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 51 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 85 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 65 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say