Skip to content
Support Us

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

A Ryanair flight has diverted to Paris after a passenger was taken ill

The flight, bound for Alicante, originated in Germany.

ryanfr flightradar24 flightradar24

A RYANAIR FLIGHT bound for Alicante has been forced to land in Paris after a passenger was taken ill onboard.

The flight, coded FR 7322, was flying from Frankfurt – Hahn Airport, Germany to Alicante, Spain.

The plane’s transponder code had been changed to 7700, which denotes general emergency.

The flight took off at 10.30 am German time and  was originally scheduled to arrive in Alicante at 1.10 pm Spanish time.

It has since landed at Beauvais Airport on the Parisian outskirts.

This flight from Frankfurt Hahn to Alicante diverted to Paris Beauvais after a customer became ill on board,” said a spokesperson for the airline.

The aircraft landed normally and the customer was met by medical personnel when they disembarked for further treatment and the aircraft is due to depart to Alicante shortly.
Ryanair sincerely apologised to affected customers for this short delay to their journey.

Read: Flying with Ryanair this weekend? You better check-in early

Read: Now Ryanair is getting into bed with Aer Lingus’s owner-to-be

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
35 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute D. Memery
    Favourite D. Memery
    Report
    Mar 22nd 2023, 1:55 AM

    A sample of 20 properties out of 48,000 can hardly be considered representative of the total, that is only 0.04%. To have a 95% confidence level, normal in statistics, the sample size should be over 100 times greater, about 2,000 properties.

    201
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chris Linehan
    Favourite Chris Linehan
    Report
    Mar 22nd 2023, 6:20 AM

    @D. Memery: Sure that would likely cost billions just to complete the surveys!

    70
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute D. Memery
    Favourite D. Memery
    Report
    Mar 22nd 2023, 6:42 AM

    @Chris Linehan: not sure it would be billions, but not cheap either, which in of itself highlights just how big the issue is. However, that still doesn’t diminish the fact that the report lacks any statistical foundation from which to draw valid empirical conclusions from such a small sample size compared to what is required.

    96
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Daniel Morrissey
    Favourite Daniel Morrissey
    Report
    Mar 22nd 2023, 6:50 AM

    Every town and village in the country has derelict /vacant properties.. they may not be derilict , but it’s a shame to see them empty.. I would love to see the properties chosen for this survey.

    69
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Niall Ó Cofaigh
    Favourite Niall Ó Cofaigh
    Report
    Mar 22nd 2023, 8:29 AM

    @Daniel Morrissey: it is a shame – but many are in the wrong place to assist with the homeless housing list despite the fact that many small villages could do with an injection of residents

    28
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Lone Hurler
    Favourite Lone Hurler
    Report
    Mar 22nd 2023, 9:14 PM

    @Daniel Morrissey: Many of which should be razed to the ground and a building with a suitable layout put back in it’s place. The trouble is, these properties are an expensive site so buyers are not interested – and often the owners don’t have the funds to carry out the work. Renovating them doesn’t appeal either because the costs are as much as the aforementioned replace and build. Then add in the stringent planning laws and people just say it’s not worth it. It’s a vicious circle.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute mariona l
    Favourite mariona l
    Report
    Mar 22nd 2023, 7:21 AM

    Sure derelict buildings are costly to repair, but where and what type of ones. The ones with 50 acre land close to Dublin that nobody can buy bar the crony friend in government / council member / builder… who will get 100.000 free renovation ticket?
    I can smell the trickery being cook!

    57
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Seán O'Sullivan
    Favourite Seán O'Sullivan
    Report
    Mar 22nd 2023, 10:11 AM

    Cpo them , put them up for auction and let the market decide , anyone not developing them within 3 years forfeits the property and what they paid back to the state

    30
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Niall Ó Cofaigh
    Favourite Niall Ó Cofaigh
    Report
    Mar 22nd 2023, 8:26 AM

    Of course a property that is not suitable for living in is exempt from LPT – local property tax – so the idea of paying someone to repair a property sounds great on paper but suddenly this property becomes liable to a tax that did not apply before. One would also be well advised to insure the property. There are ongoing maintenance charges Also, if one rents the property after renovation, one is faced with more taxes and responsibility and also the prospect of not being able to sell the property because of sitting tenants. Why not lease them to the local authority who then become responsible for repair and maintenance and all charges etc. not to mention being able to give homes to people on the housing list

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute mariona l
    Favourite mariona l
    Report
    Mar 22nd 2023, 8:56 AM

    @Niall Ó Cofaigh: I see where are you coming from Niall, do you think that if somebody has building connections or even a company, they could take the 50.000 or 100.000 free to renovate the house nicely, sell it to or even better rent it to the local authority that as you said “have people in the housing list” for a nice price, and pocket the money over and over and over… one house at a time or 50.
    Another advantage will be that renovating cost less most times than building from scratch but you can sell it for the same market value pretty much. Better margin! Sounds like a great business to me.

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tom O'Hanlon
    Favourite Tom O'Hanlon
    Report
    Mar 22nd 2023, 10:36 AM

    Buildings not suitable for renovation should be forfeited to the state at site value. That might make the owners renovate them on time.

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Lone Hurler
    Favourite Lone Hurler
    Report
    Mar 22nd 2023, 9:15 PM

    @Tom O’Hanlon: Unfair on owners who just don’t have the funds to renovate.

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Karl Phillips
    Favourite Karl Phillips
    Report
    Mar 22nd 2023, 9:18 AM

    Total lies, fantastic Herbert Sims buildings lying idle in Ballybough under the shadow of Croke Park and have been for years not sure how many families they could house.

    22
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds