Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
FRENCH LEFTISTS AND THE resurgent far right enjoyed strong showings in local elections yesterday that left President Nicolas Sarkozy’s governing conservatives struggling to maintain prominence.
Sarkozy’s role in launching the international military intervention in Libya on the eve of the voting did not immediately appear to have swayed the outcome of the voting in France’s cantons.
The elections for France’s smallest administrative segment are relatively minor, but they are the last test of parties’ nationwide strength before next year’s presidential elections.
Turnout was about 45 per cent, low for France, the Interior Ministry said. The prime minister, anguished by the low participation, urged voters to turn out for the run-offs March 27.
The opposition Socialists enjoyed the most votes overall with about 25 per cent of votes, according to preliminary results Sunday night from the Interior Ministry.
Sarkozy’s UMP party and allied parties had about 32 per cent of votes, Interior Minister Claude Gueant said. But French television and rival parties said the UMP itself had less than 20 percent of the vote.
The far right National Front had about 15 per cent of the vote, Gueant said. The party is riding the wave of popularity of its new leader, Marine Le Pen, who has tapped into worries about Muslim immigrants.
Le Pen took the party leadership in January from her father, party founder Jean-Marie Le Pen, an icon in French politics for decades who worried millions of French voters and neighboring countries when he made it into the runoff in 2002 presidential elections.
Recent opinion surveys have showed Sarkozy’s approval ratings at historic lows. Leftist voters are angry at his cost-cutting measures and say he is too cosy with corporate interests. Many conservatives are disappointed that he has not been bolder about loosening up the labour market and hasn’t eased tensions between police and youth in suburban housing projects.
A win in a cantonal election gives candidates a seat on councils overseeing France’s departments, or provinces.
- AP
The increase in SNAs is a smoke screen. They can sanction thousands of extra SNAs but if the SENO to the school won’t allow it then the school won’t get one. A school is only granted SNAs for care needs. A child in mainstream could be struggling with ADHD, Autism, speech and/or language, depression, anti-social behaviours, be a child with Down Syndrome or any other multitude of issues that present themselves but if they don’t have care needs (toileting issues or be a danger to themselves or others) then they won’t/don’t get an SNA.
The increase in the school building programme is badly needed. You only get one go at being in school, it’s so unfair that for some kids, their school experience takes place in delapidated, extremely expensive, prefabs.
Still far to high a pupil / teacher ratio.
@Philip Broderick: I totally agree but it’s a good start.
The announcement on the increase in SNA’s must be good news for those in need of Special Education, their teacher’s and parents.
@Eamonn Tierney: and good news for my sister. She just got her sna cert today
have your say