Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shannon Airport Mike Reeder via Flickr/Creative Commons

Inexperienced pilots major factor in Shannon plane crash

An air accident investigation highlighted a lack of understanding among pilots of aircraft controls in severe weather conditions.

INEXPERIENCED PILOTS AND strong winds were possible factors that led to a crash in Shannon Airport, according to an air accident report.

All 21 passengers and crew on board the Sunday morning Aer Arann flight from Manchester escaped uninjured but the plane was damaged beyond repair.

On 17 July, the commercial plane approached the airport in “blustery weather conditions that featured strong and turbulent crosswind”, according to the Department of Transport’s Air Accident Investigation Unit.

As the plane made its first attempted landing during turbulent conditions the aircraft bounced on the runway and was forced to return to the air.

During the second approach, the ATR 72 aircraft hit the ground nose down and skidded along the runway before coming to a stop.

The passenger plane was operated by Aer Arann on behalf of Aer Lingus.

The report highlighted a number of concerns regarding the experience of the crew and their understanding of the plane’s controls in severe weather conditions.

The AAIU said the “newly promoted” 29-year-old female commander, who was two months in her position,  was relatively inexperienced in handling an aircraft in “limiting conditions”.

Although this was the first go-around during line operations by the recently promoted commander, command training and previous experience should have adequately equipped her to recognise and appraise the prevailing conditions relative to her experience.
The investigation believes that the severity of the prevailing conditions was not recognised by either of the flight crew, either before or after the go-around.

The report also found there was inadequate guidance provided by the aircraft manufacturer on handling techniques in blustery crosswind conditions.

Aer Arran experienced similar landing difficulties with two other aircraft in the same fleet as the plane damaged in the crash.

The investigation found there was a “misconception” among Aer Arann pilots regarding land procedures and power handling for ATR aircraft.

The airline accepted the findings and recommendations made in the report.

Read: ‘Substantial’ to air ambulance during rescue operation >
Read: Investigation into plane crash which instructor and trainee pilot >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Philip Ryan
View 48 comments
Close
48 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds