Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
THE DUP HAVE accused the Irish government of getting involved in the Stormont Assembly talks by urging the North to legalise same-sex marriage, which is a Sinn Féin policy demand.
Both powersharing parties have already missed three different deadlines this year to form a Stormont Assembly, and leaves an uncomfortable precedent to the British and Irish governments on how to react.
As talks aimed at form a Stormont Assembly slowly grind to a halt, Sinn Féin responded to criticism from the DUP that they’re demands are “unreasonable” and “amount to blackmail”.
Sinn Féin MLA Conor Murphy told Morning Ireland that this was ”simply not true”.
He said that most of what Sinn Féin are asking for – which include an Irish Language Act, the legalisation of same-sex marriage and the resignation of Arlene Foster – have been already agreed in previous agreements, and haven’t been implemented.
These are rights and entitlements that people agree to in the [Republic of Ireland] and in Britain… so they’re not unreasonable demands at all.
I can’t understand why the DUP would not allow someone who wishes to live their life through the medium of Irish the right to do so.
DUP leader Arlene Foster. David Young / PA Images
David Young / PA Images / PA Images
The DUP’s Sammy Wilson told Morning Ireland today that it wouldn’t come to an agreement on Sinn Féin’s terms.
“The Irish government is sticking its nose in business it has no responsibility for,” he said, before criticising the Taoiseach for urging the North to change its laws to allow same-sex marriage.
Advertisement
He said he hadn’t heard the Taoiseach urging any other member of the EU who haven’t legalised same-sex marriage to change their laws.
More disagreement
David Young / PA Images
David Young / PA Images / PA Images
Yesterday, Sinn Féin accused British Prime Minister Theresa May of setting the Northern Ireland peace process back decades after a further delay in talks.
Michelle O’Neill, Sinn Féin’s leader in Northern Ireland, said an agreement between May and the Democratic Unionist Party’s 10 MPs in the London parliament to prop up her minority government was at fault.
“She is in hock to the DUP,” O’Neill told reporters in Belfast in comments aired on national television.
Sinn Fein are disappointed but not surprised that a deal has not yet been done. What this constitutes is a monumental failure on behalf of Theresa May.
“She has set back decades of work,” O’Neill said.
The British government continues to insist that the deal has no bearing on the Northern Ireland peace process.
The DUP, in turn, has been critical of Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Coveney’s support for an Irish Language Act, and Coveney was quick to then distance himself again:
The governments can support and encourage but, in the final analysis, it is only the parties themselves that can make an agreement with each other.
Britain’s Northern Ireland Secretary James Brokenshire warned that if no agreement was reached, he would be forced to draft a budget for the province and have it enacted by civil servants, but a day later said only that he would “reflect carefully” on how to manage public services.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
With the numbers of Irish citizens up there it’s more our business than you think Ms Foster. Also, ask the average Londoner what they think of you sticking your nose in their business.
@Oisín O’Connor: After the Brexit vote the DUP encouraged it members to source Irish passports. For me looking from a distance, they can keep the North, We are in enough of a mess down here without adding a vast politically dysfunctional sector, which is a failed economic entity where sectarianism dictates.
@Oisín O’Connor: Why is the north so far behind the rest of the UK on issues concerning civil rights, we seem to be slipping backwards. They need to wake up to the twenty first century, or I can see (hopefully not) trouble on the horizon.
@Oisín O’Connor: Why is the north so far behind the rest of the UK on issues concerning civil rights, we seem to be slipping backwards. They need to wake up to the twenty first century, or I can see (hopefully not) trouble on the horizon.
@ktsiwot: As an Irishman living in the six counties, allow me to sat that you can shove your “they can keep the north” attitude way up where the sun doesn’t shine. Partition is wrong at every level.
Poor dermo, doesn’t have the cop to realise that abstentionism is in fact the choice of the Nationalist community in the 6 counties, not just SF, as proven by the fact that the non-abstention nationalist party, the SDLP, got wiped out in the Westminister elections.
@Chris Kirk: Interesting, the dup are bigots but to suggest the rest of the U.K. have it all spot on in regards social issues is open to scrutiny. For one I don’t think the U.K. Is doing anything for social cohesion with the way they are allowing the proliferation of an ideology that is a living anathema to progressive social values. Islam.
@Chris Kirk: in the recent referendum in 2015 on same sex marriage 30 percent of voters voted against same sex marriage . That’s equivalent to half the population of NI . It only took the Irish republic 90 odd yrs to have a referendum and vote on the thing .
@Tír Eoghain Gael: if their was basic cop on I would agree however observing the north and the basket case it is on every level, political, economic and socially it would destroy us, it is not as if we are in a great state here.
@Tír Eoghain Gael: but partition is very very real, how are you getting on convincing the unionist community that a united ireland is in their best interest?
@ktsiwot: ” if their was basic cop on I would agree”
Basic cop on? The same politicians you are claiming to have no cop on managed to build a peace process which is held up as an example and a template around the world for post-conflict resolution. That is a vastly greater achievement than has been won by any politician in the 26 counties. The current negotiating deadlock is relatively small fry. It will be resolved by the Autumn. And regardless of what your perception of the standard of politics, I always find it depressing to see Irish people actively embrace and express a desire for, the continuing division of their own country. Sad.
@ktsiwot: I remember when people were saying the two Germanys could never get back together , Ireland had been one country longer than Germany existed .
@james connolly: I don’t understand your mentality about a divided Ireland , perhaps you could enlighten me as to how you have come to your views on the forced partition of Ireland being a legitimate situation .
@Jon Snow: Perhaps not at the beginning , but at the end there were huge ideological differences between the two Germanys And atheistic and religious views .
@Scundered: Hey scundered, on June 14th, you posted a claim that I have regularly posted derogatory comments about Protestants on this site.
I know I’ve been constantly asking you this, and that you keep dodging it when I do ask, but I’m going to keep asking you. Can you either post up even just one single example (with a link) of me making a derogatory comment about Protestants, or else retract the claim?
@Tír Eoghain Gael: Poll after poll shows the majority of people in the Six Counties don’t want a united Ireland, and that includes a big chunk of Nationalists too.
@Tír Eoghain Gael: they are the same politicians who regularly threaten to bring down the peace process when relatives of IRA victims ask for answers, wonder your not calling people free staters and west brits. That’s what you usually end up doing!
@Atheos Euripides: And? Can you blame people for being hesitant to being hitched to a debt ridden cesspit of corruption that is the 26 counties right now? No doubt it will improve in time though. And in the north, demographics are shifting rapidly. Most Catholics happen to be in favour of a united Ireland and census trends show we are fast heading towards a Catholic/nationalist majority. And surely a section of protestants will be open to the knowledge that the DUPs current position of influence in Westminster is a once in a lifetime, short term slide of power, and that the protestant/unionist community would hold much more sway as a regular big fish in a unified Irish parliament instead of being minnows in a westminster one. http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/news-analysis/demographics-are-shifting-towards-a-united-ireland-we-must-have-a-plan-35865222.html
@Bull Spite: lol good man Bull. The most recent poll commissioned in the 26 counties was by RTÉ and it showed a majority in favour of reunification lol. Clown.
@Richard Doherty: The DUP are using religion as an excuse for being hard faced bigots. They are no more Christians than was Adolf Hitler a jew.
The power is with the British government to do something about it by enacting proper laws, afterall it is the British taxpayers keeping the place going. This would not be tolerated in the rest of the UK.
@Dan Murphy: You must be joking, we don’t need this backwards looking attitude, haven’t we just shaken off the shackles of the church controlling our lives.
@Brinster: Silly comment. Politicians do not simply ‘sit around’ when their parliament is closed. It’s their work at constituency level, rather than parliamentary level, that usually gets them reelected. Hence the phrase ‘All politics is local’
Sinn Fein showing the Dublin government how to negotiate and defend the people you represent. Its a pity they weren’t in charge when the banks came calling.
@Paul Fahey: You are incorrect, they supported the proposal on Sept 30 2008 before any of the terms had been worked out and based on false assurances from Lenihan. Once the terms of the actual guarantee were detailed and presented they voted against it on October in the Dail.
@Cathal Mac Einri: they voted in favour if it, it is a documented parliamentary record. Rewriting of history is a desperate measure, much like their stance on water.
Hey scundered, on June 14th, you posted a claim that I have regularly posted derogatory comments about Protestants on this site.
I know I’ve been constantly asking you this, and that you keep dodging it when I do ask, but I’m going to keep asking you. Can you either post up even just one single example (with a link) of me making a derogatory comment about Protestants, or else retract the claim?
@Dan: A little knowledge is dangerous, Sinn Fein voted for Trokia measures incl Bond holders not being burned! All the cuts Siin Fein were against in the Republic are the same as those they voted to be introduced in the North, double standards or what?
@Tír Eoghain Gael: Ah the women bully is back, early start in the bar for you today, already fallen out with one lad on this thread I see…. doing a sterling job of uniting people for your vision of equal Ireland.
@Scundered: More cowardly dodging. I’ll ask again. On June 14th, you posted a claim that I have regularly posted derogatory comments about Protestants on this site.
I know I’ve been constantly asking you this, and that you keep dodging it when I do ask, but I’m going to keep asking you. Can you either post up even just one single example (with a link) of me making a derogatory comment about Protestants, or else retract the claim?
@Scundered: You claimed I have made regular derogatory remarks specifically about Protestants. I’ve repeatedly asked you to show everyone the proof. I’d have thought you’d jump at the chance to do so and embarrass me. It’s almost as though you know such evidence doesn’t exist.
But we’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. Post just one of those “regular” derogatory comments about Protestants that I’ve apparently made, with a link. Or retract your accusation. Time to man up.
@Tír Eoghain Gael: Your record appears to be stuck on repeat, though I suppose it must be embarrassing that you can’t defend falling out with everyone who has a different opinion to yours. Look at the amount on this thread alone.
Ladies and gentlemen, I present to you the journal’s very own keyboard sociopath.
@Scundered: Stuck on repeat and youay get used to it for as lonh as you keep avoiding the issue. So here we go again…you claimed I have made repeated derogatory comments on this site about Protestants. Show a quote and link to even one such comment or retract the accusation please.
Unless the DUP feel that they can unilaterally re-write the Good Friday Agreement, just because they have the Tories by the balls, I would have thought that the Irish Government have as much right as the British Government to “stick their noses” in. Unless co-guarantors means something different up there.
@David Knight: I think it does. It means if you are one of Darlene’s mates you guarantee her that you’ll buy lots of furnaces and she’ll guarantee her mates that they’ll make loads of money .#rhi #rhi scandal #redsky
@David Knight: In fairness to the British Government, their Prime Minister or their Foreign Secretary didn’t come out and make public comments about what should happen during the ‘negotiations’
Is anybody else surprised about how much interest finegael are showing in the six counties lately, the same six counties they ignored when they were under constant attack by government forces and authorities daily.
A few ago these bigots were on their knees but again the brits have propped them up.No way can Sinn Fein work with this sectarian lot,no way.
They are he’ll bent on causing as much trouble as they can.The Irish government has to get involved.This is our Island not a British island.
We definitely need a referendum on a United Ireland.
@The Risen: Gerry Adams says a lot of things. Actions speak much louder than words. Sinn Fein have done little to “unite Orange and Green in equality and mutual respect.” in recent years.
The conflict in Nothern Ireland is only sectarian by circumstance. It really is a cultural/political conflict. Provisional Sinn Fein and the DUP are still the extremes of both sides.
@Craba:
“Gerry Adams says a lot of things. Actions speak much louder than words. Sinn Fein have done little to “unite Orange and Green in equality and mutual respect.” in recent years.”
He and SF built one of the worlds most successful post-conflict peace processes. So yeah, actions do speak louder than words.
@Craba:
“Provisional Sinn Fein and the DUP are still the extremes of both sides.”
Which of SF’s demands in the negotations are “extremist” could you tell us:
A) An Irish Language Act akin to the indigenous language acts which now exist in the 26 counties, in Scotland and in Wales.
B) A Bill of Rights to guarantee equality for all citizens
C) Same sex marriage to be legalised
D) Accountability for the half billion pound RHI scandal
@Tír Eoghain Gael:
I replied in some detail a couple of hours ago, but the journal is becoming a lottery of whether a comment will post or not.
In summary the words “recent years” answers you first point.
Secondly I didnt say that the specific demands of Sinn Fein were extremes. I said Sinn Fein were. They are an extreme Left wing marxist organisation. I would also say that labeling those you disagree with as “traitors” is extremist also.
@Thaddius T Sawballs:
Sinn Fein’s only interest is getting into power in Ireland. The only ways they see that happening in the foreseeable future is to use their Northern Ireland constituency to add more seats in the Dail. They don’t want the institutions in Northern Ireland to work. Its not in their interests. They want to be able to say the Irish citizens in Northern Ireland are not represented. Ironically Provisional Sinn Fein are the ones who won’t represent them.
@Craba: Provisional Sinn Fein don’t exist.
Sinn Fein are representing the People who voted for them unlike other political party here in the Republic of Ireland FF/ FG Labour
@Christopher Doyle: They should take their case concerning civil rights to the EU parliament, rubbing more salt into Theresa May’s government. They have enough MEP reps in the EU parliament to make their case and gain support before brexit kicks in.
@Christopher Doyle: I think you’ll find Sinn Fein ceased to exist in 1922. Provisional Sinn Fein was established in 1970. They still exist. They have dropped Provisional from their name as they believe it has negative connotations. I cant imagine why that would be.
Where do they represent their Nothern Ireland electorate. Westminster? No. Stormont? No. Ah! the European Parliment. One M.E.P. out of 750, Influential. Funny thing is there probably won’t be any Northern Ireland MEPs in the next European Parliament.
@Tír Eoghain Gael:
Different Sinn Fein. The supreme court in 1948 found that the Sinn Fein that were constituted in 1923 and no legal contiuation from the party that ceasesed to exist in 1922. (Buckley and Others v Attorney General and Power 1948)
@Craba: Of course they found it to be a different organisation! De Valera left it and wanted to get his hands on it’s funds. Just more of the corruption that the free state was built upon! Besides, it won six seats in 1927, which you may not be aware, was before 1948.
@Tír Eoghain Gael:
Different organisation, reconstituted in 1923. The government of the day wanted to use the funds for verterans on the 1920′s conflict. The plaintiffs wanted it to fund their military and political aspirations. All the money got flittered away in legal fees.
As today, when Sinn Fein gets involved, everybody loses.
@Craba: “Different organisation, reconstituted in 1923.”
There was a split. After which there still existed Sinn Féin. And again, the 1943 debacle came about through free state corruption and greed. As usual.
@David Dineen: You mean because of the artificial gerrymandered line that was created for the benefit of one section of the population over the other.
“Northern” Ireland only exists if inequality is preserved.
Equality is coming to the North.
@Niallers: Northern Ireland would still exist irrespective of Gerry Mandering, which was about maintaining Protestant control and catholic subservience.
DUP are getting arrogant now they’ve got leverage over the Tories. Irish government can stick it’s nose in as much as it likes and there’s nothing they can really do about it is there.
Few people on here have absolutely no positive contributions to the ongoing crisis in the north. Just childish behavior and negativity. They are either Trolls or undercover staunch unionists trying to get their prehistoric outdated values heard. This is the core of the problem. unionist support is declining by the minute. A untied Ireland is not far away and this really gets some people’s backs up and blood boiling. It very much shows in some of these posts. Just watch the replies
Support for Sinn Fein is in decline it has being since the end of the troubles . While the catholic population is increasing support for nationalist parties are decreasing . In 2016 they receive half the votes they got in 2001 . In 10 to 15 yrs time they won’t be relevant in NI anymore .
@Tommy Whelan:
“While the catholic population is increasing support for nationalist parties are decreasing”
The nationalist turnout increased at the last two elections, clever cloggs!
@Tommy Whelan:
“In 2016 they receive half the votes they got in 2001″
Firstly there was no general election in 2016, it was in 2017. But let’s run a quick fact check on the rest of that claim:
Number of votes for SF in:
2001: 175,933
2017: 238,915
So no, their vote didn’t decrease by a half, it increased by 62,982 votes.
@Tommy Whelan:
“In 10 to 15 yrs time they won’t be relevant in NI anymore”
So in the last 15 years their vote has increased by 63,000 votes, and that is your reasoning behind figuring they won’t even be relevant in the next 15 years? lol
I know joined the British Army and all, so brains were never going to be a strong point, but come on! You managed to get absolutely every single claim wrong in that post lol!!
lol Care to explain how you got from that their vote has been declining since the end of the troubles? Given that their share of the vote has actually increased by 5.1% in that time (with an increase of 63k votes). lol you really are a clown!
@Tommy Whelan: “a true characteristic of a shinnerbot to insult those that don’t agree with their opinion”
It’s not a matter of opinion lol. You claimed the nationalist vote is declining and are using an old article to support that claim. Since that article was published there have been two more elections. Here’s the percentage of nationalist votes since 2016:
So it’s not my “opinion” that you are wrong in saying the nationalist vote is in decline. The RESULTS show the nationalist vote is increasing.
lol so again, every single claim you made in your initial post was verifiably wrong, and spectacularly so!
@Tommy Whelan: tommy, you made a ridiculous claim that is easily and demonstrably refuted by the facts and a grasp of basic math. SF have increased their support and representation in every jurisdiction where they have took part in elections, the republic, the 6 counties, the westminister elections and the european elections.
I think you made that claim before, so fully expect to be proven wrong the next time you make it as well.
Like when you claimed SF’s vote has plummeted since the peace process, when it actually has increased by 63,000 votes.
And like when you claimed that the nationalist vote has gone into decline, when it has actually increased by 5% over the last two elections.
And like when you claimed that “In 2016 Sinn Féin received half the votes they got in 2001″ when in actual fact they got 62,982 MORE votes in 2016 than in 2001.
Go have a lie down and leave the keyboard be for a while before you make any more of a fool of yourself.
@Scundered: Hey, scundered on June 14th, you posted a claim that I have regularly posted derogatory comments about Protestants on this site.
I know I’ve been constantly asking you this, and that you keep dodging it when I do ask, but I’m going to keep asking you. Can you either post up even just one single example (with a link) of me making a derogatory comment about Protestants, or else retract the claim?
@Tír Eoghain Gael: in only going by what I read in a article that I displayed here . It’s obviously true as you are getting all work up over it . Did I touch a nerve .
@Tommy Whelan: lol you haven’t a good record on posting articles. Like a while ago when you posted one to apparently prove that the nationalist vote is in decline, when it has actually increased for the last two elections. You’re playing a blinder Tommy!
@Tommy Whelan: “I would believe a article from the daily sport before a shinnerbot on here ”
I don’t doubt you’d believe anything. Sure you believed a SF support had halved since the peace process began, even though it increased by 63,000 votes lol Set down your shovel you absolute donkey!
Another article based on 2016 election results? lol Have you already forgotten that I pointed out there’s been two election since then? How can you be as thick as to continue to claim that the nationalist vote is declining when the facts have just been provided to you in black & white?? lol Look…I’ll even post them again for you!
Nationalist vote share by % in the past three elections:
The DUP never wanted to work with anyone from the nationalist side and still don’t , they were dragged kicking and screaming through the Good Friday agreement .The only reason they were forced to get involved back then was because joint authority had been imposed because of their continued intransigence .
They will happily pursue a hard brexit and be willing to live with the consequences. I personally can’t see the assembly been reformed while the DUP are in their arrangement with Threasa May , sure they couldn’t be happier with the way things are at the moment .
It must be truly awful to be born into a Loyalist/Unionist back round. Being born as one thing but identifying as another. Oh, wait… that sounds familiar. Maybe they have more in common with the LGBTQ community than they think
@Niallers: They can park that bus next to the one that finally brings the 21st century to the North.
Both sides are quagmired in the past.
No-one down here can take seriously two insane clowns squaring up to each other after closing time in the pub carpark.
@Liam Mac Roibin: “Both sides are quagmired in the past.”
Here’s SF’s demands in the talks:
A) An Irish Language Act akin to the indigenous language acts which now exist in the 26 counties, in Scotland and in Wales.
B) A Bill of Rights to guarantee equality for all citizens
C) Same sex marriage to be legalised
D) Accountability for the half billion pound RHI scandal
Maybe you could step back from your grossly simplistic (mis)understanding of the issue for a minute and explain which of those demands are “stuck in the past”?
“No-one down here can take seriously two insane clowns”
Such misplaced partitionist arrogance. It’s hard to take seriously the 26 counties too, or it’s claim to be a Republic when it is currently a debt ridden cesspit of corruption whose leaders have continuously embraced the partition of their own country.
@Scundered: Hey scundered, on June 14th, you posted a claim that I have regularly posted derogatory comments about Protestants on this site.
I know I’ve been constantly asking you this, and that you keep dodging it when I do ask, but I’m going to keep asking you… Can you either post up even just one single example (with a link) of me making a derogatory comment about Protestants, or else retract the claim?
@Tír Eoghain Gael: Nice try at deflection. However the fact you’ve already been derogatory to 3 others on this thread already shows the truth to your character, and of course bullying a woman yesterday on another. Classy.
@Scundered: Speaking of deflection, you keep avoiding answering me. So I’ll ask again. You claimed I have made regular derogatory remarks specifically about Protestants. I’ve repeatedly asked you to show everyone the proof. I’d have thought you’d jump at the chance to do so and embarrass me. It’s almost as though you know such evidence doesn’t exist.
But we’ll give you the benefit of the doubt. Post just one of those “regular” derogatory comments about Protestants that I’ve apparently made, with a link. Or retract your accusation. Time to man up.
Sticking its nose in lol! You lads need to be supervised by someone at all times, your track record on FairPlay and decency isn’t great. You couldn’t score in a cathouse
Deja vu! This is back to the politics of the 90s… We need some back room negotiations and really skilled facilitators (which got the GFA across the line). Keep this megaphone ‘blame the others’ politics going and the whole enterprise could start to unravel!
Our new minister Coveney seems very pro SF….When you see him on RTE could be SF spokesman for the talks…..Forner one Flanagan was better and more objective on NI policy…..
Like I said before, the DUP are a bunch of racist, sectarian, homophobic, anti Irish, anti women’s rights, backwards bunch of arseholes. They’re the ones who keep their feet in the past, it doesn’t matter about what anyone else wants, just what they want. I have no time for the sinn fein but at least they’re TRYING something! the dup don’t give a shit, all they care about is being the MOST important group in Westminister as long as they get their money, they don’t give a shit
In unprecedented move, Ireland's psychiatrists say CAMHS 'urgently' needs to be overhauled
7 hrs ago
4.3k
14
Protest
Disruptions in the Dáil expected as speaking time row takes centre stage again
27 mins ago
466
7
trump administration
White House confirms Defence Secretary accidentally texted journalist US plans to strike Yemen
Updated
9 hrs ago
69.1k
138
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 160 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 142 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 112 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 133 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say