Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
THE STATE WROTE off €9 million more on the sale of Siteserv by IBRC than was previously suggested, according to newly-discovered documents from the Department of Finance.
Minutes of an IBRC board meeting from 15 March 2012 disclose that the company was sold to the Denis O’Brien-owned Millington for €45 million with a €5 million pay-out to shareholders as part of the deal.
According to the minutes, this amounted to a total writedown of €119 million, more than the previously reported figure of €110 million.
The minutes state:
Following consideration the board approved the proposal as presented namely (i) to proceed with the sale of Siteserv plc for €48 million (with net proceeds arising for the bank of €44.3 million) with (ii) a write-off of the balance of facilities of €119 million following the sale, however noting that the this was circa €10 million in excess of the current impairment provision.
The minutes were published on the department’s website last night after a filing error resulted in them only being discovered as officials compiled responses to FOI requests.
The filing error was played down by department sources last night who insisted that the discovery did not change the substance of what Finance Minister Michael Noonan previously told the Dáil, only a point of fact.
Noonan has maintained that he was only made aware of the Siteserv transaction after it was approved by the board of IBRC on 15 March 2012.
The same minutes also disclose that IBRC’s former head of asset management, Richard Woodhouse – who managed Denis O’Brien’s loans with IBRC – was present for the same 15 March meeting where the sale was discussed.
This would appear to contradict what Alan Dukes, the former IBRC chairman, said in a lengthy press conference on 24 April.
Dukes said at that time that Woodhouse was kept out of discussions over the Siterserv deal “as he also managed the relationship between the bank and Mr O’Brien”.
Contacted this evening, Dukes told TheJournal.ie that Woodhouse had been kept out of the discussions about the Siteserv process and he did “not play any part in putting the final proposal together”.
“He was at the board meeting where the decision was made, but he was there on another issue before the board, which was coming from the bit of the bank he was in charge in.”
Dukes also drew attention to the minutes stating that Woodhouse informed the board of a letter from Virgo Capital “attesting to the fairness of the sales process which had been followed to date” in relation to Siteserv.
Speaking today, Fianna Fáil leader Micheál Martin said he found the department’s explanation for the missing board minutes “difficult to comprehend”.
He claimed the department had made a “deliberate attempt” to prevent this news from getting out. He said there had been engagements between officials in IBRC and the department going back to 2009, according to his sources.
Martin added: “The way this continues to be handled falls well short of what the public expect. The Government clearly hope that they have drawn a line under the crisis with the announcement of a Commission of Inquiry. But the efforts we have seen to mislead the public have actually raised yet more questions to which we need answers.”
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Can we not do away with these Ratings Agencies??
Agree with you Jason. They always seem to pounce with a downgrade just as it seems countries are reaching a solution to some of the financial problems. As European leaders seem to finally getting their heads in gear to sort out the euro S&P through this in. Who are they? Who owns or controls them. Is there a Mr or Ms Standard. (lord knows we are all Mr &Ms Poors at the moment!)
This downgrade has been due for a LONG time.
The latest chapter in Ireland’s history, we’ve had the vikings, Normans, English, catholic church and now it’s time for the banks.
They’re making money by playing the markets like this. They should be disbanded
Yeah but who rates the rating agencies eh??
The coastguard?
As far as I’m aware, the ratings agencies are funded by the stock exchanges. The bigger problem is these agencies were asleep at the wheel in the run up to the financial crisis in 2008 and actively contributed to these problems. They’re overcompensating now.
Standard and poors , Moody’s , the markets , Moore McDowell , the troika … Go and find a hole and throw yourselves into it and let us go back to our half normal life before youse gobshites came along and rated us.
The agencies are owned by public companies and earn their revenues from bond issuers asking to be rated. If we weren’t rated, many pension fund rules would prohibit them from investing in our debt.
The rating agencies were absolutely shocking in the run up to the sub prime crisis, but as for this recent action, they’re just saying what everyone else knows – that banks aren’t as safe as they used to be and government support is no longer guaranteed. They’re just doing their jobs.
have your say