Take our survey • Win a prize
Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Eamonn Farrell/Photocall Ireland

Smithwick Tribunal judge seeks more time to complete work

Judge Peter Smithwick writes to the Dail asking it to extend the deadline of November 30, saying he’ll need six more months.

THE SOLE JUDGE leading a tribunal into alleged Garda complicity in the murder of two RUC officers has written to the Dáil asking for a six-month extension to its deadline for the publication of his report.

Judge Peter Smithwick, who has been leading the tribunal since May 2005, wrote to Dáil clerk Kieran Coughlan last week to request that the Dáil extend the deadline it set down on June 30.

“It is now quite apparent that with the list of witnesses as of today’s date, the hearings will have to continue until the third week of November,” Smithwick wrote in the letter, which has been published by the Oireachtas this morning.

Smithwick said the Tribunal had heard from 105 witnesses since it began hearing public testimony in June, and that it intended to hear from a further 42 witnesses.

“The Tribunal has continued with unfinished aspects of its private investigations and has pursued certain new lines of enquiry which have emerged,” Smithwick wrote.

Since starting the public hearings – and it may be a consequence of the publicity given to the hearings – a number of persons hitherto unknown to the Tribunal have come forward with potentially important information.

This information has to be investigated and the persons who provide it interviewed to assess whether they have evidence that I need to hear. If so, then further time will be needed for these individuals to give evidence.

Smithwick added that time would also be needed to gain access to papers “held abroad” of which the Tribunal had only recently been made aware.

The deadline of November 30 for the publication of the Tribunal’s written report had been set down by the Dáil on June 1, with justice minister Alan Shatter insisting that the deadline was not meant to hamper the work of the tribunal.

Correspondence later emerged between Shatter and Smithwick, however, in which Smithwick had asked for the government’s deadline to be revoked “so that I may properly complete my task”.

“The effect of a public deadline is to indicate to parties who may have an interest in frustrating the work of the Tribunal that they need only withhold co-operation for a few months in order to achieve their objective,” Smithwick wrote at the time.

The Tribunal is examining allegations of Garda or State collusion in the murder of RUC chief superintendent Harry Breen and superintendent Bob Buchanan in 1989.

The pair were killed on their return from a Garda station in Co Louth.

Smithwick accuses Minister Shatter of interfering with tribunal >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
6 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Adam Magari
    Favourite Adam Magari
    Report
    Oct 10th 2011, 1:15 PM

    In Ireland, tribunals seem to have become a form of quantitative easing for the legal profession. When one hears of families being evicted and their homes repossessed for not being able to come up often with less than a senior counsel earns in a fortnight, well, what can one say…

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Murphy
    Favourite John Murphy
    Report
    Oct 10th 2011, 12:45 PM

    Do I understand from this that the Tribunal started in May 2005?
    And at the end no one can be prosecuted or called to task just like all the others we’ve had?

    To say: ‘The effect of the public deadline is to indicate to parties who may have an interest in frustrating the Tribunals work that they need only withhold co-operation for a few months in order to achieve their objective.’ Is to say nothing. if parties have already been withholding information why should they yield it up before a new deadline?

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Murphy
    Favourite John Murphy
    Report
    Oct 10th 2011, 12:47 PM

    Especially if this information is being held outside the jurisdiction.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Pete Gibson
    Favourite Pete Gibson
    Report
    Oct 10th 2011, 1:41 PM

    The Irish legal profession have skills comparable to bricklayers.

    Bricklayers are not as skilled at sponging off the Irish Taxpayer.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Derek Healy
    Favourite Derek Healy
    Report
    Oct 10th 2011, 8:34 PM

    Another Tribunal taking the Irish people for ride down theft avenue. We could learn a lot from the british in how they carry out equivalent inquiries etc……short time frames, small budgets, Job done! They should tell him yes, sure you can have an extension, but you’ll have to work for free because you were paid to get it done on time.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute rita martin
    Favourite rita martin
    Report
    Oct 10th 2011, 8:42 PM

    We have a chance in the referendum to vote for the dail to carry out enquiries so we make sure it is successful

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds