Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Clouds of steam spewing through a crevasse in Vatnajokull glacier, near Grimsvotn
Volcano
The bluffer's guide to... Vatnajokull and Grimsvotn
Everything you need to know about Iceland’s latest volatile volcanic area.
9.54pm, 1 Nov 2010
1.4k
ICELAND – AND THE rest of Europe – are on volcanic/ash cloud watch again. When meltwater began flooding from the glacial lake in the crater of Grimsvotn volcano on Iceland’s biggest glacier Vatnajokull yesterday, geological officials began to fear it might be about to erupt.
The country’s Civil Protection Department are keeping a close watch on the situation as Vatnajokull lies on a number of volcanic hotspots, including Grimsvotn volcano. A statement from the department today read:
A meeting was held on the Science board today in light of the latest events in Iceland. Earthquakes, eruptions and glacial river floods were on the agenda. Grimsvotn were a special item on the agenda because of a flood that started on Sunday. Glacial river floods have started eruptions in Grimsvotn before, the last one being in 2004…
While Iceland is declaring only the lowest stage of alert, “the so-called stage of uncertainty”, we at TheJournal.ie like to keep our readers prepared for anything.
Firstly, familiarise yourself with the area with this slideshow:
Secondly, be ahead of the curve/ash cloud with our guide to Vatnajokull and the tempermental Grimsvotn:
Advertisement
Learn to pronounce it: When the Eyjafjallajokull volcano erupted in Iceland in April, news presenters all over Europe learned to dread the appearance of its name on their autocues. Vatnajokull is easier. It’s Vat-na-yuhktl. Grimsvotn is Grims-vo-etn. Simple.
It’s not near the other one: Eyjafjallajokull lies about 100km away. Grimsvotn lies in the western part of Vatnajokull, which itself lies in the southeast of the island.
Bad news: Grimsvotn is considered Iceland’s most active volcano. In 2004, a similar flood from the lake in its crater was followed by an eruption.
Good news: an eruption might not affect travellers as severely as the April air chaos when more than 100,000 flights were disrupted. AFP quote a spokeswoman from Keflavik Airport who said that it is “near impossible to say if Grimsvotn erupts whether it will have an affect on air traffic at all”. It will depend on whether the volcano spews out lava or ash.
You might go there on your holidays (well, maybe not just right now):Vatnajokull National Park, home to Grimsvotn, is the largest national park in Europe. It has Iceland’s highest mountain, its largest glacier and Europe’s most powerful waterfall.
Bond on ice: The 007 films Die Another Day and A View to a Kill had icy chase scenes filmed on the glacier of Vatnajokull. Incidentally, Vatnajokull means “glacier of lakes”.
See for yourself: This is footage shot from a plane of the 2004 eruption at Grimsvotn. Set to the music of Queen’s Bohemian Rhapsody.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Of course it’s about pay! Leave out the ‘higher purpose’ bs and people will take it more seriously. Whenever I hear “it’s not about the money’ statements, I assume its all a load of waffle. Say it like it is.
It’s about ever-worsening working conditions.
Doing admin work that has no benefit to our role as educators so Quinn can say he has increased the working week of teachers so begrudgers like you think we have it less handy.
At the end of the day, we don’t care what the public think anymore, if we don’t stop the rot now, The job won’t be worth doing due to the casualisation of the job (jobs being split in two/three etc) in addition to having to jump through hoops copied from the failed UK system which has since been changed.
Fergal if you look at the difference between the Haddington Road agreement and the FEMPI that now applies to ASTI members I think you’ll find that FEMPI is worse on pay overall.
Haddington road adds in what the gov likes to call “productivity increases”. What these amount to is increases in teachers covering for out sick teachers during times when they are not scheduled to have class.
What that amounts to is more unemployed teachers not even getting a chance to get their foot in the door.
Sorry, Tony but it was the recruitment freeze in the public sector under Croke Park I that stopped young unemployed teachers and other young graduates getting their foot in the door. Then on top of this, as their wages weren’t protected by Croke Park I, those that did get in were subject to a pay cut while those already in a job weren’t. So this has nothing to do with trying to help unemployed teachers. It has everything to do with pay.
I don’t think you ever did. That statement just about sums up the greed and arrogance which that has people annoyed. You need to care what we think, we’re paying your wages.
IgnoreIreland – the recruitment freeze of course has a big effect but those hours of in-house cover also has a big effect. There’s no recruitment freeze when a teacher calls in sick – it’s not recruitment then, it’s sick cover.
4th highest in the OECD Phyllis and operating in a system that has dropped education spending by more than 40% since 2000 (which brings us to 75% of the OECD average spend).
Do you honestly think that that is all teachers work? Our contract, if we are lucky enoug is for 22 hours class time a week. That does not include the correcting hours, planning, schemes of work and all the extra curricular activities that take place in schools across the country outside of school hours. Also if a teacher needs a resource they have to buy it out of their own money! People who work in any industry get all resources they need to carry out their job to a competent standard supplied while a teacher must buy everything him/herself out.
Well loop De loop, you are bang on, you can tell from the red thumbs who is reading the Journal ( probably while “teaching” and you are wrong the taxpayer does not pay their wages the tooth fairy does. Based on speaking to parents and past pupils there are SOME teachers who shouldn’t be washing cars let alone have the responsibility of teaching the next generation, but guess what as a former teacher informed me “you cant get rid of them”
HOW MANY POOR TEACHERS HAVE BEEN SACKED IN THE LAST 20 YEARS??
Just because there are red thumbs doesn’t mean they’re all teachers – you suggesting so is to imagine that there is zero public support which simply isn’t true.
You’re absolutely right about the sacking of teachers though – there needs to be mechanisms around this – ones that protect good teachers and address those who just shouldn’t be there. The Teaching Council have made some moves towards this but not in any way speedily enough.
Apart from professional misconduct though it’s very hard to see how to measure teaching. I’ve never once seen a comprehensive suggestion on just how to do this.
Begrudger? I’m in support of the action, but to say it has nothing to do with pay is a lie. It may also have to do with conditions etc, but to say that pay has nothing to do with it is untrue.
The deputy leader of the union was on the radio claiming that they couldn’t ballot members during the summer holidays. But he didn’t say why. I can’t imagine they don’t have contact details for their members..
I used to feel like that too David – over the year since graduating I’ve had 15 days teaching work. Reality comes to bite in pretty quick then…. I hope it’s different for you but I’d be very very surprised if it is.
Well according to an article in the examiner in April of last year the average wage of a teacher in Ireland is between 55k – 60k. The average salary of an Irish worker last year was 41k and somehow they manage to pay their mortgages and bills. Have ye all got million euro mortgages or something? Or is it the summer trips to Australia and America putting ye a little behind?
Greedy teachers who want the most money for doing the least work as possible.
Even in the link you provided it says the wages of 1500 “teachers” are up on 115k a year.
These would all obviously be principal teachers, ie headmasters and if their wages are lumped in with regular teachers, guess what happens to the “average” wage you’re so keen to point out?
It gets skewed to a higher figure than it actually is.
That’s basic statistics.
30% of ASTI members are on casual contracts starting on €30,700.
Of that figure, Very few get that as they could be on 11 or 16 hours teaching time a week instead of 22, meaning 15k or 24k a year.
Er… Are you a religion or a maths teacher? If only 1,500 are above 85k, and a whopping 30% are on less than 30k, the average would be well lower than 55k. Basic statistics show that the average is 55k – 60k because the average pay is 55k – 60k.
The average salaries of workers in the public service have risen as recruitment of new-entry (ie lower salaried) employees has been greatly reduced due to the austerity.
In the end, we will be left with only the boring old farts (like me)!
Average stats are the average wage of a teacher, so no it is not rubbish it is the average salary of a teacher. According to this journal article 17000 ASTI are striking so minus 1500 principals, headmasters etc from the equation there are still 15500 regular teachers. 1500 higher paid staff on tops of 115k are not going to push the average wage up that high so the vast majority of teachers are still on a considerably high salary. And those stats would also include those low hours salary wage teachers. Much higher than the average workers salary. I have a 4 year degree in finance and have to work 38 hours a week with 2 weeks holidays a year and earn 24k a year.
Oh my god a teacher has to start off in their very first job on 30k. I don’t know how ye get up in the morning. Given the average college graduate starts on 25k ye can be extremely happy with that. And us private sector workers actually have to go and earn our pay raises and bonuses instead of just being given raises for time served.
John, I’m a public sector worker on €41k. After tax etc, that’s €2k a month. I keep reading that the average public sector monthly net is about €900 a week. Don’t believe the hype.
John – take a look at the “Education at a glance 2013″ OECD report.
education spending in Ireland from 2000-2010 dropped 40%
went from being a little above the OECD average to 25% below the OECD average
teacher pay at 82% of other degree holders as of 2011
teaching hours significantly higher than OECD average at secondary level (by about 5 places)
teaching hours at primary level are about the 4th highest in OECD countries
There have been a lot of suggestions as to what teachers “should” be paid and moans about “long holidays”
Let’s hear your suggestions of a pay structure for educators (including lecturers who are possibly included in that examiner article) and what hours should be worked….
If you do intend to make suggestions I don’t want to be accused of “picking holes” but I will say that some of the suggestions made over the last few days have been obviously unworkable and have consequences for the wider economy too – so while I’m seriously interested to hear anyone’s ideas on such a ting so that a reasonable conversation can happen, let’s make it comprehensive.
@john smith, hello john, i am not a teacher,so i dont pretend to know everything about it,nor do i buy into any newspaper statistics, or statistics in general. However if you use those figures with the word average as some sort of leverage for an arguement you clearly make it baseless assumption rather than matter of fact. 10 teachers earning 30,000= 300,000 + 2 teachers earning 115,000 makes 530,000 divided by 12 = 44,166 as an average wage. This is clearly misleading as stats can be,and when you use newspapers stats(whos bottom line is to sell newspapers) to argue the average salary is….you let yourself down. Also this may come as a shock but teachers pay tax also. If you were to incorporate the top rate in private sector and public the public is much lower paid, and given your intellectual prowess with figures and statistics who studied finance 24 grand is well overpaying you imho.
Maybe you should read the article, the so called meaningless averages don’t look all that inaccurate. And it certainly paints a picture that a considerable amount of teachers are grossly overpaid.
More than one-in-three primary teachers and 43% of those working at second level earn at least €61,000 a year.
Just over half of all teachers earn between €41,000 and €61,000 a year, through a combination of salary and various allowances.
Well done on totally ignoring reality and blanking your ‘average salary of a teacher ‘ statement. When reading newspapers john a pich of salt, good day sir.
So what you’re saying is that you have no ideas – you just want to stamp your feet and say “that’s too much” without even a single suggestion?
Sounds like you’re bitter to me. (and yes – I’m aware of the pun!)
Now, in terms of the figures in the article, I find it interesting (read: suspicious) that the number of 61K was chosen given that this is just barely below the level at which a teacher with 35 years of service would get. That is, assuming they had no other post of responsibility or any other type of allowance.
So really, what we seem to have here is an isssue of the demographics of teaching. Looking again at the OECD report (that you seem to have ignored), less than 10% of teachers in 2nd level schools are under 30. There are also a lot of changes which have been brought in that will affect these numbers. Or rather, they already have, we just haven’t any visibility on them yet:
Retirements in Feb 2012 will change the demographic somewhat and will result in savings. Also the removal of allowances as of Feb 2012.
People should give some notice to such changes that have already happened and relying on old and open figures.
The journal will keep these articles coming due to the high comment count. I worked on the private sector for last 7 years. I was on 53k gross. Good money, but paying huge amount of tax. I have given up the job to study to become a teacher of business and accountancy as it is something I always wanted to do. I know I will probably be unemployed picking up the scraps for years in Ireland when qualified. I’ll emigrate if need be. That’s not an option for many though. When did we become a country of miserable p***ks hat just wants to see everyone else suffer. Do you not see the importance of a knowledge based economy? If you all believe some of the figures being bandied about that teachers earn an average of 60k you are mad. How much did the cowboy builders earn in the boom building crap quality houses to sell to each other so we could all be millionaires? No one seemed to begrudge them. Neither did I, but I did understand enough that it was unsustainable and thankfully didn’t buy. I understand the need to manage the budget as teachers are public sector. That’s understandable. But why should the teachers get walked on either just to keep public opinion happy that they suffer too. We have all suffered in this recession. The public vs private sector divide seems greater than ever. Divide and conquer strategy being used by the Government.
Because frankly they don’t do a very good job and expect to be paid over the odds for doing it. They refuse any form of monitoring, accountability, league tables, anything that will hold their performance up to scrutiny. I would have no problem paying good, committed teachers a good wage, more than they get now, but only so long as the useless ones who are there for June, July & August only can be removed. Look back on your school days and no doubt you had some great teachers, but they’re rarely the ones that stand out in your mind. The wasters mess things up for everyone else, and the unions protect the wasters. Make it a real job, where either you perform or you queue for the dole like everyone else in the world, then they might be taken seriously.
I agree with you. There are poor teachers protected by the system. Having worked private sector I know the importance of reviews to improving performance and to weeding out poor employees too. Usually though, if someone gets through the initial 6 months in private sector probation they would need to make a big screw up to get fired. Instead these employees just sit at their level or get shuffled around a bit rather than fired. As you said, I do remember my great teachers and the bad ones too. This is where most reform is needed I believe. There are inspections carried out on teachers and these are becoming more regular and provide more feedback for the school and teacher concerned. It is difficult to assess teacher performance by looking at student results as students are all different and backgrounds vary greatly. Schools are not like a factory that picks the best ingredients to make a product. You cannot compare students to ingredients in a process. They are individuals and what represents success for them is different from student to student.
Good post. I’ve a daughter just starting 5th year, she’s had 2 of her teachers out sick already, she’s not back a wet weekend since the summer holidays.
When your son does gets 90% on a subject in year one and drops to 40% in year to and three (different teacher) something stinks! A drop of 10/20% might account for difficulty!! and you speak to other students and parents, then you hear ah! “thats Mr X sure he does almost no teaching, spends most of the class on his laptop!” ( probably reading the Journal)
Taxi Bill: excellent post. If you were making small talk in a taxi. Any chance you could save your comments for the poor unfortunates who have to listen to drivel as they are ferried from A to B? BTW, if you aren’t a taxi driver , you should give serious consideration to becoming one! Or become a teacher. Then you can type away to your heart’s content on a laptop in front of your students. While earning a small fortune, for ever, for doing nothing
Every teacher knows a “mr/miss x who give great teachers a bad name, but time and again I have been told (by teachers) they cant be fired!
I know many people dont like my comments, but I tell it how I see it.
So, there are bad teachers who cant be fired. Therefore, the Teachers are wrong to go against Haddington Road. Your ‘logic’ baffles me. It might be better to consider what could happen if you supported the teachers. Do you honestly think that your support for them would damage the education system (not that R Quinn needs any help)?
Not about pay, what a load of bull. Everything with teachers is about more money for doing less work. The vast majority of the public are sick to death of teachers moaning all the time about pay and conditions when they are on far better terms of employment than your average joe. I implore the government not to give in to the greedy demands of teachers, you will be backed by the public
correct John.
true, there are many dedicated teachers out there – but most ordinary people will NOT be sympathetic to the demands of the ASTI or to teachers.
In fact many will be downright angry reading this.
Most people are really struggling out there.
Some people in private sector barely get two weeks holidays, in a full year. (Lower paid public servants the same). Small business owners can hardly afford to take any time off, at all.
Teachers really need to wake up, – to the reality of the lives of others in our society.
Let me get this straight. So they’re only back a couple of weeks after 3 months off paid holidays, and they’re already striking? They don’t know how good they have it. Come into the real world lads. Unbelievable
“Holidays” aren’t paid.
Our pay for 168 days teaching is spread over the year.
For many young, substitute teachers, the “holidays” are periods if enforced unemployment as they can’t work when kids aren’t in school. This affects 30% of secondary teachers.
Try living on fresh air for 12 weeks during the “summer off” when it takes the DPS 12 weeks to put through a job seekers claim.
This is not what that’s about.
It’s about standing up to Quinn & co when they propose these “agreements” which are more akin to coercion.
We do not agree to ever worsening conditions.
We do not agree to targeting us for the 5th year in a row as a soft target.
This is not striking, not yet.
We have chosen a more draconian cut to our wages in FEMPI over the Haddington Road Coercion because we can’t take conditions deteriorating any further.
We have done our bit for the austerity cause. Enough is enough.
So what’s the average weekly wage for 168 days work? I think that’s the question most people have. It’s never fully explained how teachers are usually paid. If you spread your yearly wage out to ensure you are getting a constant weekly wage, surely you can understand the frustration some people feel when they see someone get paid all year round for just 168 days work?
What a load of rubbish. Ya I’m earning 50k for one day but that’s spread out over 365 days……. So the average wage of a teacher (according to below article in April of last year) is between 55k – 60k per year and ye work 168 days a year. So basically ye earn roughly 350 euros a day?
What people insist on NOT seeing is that when you’re paid over 26 pay periods as opposed to the 18 or so in a school year it’s actually saving taxpayers money.
getting paid at a lower rate each fortnight amounts to the gov holding back about 30% of a teacher’s salaray and then paying that over non-school weeks. So that money has a chance to earn interest.
Would you propose to change it to a system where pay is put out only on weeks worked? And create a payroll nightmare that would end up costing MORE?
Average figures are the averages that teachers are paid. What are you talking about that they are meaningless? They mean that is the average pay of a teacher.
Well given only 1500 out of 17000 are on 85k plus and new teachers are starting off on 30k would a 55k-60k average not seem correct? Provide some backup the remaining 15500 teachers are not earning 55k-60k
John – in another comment you’ve compared teachers’ pay to the private sector average wage. If ever there was a meaningless comparison, that’s it.
The article you mentioned from the examiner doesn’t make it clear whether or not 3rd level educators are included in those figures. This is a pretty important point don’t you think?
I think the only people that would complain about the level of pay at the upper end of the scale for educators are those who are on those monies – but most teachers simply aren’t. It’s not the reality for teachers.
Love how he kept saying “teachers” had voted against us as if to label them all on the no side, when in reality it’s only the asti who rejected it. Nice little attempt at trying to pull the wool over our eyes.
John , teachers pay enough in taxes towards educating your kids on top of minding them all day and educating them. They should be remunerated accordingly.
Private sector workers pay enough in taxes to keep ye in your jobs and don’t forget that because many are getting very sick of ye’re constant moaning. Your job is a teacher, minding and educating kids is what your supposed to be doing. Even with cuts still on massive salaries compared to most people
How kind of you Tommy, to return the money you take from our paypackets each month to our employers. Please ignore all the disparaging comments on here and rest assured that we simple private sector serfs are forever grateful for your selfless materialism within private sector establishments.
Anyone else remember the day the PS went on strike and there were two hour tailbacks to Newry as they were all going up doing their xmas shopping?! Good to see our taxes going to support the private sector all right, just such a pity that the moment the opportunity arises, it is someone else’s private sector.
Tommy C, your point is quite nonsensical. The teachers are paid to teach and take responsibility for the children while they are in their care. As servants of the state they are paid by the state who in turn are funded by the taxes that they collect from the private sector. How much tax they pay is irrelevant as every worker pays according to the same tax legislation.
The question of being remunerated accordingly is the key as Pat King has just stated that that is not the reason for the industrial action and perhaps whether you are indeed a teacher or merely a supporter your comment contradicts his assertion. You would do well to remember that the ASTI are alone amongst all of the public sector unions in not recognising the financial situation that the country finds itself in.
Silent, I didn’t go on strike. I never have. I do your tests in hospital on a 24 hour Rota including xmas day. You keep paying those public sector creche owners a grand a month, oh no wait! I mean private sector! The sector that has been ripping us off for years! If you’re wondering where the healthcare budget is spent, try looking to the private sector who keeps increasing the cost of lab consumables and machinery etc to pay their overpaid staff.
Servants of the state??? Give me a break! Without teachers, you’d have to take full responsibility for your own kids all the time! Parents get away with a multitude of responsibilities due to their kids being in school. Don’t like it, educate your kids at home. Maybe more of you should look at home schooling?
It worries me that our taxes apparently pay your salary because I just hope that you apply better logic to whatever tests you carry out than you apply here.
Excellent Tommy, just excellent. So just so I understand your point correctly, public sector workers will spend their wages, which they extract from the Irish private sector, within the Irish private sector, but only so long as the goods and services within the Irish private sector are cheaper than in other jurisdictions? However, you still expect Irish public sector workers to be paid more than public sector workers in our neighbouring jurisdiction, to fund which means we must extract more money from the Irish private sector in taxes, resulting in higher costs in the Irish private sector. Your grasp of economics is so poor I think you may actually have a future in politics.
The ASTI members are now in a difficult position as the only union that has not accepted Haddington Road (I refuse to include “Agreement” – because it was/is overt bullying) or a number of reasons:
1. Public opinion will soon be strongly against them, as parents may find it difficult to make parent/teacher meetings during normal work hours
2. From my understanding, ASTI members will fall under the Financial Emergency Measures in the Public Interest Bill (FEMPI) which entitled the Minister to change their pay and work conditions at will. Who is not to say Minister Quinn won’t exercise this newly-granted authority?
Many years ago I remember a teacher of mine taking the mickey out of Dail holidays and then telling us about her month long tour of Quebec during the summer. I sometimes smile when thinking of this.
While our junior doctors have been forced to engage in industrial action as they feel that their 100 hour weeks in highly stressful roles, literally with the power of life and death in their hands, may be detrimental to their professional performance & even their own health, our teachers are, YET AGAIN, kicking up a fuss about the conditions in their 20 hour a week, 7 month a year job. Although I doubt this government have the courage to do it, it is about time someone broke this union and brought teachers into the real world. We only have so much money, doctors are bloody hard to replace should they choose to up sticks due to their work conditions (and it’s never hard for a doctor to find work abroad), teachers can be replaced very easily. We have an excess of young teachers now, many of whom can’t even complete their training. So I say, strike away, you’ll come back when you’re hungry enough but you better hope one of those young teachers wasn’t hungrier as you may return to find your job and your union safety net are things of the past.
I think people on here are confusing average salary and median salary. There is a big difference. If one teacher was paid a million euro that would hugely skew the average pay. Teachers on 100k plus would be very few and would only be principals in huge schools who would be responsible for managing well over 700 pupils plus 50 plus staff.
While the summer holidays are great for the permanent teacher the others don’t get paid for the 3 months and the long holidays are actually a negative in pay terms.
The conditions seem to be a big thing. The deal would not have been voted down otherwise. A big reason for it failing is that existing teachers will have to cover other classes for free when they would have used this time to prepare for their class time. This also prevents young teachers from getting these class periods thus young teachers would have been badly affected if the deal went through.
“Not about Money”… “unless they are pensionably remunerated”
Em…
outside of normal school hours?? so what time is quitting time?
I remember that in my old school school hours was 20 mins or so after the end of classes to allow for meetings etc
I would think that the vast majority of people on here giving out, moaning, complaining about and slagging off teachers fall into at least one of the categories below:
(A) hate their own menial professions so much they have to slag off a rewarding job like teaching ;
(B) Probably spend most of their day jobs ‘uninspiringly’ pressing buttons on a keyboard thinking it is actually work.
(C) didn’t like a particular teacher at school and is still hung up about it ever since.
(D) and obviously as they’ve spent a period of their lives behind a desk in the classroom believe they are qualified enough to critique the teaching profession.
(E) Only get 20 days annual leave days per year because their job is pretty meaningless and worthless.
(F) reading and red-fingering this comment when they should be actually working (likely a profession which involves pressing a lot of buttons creating some majestic programming database thing)
Apologies for any offence caused to anyone but which one do you fall into?
They thought that the Haddington Road agreement was above them,,,,they gambled and lost,,,,,their working conditions are far supreme to that of mere Labourers,,,,,,they expect us to look up to them because our childrens futures supposedly lie in their hands,,,,,,,all they are doing is high lighting how good their working conditions really are,,,,,their conditions and hours are family friendly,,,,and so is their pay,,,,,the country wont grind to a halt as they throw their toys out of their pram.
Gaza rescuers say children among 8 killed in Israeli strike
40 mins ago
312
Áras An Uachtaráin
134 members of the Oireachtas say they will not nominate McGregor for the presidency
42 mins ago
5.2k
35
It couldn't be you
Euromillions: Over 104,000 prize winners in Ireland as Austrian ticket bags record €250m jackpot
23 hrs ago
36.7k
54
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say