Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Edward Smith

The Sun's 'win a date with a Page 3 girl' ad banned

The ad was described as “demeaning to women”.

BRITAIN’S ADVERTISING WATCHDOG has banned an ad for The Sun newspaper, which promised readers a date with a Page 3 model.

The Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) said that the ad, which related to the paper’s fantasy football competition, was “demeaning to women and objectified those offered as prizes”.

The ad told people who had already entered the competition that if they signed friends up, they could win a date with a model.

[I]f you recruit 10 players or more to your league you will get: Entered into a prize draw for a date with a Page 3 girl – we might even let you pick which one, so feel free to start your research now …
Don’t listen to your girlfriend when she says size doesn’t matter. The bigger your Mini League is, the more prizes you can get your mitts on.

The ad received over 1,000 complaints, many from the SumOfUs website.

The Sun’s owners, News UK and Ireland, responded to the ASA that the girls were league spokespeople for the competition.

“The Sun believed that the promotion was appropriate for their target audience. They said approximately 93% of the recipients of the email were male and comprised of either previous or current Dream Team players. They did not believe that the email would cause offence to those recipients.”

The ASA ruled that the ad was, in essence, a direct ad promoting a gambling event, which is against UK rules around responsible advertising and that the ad demeaned women.”In the context of the ad, we considered that to offer a date with a woman as a reward for success in the game was demeaning to women and objectified those offered as prizes. We also considered that the wording “we might even let you pick which one, so feel free to start your research now …”, further enhanced the impression that the women were simply objects to be selected at the whim and enjoyment of the winner, and had no choice in the matter themselves.

“Because we considered that the email presented the women as objects to be won, we concluded that it was sexist, offensive and socially irresponsible.”

The ASA said that the ad must be pulled and not run again and “told the Sun to ensure that their future advertising contained nothing that was socially irresponsible or likely to cause serious or widespread offence.”

Read: Burger King’s claim that its Satisfries have 30% less fat doesn’t cut it

Read: Honda’s brilliant new interactive ad is the coolest thing you’ll see today

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Paul Hosford
View 26 comments
Close
26 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds