Skip to content
Support Us

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shawn Thew DPA/PA Images

Another blow for Trump's new travel ban as court blocks it indefinitely

The US Justice Department will appeal for the travel ban from six predominantly-Muslim countries.

THE US FEDERAL judge who halted President Donald Trump’s revised ban on refugee resettlement and arrivals of people from six mainly Muslim countries has extended his order blocking its implementation.

US District Judge Derrick Watson in Hawaii said yesterday he had turned his original temporary restraining order into a preliminary injunction.

Such an injunction generally has no set expiration date, said Hawaii state Attorney General Doug Chin.

This means Trump will be barred from enforcing the ban while it is contested in court.

The US Justice Department is expected to appeal to the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse the ruling.

Watson’s first order suspending enforcement of Trump’s amended ban was issued 15 March – a day before the measure was to go into effect.

Trump’s first ban and the revised one have both been criticised as amounting to a ban on entry of Muslims into the US.

Hawaii’s attorney general Chin praised the court ruling.

“With a preliminary injunction in place, people in Hawaii with family in the six affected Muslim-majority countries – as well as Hawaii students, travelers, and refugees across the world – face less uncertainty,” he said.

Travel Ban Lawsuits Hawaii Attorney General Douglas Chin Caleb Jones AP / Press Association Images Caleb Jones AP / Press Association Images / Press Association Images

“While we understand that the President may appeal, we believe the court’s well-reasoned decision will be affirmed,” he added in a statement.

In his first order, Watson ruled it was plausible “to conclude that targeting these countries likewise targets Islam” given their Muslim populations ranging from 90.7 percent to 99.8 percent.

Trump has said a travel ban is needed to preserve US national security and keep out extremists.

If the Justice Department appeals the latest ruling it will be heard in the same San Francisco-based court that upheld a halt to Trump’s first travel ban in February after a judge in Seattle ruled against it.

The ban aims to close US borders to nationals of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen for 90 days, and all refugees for at least 120 days. Iraq was on the original ban but removed in the revision.

The White House said the six countries were targeted because their screening and information capabilities could not meet US security requirements.

© AFP 2017

Read: Trump’s climate plan labelled ‘a colossal mistake that defies science’

Read: Trump’s top aide and son-in-law Kushner to face Russia investigation panel

Author
View 48 comments
Close
48 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Glen
    Favourite Glen
    Report
    Nov 13th 2014, 12:31 PM

    Well we can all sleep peacefully now that that’s sorted.

    90
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fergus Flanagan
    Favourite Fergus Flanagan
    Report
    Nov 13th 2014, 1:04 PM

    Not the best comparison really considering he retorted with a figure for the domestic market rather than all operated markets combined.

    52
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute andrew
    Favourite andrew
    Report
    Nov 13th 2014, 12:34 PM

    The greed of the music companies is line one endless stream. The artists complaints are a joke. Plays on Spotify are like having your ads paid for

    50
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ruairí
    Favourite Ruairí
    Report
    Nov 13th 2014, 12:43 PM

    Streams on Spotify are a pittance and a poor source of income for musicians. More power to her if she wants to remove her music from Spotify. She clearly doesn’t need it as she’s by far the best selling artist this year.

    47
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alien8
    Favourite Alien8
    Report
    Nov 13th 2014, 3:08 PM

    Taylor Swift and her record company are just in it for the prestige of record breaking sales and the history books, not people who listen to the music. Nowhere is questioned what is better for the consumer (or fans as they used to be known)?

    Spotify has obviously not cannibalised the album buying public, as her album has one of the highest number of record sales, which is in addition to any income from streaming and video services.. Spotify replaces the radio, not albums sales, and it gives people to opportunity to spend a small amount to listen (not own) music for a low cost. But not low enough that If all you wanted to listen to was taylor swift, then you could buy her back catalogue for less than a few months of spotify.

    What the record company don’t get is that the spotify income, small as it is compared to if everyone who listened to a track bought the album instead, is a top up from people who would just download it from a torrent, or listen to it on the radio. It is never about being paid for their work, as she has the highest income per effort in the world, but instead just making sure parents pay what a record company exec told her each fan was worth.

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tweety McTweeter
    Favourite Tweety McTweeter
    Report
    Nov 13th 2014, 1:25 PM

    She is probably the most popular pop artist out there at the moment and she would only make €400k/year on Spotify? Most artists must only be making pennies on it

    38
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Powerful Sayings
    Favourite Powerful Sayings
    Report
    Nov 13th 2014, 12:54 PM

    I like her songs.

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute gerry o donell
    Favourite gerry o donell
    Report
    Nov 13th 2014, 9:41 PM

    don’t know why. but her and her songs really annoy me, even more than Cheryl cole

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute _doesnotcompute
    Favourite _doesnotcompute
    Report
    Nov 13th 2014, 1:53 PM

    Oooooh no, she only earned €398,000 in the last 12 months. Boo focking Hoo.

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Plain Porther
    Favourite Plain Porther
    Report
    Nov 13th 2014, 9:15 PM

    Taylor Swift and music in the same sentence . . . ? Jaysus.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Roche
    Favourite Paul Roche
    Report
    Nov 13th 2014, 12:42 PM

    Nope.

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mrs Shalakalananaka
    Favourite Mrs Shalakalananaka
    Report
    Nov 13th 2014, 1:00 PM

    Maybe?

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Chief
    Favourite Chief
    Report
    Nov 13th 2014, 2:14 PM

    Depends!

    4
    See 1 more reply ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Roche
    Favourite Paul Roche
    Report
    Nov 20th 2014, 7:35 PM

    On?

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds