Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Evan Vucci/PA Images

Top US official restricted access to Ukrainian phone call because he feared it would damage Trump

Timothy Morrison told investigators he knew immediately how sensitive the phone call with Ukraine’s president was.

A TOP US official restricted access to the summary of Donald Trump’s Ukraine call that triggered an impeachment probe, fearing it would damage the president, testimony released yesterday showed.

White House Ukraine expert Timothy Morrison told House investigators he knew immediately how sensitive the call was when he heard Trump press Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate former US vice president Joe Biden.

Morrison said in his 31 October deposition that he had asked National Security Council (NSC) lawyers to review the call because he thought it would be “damaging” if it leaked.

“I recommended to them that we restrict access to the package… that we did not need quite so many people to have access to the package,” said Morrison, who left the NSC a day before testifying.

The conversation, which took place on 25 July while the White House was withholding military aid to Ukraine, is central to the House impeachment inquiry into Trump.

Democrats leading the probe say the call summary shows the president abused his office by bullying a vulnerable ally into interfering on his behalf in the 2020 US election.

The investigation threatens to make Trump the third US president to be impeached, although the Republican-controlled Senate would need to convict him to remove him from office.

“The testimony released today shows that President Trump’s 25 July phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky immediately set off alarm bells throughout the White House,” Adam Schiff, the congressman leading the inquiry, said in a statement released jointly with other senior Democrats.

‘Unusual and inappropriate’

Morrison said however the summary had been placed on a highly classified system due to a “mistake” by White House staff – casting doubt on allegations that it was squirreled away as part of a deliberate cover-up.

He also broke with other witnesses who have spoken out against the call, telling House investigators he heard nothing wrong.

House investigators also released testimony yesterday from Jennifer Williams, an aide to Vice President Mike Pence, who told lawmakers Trump’s push for Ukraine to open investigations was “unusual and inappropriate”.

Williams listened in on the 25 July call and said the requests appeared to have been made to further Trump’s “personal political agenda” rather than US foreign policy goals.

“I guess for me it shed some light on possible other motivations behind a security assistance hold,” she added.

The depositions were made public as another official arrived on Capitol Hill to answer questions on the White House’s withholding of nearly $400 million in congressionally allocated military aid for Ukraine.

Mark Sandy was the first staffer from the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to testify, rejecting a Trump administration directive not to cooperate.

OMB acting director Russell Vought and acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, who still has the title of OMB director, defied congressional subpoenas to appear.

Previous witnesses have testified that the money was delayed as part of a wider extortion plot to extract a public announcement from Zelensky that Biden was being investigated.

Smear campaign

The White House says Trump delayed the cash because of broad concerns over Ukrainian corruption but Mulvaney undermined this defense when he told reporters in October that there was indeed a “quid pro quo” of aid for investigations.

“That’s why we held up the money,” he said. “Get over it.”

Sandy told investigators he did not know why the assistance was held up but added that he had never seen such a move during his career at the agency, according to The Washington Post.

Sandy’s deposition caps a blockbuster week on Capitol Hill, in which the House of Representatives staged the first public hearings in the probe.

On Friday Marie Yovanovitch, a 33-year diplomatic veteran ousted by Trump, accused the president’s aides of undermining US foreign policy in Ukraine.

The ambassador testified that she was subjected to a “painful” smear campaign before being abruptly pulled from Kiev.

Trump was accused of witness intimidation, a crime punishable by up to 20 years in federal prison for normal citizens, after he launched an extraordinary real-time Twitter attack during her testimony.

The public impeachment hearings kicked off Wednesday with testimony by two senior diplomats including the current top envoy to Ukraine, William Taylor.

The gray-haired former Army officer and veteran diplomat testified that he was told by an aide that Trump cared more about the probe than he did about Ukraine.

- © AFP 2019

Author
View 54 comments
Close
54 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds