Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
A SENIOR VATICAN official has been harshly critical of last weekend’s Yes result in the same-sex marriage referendum.
“I was deeply saddened by the result,” Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin told a conference last night, The Guardian reports.
“The church must take account of this reality, but in the sense that it must strengthen its commitment to evangelisation.
I think that you cannot just talk of a defeat for Christian principles, but of a defeat for humanity.
While the Pope has not reacted officially to the result, the Vatican’s newspaper Osservatore Romano also spoke this week of “a challenge for the whole Church,” and of “the distance, in some areas, between society and the Church”.
Cardinal Parolin is the top diplomat in the Vatican, second only to Pope Francis himself.
His comments contrast with the tone of remarks by Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin, who spoke at the weekend of the Church in Ireland needing a “new language” to connect with people.
“The Church has to find a new language which will be understood and heard by people,” he told reporters after mass at the Pro-Cathedral on Sunday.
“We have to see how is it that the Church’s teaching on marriage and family is not being received even within its own flock,” he added.
Ireland voted with 62 per cent in favour and 38 per cent against legalising gay marriage in last Friday’s poll.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Party based voting is a perversion of the democratic process. It should be illegal to force a TD to vote a certain way. They are supposed to represent their constituents views.
They are elected on a party platform as opposed to their own views. Therefore its reasonable to assume that most people voting for them are also voting on the party platform. It would then be wrong for them to suddenly decide that they don’t want to represent that platform. If that’s what they want they should go as an independent before the electorate.
There’s nothing wrong with party based voting, per se. It’s party based speaking time in the Dáil that’s the problem. The smaller your party, the less time you have to speak. If you’re an independent, you’re screwed unless you put together a technical group.
Is the catholic church or the government running this country ?
Or in other words ‘Is the catholic church or the government RUINING this country?
We have no idea how much the catholic church runs the government. Any politician that is catholic could face excommunication on these matters. Thats the gun being held to their head.Do we really want to live in a state run by an organisation without credibilty. This is a fight to the death for the catholic church. They see their power slipping away.
Since all the Sunday collections have nearly stopped the Fs (FG/FF) have directed larger amounts of tax payers money into church controlled charities (Ruhama, Immigrants Council of Ireland…).
Those charities in turn use their citizen paid PR departments to push church policy from an ‘independent’ advocacy position. The local TD gets to cut the ribbon at the next charity event, they get elected for ‘doing good for the community’ (non-church groups don’t have a chance) with the aid of the few votes the church can muster.
The whip ensures that there is no free vote and the church/government policy/finance/vote loop is closed.
There should be no obfuscation or waffling on this matter. We need to legislate with safeguards for all. Its a disgrace that we have, after all this time, exported our problems abroad as if it never happens. Typically Irish solution to an Irish problem, stick our heads in the sand and hope it goes away. We need “Savita” legislation now.
We need to legislate with safeguards for all…………………what in all that’s holy could this mean?
Meanwhile over 4,000 women still travel to the UK, it’s really time we face the reality instead of continuing to stick our heads in a sandbox
Another insult to our intelligence by the masters, Fine Gael. They haven’t the nerve to vote as a party on the matter after Savitas death,so are hoping to weasel around it with a free vote.
Don’t believe me? Where was Shatter calling for a free vote back in April on the same matter?
“an insult to our intelligence”…….mmmmmmm?
Has the Dáil ever had a free vote recently, it must be one of the world’s most whipped parliaments.
Any TD who votes no is blocking the democratic will of the people. No TD should even countenance voting no.
In terms of abortion in general, I don’t think parties should have policies other than a commitment to hold referenda or not. That said, every candidate should state the way they would vote on such matters before the election.
Dame Edna has said NO.
A free vote for all TDs is essential. Otherwise we will have a dictatorship headed by Dictator Enda!
Some say that the Supreme Court decision on the X case is probably incorrect and unconstitutional. If true why has the Expert Committee of Advisers not recommended a review of the X case before recommending legislation.FG gave a or election commitment that it would NOT legislate for abortion.It is now doing so. FG has adopted the policies of the Labour Party on abortion. If the government do not reassess its position FG will be wiped out at the next election. Remember the VAT on children’s shoes! Sad!
have your say