Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

PA Wire/PA Images

Whatsapp denies claims of a 'backdoor' into the messages of its 1 billion users

The Facebook owned company has flatly denied a report by The Guardian.

WHATSAPP, A MESSAGING platform owned by Facebook, is well known as one of the more secure messengers on the market.

Whatsapp redesigned its backend earlier this year so that every message sent using the service will be protected in a way that even Whatsapp would not be able to read it if it wanted to, called end-to-end encryption.

But a Guardian report published yesterday cast doubt on Whatsapp’s security, saying that a “vulnerability” or “backdoor” existed that could allow governments to snoop on people’s private messages.

But don’t worry, there is no backdoor in Whatsapp like the FBI was seeking for the iPhone says Moxie Marlinspike, one of the people behind Whatsapp’s encryption.

Marlinspike is founder of Open Whisper Systems, which helped designed Whatsapp’s security protocol and shot back against The Guardian’s claims in a long and detailed blog post.

Cryptography is detail-oriented and complicated, and often summaries can get important aspects wrong, but here goes: Messaging systems need to know if the person it’s sending a message to is actually who he says he is.

But Whatsapp decided that if one messenger changed his security key, then it would simply give the user a warning — instead of blocking him entirely like some secure messengers do, it would simply display a warning, like this:

wa BusinessInsider / WhisperSystems BusinessInsider / WhisperSystems / WhisperSystems

This decision led The Guardian to speculate that a government might be able to pull off “man-in-the-middle” attacks and hijack messages meant for another person.

Marlinspike explains:

Most end-to-end encrypted communication systems have something that resembles this type of verification, because otherwise an attacker who compromised the server could lie about a user’s public key, and instead advertise a key which the attacker knows the corresponding private key for. This is called a “man in the middle” attack, or MITM, and is endemic to public key cryptography, not just Whatsapp.

In fact, Whatsapp made a security choice based on usability, because it has 1 billion users, and shutting down people’s conversations could be annoying for its users. Even worse, it could make the entire system less secure. Cryptographers have to make trade-offs all the time.

“Given the size and scope of Whatsapp’s user base, we feel that their choice to display a non-blocking notification is appropriate,” Marlinspike says.

“The choice to make these notifications “blocking” would in some ways make things worse. That would leak information to the server about who has enabled safety number change notifications and who hasn’t, effectively telling the server who it could MITM transparently and who it couldn’t.”

Technology stock Dominic Lipinski Dominic Lipinski

Response

Whatsapp has denied that a “backdoor” exists to its content, providing a lengthy comment from cofounder Brian Acton that’s partly reproduced here:

The Guardian’s story on an alleged “backdoor” in Whatsapp is false. Whatsapp does not give governments a “backdoor” into its systems. Whatsapp would fight any government request to create a backdoor.Since April 2016, Whatsapp messages and calls are end-to-end encrypted by default. Whatsapp also offers people a security notifications feature that alerts them when people change keys so that they can verify who they are communicating with…Like everything else in Whatsapp, it’s designed to be simple. We built end-to-end encryption with encryption as the default so not a single one of our 1 billion users has to turn on encryption.

This is also true for people who delete and reinstall Whatsapp or for those who change their phones. For some people, this can be a frequent occurrence as people manage data charges and phone storage, or share devices with family members.

We want to make sure that people in these situations do not lose access to messages sent to them while they are in the midst of re-installing the app or changing their phones. Because a person’s encryption key is changed when Whatsapp is installed on a new phone or re-installed on an old device, we make sure those messages can eventually be read using the new key.

“We appreciate the interest people have in the security of their messages and calls on Whatsapp. We will continue to set the record straight in the face of baseless accusations about “backdoors” and help people understand how we’ve built Whatsapp with critical security features at such a large scale.”

- Business Insider- Kif Leswing

Read: Text messages are on the way out – but we’re eating up huge amounts of data >

Read: Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil spent thousands of euro targeting voters with Facebook ads >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Published with permission from
View 21 comments
Close
21 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds