Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File photo Shutterstock/Standret

Mechanic awarded €11.5k after being sacked for failing to turn up to work on time

The man in question had been employed as a mechanic at a garage from 1 July 2003 to 18 March 2017.

A MAN HAS been awarded €11,500 in compensation after losing his job as a mechanic after 14 years following claims he was dismissed because he could not be depended on to turn up to work on time. 

The man in question had been employed as a mechanic at a garage from 1 July 2003 to 18 March 2017, with weekly working hours of 24 hours and a weekly pay of €240.

In a complaint to the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), the man said that his employer had failed to provide him with a written statement of his terms and conditions of employment in accordance with the provisions of the 1994 Act. 

He also claimed the employer terminated his employment without notice or pay-in-lieu of notice in accordance with the provisions of the 1973 Act. 

Futhermore, he claimed that his employer had not afforded him his rights and entitlements in relation to annual leave and public holidays. 

In relation to his dismissal, he said he received a call on 18 March 2017 from the proprietor who told him he was being let go as there was no work for him. 

The mechanic said he took advice and returned to the proprietor two weeks later, who informed him that there was still no work available. He then asked for his redundancy payment, which he claimed not to have received. 

Later, the man asked for his P45, but he claimed the respondent refused to give it to him.

The proprietor then offered the complainant his job back. However, the mechanic did not accept the job, as he said he did not believe it was a serious offer and that the employer was “just trying to cover the fact that his dismissal was unfair”. 

Late for work

In a response to the WRC, the employer said that the mechanic was dismissed by them for good and valid reasons. 

The employer said the mechanic was dismissed because they could not depend on him to attend work at normal times and to work normal hours, despite him being repeatedly spoken to about his absences and repeatedly warned that this could not continue and that the consequences of it would be the loss of his job. 

The proprietor said the complainant was a “super mechanic, a very good employee, who worked faster than the other employees and his productivity was very good, but the difficulty with him was getting him to work full days”. 

However, he said the mechanic didn’t work full days regularly, be it starting late, taking extended lunch breaks and missing time. 

The proprietor said he spoke hundreds of times over a very lengthy period and warned the mechanic that he could not continue to employ him if he didn’t work normal hours. 

He said that he gave the complainant every chance to improve his timekeeping but that it didn’t happen. 

The respondent said that eventually on 18 March 2017, when the mechanic didn’t turn up for work, he rang and said, “This can’t keep going on (missing time). I can’t keep you working these hours.” He acknowledged that he was, in effect, dismissing the mechanic because of his timekeeping record. 

The mechanic didn’t come to work for a further two weeks, according to the proprietor, at which stage the mechanic asked him had anything changed. The proprietor offered the complainant his job back, provided he would come to work for the full scheduled day.

The respondent said the mechanic didn’t take up on the offer. He said the same offer was still open to him, even now. 

The employer said he had no choice but to terminate the mechanic’s employment in view of his failure to maintain a proper or reasonable attendance and timekeeping record. 

As a result, the employer confirmed the mechanic was replaced at his job.

While they insisted they had given the complainant numerous verbal warnings, the employer had no records of these, nor could they provide dates of when they verbal warnings were allegedly given. 

The employer confirmed they had not given any written warnings to the mechanic and that the allegations or complaints were never set out in writing to him, nor was he ever informed in writing of the possible consequences of his alleged failures. 

At the WRC hearing, the employer also acknowledged they had not provided the mechanic with a written statement on his terms and conditions of employment, and that they had not provided him with his minimum notice of entitlements and or pay-in-lieu.

They also accepted that the mechanic had not been afforded his entitlements in relation to annual leave and public holidays. In relation to annual leave, the employer said that when the complainant took a one-week holiday at Christmas and in August he was paid €100. 

Response

After the employer presented his case, the mechanic denied that he was regularly missing from work. He said that he may have been missing occasionally, but that it was equally true that he often stayed on late after his finishing time without any extra pay. 

He denied that he had been repeatedly informed by the proprietor about missing time from work and that his job was at risk for that reason.

He also claimed that he had never been subject to any disciplinary action of any sort during his employment. He was never given a verbal warning, a written warning, a final written warning, a suspension or any form of disciplinary action, he said. 

The mechanic did not seek alternative work following his dismissal as he was running his own businesses from which he said that he was receiving an average of €140 per week. 

Decision

The WRC officer Seán Reilly noted that while the employer said that the mechanic was dismissed for good and valid reasons as they could not depend on him to attend work at the appointed time, a number of facts were established at the hearing which could not be disputed. 

This included the fact that no written warnings were given, allegations or complaints were never set out in writing to the mechanic and that he was never informed of a right to be represented during any procedure. 

Reilly noted that the hearing on 24 October was adjourned at the request of both parties to facilitate the reaching of a compromise to settle the matter.

However, the WRC was then informed that a resumed hearing was required and it was held on 18 April 2018. At the resumed hearing, Reilly was informed that €5,500 of the agreed settlement had been paid to the mechanic and it was agreed that he would take that into account in any redress awarded. 

“I have carefully considered the appropriate redress in the instant case and I have taken all factors into account including the views of the parties as expressed at the hearing,” Reilly said.

“I have concluded that there is an absence of the minimum level of trust necessary to sustain an employer/employee relationship in the instant case and that accordingly, the only appropriate redress is compensation.”

Having been awarded compensation and redress for breaches of his rights under the Terms of Employment (information) Act 1994, the Minimum Notice and Terms of Employment Act 1973, the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 and the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977, the complainant received a total of €6,000. 

With the sum of €5,500 already paid to the mechanic, he received the total amount of €11,500. 

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
14 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John F doe
    Favourite John F doe
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 8:41 AM

    The ‘who killed your granny’ budget

    44
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Anthony Curran
    Favourite Anthony Curran
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 8:55 AM

    @John F doe: The “fix Britain after 14 years of the Tories” budget

    30
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John F doe
    Favourite John F doe
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 9:51 AM

    @Anthony Curran: by killing off the elderly? I know you shinners have a low value on life but this is disgraceful

    16
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Sean
    Favourite Sean
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 10:50 AM

    @John F doe:
    A quick Google search will show you just what the tories thought of the elderly…Savage cuts to resources for vulnerable people..

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alan
    Favourite Alan
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 11:01 AM

    @John F doe: if SF get in this is exactly what will be facing us if not worse.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tommy
    Favourite Tommy
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 9:26 AM

    I wonder will Ireland be loaning money to the U.K.? As the loaned money to us when we were in a very dire state but we still are unfortunately.

    16
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John F doe
    Favourite John F doe
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 9:53 AM

    @Tommy: we should absolutely help our wonderful nearest and dearest if needs be, they did it for us

    20
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mr “JonnieBoy” Johnson
    Favourite Mr “JonnieBoy” Johnson
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 10:04 AM

    @John F doe: dearest?

    10
    See 4 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ian
    Favourite Ian
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 10:37 AM

    @Tommy: Economics clearly isn’t your strong suit.

    3
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute The Firestarter
    Favourite The Firestarter
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 11:14 AM

    @John F doe: In fairness they provided jobs for the Irish for decades, and still do, not that we need them as much these days.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Buster Lawless
    Favourite Buster Lawless
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 1:02 PM

    @Tommy: let’s go Tommy Robinson

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Lulu
    Favourite Lulu
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 1:09 PM

    @John F doe: And maybe charge them an outlandish rate of interest like they did to us !!

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Thesaltyurchin
    Favourite Thesaltyurchin
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 9:20 AM

    Mad how the Torys can do whatever they like, recklessly destroy the economy BUT Labour oOOoooo ‘pure evil’… politics is truly pathetic

    31
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John F doe
    Favourite John F doe
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 9:52 AM

    @Thesaltyurchin: the conservatives never launched an attack on the elderly

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ian
    Favourite Ian
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 10:36 AM

    @John F doe: You’re absolutely dense.

    24
    See 3 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Leech
    Favourite Paul Leech
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 10:38 AM

    @John F doe: Are you thick?. What age group do you think uses an underfunded NHS more than any other ?

    15
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Burke
    Favourite Michael Burke
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 10:42 AM

    @Ian: I agree

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute M To The B
    Favourite M To The B
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 9:48 PM

    @John F doe: neither have Labour so what on earth are you talking about?

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dominic Leleu
    Favourite Dominic Leleu
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 8:58 AM

    so she can take the blame when it will backfire

    12
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Purcell
    Favourite John Purcell
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 10:58 AM

    For all those ppl in ireland u say “the government can’t get any worse” of course it can get worse

    10
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Eddienowy Byrne
    Favourite Eddienowy Byrne
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 10:07 AM

    The Budgies won’t be impressed with a tax hike.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alan
    Favourite Alan
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 10:58 AM

    Labour a bit like our own, pretend to be sympathetic and be the voice for the working class, yet when in power, o difficult decisions will have it be made. A conservative landslide is likely when they eventually put in a motion of no confidence against this travesty. Stammer the worst Labour PM since Ramsay MacDonald

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute M To The B
    Favourite M To The B
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 9:47 PM

    @Alan: the Tories ran the country in to the ground for over a decade. That Labour would actually try and fix that by taxing the people that can afford it isn’t the “travesty” you think it is. The Tories are trying to paint this budget as crippling the working class but that’s, once again, is an utter lie.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ronan Mc
    Favourite Ronan Mc
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 11:02 AM

    Yep, how do you tax all the profits from State assets sold for a pittance to cronies and then offshored and shielded from view forever?

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Ned
    Favourite Ned
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 3:48 PM

    The once Great Britain is now little Britain a byproduct off Brexit.

    4
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Gerard Hayden
    Favourite Gerard Hayden
    Report
    Oct 30th 2024, 6:09 PM

    What is this talk of Labour having promised not to raise taxes? Let’s be clear what they promised was not to raid Texas, and so far they have honoured that!

    2
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds