Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Over half of young voters say they will vote for oppositional parties with 24% saying they will vote Sinn Féin. Alamy

What parties will 18-34-year-olds vote for in the EU elections? And why?

The EU’s response to the conflict in Gaza had a negative effect on young voters’ view of the institution.

NATIONWIDE POLLING HAS has found that young voters are most likely going to give a first-preference vote to Sinn Féin in the European elections this coming June.

The first edition in a series of The Journal/Ireland Thinks polls has found 30% of 18-34-year-olds intend to vote for a Sinn Féin candidate, placing them as the most popular option for the cohort. 

The country’s youngest voter group feel strongly about the European Union’s response to the conflict in Gaza and are less exercised about the EU’s impact on the economy or climate change.

When asked to rank the EU’s climate or economic measures on a scale of one to five (with 1 being very bad and 5 being very good), most of the group expressed a more neutral position towards two key pillars of EU legislation, ranking them – on average – at 2.6 and 2.8 respectively.

However, the majority of young voters expressed a much stronger, more negative view on the EU’s performance on Israeli-Palestinian relations. When asked to rank the EU’s performance on the Israel-Gaza conflict, the bloc scored a 1.8 with the young voters.

53% of 18-34-year-old Irish citizens rated the EU’s performance on the issue – ongoing since the 7 October Hamas attack on Israel – ‘very bad’, a 1 on the polling scale. 

When compared to the same question but on the war in Ukraine, the group ranked the EU’s performance a stronger 3.1 in comparison. 

The EU’s response to the conflict in Gaza was heavily criticised after the Israeli flag was flown and projected onto the EU Commission’s building in the wake of the 7 October attacks. Further criticism came after the Presidents of both the EU Commission and Parliament visited Israel shortly thereafter.

Israel’s swift and violent reply to the attack has killed tens-of-thousands Gazan civilians. 

Although the European position has softened since, Commission President Ursula von der Leyen does still tout the bloc’s “solidarity” with Israel.

Von der Leyen also announced in October, shortly after the backlash, that the EU would immediately treble its humanitarian aid to Palestine after the al-Ahli Hospital in Northern Gaza was hit in a strike.

Today, the EU’s foreign policy chief Josep Borrell urged allies of Israel – primarily the United States – to stop sending it weapons as “too many people” are being killed in Gaza.

This came as US President Joe Biden commented last week that Israel’s military action was “over the top”.

Borrell said: “Well, if you believe that too many people are being killed, maybe you should provide less arms in order to prevent so many people have been killed.”

“Is [it] not logical?” he asked, in a Brussels conference alongside the head of the UN’s agency for Palestinian refugees UNRWA whom Israel is pressuring to resign.

The mixed response has seemingly left a bad taste in the mouths of young voters, as 75% of them said their overall view of the EU has been negatively impacted since the escalation of the conflict in Gaza.

Under half, 45%, of young voters said their view of the EU had been “somewhat disimproved” since the escalation, while 30% of them said it was “much disimproved”.

In the aftermath of the 7 October attack, Hungary’s EU Commissioner Oliver Várhelyi said that the EU would place €691 million of support to Palestine “under review”.

The move was slammed by many Irish MEPs, across the political spectrum, and labelled a “solo run”. The review decision was reversed shortly after and Várhelyi later was quizzed by MEPs about the decision.

A cross-party reaction against the EU’s quick decisions to disregard Palestinian issues has since been established between Irish MEPs, with some telling The Journal it was an issue of broad agreement. 

The vast amount of Ireland’s sitting MEPs – only one of whom is of Sinn Féin – have taken a pro-Palestinian approach to such debates in Brussels and Strasbourg. About 29% of 18-34-year-olds intend to vote for one of the three Government political parties, a combined number still behind Sinn Féin’s 30%.

Fine Gael and the Green Party rank marginally higher among the younger voters, polling 10% each, when compared to Fianna Fáil who were the lowest ranked party overall at 9%.

Over half of the group say they will vote for a party in opposition, with the Social Democrats polling a strong 12% and ranking as the second most popular party for the group.

The Social Democrats have yet to announce any candidates for the elections in June and only nominated one candidate in just one constituency in 2019.

Overall, 82% of 18-34-year-olds say they are likely to cast a vote in the election – despite previous exit polls suggesting a historically low turnout – but 19% are still unsure which party they will vote for.

The Journal/Ireland Thinks series of polls will run each month ahead of the European parliament elections in June. It will continue to explore voter intentions, measure Irish public sentiment towards the EU on a number of issues and highlight any potential opinion gaps between different demographics of Irish society on matters important to them. 

The poll of 1,255 people was carried out between the 2 and 7 February and has a  margin of error of 2.8%. Those who were unsure of which party they’d vote for, or unsure if they’d vote at all, are excluded from the figures.

***

This work is co-funded by Journal Media and a grant programme from the European Parliament. Any opinions or conclusions expressed in this work are the author’s own. The European Parliament has no involvement in nor responsibility for the editorial content published by the project. For more information, see here.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
39 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Caroline Molloy
    Favourite Caroline Molloy
    Report
    Apr 13th 2012, 3:06 PM

    Communism doesn’t work !

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Frank2521
    Favourite Frank2521
    Report
    Apr 13th 2012, 5:33 PM

    I saw on the TV that china are sending their workers to work in the mines in Zambia and in the forrests in Brazil that they own. This is a result of their work ethic of 7 days weeks with 10 to 12 hour days. As the work dries up in china I expect them to export more workers to Europe and wherever else they own. Our government have just agreed to grant more visas and set up a hub for the Chinese entry point to the EU. We ate selling our soul to the slave masters.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Revolting Peasant
    Favourite Revolting Peasant
    Report
    Apr 13th 2012, 6:08 PM

    “as the work dries up in china”??? uneducated claptrap, only germany exports more than china and that will soon reverse, they are buying as much of africa,asia and south america as they can for 3 reasons, food production to feed their massive population, mineral aquisition to supply their massive industrial production demand and energy production as a commodity to sell to europe and north america, one such plan is the covering of deserts with solar panels, my brother works for a chinese shipping company, they build cities to produce specific items like solar panels or oil pumps, within the next 3 years they will over take the usa as the worlds leading economy, their major advantages is their work ethic and flexibility, as the work dries up in china indeed, also they are building casinos all over the world, in the last 5 years the chinese have built more casinos in asia than all casinos previously built in the rest of the world combined

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Fagan's
    Favourite Fagan's
    Report
    Apr 13th 2012, 7:02 PM

    Their work ethic is impressive, however life is absolutely worthless there. If China becomes the leading world power, which it will, in next 5 years, it will represent a massive threat to democracy and freedom and could lead to rights we have taken for granted being rolled back.

    It’s the land of the indentured slave.

    14
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Saffron Willetts
    Favourite Saffron Willetts
    Report
    Apr 13th 2012, 6:42 PM

    When the Chinese are the next super power we will wish we had the americans back. Their work ethic is a slavery work ethic – and its not communism its capitalism with Asian values. I saw the zambian workers, they said the Chinese are the worst to work for.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Martin Sinnott
    Favourite Martin Sinnott
    Report
    Apr 13th 2012, 4:38 PM

    Ah no it only grew by 8%, how will they manage ! They should come back here for some lessons from Bertie.

    11
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave Spart
    Favourite Dave Spart
    Report
    Apr 13th 2012, 4:44 PM

    Er, basically this is another sign that international capitalism is in meltdown and only communism can save the oppressed masses…er……

    9
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael J Hartnett
    Favourite Michael J Hartnett
    Report
    Apr 13th 2012, 5:14 PM

    I take it dave from your comment you have never been to a communist country

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Brian Callinan
    Favourite Brian Callinan
    Report
    Apr 14th 2012, 1:07 PM

    I’m pretty sure Dave was taking the piss guys.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute pip white
    Favourite pip white
    Report
    Apr 13th 2012, 7:09 PM

    see what happens when you sell your kidneys for an Ipad!!!

    8
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute DashRiprock
    Favourite DashRiprock
    Report
    Apr 13th 2012, 5:39 PM

    I was watching an analyst on BBC earlier who stated that at this stage anything below 7% growth on China would basically be viewed as a recession by the markets… nice for some!

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Saffron Willetts
    Favourite Saffron Willetts
    Report
    Apr 13th 2012, 6:49 PM

    The analyst on c4 also suggested that at the worst case scenario if economic growth serioiusly stalls in China the party may choose the option of uniting the people against the threat of an outside enemy to stop the huge population turning on itself.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute phantom duck Nibbler
    Favourite phantom duck Nibbler
    Report
    Apr 13th 2012, 4:21 PM

    broken china in the 1 percents display cabinet , they wont be happy

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tony Skillington
    Favourite Tony Skillington
    Report
    Apr 13th 2012, 10:38 PM

    8.1%????…..Christ we’d take a quarter of that!

    2
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute One-Off Ireland
    Favourite One-Off Ireland
    Report
    Apr 14th 2012, 4:28 PM

    so 8.1 % means the total size of the Chinese economy doubles every 9 years. Physically impossible. there isnt enough resources or markets in the world. Oil peaked in 2006 and Chinese export economy is impossible without oil at a reasonable price.

    @revolting peasant ‘mineral acquisition’ is a very tame way to describe resource plunder and environmental destruction.

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Austin Tiernan
    Favourite Austin Tiernan
    Report
    Apr 14th 2012, 4:09 AM

    That’s what a visit from Enda can do.

    1
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds