Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Here’s all the news you need to know as you start your day.
Weather
1. Met Éireann is forecasting highs of over 31 degrees Celsius in some parts of the country today, as a nationwide Status Yellow temperature warning continues.
The mercury hit 30.5 degrees in Carlow yesterday.
Today’s forecast is a hot, dry and sunny day with highest temperatures generally between 26 to 31 degrees
The 75-year-old Indian-born British author sustained nerve damage to his arm and damage to his liver, according to the New York Times.
Climate Action
3. The Government has been urged to hasten efforts to reimburse people who sell excess renewable energy that they produce ahead of a feared national shortage in the winter.
Under a new scheme, homes, businesses and farms that generate renewable energy, such as through solar panels, will be able to sell back any extra power that they produce to their supplier.
Travel
4. If you’re travelling into Dublin today, Iarnród Éireann has reminded passengers that due to works being carried out the rail line between Connolly Station and Grand Canal Dock today and tomorrow.
Tara Street and Pearse Stations will be closed and Northside DART services will operate from Howth/Malahide to Dublin Connolly in the city centre.
Advertisement
NCT
5. Ever wondered what make, model and NCT test centre has the highest and lowest pass rates. Well, all is revealed.
An analysis of NCT tests carried out on more than 1.4 million vehicles last year found that 85.42% of the hybrid Toyota C-HR cars inspected passed their initial test.
Cars were tested at 49 NCT centres around Ireland in 2021, with Portlaoise having the highest pass rate at 60.22%.
In contrast, just 38.12% of cars tested in Castlerea last year passed on the first attempt. 15 test centres had pass rates below half, while the overall pass rate was 52.8%.
Anne Heche
6. Actress Anne Heche has died aged 53, a week after she was critically injured in a car crash in Los Angeles.
In a statement to CNN, her family said she is “brain dead”, which is the definition of death under California law, but remains on life support as they seek a match for organ donation, in respect of her wishes.
Nuclear
7. Irish diplomats are involved in high stakes talks in the United Nations to bring an end to nuclear weapons – but efforts to take “the bomb” out of global politics are stymied as Russia and China seek to grow their arsenal.
The tenth review conference on the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in New York opened last week, with Ireland playing a pivotal role among non nuclear countries in the talks.
Monkeypox
8. The Department of Employment Affairs and Social Protection says that those who need to self-isolate after contracting monkeypox may be entitled to Illness Benefit.
Concerns have been raised about the financial supports available to individuals who are self-employed or on hourly contracts should they catch the virus.
Trump
9. FBI agents recovered records marked “top secret” during their search of former US president Donald Trump’s Florida estate, according to documents made public in a probe that includes possible violations of the US Espionage Act.
The extraordinary search was partly based on suspicions of violations of the US Espionage Act related to the illegal retention of sensitive defense documents, the warrant showed.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
It came to war, this is a war that the U.S. could not win. It would cost them an absolute fortune given the logistics, and their production capabilities are nowhere near what China’s are now. China is a juggernaut of heavy industry.
@Phil Magee: Hi Phil, The US armed forces vastly outnumber both China and Russia when it comes to arms several times over. The US has a massive army. No comparison. Under Obama the US had a weak commander but not now. Trump will not be pushed around by Chinese threats,
@Eye_c_u: Agree the nuclear option will cancel out any aggression but the US army dwarfs Russia/China/EU combined. It is HUGE. China are no threat to the US.
China is not threatening to attack the US. However the US is making threatening comments towards China. Threats don’t help anyone when both countries posess nuclear arms.
@Burke John: China couldn’t win away from home, but the U.S. would never conquer China, it would cost too much. If they couldn’t properly defeat Afghanistan how would they take on a country 20 times bigger with a billion inhabitants?
@Burke John: Yes, but they fail to defeat the Taliban in Afghanistan and the insurgents in Iraq. War is a funny old business as Napoleon and Hitler found out to their cost.
@Burke John: Also, China has almost 1 million more active servicemen than the divided states of america, they can build machines several times faster than anyone else. It would not take them long to build a bigger airforce if they wanted to.
@Phil Magee: China have been bullying their neighbours in the South China Sea for years since Obama took office. China saw Americas weakness as their opportunity. I think them days are over.
In this case the US would not be facing China alone. Vietnam Indonesia and the Philippines are also in dispute with China. And logistics would not be a big a problem for the US as it would seem. They have naval bases in the Philippines and Japan right in the disputed zone.
As ever the U.S is the primary aggressor. John Pilger explains:
“Today, more than 400 American military bases encircle China with missiles, bombers, warships and, above all, nuclear weapons. From Australia north through the Pacific to Japan, Korea and across Eurasia to Afghanistan and India, the bases form, says one US strategist, ‘the perfect noose’…….
In 2015, in high secrecy, the US staged its biggest single military exercise since the Cold War. This was Talisman Sabre; an armada of ships and long-range bombers rehearsed an ‘Air-Sea Battle Concept for China’ – ASB – blocking sea lanes in the Straits of Malacca and cutting off China’s access to oil, gas and other raw materials from the Middle East and Africa.
It is such a provocation, and the fear of a US Navy blockade, that has seen China feverishly building strategic airstrips on disputed reefs and islets in the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea. Last July, the UN Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled against China’s claim of sovereignty over these islands. Although the action was brought by the Philippines, it was presented by leading American and British lawyers and can be traced to then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.”
@Burke John: I’m not sure you understand the scale here. Sure, Americas military might is greater, but they would not be able to pit all their might against China. Remember when China shot down the spy plane? G.W.Bush, who went to war because his daddy went to war, demanded the plane back, he got it back, or at least the shell of it, 6 weeks later. China does not fear America, they may not be as powerful but are powerful enough to face them down.
@Mick Jordan: Naval bases in any country mean very little without the ability to protect themselves, I doubt very much that the Philippines is much more than a utility. Considering that the Australian navy is probably the biggest naval force in the West Pacific region I don’t see them getting overly concerned wirh the Chinese at present. If America is just looking for a fight they couldn’t have picked a stronger opponent than China. Trump is a fool if he thinks he can get them to back down over the South China Sea.
Chris. The Indonesians have the Second biggest Military in the region followed by the Vietnamese. Look at the areas that China are laying claim to. Air cover alone would be a major problem for the Chinese. Where both the US and the other nations in dispute with China are slap bang in the centre. And the US have two Carrier Battle groups in the Pacific and could move even more in from the Indian Ocean if needed. China knows if it came down to a shooting war their naval forces would get severely mauled. What they are currently doing is simple bullying it’s smaller neighbours. And like any bully if a bigger kid puts it up to them they back down
Patches. Pilger is well noted for his anti US ramblings. But it was you who posted his remarks so that would suggest you agree with them. So my question to you still stands.
Your question can stand and wait. There’s a good lad.
Meanwhile here’s some more context from the great war corespondent Pilger:
“Seldom a day passes when China is not elevated to the status of a “threat”. According to Admiral Harry Harris, the US Pacific commander, China is “building a great wall of sand in the South China Sea”.
What he is referring to is China building airstrips in the Spratly Islands, which are the subject of a dispute with the Philippines – a dispute without priority until Washington pressured and bribed the government in Manila and the Pentagon launched a propaganda campaign called “freedom of navigation”.
What does this really mean? It means freedom for American warships to patrol and dominate the coastal waters of China. Try to imagine the American reaction if Chinese warships did the same off the coast of California.”
Patches. You seem to be a fan of Pilger. And such agree with his Anti US stance. As such you answer my question. You don’t think China is the Aggressor in this case even though the International Maritime Court and the UN disagree.
As you seem to believe this is a Q&A session. Tell us who you think is easily the most aggressive imperial power on the planet since WWII?
Here’s a clue for you:
“The disquieting reality of the world we live in is that American efforts to destroy democracy, even as it pretends to champion it, have left the world less peaceful, less just and less hopeful……………..
To place the coup in Ukraine in historical context, this is at least the 80th time the United States has organized a coup or a failed coup in a foreign country since 1953……………….
Noam Chomsky calls William Blum’s classic, Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions since World War II, “Far and away the best book on the topic.” If you’re looking for historical context for what you are reading or watching on TV about the coup in Ukraine, Killing Hope will provide it. The title has never been more apt as we watch the hopes of people from all regions of Ukraine being sacrificed on the same altar as those of people in Iran (1953); Guatemala(1954); Thailand (1957); Laos (1958-60); the Congo (1960); Turkey (1960, 1971 & 1980); Ecuador (1961 & 1963); South Vietnam (1963); Brazil (1964); the Dominican Republic (1963); Argentina (1963); Honduras (1963 & 2009); Iraq (1963 & 2003); Bolivia (1964, 1971 & 1980); Indonesia (1965); Ghana (1966); Greece (1967); Panama (1968 & 1989); Cambodia (1970); Chile (1973); Bangladesh (1975); Pakistan (1977); Grenada (1983); Mauritania (1984); Guinea (1984); Burkina Faso (1987); Paraguay (1989); Haiti (1991 & 2004); Russia (1993); Uganda (1996);and Libya (2011). This list does not include a roughly equal number of failed coups, nor coups in Africa and elsewhere in which a U.S. role is suspected but unproven.”
@Mick Jordan: The bigger kid didn’t do so well in Vietnam. The Chinese will not back down and if anything they will break America on land and sea. Mark my words it isn’t worth the effort for Trump to send in the navy unless he is prepared to keep them there perminently. The countries are not at war with each other so best to learn to live with each other with mutual respect.
Hallelujah. That’s where you are wrong. Vietnam was a land based conflict where the North Vietnamese could depend on Southern Support. This would be a Naval conflict where the US and those other countries involved hold all the cards. The majority of the region claimed by China borders those countries and makes China’s logistics much more difficult especially the further South they go.
@hallelujah: Exactly, the Americans made a big political deal about their war dead returning home in body bags from Vietnam. While the Vietnamese just went quietly about burying theirs. A war against China would be too big a cost for America to contemplate.
@Mick Jordan: Actually Mick, the Vietnam war started after Vietnamese gunboats attacked a provoking American warship. The Americans just couldn’t stop themselves from getting involved thinking that it would be easy against the communist regime. Surely they must have learned some lessons from that war.
But you are ignoring the simple fact that Vietnam was a land based war where the North had logictical support from supporters in the South. China doesn’t have that support in the disputed region, quite the opposite in fact. And as it would entail no ground forces but would be a Naval/Air war China is at a distinct disadvantage.
@Phil Magee:total BS. The US has 400 bases in that region already and money is absolutely 100% not a problem. The looting and future dominance of any of America’s targets pays dividends in the long run.
I saw the documentary “The Coming War on China” on ITV just before Christmas.
I disagree with John Pilger on some issues but I have a lot of respect for him. I’m aware that he exposed the US government’s policy of supporting the Khmer Rouge after it had been removed from power by the Vietnamese military.
China has this and America has that, you lot on here expecting to get a ticket to watch the show, don’t bother you will be in it, it will effect every nation on the planet, so ye can cancel the popcorn, and take up the nuclear attack position, find a room in your house that has a good level floor, lie flat on the floor, pull both feet in until your knees is at an angle of 45% then put your your arms under your legs between the thigh muscle and calf muscle gripping both shin bones firmly, pushing as far forward as you can, and you should be able to kiss your a**e goodbye….
No fan of trump, but this is a scaremongering piece to suggest that Trump will cause a conflict over the South China Sea territory. The US under Obama has already moved massive naval assets into this sphere of the globe and he admonished Beijing a number of times in regards to this issue. In August under the Obama regime three b1 bombers were sent over the area as a show of strength, these planes are capable of carrying a nuclear payload. It’s a much more complicated mess then suggesting it’s limited to the US backing Taiwan or the one china question. Japan, the Philippines, Korea both north and south all have claims on the territory, which is currently in international waters. There have already been many clashes with Chinease naval forces in the area, much more serious than the one with the Indian naval vessel over the disputed territory. Trump may be a nut, but this has been brewing for many years, and if you are going to do a piece on this powder keg do a balanced and fair one covering all the nations and their claims rather than a puff piece to scare people about trump , you also forgot to mention the landing strips that have been built on the reefs or the the Sam missiles the Chinease have moved there already or the fact they seized the us naval drone in December
I don’t see America threatening Israel when it comes to occupying land they don’t own. America should have learned their lessons from the Vietnam war not to meddle in Asia. The Chinese won’t be pushed around by Trump and his cronies, while Russia looks on with amusement.
John Pilger released a new documentary a few months ago called the coming war on China and it’s really interesting. America has been building military bases and pointing missiles at China for years, they have totally surrounded China. The US want what’s known as total spectral dominance across the globe. It’s apparently ok if the US has ‘interest’ in any part of the world but if any other country has interest in something they need the approval from the US military. The western media are being economic with the truth about the China situation too, they won’t tell you that the US is being a bully and an aggressor in the south China Sea.
@Mick Jordan: That are against a hegemonic tyrant raging war across the planet. Let me know when you have even one of the credentials of Pilger and maybe your ‘opinion’ might be worth one of his words.
Surely there is a diplomatic solution available. Surely the UN or someone can come up with a solution letting everyone save face without a battle.
In Vietnam, President Johnson said in 1965- “we will not talk to North Vietnam, we will not surrendar also” and sent in the US army.
In 1968, half a million US troops later, President Johnson ” lets talk to the North Vietnamese, and try and achieve peace”
Joe Duffy announces retirement from Liveline and RTÉ
1 hr ago
13.8k
43
Conclave
Black smoke emerges once again in the Vatican this morning as cardinals fail to elect new pope
Updated
3 hrs ago
17.4k
Courts
Michael Healy-Rae seeks injunction against 'serious and grave' publications about him
7 May
42.9k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 184 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 123 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 163 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 127 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 90 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 91 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 44 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 41 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 148 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 69 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 87 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 93 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 40 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 56 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 29 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 105 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 109 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 79 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 60 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 99 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 82 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say