Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Paul Faith/PA Wire/Press Association Images

Apple settles $60m Chinese iPad trademark case

The US technology giant was involved in a long-running dispute over the iPad trademark in China, but the court said it was resolved “in a satisfactory manner”.

US TECHNOLOGY GIANT Apple has paid a Chinese firm $60 million to settle a long-running dispute over the iPad trademark in China.

The government body overseeing trademarks has been asked to immediately recognise Apple’s rights to the iPad name, the High Court of the southern province of Guangdong said on its website.

Apple last week paid $60 million to settle the dispute, according to the statement — well below the $400 million the Chinese firm had demanded.

The court statement said:

This means that the dispute between Apple and Shenzhen Proview over the rights to the iPad brand is resolved in a satisfactory manner.

Both Proview Technology, based in the southern city of Shenzhen, and Apple had claimed ownership of the Chinese rights to the “iPad” trademark and were locked in a legal battle.

Proview’s Taiwanese affiliate registered “iPad” as a trademark in several countries including China as early as 2000 — years before Apple began selling its hugely successful tablet computer.

Apple subsequently bought the rights for the global trademark – including from the Taiwanese affiliate – but Proview said the deal did not include the rights for mainland China, and sued after the iPad was launched.

Rare

It is rare for a Chinese enterprise to accuse an overseas firm of trademark breaches – although foreign companies frequently complain of intellectual property rights violations in China.

A lawyer for Proview, Xie Xianghui, said the debt-ridden Chinese company had originally sought $400 million in compensation for giving up the rights but settled for the lower amount out of “practical” considerations.

We previously hoped that the compensation would be $400 million, so that it would be enough to pay back all the debts. We have to say it is the practical choice. It is a comprehensive settlement and the end of the lawsuit in mainland China.

Xie said Proview felt “pressure” to settle, though he declined to say why. “Court mediation gave us some pressure,” he said.

Bans

Proview had previously sought bans on iPad sales in China and blocks on imports into and exports out of the country.

The legal battle did not halt sales of the iPad through Apple’s five retail stores in mainland China, a hugely valuable market for the US company.

But Chinese media reported that local officials had seized scores of iPads in at least two cities, and the resolution of the case should clear the way for Apple to sell the iPad free of any trademark concerns.

The US tech giant last year took Proview to court in China itself, claiming trademark infringement, but a court ruled Apple lacked “supporting facts and evidence” for its claim.

Apple is wildly popular in China, where die-hard fans have been known to line up for days to get their hands on its latest offerings.

Greater China — which includes Hong Kong and Taiwan — has become Apple’s fastest-growing region, with revenues second only to the United States.

- © AFP, 2012

Read: Apple to be fined over Australian ads for new iPad’s ’4g’ capability>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
View comments
Close
Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds