Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Yui Mok/PA Wire

Apple complied with a lot of data requests made by Irish authorities

The requests would involve information relating to registration, subscribers, services, and purchases.

THREE-QUARTERS OF DATA requests made by Irish authorities to Apple resulted in some data being disclosed.

Details from Apple’s transparency report shows that Irish authorities made 252 requests between July and December 2015, and involved 671 devices. Of those requests, 75%, or 190 of requests, resulted in some data being provided to the relevant authorities.

The information provided would have included data like registration, subscriber, service, repair, and purchase information. Apple says the majority of requests made by law authorities tend to relate to lost or stolen devices.

This was higher than the general average of accounts requests honoured. In Europe, Middle East, India and Africa, 52% of requests were honoured in total. In the US, 80% of requests were accepted.

The number of requests for accounts was far smaller with eight requests for accounts made overall, with five of them resulting in non-content data (like subscriber or transactional information but not the specific content) being disclosed.

There were two cases where Apple objected to while none of the requests saw any content being disclosed.

Only one emergency request for account information was made during this period, completed when the situation involves imminent danger or death.

Apple says it informed those who are involved that a request concerning their personal data was made “unless we are explicitly prohibited from doing so”.

“If there’s a question about the legitimacy or scope of the request we challenge it, as we have done as recently as this year. We only comply with information requests once we are satisfied that the request is valid and appropriate, and then we deliver the narrowest possible set of information,” it says.

Read: This bendable sheet just happens to be a functioning camera

Read: Annoyed you can’t watch the US version of Netflix? Its CEO doesn’t really care >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Quinton O'Reilly
View 10 comments
Close
10 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds