Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
How worried is Ireland's pharma industry about Trump's tariffs?
Top Trump advisor used Gmail for official business, adding to security pressures
Verona Murphy wins first-ever Dáil vote of confidence in a Ceann Comhairle by 96 votes to 71
Government Buildings reflected in a fountain in front in the main courtyard. Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland
Analysis
5 key issues facing the banking inquiry before it even starts
The government is pressing ahead with an inquiry but it will be a while before it starts properly and there are a number of outstanding issues before it does.
With two former executives at the defunct bank found to have participated in an illegal lending scheme involving some €450 million, the government is now pushing to establish a public inquiry that will examine just what happened in the lead-up to and on the night of the now infamous bank guarantee of 30 September, 2008.
In case you need reminding, the decision to issue a blanket guarantee worth some €440 billion has ended up costing Irish taxpayers €64 billion.
It has been the reason for a series of austerity budgets since 2008 and it is why Ireland was forced into an EU/IMF bailout in 2010 with debt repayments that will go on for decades.
But politicians want their turn at examining the issues and bringing politicians, civil servants and public officials before them in a public environment and forcing them to account for their actions.
“It will all be done before the court of public opinion and people will be able to judge these matters,” Minister Brendan Howlin said today.
The phrase ‘political show trial’ has been uttered more than once but before we can even focus on what might happen when these faces from the past come before an inquiry made up of politicians there are a couple of outstanding issues…
1. Who will sit on the inquiry committee?
We know that Labour’s Ciarán Lynch will chair the inquiry that will be carried out by a specially-established Oireachtas committee. But the identity of its other members is unclear. TDs as well as Senators will most likely be involved and the government will ensure it has a majority of its members on the committee.
Possible members include the vice chair of the Public Accounts Committee Kieran O’Donnell, indeed almost all members of the PAC are likely to be in with a chance of participating. The same would apply to those who sit on the Oireachtas Finance Committee. Coincidentally Lynch will almost certainly step down as chair of that committee once the inquiry gets up and running.
Opposition parties will be allowed to nominate who they want to sit on the committee but the final say rests with the Dáil’s Committee on Procedures and Privileges and ultimately the government. Fianna Fáil’s Michael McGrath is currently the most likely opposition politician to feature. The identities of Sinn Féin and independent members are unclear.
Obvious choices like Pearse Doherty and/or Shane Ross may be prevented from taking part due to their previous comments about the financial collapse and bankers. A government source has previously spoken of the need for “political savvy” over accounting and banking expertise.
All that said, accounting and banking expertise will be needed which is why the committee is expected to have dozens of support staff comprising of accountants, economists and experts on financial regulation. As well as some 48 staff it will be roughly allocated around €5 million in funding.
2. What will it examine and how far can it go?
The buzzword here is ‘scoping’. Before any public sessions can be held the inquiry is likely to spend a number of months scoping out the parameters of the inquiry and establishing terms of reference.
Advertisement
Essentially this is figuring out what exactly the committee is going to look at and who it’s going to call. The Taoiseach has previously said that the inquiry will focus on three main areas:
the bank guarantee and the events leading up to it;
the role of the banks and their auditors;
the role of State institutions.
Lynch stressed today that he wants to ensure there is consultation and agreement with members, saying: ”I think my role as chair is not to come into this with a proscriptive position, but to get the views of all inquiry members.”
In doing this, it might be worthwhile if the committee considers a report already carried out by the PAC in July 2012 which examined the crisis in the domestic banking sector and provided a ‘framework for a banking inquiry’. The nearly 300-page report should be required reading for anyone involved in the special committee.
3. Avoiding legal difficulties
Willie McAteer and Pat Whelan Brian Lawless / PA
Brian Lawless / PA / PA
In establishing the terms of reference and examining the role of banks, the issue of Anglo may be a thorny one. While the convictions of Pat Whelan and William McAteer and the acquittal of Seán Fitzpatrick draw a line under the Maple 10/Quinn loans issue there are two other criminal trials involving the bank that are pending.
Were they to get under way this year it raises the possibility that the inquiry will be forced to stop or to avoid the Anglo issue altogether. There will be questions about the value of any inquiry that excludes Anglo – a situation that would be “nearly akin to Hamlet without the Prince” according to one senator.
4. Making sure they have all the documents and records
As we’ve reported extensively in recent months, the Department of Finance has lost letters concerning Bank of Ireland after the guarantee was issued and has been unable to find them despite an extensive search. This raises huge questions about the integrity of documents related to the guarantee.
The Department of Finance has started to document all the records it possesses and to cross reference these with other documents in that period with a view to ensuring the completeness and integrity of records from the period. It says that it is “not aware” of any other missing documents.
The Department has asked banks to preserve internal recordings of conversations and make them available to the banking inquiry in the wake of the emergence of the Anglo Tapes last year.
As well as this, the Taoiseach has consistently bemoaned the lack of records in his department which explain the rationale behind the guarantee decision. A schedule of records, obtained by Fianna Fáil, disputes this version of events and details a raft of records that are all currently restricted due to government confidentiality. Will the committee have access to these records?
5. Drawing up a witness list… and making sure witnesses attend
Laura Hutton / Photocall Ireland
Laura Hutton / Photocall Ireland / Photocall Ireland
The witnesses are unlikely to appear any time soon but when they do they will be drawn from all spheres – political, civil service, Central Bank and people “in and around” the guarantee, as one source close to the inquiry said today. This will include officials from accountancy firms KPMG and Merrill Lynch, who provided key advice at the time.
The former financal regulator Patrick Neary (above), around whom huge questions have arisen after the Anglo trial, will almost certainly be called to attend. Former taoiseach Brian Cowen and his predecessor Bertie Ahern will also be asked to appear and have said that they will. Other notable and likely witnesses include former Department of Finance official Kevin Cardiff and serving and former executives at the country’s leading banks whose account of events was recently published by the Irish Times.
In assessing what witnesses to call the committee may face further legal issues. The recent Anglo case shone a light on the involvement of its former chief executive David Drumm. His US residency has made it impossible for gardaí to interview him and it’s almost certain that the committee will face the same problems.
The committee will have powers of compelability, akin to those enjoyed by the High Court, but it will hope that it won’t come to that and that the willingness of the many to attend will result in the few who are not being pressured into doing so.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
If anyone involved in this travesty owed Five Grand to a drug dealer they would be lying face down in a ditch. The fact is they owe the people of Ireland 64 Billion… And get to play GOLF.
There is only one issue that I am concerned about. Is there any chance that any sort of justice will come from this €5mil cost? Is this just another round of the seemingly endless game of ‘let’s all kid ourselves’.
It will take a few months to set up and will focus on FF role on the banking collapse just in time for the next election so Enda ensures he is the first two term back to back FG Taoiseach! Or am I being too cynical
Don’t get your hopes up. This is nothing than a politically motivated charade.
If the govt wanted a real enquiry into the events of 2008 specifically and also the years leading up to it then they would have set this up day 1 in office.
This is designed to have maximum impact for the next general election.
Two events happened this week to back this up:
1. Banking enquiry – Prefectly timed that hearings will probably have just started when the election is called.
No firm report or interim report at that stage just lots of commentary
2. Adams arrested – (as you will know I am not his biggest fan) again the evidence had been bandied about for years.
However, SF are getting uncomfortably big. People have seen the demise of the SDLP. Parties on both sides of the border are worried.
And I’d suggest there is tacit approval from the southern leadership of SF. They buy into it because Adams is a blocker to advancement here in the Republic.
My overall point: it is all politically motivated.
Why not bring in people from the states or any other country that has experience investigating white coller crime. I’m sure the FBI would have retired agents well equipped to investigate. This getting politicians with no expertise in banking or law is a joke. The bankers and politicians are too closely linked.
Because the offences they were found guilty of, and the circumstances around the committing of those actual offences, did not warrant a custodial sentence.
You can only jail someone for what they have been found guilty of.
What’s your point Kerry?
Judges decide sentences. It’s their job.
As regards opinion, I’ve yet to hear any journalist who attended the trial disagree with the sentence. People have a right to be angry but you can only sentence people on the actual crime.
“To the best of my recollection”
“Too ill to attend”
“Letter cannot be found”
“Person who had the pertinent information is deceased”
Anyone expecting anything else?
This entire charade is an an attempt to have the so called issues paraded across the front pages in the period leading up to the next election.
It is clear from the comments of Howlin and Kenny that what they want is a Star Chamber style political show trial and not the truth. We all know that Bertie and Biffo created the economic environment that lead to the crisis and we know exactly how the Banks got into the mess that they did get into. We also know the action taken, rightly or wrongly, by Brian Lenihan and the Central Bank to avoid a Banking collapse.
All that is left is an examination of the advice given to Brian Lenihan and the then Government.
Why does this need a Parliamentary enquiry?
Kind of makes one relieved that we voted against giving these committes more power
We live in a crazy country where the LAW is an ASS!
A bank gives over €400 million in illegal loans contrary to Section 60 of The Companies Act yet nobody is held liable!
What kind of legal system do we have?
The Government will now establish a Tribunal to find out the facts! Yet nobody will go to prison!
No wonder people have lost all faith in politicians!
We live in a country where innocent Taxpayers are deemed liable for the debts of developers, builders and bankers and politicians who made a mess of Ireland – yet these people draw big salaries, are on big pensions and get big bonuses!
NAMA even pays salaries to some of theses guys!
The so called Regulator got a big tax free lump sum and big pension yet he did not do his job!
Ireland is the laugh ting stock of Europe and the World -we bailed out the unsecured German Bank Bondholders and our Government transferred the debts to all Irish Taxpayers!
“Obvious choices like Pearse Doherty and/or Shane Ross may be prevented from taking part due to their previous comments about the financial collapse and bankers.”
The only understanding I can derive from that sentence is – “we know you’re disgusted at the behaviour, so we’d rather not be justifiably berated and embarrassed in public”.
I wonder will 7 Gardai be called to remove Shane Ross if he shows up asking real questions…….
Jesus haven’t they wasted enough of the tax payers money no one will be done for this because they will always look after themselves but I’m sure they will fine enough people for TV and water to pay for it Filth that’s all they are
It has taken too long (and too many excuses) to get this started. Deciding the parameters should not take half a year (or however long it will take). A couple if months within a well organised, intelligent group (I know – this is one of the problems!) should have this done in a couple of months – that’s with legal checks. A time limit set of less than 6 months to run through everything and force the feckers involved to attend and a financial limit imposed on how much the lawyers and consultants make out of this. Most importantly however, proper enforcement of punishment to anyone found guilty of destroying this country in any way. No more Mahon tribunal crap of well we know they were wrong on many levels but we have no power to do anything to them and will continue rewarding them with a better pension than most people’s salary.
Of course I realise this is sadly a fantasy – this is a ploy to get us thinking they care before elections and after fortunes more spent no justice will be done.
Hasn’t enough money been wasted already ? It’s not as if this bank enquiry is going to lead to any of the guilty parties being punished . The main players have already sailed off into the sunset with pensions and personal fortunes Intact ! This nonsense is just adding insult to injury .. F.G. just want all the slimey details back in the public domain in time for the next general election !
We know in the recent trial some facts, that the share support scheme was illegal, we know that the regulator helped the Anglo executives in their scheme. We know that everybody did not know it was illegal, so there is no responsibility.
Simply put there is no political will to prosecute senior civil servants who helped in this illegal share support scheme.
Is this the ultimate in group think We are the state we can do no wrong. Or just insiders do not need to answer to the law.
We do not need another inquiry, it will be just a smoke screen to deflect and delay.
Here we have a bunch of parasites investigating their buddies and relatives. The trial of Anglo was a farce and this is just a nice earner for the legal profession……The 1 % of haves are now really taking the urine milking a dead cow. Do they really believe that the people of this country are so stupid?
What a waste of time everyone who has the slightest interest already knows what happened and also knows that this bs will not punish anyone so what’s the point except jobs for the boys
As in ALL Irish Enquiry’s or kangaroo courts…..Lets give mr greedy bags widow a wad of cash to ask her can we use him as a scapegoat, we love to blame the dead guy….. !!!!!!!
Inquiry conclusion: ecb banking rules, to whom irish central bank reports, were and still are very relaxed allowing banks to overleverage (take high risk). Same rules permit a mixing of risky investment banking business with high street banking by banks previously outlawed but thanks to the usa (bill Clinton 1999) these protections were repealed. The result: large international banks gave anglo too much money. In engineering terms you could say that banking is like a car without a speedometer. Nothing has changed, we are still exposed to dodgy financial products eg. Cfd’s, cds’ s, all variety of assed backed
securities -cdo’s, and re mortgaging by banks. even without sean quinn anglo was over leveraged and going to go bust anyway. Once lehmann fell others were set to follow and vulture capitalists saw an opportunity to buy assets at knock down prices and earn an amazing return on irosh govt bonds even though these were guaranteed
How worried is Ireland's pharma industry about Trump's tariffs?
Eoghan Dalton
10 mins ago
163
0
trump administration
Top Trump advisor used Gmail for official business, adding to security pressures
1 hr ago
6.4k
18
Speaking rights row
Verona Murphy wins first-ever Dáil vote of confidence in a Ceann Comhairle by 96 votes to 71
4 hrs ago
29.0k
107
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say