Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Sam Boal/Photocall Ireland

Leaving Cert students won't lose marks because of error in Irish language Maths paper

The State Examinations Commission said that the error will be taken into account during marking.

AN ERROR IN the Irish-language version of a Leaving Cert Higher Level Maths exam meant that part of a question worth a total of 50 marks made no sense.

Question 8 (b) in Higher Level Maths Paper II on Monday mistakenly used both an Irish-language and English-language version of a mathematical formula, resulting in the question making no sense.   

Only students doing the exam through Irish were affected by this mistake. 

In English, students were asked to use a calculation of fuel consumption(F) and speed (S) to explain how the two factors relate.

The question called for students to write about the calculation “rFS”, however the Irish version of the question also referred to “rFS” despite the fact that fuel and speed begin are “breosla” and “luas” in Irish.

sec SEC SEC

Niall Mac Uidhilin, whose daughter discovered the error, and Eoghan Ó Ceallaigh, Principal of Coláiste na Coiribe in Galway, discussed the matter on Iris Aniar on RTÉ Raidió na Gaeltachta yesterday.  

Niall Mac Uidhilin said that the second section of the question left his daughter bewildered, but that she thought that the fault lay with her own lack of understanding.  

“She said that there was something in the question that made no sense to her.  She had to give up on it, but she thought it was her own fault that she couldn’t understand it.” 

“She had already done two pages of work on the question, so she had wasted a certain amount of time, and then she had to go and find another question to answer instead … She thought there was something she hadn’t seen or understood, that she was the problem.” 

Mac Uidhilin said he went searching for any media coverage of the error but found none.

“It’s important to highlight it, who knows, there must be other students who have been affected who don’t know that it was an error in the translation, and that they were not to blame.” 

The SEC has issued a statement acknowledging that the error “may have been a cause of confusion for candidates”.

“The SEC has procedures in place to enhance reliability and to minimise error in advance of papers going to press. Despite these procedures, it is an unfortunate fact that errors can and do occur on examination papers from time to time.”

“The SEC operates within the core principle that candidates cannot be disadvantaged as a result of an error on an examination paper.”

Eoghan Ó Ceallaigh, Principal of Coláiste na Coiribe in Galway, told  Iris Aniar that not many people had come to him about the error.  

“It was clear there was a mistake between the English and Irish versions.  Most students probably didn’t understand that it was a mistake.  There are likely lots of students who did the exam who don’t know.  You would have to compare the English and Irish versions of the papers to understand the question.” 

“We were in touch with them [the SEC] yesterday.  They are usually good in cases like this, they know that things like this happen.  They’ll have to discuss the implications of this mistake now for the marking system.”

“The main thing for me now is that there is equality for all students, and the SEC now has to look at that and come up with a marking scheme that makes sure it’s fair for all the students who sat the paper through Irish.” 

The SEC stated that it would use its guidelines ‘How the SEC Deals with Error in Examination Papers’ to determine how to address the specific nature of the issue.

The document advises SEC officials that “care must also be taken to ensure that the marking strategies adopted for dealing with error do not inadvertently unfairly advantage any candidates.”

This may mean that any changes to the marking scheme will have to apply to students who attempted the question in its entirety and also students who may have skipped part b.

The SEC said 25,867 candidates registered to sit Higher Level Mathematics of which 2,057 entered to sit the paper through Irish.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
6 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds