Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Shutterstock
Roberstown
Man hospitalised after serious assault in Kildare
The man was taken to Tallaght University Hospital where he is currently in a stable condition.
1.16pm, 28 Aug 2022
35.5k
11
A MAN IS in hospital after he was assaulted at a residence in Kildare in the early hours of this morning.
Gardaí in Naas are investigating the assault which took place in Robertstown, Co Kildare, at about 2.30am.
A man in his 30s was seriously assaulted at a residence in Father Murphy Park.
Advertisement
The man was taken to Tallaght University Hospital where he is currently in a stable condition.
The scene is currently preserved for technical examination and no arrests have been made. Investigations are ongoing.
Gardaí have also appealed for any road users who may have camera footage (including dash-cam) who were in the area of Robertstown between 1am and 4am to make this footage available to them.
Anyone with information is asked to contact Naas Garda Station on 045 884300, the Garda Confidential Line on 1800 666 111, or any Garda Station.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
The EU has become a joke. It should be a zone of free trade and co-operation. Not the amalgimation of completely different cultures into one country. The EU was set up to protect small nations from war but small nations are becoming manipulated by powerful nations’ diplomacy. IREXIT?
No good telling people “sure your generation will be the first in human history to be worse off than their parents because of our economic decisions, but at least the Germans arnt dropping bombs on you anymore”
But they are, only now the bombs come through the letterbox
@Philblanc Your a little confused The EEC was set up and britain and ireland joined in 1973 as a common market . Between 1945 and 1973 europe was peacefull . Nato keeps the peace
October 2nd: Hungary’s referendum on migrant quotas is up for grabs. Hint, it will be a “no thanks” and the Austrian re-election is on due to previous vote rigging. Norbert Hofer’s Old Right party are set to win and when they do, Norbert has promised to put to the people an Austrian EU Exit referendum. No wonder the top brass in the EU are showing a bit of mutual solidarity for an EU END-IT is almost here.
The EU is a failure. The sooner it goes the better for us all.I though Ireland was a republic, turns out its a vassal state of Germany, ruled by faceless suits to the determinant of ordinary Irish people.
Hmm. I mean, look how peaceful, democratic, and friendly with its European neighbours Turkey is, what with all the democracy that being a NATO member, umm… hasn’t brought it. Sorry, but it’s not enough to be in a military alliance against Russia to keep European peace. You need countries to be able to work together rather than against each other on common problems (such as, in this age, tax-dodging, environmental protection and protecting refugees), to have strong trade links, to be familiar with each others’ cultures, and to know and be friends with people from different backgrounds and different countries. The EU helps massively to provide these things; NATO, though very important in its own right, doesn’t.
It’s staggering that they don’t realise that people want less European integration and not more! You would’ve thought Brexit would signal that. Also, their comments on defence and security are very unsettling with regard to the security interests of military non-aligned nations within the EU and effectively their (our) sovereignty with regard defence competencies. We are stronger together, but like an overly-attached girlfriend/boyfriend: it can become too much after a while.
I don’t think many care so much about integration level, it’s three big problems:
1. When things go to EU level they’re in the hands of an unelected president leading an executive branch owned by lobbyists
2. This smug attitude of the big 3-4 telling everyone else what to do, they go on as if the German Chancellors the sole leader of the EU, the media plays along with this never questioning it. They appear totally oblivious to how much this angers ordinary away citizens outside the EU
3. The idea of the EU was a social market economy where ordinary joe had a higher quality of life, that’s what made it so attractive to people fleeing the Warsaw Pact back in the day, but since the Euro cos of how it’s designed the EU is basically attacking the living standards of its own people.
Hi Fred,
I would welcome a federal Europe, so am unsure how you have secured the right to rant for me.
I do insist that the building of a social Europe be put back on track and I hope that Brexit will have helped ensure the leaders mind return to that task.
A real federal Europe would be democratic with an elected President to lead the executive branch and a parliament that can propose laws.
What we have now is an undemocratic superstate where they intentionally transfer powers to EU level so they can say “nothing to do with us now talk to the EU!”. But we can’t, because our MEPs can’t propose their own laws and we do t vote for the President, and the only people who have influence on him are corporate lobbyists….don’t tell me that designs an accident
Hi Ryan, I totally agree with your three points, however, integration is another issue facing the EU. Statistics time and time again show higher levels of nationalism than that of supporting their European identity over their country (Google it Joe).
For all their problems they at least get to elect their President, ours is chosen behind closed doors. They get to vote for a congress that can make its own laws, ours can only vote on what the unelected president hands them. When one of their states has problems funding it’s budgets due to federal mandates they get fiscal transfers, whereas we get high interest loans while haughty smug Germans act like they’re cutting us a welfare check totally oblivious to the fact that as they ran large budget deficits in the 90s/00s Ireland ran surplus after surplus and paid down its debts.
Also, the US populace does not elect its President. The Electoral College does, which in many states, is not obliged to vote for whom the populace voted for nor required to state who it voted for. It is fundamentally undemocratic and was precisely intended to be that way.
@KerryBlake
Ireland has the structures and voting system to allow for democracy and an active Republic but the populace refuses to use it.
The US has no such choice.
True, actually Kerry.
We had in that regard. They bullied us into it and made sure it is near impossible to do anything to go back. No real Euroscepticism in the Dáil. A handful, maybe.
I’ll give you a short summary of two areas Guybrush, so you get the gist.
First off, it bullied the populations of several countries, ourselves included, into signing over sovereignty to a greater extent each time. France voted against the EU constitution and it was forced on them anyway. It was originally believed to be for a single market. However, it was always intended to become Superstate. They do everything in secret. Countries who are obliged to have referendums, like we do, and vote no are made to vote again until they get it right.
It is all done incrementally. Quite clever. No sane person would vote for the right of Germans or Danish people living in their countries to have a say in the laws of Ireland.
Secondly, you want your MEP to change a law? Too bad, he/she can’t. They only vote on bills written, initiated and approved by the EU Commission. MEP’s can’t propose, amend or repeal legislation. Each member state has one commissioner. The commissioner swears an oath to uphold the interests of the EU not the interests of his country. They run the show. We do not elect our commissioner.
*Note however that criticising the EU does not mean that I think Ireland is an amazing democracy. The difference is, as I mentioned in a previous comment, has structures in place that potentially allow the people to have a say should they decide to use it. The EU has none of these.
Britain exerted its stronger sovereignty – Ireland continues to be an EU lapdog care of the usual political Mafia, getting screwed over in oil, gas, fishing rights, secret trade agreements that will affect 500+ million more badly than good.
No wonder Merkel and co are pissed. Someone stood up to them and told them basic where to shove it!
Merkel and co are full of sour grapes.
The EU is just exploiting the rest still in it for the gain of itself.
Be it the new EU army or shoving TTIP down throats – its all sickening.
Now that the EU is progressing to with another extra army structure in the world, it means another entrant into the arms race. With people in it that are not citizen democratic elected – thus less accountable as the public cannot un-elect them for any mistakes or bad decisions – they have more of a carte-blanche to do as they see fit, spend as they see it (with public money) and carry on regardless? Now there’s a few points to ponder over?
Ireland being part of the EU, any final vestiges of a once neutral Ireland status, can be thrown out any window of an EU office? Irelands neutrality has been slowly, quietly chipped away? Only fools would espouse that Ireland is still as neutral as the day the state was created?
The above questions arise as its further looked at the direction Ireland is heading to?
Ireland, care of the EU, is being told to spend more of its money buying military equipment including seafaring articles of war. All this while EU chiefs deliberately delayed revealing further details about proposals for a new £1 Trillion budget, for the next seven years to the army that Juncker wanted. Budget plans were put off till autumn 2016 so not to fuel British Eurosceptic arguments their referendum. An attempt at censorship that failed as (a) news got out anyway and (b) the Brexit side won by a two million vote surplus.
Only EU diplomats were quietly shown the EU army plans. The plans are said to include proposals for new European military structures, including a headquarters. The plans for the army could reach further back than anything Juncker desired. One of CIA’s most senior analysts, Michael Scheuer is on past record stating;
“EU leaders suffer from a “hubristic desire” to rival US power.”
On June 12th, 2016 one Dutch brigade, the 11th Airmobile, official joined the German army. The Dutch army is made up of three brigades, plus support staff and Special Forces so they are relinquishing control of one third approximately of their military services to another state.
Die Welt’s political editor Thorsten Jungholt wrote;
“Never before has a state renounced this elementary and integral part of its sovereignty,”
People have asked “What about NATO?” NATO is a relic for the Cold War era. It was a treaty organised so that countries could call on others to quickly later, after some incident to justify coming together, then combine their forces on a European battlefield. NATO is now looked at by many as out of date and might not be quick enough to come to a ‘rescue’. The fact that NATO is three quarters funded by the United States of America is also a factor.
The new EU army will be a pre-existing force, already operating before any war-like incident. One already combined and ready to go. The title of the Die Welt June article could say a lot beyond its seven words; “Germany is driving the European Army Project”. With Juncker pushing it massively forward since he came to EU office, there’s apparently no stopping it now? It appears so. As regards the Dutch contribution, Germany is pursuing a second brigade from them alone.
The German Army’s Chief of Staff, Lt. Gen. Bruno Kasdorf, wrote a letter outlining plans for future cooperation. “The integration of the Dutch 43rd Mechanized Brigade into the [German] 1st Armored Division shall be encouraged.”
Kasdorf has added that Germany wants to employ the Dutch model in cooperation with other nations.
“The bilateral cooperation with Austria and Poland is currently gaining much momentum,”
Hans-Peter Bartels via being chairman of the German parliament’s defence committee, is on record to Die Welt saying; “The hour has come, finally, for concrete steps towards a European Army,”
While other countries are joining up with Germany, sacrificing their military and elements of control over their own men and women, it’s vital to take note of one significant legal factor.
Germany’s constitution, and its subsequent interpretation by the Constitutional Court, ensures that the German parliament must remain in ultimate control of its own German Army. How this will further play out, affecting overall matters, remains to be seen! So far decision makers in the German defence ministry have given no indication that they would likewise, be willing to transfer over portions of the German Army to other nations. Once again Germany is on the road to being an even bigger major power in the world – all with the help of its neighbours!
As far back as 2004 concerns were expressed in UK media over the forthcoming plans for an EU army while stating in print that “US officials have worries about the EU force” (Article: Blair told plan for EU army may hit relations with US – The Scotsman, 11/011/04). It appears that the military direction of the EU has been a long time coming and an elite in the American intelligence community have known about such plans for a long time – far more than the public in Europe, that the army is supposed to be serving. Certainly if this is the case, it again shows a lack of transparency and honesty with the EU people for over ten years on this matter alone.
When it comes to the actual use of an EU army, would Ireland try and opt out? It remains to be seen. Currently the Irish army participates in other Europe military exercises besides working alongside other nations armies outside of Ireland. A surprising attempt to opt out from battles would come more of a shock to many other EU leaders, than only to be expected?
Should Ireland opt in or opt out of the new EU army, clarity might be need to be constitution permission refined due to one important factor (that could also affect the TTIP treaty too). The Irish Supreme Court previously was called upon to adjudicate on how the EU affects its Irish Constitution on several occasions. The result stemming from this was that, in 1987, a “Crotty Case” concluding had a ruling that stated major EU treaties required a referendum in Ireland.
If Ireland is to opt in militarily, would this require a change to the Irish constitution to allow this to be legal or would any quiet sections in EU treaties already signed, be overruling of the present Irish constitution, regarding any use of Irish military personnel and civilian people?
Questions… Questions… So far still, very few answers and details coming from Dail elected.
Most Irish citizens either don’t know it or it doesn’t enter into their lives any time of any year, but Ireland is signed up to a NATO/Partnership For Peace Agreement (PfP). In PR terms this sounds nice and cosy. In real terms it means that Ireland is also willing to go to war and fight for “peace”. Somewhere in the last sentence there is a touch of irony? Again, Irelands actual supposed neutrality again becomes exposed as just a mere myth that’s just fed to the masses.
Ireland signed up to this agreement alone involves being in joint venture to what’s known as Interoperability. This mouthful of a word is very important to NATO and it’s a task they take very serious and expect Ireland to play its part fully in.
NATO describes Interoperability as:
“The ability for allies to act together coherently, effectively and efficiently to achieve tactical, operational and strategic objectives.”
In other words, at times of war (involving also possible foreign invasions etc), individual nations fight for another country as best each can, front-line or providing background support.
In 2015 Fine Gael ex-minister for defence, Simon Coveney, produced a White paper on the matter of interoperability. It stated that “Ireland will continue to engage proactively with the UN, the EU, the OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe) and NATO/PfP and other states”. A section in the White paper with the subtitle “Interoperability” also mentions:
”NATO has become the standard-setting organisation for modern military forces, in effect the de facto ‘I.S.O.’ 28 of the military world …the unique NATO process of achieving full interoperability has been made available through PfP to partner countries such as Ireland.”
Such statements clearly show the real direction that Ireland is being further took – all done through the sneakiness of political parties in government who are not even bothering to tell its nations citizens what elected are doing in their name, what actions and consequences they are signing their nation up to or even explaining why! The same quiet, sly signing up applies to also military agreement’s as under the termed “Common Security and Defence Policy” – in other words, the PR euphemism used for describing the formation of the newer EU army.
Buried deep in government documents, away from public prying eyes – heaven forbid the citizens might find out these things – is the Departments of Defence and Defence Forces Strategy 2015-17. Amid many things detailed, comes the following:
“Ireland’s participation in the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) and EU operations, in EU Battlegroups and in NATO/PfP and the partnership goal process has supported the development of increased interoperability with other likeminded and EU member states”
Amid the waffle above, note the use of the word “Battlegroups” in conjunction with “Interoperability” and the new EU army (CSDP) to boot! Does anyone seriously think Ireland is a neutral country still? Would they be that deluded as Fine Gael, Fianna Fail and Labour, etc. continues to involve supposed ‘neutral’ Ireland in all the above and more? Seriously?
Of course the average citizens are not told all of this. In fact, they are told very little of it, at all. There might be the once in a ‘blue moon’ mention of abbreviations and RTE quoting “European cooperation” on security matters – but the information meat on the activity bones are left from the eyes and ears of a nation of people. Heaven forbid they might object after they kop on what’s really further going on and how deep is their nation involved via their elected?
The Departments of Defence and Defence Forces Strategy 2015-17 says regarding Ireland and “key strategies”:
“…Continue our positive engagement with NATO/PfP …in order to enhance Defence Forces interoperability in multi-national operations and contribute to the development of military capabilities in accordance with international standards”.
Amazingly, older established parties of Ireland still PR spin about Irelands neutrality still supposedly alive, it being a core value of Irish foreign policy!
There was a NATO/PfP meeting on July 8th/9th, 2016 in Warsaw, Poland which was attended by Fine Gaels Paul Kehoe. By coincidence (or not?) it was at the same place and time as a NATO summit was also occurring. Details of what the further outcome for Ireland from either has not been disclosed to the public and little or no details has even been passed onto the Dail!
Ireland citizens are once again being left in the dark. The public however is once again expected to tax cough up for all this military cooperation and arms spending. They are just not being told why, where and how often where part of their ‘neutral’ money goes!
The point I was making is that there is no evidence that Russia has a plan to invade Poland. I see no rational reason for that but such a wild assertion deserves to be challenge as a specific assertion.
As for the essay on European militarism, it is an interpretation but not one with which I agree.
There is no EU army?
That’s one of the most wrong statements made all day. Someone is either not well informed of facts that can be verified and on record – some stated above – or they are in denial.
NATO is done. As the US is 75% funding it and show seriously reluctance to continue doing this, Junker and co have long progressed their EU army and nations including Germany have already combined forced to create it.
Its no interpretation – the facts are on record as is the Junkers (and other EU heads) statements along with military personnel creating the new EU Army. You and man are just (a) not aware of the facts as you are being kept tin the dark by elected close to home or (b) sadly in denial.
The is a build up of Russian troops on the Ukraine border. Also Poland are requesting more NATO bases because the fear Russian will invade. Europe is weak, Russia is aggressive, Obama is weak on Foreign Policy. Putin is hungry for the old Soviet Union and has entered into a pact of steel with Turkey. Be vigilant. War is coming.
“The Ventotene trip was the start of an intensive tour for Merkel as she attempts to coordinate a response to one of the EU’s biggest crises in decades and quell fears Berlin wants to monopolise the debate.”
Had to laugh at that sentence. Is that not just what she is demonstrating?
“the leaders vowed to tighten their grip on the European project following the Brexit vote.” fixed it for you Journal.
It’ll be interesting to see how far King Endi can bend over when he meets his counterparts in the coming weeks, I’m sure he too will have some words of reassurance for us. “Ireland!!… Assume.. the position.”
Ya they’re right to move on from it. UK is a self-aggrandising bore. After the Olympics, if I never hear the words ‘Great Britain’ again, it will be too soon.
But it sung them like the Communist countries in the 80, to prove their defiant seperatism, I’ve never heard anything so OTT, it was like the sentimental parts of the X Factor, commentators were sacked if they didn’t tear up instantly!
Buster. Do tell when Turkey will join the EU? A side from the fact membership would require a unanimous vote to let them join. Now I can’t see Cyprus, Greece, Hungary or Croatia voting yes anytime in the next century.
Buster. As I said it takes a Unanimous vote by all EU members. Now your piece is from the Daily Express during the Brexit debate prior to the vote. And now even the most rabid Brexiteers admit that Turkey has zero chance of joining the EU.
Btw Buster you may have missed this part in your piece. From the Turkish Ambassador to the EU. “ambassador did admit the conditions for joining are not favourable”. And until all members are prepared to vote to let them in it is not going to happen no matter how much Turkey wish it. And with Cyprus with half the Island currently occupied by Turkey and it’s closest ally Greece stating never, it is not about to happen.
Europe is on the verge of war , no tinfoil hat just facts . On Wednesday , the German government will issue an order for all citizens to stock up on 5 days of food and water in the event of a likely attack . Watch this space
I don’t know , turkey ? Russia ? Last week , the USA nuclear weapon was moved outta turkey to a US base in Romania , closer to Russia . My bet it’s with Russia , odds on NATO will fire the first round
The younger generation may be different but the over 40s still have that nostalgic notion of an island apart, the fortress nation, the odd man out in Europe.
Goodbye Great Britian; hello little England.
British bureaucrats often felt lost in the European democracy.
Now national pride will be restored. It will be a less influential and less internationally engaged nation, more inwards looking, but perhaps happier in the security of appearing to be in charge of its own affairs even though it exists in a global environment.
Britain will be a little more aware of its separate and distinct Britishness.
You mean they will be allowed to make their own choices Michael? Unlike Ireland when we voted no in two referendums who were told to vote again and vote yes???
So right Micheal. It can’t have its cake and eat it. It is a great country for its heritage and traditions, but has little or no power or influence in our globalised world, and that it can never accept
I have no problem with democratic choices. Choices have consequences and costs but that is the responsibility of democracy. Democracy is the rule of the people. It’s the least bad option.
I never supported the euro. It was conceptually misconceived.
I believe that European integration is desirable.
It may be that Brexit will give the European movement a renaissance but only if greater democratic accountability is introduced. The flaws in the European institutions are serious. Reform is needed.
So hard to say Buster, I don’t like the EU but I find the British harking back to past glories it can never re-attain equally hard to stomach. What to do?
Fint , we need Britain more than you think , did you know there’s an agreement in place that Ireland is ever attacked whether terrorist attack or by another country , the RAF will provide us with assistance
The main reason the English/British voted to leave was the freedom of movement directive.
English towns are swamped with eastern Europeans ,leaving no work for the locals plus putting a huge strain on the local infrastructure The idea of paying children’s allowance for children still’ in say Poland’ also stuck in the craw,the ECHR also did not help
When that poet-laureate of warmongering and imperialism Rudyard Kipling boasted that the sun never set on the Empire, one of our own, George Bernard Shaw, responded that the reason was probably that God wouldn’t trust the English in the dark. Some of them have still not emerged from that bubble and still harbour the attitudes that prompted the front page newspaper headline in the 1930s: Gales in Channel – Continent cut off”.
Let them go, let them tarry, let them sink or let them swim, as the old song goes.
Well those Dutch, French, Poles and Belgians who managed to make it to the island of Britain did play a part during the Normandy invasion which I respect do you?
Actually it didn’t Proinsias. The USA remained neutral until Japan attacked them. A good two years after the war officially commenced (or four years if you count the Japanese invasion of China). The USSR meanwhile were abiding by a non-aggression pact until Nazi Germany later invaded them. Poland, France and Belgium were all occupied by the Germans. When historians say the UK stood alone, they actually mean it. The only outside help in the Battle of Britain came in the form of foreign pilots volunteering (mostly Poles, Canadians etc.).
Where would they be indeed as Russia & the Germans attacked Poland simultaneously in 1939. Russia started ww2 with the Germans something anyone from Poland will tell you.
@ Kerry Blake You have been reading too many Battler Britain comics, Kerry. Did the British storm the Führerbunker in Berlin? Was Monty in charge at Stalingrad?
Britain was never alone for a moment – with the vast resources of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and many colonies at its disposal. One of them was India, where food and materials were ruthlessly collected for the Imperial cause – and three million people died in the Bengal famine.
Then, of course, the Americans were neutral, but when you hear the word “neutral”, the question you must always ask yourself is: “Neutral against whom?”
BTW, only three capitals of the European countries involved in WWII were never occupied. Two of them were London and Moscow. I’m in the third right now, the capital of a prosperous, democratic, socially liberal country that had to fight for its life and at great cost for years against one of Britain’s allies. It’s also an EU member and most people here wish the British would just buzz off to wherever they want and let Europe get on with solving its real problems.
History is far more complex than you could begin to grasp before you educate yourself a little.
UK from day 1 was a reluctant member. The colonial mentality is ingrained in their psyche. They have an undeserved air of superiority I believe the youth will regret not getting off their ass to vote to remain.
FFS give it a rest. I’d rather UK friends than German threats. Wake up to the reality of Ireland’s position as a Provence in the German run EU. Ireland need to follow the UK out.
England were never been able to be controlled , under the Roman Empire they were always causing Rome trouble , they caused the Catholic Church nothing only trouble during the reformations , England are not like the Irish , we fought for freedom against England then handed straight over to Germany
These clowns are living in cuckoo land. The EU is dying and their policies are driving it into the ground. Britain is right getting out and we should give it consideration. We have nothing in common with these countries. Britain is more important for many reasons. Britain will grow now that they are not being destroyed these losers. The EU is dead and that damn currency is dropping like a stone.
I agree Alan but its the direction the EU is heading in that worries people,it should be left at being a trading block,
but it is turning into a vast social experiment.
The EU is far from perfect but maybe we should remember what Ireland looked like before we joined. A second world country with pot holed roads run by the Catholic Church. If anyone thinks that generation was better off than this one they need to look at what the EU did to help bring us into the 21st Century. Just because we don’t agree with every rule does no mean we are better off alone.
White House slaps 104% tariffs on China as Elon Musk publicly spats with Trump trade advisor
18 mins ago
3.1k
19
InvestigatesExporting Abortion
'The most vulnerable are still being exported': Why and how women have to travel for abortions
21 mins ago
416
beaufort
Boy killed after being struck by tractor in Co Kerry this evening
20 hrs ago
38.3k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 164 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 111 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 146 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 116 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 85 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 85 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 136 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 76 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 84 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 47 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 93 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 100 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 73 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 55 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 91 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say