Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The bank denied there had been any breach of duty in the case.

Bank of Ireland to pay €350K over alleged data breach that saw woman stalked by her father

The woman claimed her father used confidential bank transaction data to track her down abroad.

THE HIGH COURT has ordered Bank of Ireland to pay a €350K settlement to a woman and her partner, who alleged her data was released to her estranged father, who then used it to find the couple abroad and stalk them.

At the High Court today, Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty was told the settlement, which was made without admission of liability by Bank of Ireland, meant the bank would pay €275K to the woman and €75K to her partner to settle the matter.

The woman claimed her father used the confidential bank transaction data to track her down abroad and then “watch, beset and harass” her, causing her psychological trauma.

In her High Court case against the bank, her father and her father’s firm, the woman sought damages for the alleged breach of duty, privacy and confidence.

The bank had claimed it was a stranger to much of the woman’s case but accepted the woman raised issues with it and the Data Protection Commissioner in relation to her personal data.

It had denied there had been any breach of duty in the case and made no admission as to how the documents came to be in the possession of the woman’s father as claimed.

Following the involvement of the Data Protection Commissioner, the bank moved to acknowledge it had “fallen short of the standards” the woman should have been able to rely upon.

Ms Justice Greally was told by senior counsel John O’Donnell, who appeared with barrister Ben Clarke, instructed by Coleman Legal LLP, for the two plaintiffs, that there had been an “unhappy and traumatic” history between the woman and her estranged father.

O’Donnell said the plaintiff banked with Bank of Ireland and that her estranged father either accessed or was provided access to her banking details and from there was able to trace the plaintiff and her partner in Spain and the UK while they were working there.

Her father would then inform her by email of where she was and tell her he would be at these locations.

O’Donnell said the bank admitted falling short of conduct expected from a bank and that an order was made in February 2023 for a lodgement but time to do so had been extended.

O’Donnell said the lodgement was now made and that €350K was to be split between the couple, with €275K and €75K accepted by the woman and her partner respectively.

As part of the settlement, said counsel, the plaintiffs will have their costs awarded in the case up to October 9, 2023.

Mr O’Donnell said cases taken by the couple against the woman’s father and his business could be struck out with no order as to costs.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds