Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
FORMER US PRESIDENT, Bill Clinton and Chancellor of Queen’s University Belfast, Hillary Clinton will take part in an international conference at Queen’s next month to mark the 25th Anniversary of the Good Friday Agreement.
President Clinton played a critical role in the negotiations leading up to the signing of the Agreement, appointing US Senator George Mitchell as Special Envoy for Northern Ireland to specifically support and aid the peace process.
Clinton also decided to grant Gerry Adams a US Visa in 1994, much to the anger of the UK Government at the time.
Queen’s University’s Chancellor Clinton will host the three-day conference, which aims to reflect upon how the Agreement was achieved in 1998 while also looking forward with a renewed commitment to resolving outstanding issues as society looks forward to the next 25 years.
Global, political and civic leaders, past and present, are due to gather at Queen’s from 17-19 April.
US President Joe Biden and UK Prime Minister will also visit Northern Ireland to mark the occasion, although it’s unclear if they will attend the conference at Queen’s.
No dates have been confirmed for Biden’s trip and it’s unknown if it will coincide with the actual anniversary on 10 April, which is also Easter Monday this year.
Advertisement
I'll be hosting a conference at @QUBelfast next month to reflect on 25 years of the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement.
Civic leaders who have contributed to peace and reconciliation will join @BillClinton and me to take stock of this historic turning point. https://t.co/1Ym6pAkkNj
Speaking ahead of the event, Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, said:
“Northern Ireland and Queen’s University are both close to Bill’s and my heart. It’s fitting that such a unique event will take place at Queen’s. The University makes a significant impact on the world through its outstanding research and innovation.
“I am proud to host this conference, which will bring together civic leaders who have contributed to peace and reconciliation in Northern Ireland.”
Professor Ian Greer, President and Vice-Chancellor of Queen’s University, said:
“We are delighted that our Chancellor Secretary Clinton, alongside President Clinton and a host of esteemed world figures will be joining this event to share their experiences and expertise in peace-building.”
“President Clinton played a crucial role in securing the Agreement in 1998 while working with local parties to establish the institutions outlined in the three B/GFA strands.
“Secretary Clinton, as First Lady, Senator and Secretary of State, continued that work to secure progress in Northern Ireland through dialogue and working with local leaders and community groups to promote reconciliation. It is fitting that both of them will play a central role in the conference.
“With global leaders in attendance at our conference in April, the world’s eyes will be on Northern Ireland. This is an opportunity to show how far we’ve come as a society since 1998. Northern Ireland is now a place of peace with lots to offer as a great place to live, work and invest.”
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
While not disputing the regional lockdown, why is there such a regional focus on where the cases are happening now? When Dublin was the epicentre there was no talk of Dublin only restrictions.
@Phil O’ Meara: EVERYONE was locked down. And we’ve gotten better at tracking outbreaks etc because people aren’t travelling AS MUCH as they did before. We’re used to social distancing, wearing masks and all that as opposed to what we were doing.
@Paul Dolan: in fairness it’s a terrible point. Dublin was the epicentre of a national community transmitted outbreak with cases popping up in the hundreds everywhere . These counties are now experiencing significant clusters alone while eff all cases are emerging anywhere else, including Dublin
@Phil O’ Meara: theblockdown was nationwide to prevent wholesale spread of the virus. We avoided this and are now focusing on where hot spots are cropping up. Are you really that stupid that you cant understand a basic protocol like this? Read the article. Other countries are doing the exact same thing in an effort to keep as much of their economies open as possible.
@David Clements: What about when there were a worrying rise of cases in Cavan, west Meath, Cork(notwithstanding other counties) after stage three had been implemented? Albeit while not as high as cases in Kildare, Laois abd Offaly, they were still seeing clusters. Despite this, I do agree with a regional lockdown in the three counties but Phil’s point still stands but maybe more regarding other counties nationwide. Hopefully the same measures will be applied in other affected counties if there are heavy clusters. However, I’d like to hear more about what you think of the government’s decision regarding this?
@Phil O’ Meara: only 6 new cases in Dublin , when you think of that is brilliant as to the imminent response to closure of building sites that were at the centre a week ago …
@Phil O’ Meara: I think there is a prisoner on the loose as I saw a helicopter in the sky they can say anything to lick us down it’s a joke there is something more sinister going on and we are not being told
@Caoimhín: Don’t think he mentioned anything about current Dublin cases did he? Maybe take your black screen down you’d see things clearer (face palm).
- still just 5 confirmed covid patients in ICU (no change from yesterday
- 11 confirmed covid patients in Irish hospitals, just an increase of 1 from the figure of 10 yesterday
- 0 covid admissions or discharges to/from ICU in the last 24hrs
- 0 vivid admissions or discharges to/from hospital in the last 24hrs
@Anna: And these measures are designed to keep it that way. Unfortunately more cases in our population could lead to more admissions in the near future, hence the masks and the local lockdown.
@Anna: Luckily majority of those workers are probably young enough and will not require hospitalization, however the risk is more to those they may spread it to who could be older or have underlying health conditions. Given how contagious this virus is it appears only a matter of time until those hospitalization and subsequent ICU numbers rise – also with 1-2 weeks incubation period we may not see the full impact of these clusters until middle or end of August.
@Anna: Where is this data coming from? if you present info please give a source. We had 69 new cases here yesterday https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
If these cases are not ending up in hospital that’s good but not the point. the more cases, the more disease going round, the more chance of catching it, the more chance of vulnerable people ending up in hospital and dying. So your hospital stats are an incomplete and intentionally misleading picture.
@ruairi: a sense of perspective is needed.
The cases are increasing but it is spreading mostly in the under-45 age bracket. They confirmed at the press conference that a large number of the new cases are asymptomatic. Factory workers came to work unaware they had the virus. These do not require hospital admission.
A rise in cases doesn’t necessarily mean a rise in hospital admissions.
That could happen yes. But that doesn’t mean it will happen. And so far, it hasn’t happened.
@Anna: 19,294,286 covid cases resulting in 718,339 deaths globally, suggests more cases, asymptomatic or not, will cause more deaths. What happens when those asymptomatic people interact with their family, shop in the same place as the vunerable, hospital workers?
@Anna: Irish Covid Data hub? read your original comment again because you didn’t mention that. Regardless, this presents an incomplete picture because of reasons I stated above. But you seemingly have a clear agenda to push so why bother pay attention to any of that.
@Declan McArdle: was about to make the same comment. Am checking worldometers daily. It seem to only be updated by batches. For a while in March/April the recovered number stood ridiculously low and all of a sudden thousands were flagged as cured. I appreciate it cannot be updated on a daily basis but such a patchy communication re. recovery rates doesn’t look very serious.
@Bob Rock: you’re right Bob, I mentioned it on another article.
I have an agenda to push because I am reporting facts? Confirmed cases on a hse/government backed website?
What do you think was happening yesterday when the media were reporting on the sharp rise in SUSPECTED cases? Suspected because they were waiting on results. And today there is no increase in ICU, and an increase of 1 patient in hospital with Covid. There is many suspected cases every day in hospitals and they rarely come back as confirmed.
I should add the so-called rise was in suspected patients who were already in hospital as the data hub reported no covid admissions to ICU or hospital the last couple of days. Zero again today.
@Anna: They may be ‘facts’ but my point is that these ‘fact’ give an incomplete picture of the situation and you seem to be doing it intentionally because you are ignoring this simple logic – “more Transmission = more people infected = more disease in circulation = more chance of vulnerable people getting sick = more people dying.
But keep posting about how many people are in hospital today and don’t worry about tomorrow or the day after. You were doing this intentionally to convey a message you want to repeat in every article on this topic.
@Anna: but aren’t you electing to exclude the 14 suspected cases that are also currently in ICU, because under your set parameters, they are not yet “confirmed” . while wilfully ignoring that they are obviously displaying symptoms associated with covid 19 and having difficulties that require ICU treatment, which led to them being categorised as suspected cases in the first place, which on the balance of probabilities will ultimately be confirmed as covid 19.
@David Van-Standen: there were 14 suspected yesterday. Results are back within 24hrs. The figure hasn’t changed from the 5 confirmed. There are suspected cases every day in hospital. There could be 100 suspected cases, it means nothing until the results come back to confirm or negate.
If you are admitted to hospital for whatever reason you will be routinely tested to make sure you do not contract it while in hospital. While they await your results you are a suspected case.
@David Van-Standen: Unfortunately you were not dealing with a good-faith actor with Anna, she is focusing only on data that supports the message she is promoting. For that reason Anna will not be influenced by logical argument or evidence regardless of strength or source. Don’t waste your time.
@David Van-Standen: But if you relate the suspected figure in ICU with current positivity rate of tests – is it 4.5%?, it does seem like a lot of hot air. Even those who elected to get a test due to symptoms shown prove mainly covid free. Better to be safe than sorry though.
@Bob Rock: I think she is proper logic and insightful. The only message I see her promoting is cutting through the crap of scaremongering propaganda. The clue is in one’s adjectives.
@Anna: the risk is always there these young people may living or mixing with vulnerable parents, elderly grandparents or even some friends who are in the at risk group. By stopping the virus spreading and may I stress we are all responsible for this, we will keep the hospitals and ICUs free to treat other patients who have had vital cancer or life saving surgeries and treatments. It’s as simple as that.
@Dawn Tallon: You think Anna is insightful for using hospital figures for as grounds for not implementing measures to decrease spread such as mask wearing and regional restrictions? Anna is choosing to ignore the logic of “more cases = more disease transmission = increase risk for the vulnerable = more death”. Read through these comments again and see how this quite logical point is ignored.
@Anna: then why not state that in your initial comment above with as of now 210 thumbs up? your original comment tries to highlight how few people are in hospital (as of today). By stating this and this alone the natural conclusion is that the outlined restrictions in the article are not necessary.
@Bob Rock: as I said. It’s important to keep perspective of all the information.
Not just jump to conclusions when we see a rise, like you did when you read the figures I reported and assumed I was implying the regional lockdown was not necessary.
@Bob Rock: Yes I did. So they have no data so far, yet they no kids dont spread it? How would they know this if they dont know if asymptomatic spread the virus?
@Anna: Again you are wilfully ignoring the fact that those 14 cases in fact require ICU treatment. Unlike a hypothetical suspected 100 cases that may have some symptoms or have been in close contact with a confirmed case, that might come back as positive or negative, but either way don’t as yet need ICU treatment.
@Anna: Here are the facts regarding this disease, it can kill people or keep them gravely sick for a long time, young people as well as older people can die from this. it can be transmitted by people who are asymptomatic. As you say many may not need hospital treatment but increased numbers of cases are shortly followed by increased hospitalisations and deaths (look at the US).
You highlighting hospitalisations TODAY ignores all of this. Yes, hospital numbers are low today, because transmission levels were low two weeks ago. You do not include any of this detail in any of your posts over the past few days regarding this issue. You state they are ‘facts’, yes but they are not ‘ALL’ of the relevant facts. But continue to ignore this as you do.
@Vladimir Macro: Im not even sure if I even understood what you are trying to say in those last two posts. You seem to be arguing against a point I didn’t make.
You stated a few minutes ago that the WHO advise that asymptomatic’s do not transmit the disease. you also said this same thing two days ago. This is not true and I told you this two days ago with evidence but you keep posting it. Now you’re talking about “kids transmission”
@David Van-Standen: there isn’t 14 covid cases in ICU.
There was 5 confirmed cases yesterday and the media reported a further 14 suspected cases in ICU.
Today there are still 5 confirmed cases because their test came back negative. There are suspected cases reported every day but they usually come back negative.
I check the covid data hub daily so know there has been no rise in covid ICU/hospital patients. Maybe you should do the same before you judge.
There has been no Covid admissions to ICU in the last 48hrs.
If a cancer patient is admitted to ICU (or any other non-Covid patient) they will be tested for covid19 whether they display symptoms or not. While they are waiting for the results they are a ‘suspected case’
@Anna: any reply for the point that has been made umpteen times that the ICU patient numbers today are not the complete picture and just continue to ignore the known time delay between disease infection and eventual hospitalisation? No?
@Bob Rock: so the WHO clarified they have no data on asymptomatic spread of the virus, yet the WHO know asymptomatic children do not spread the virus.
I cannot make this any clearer and I cannot understand why the masses accept that the WHO can ascertain that asyptomatic children do not spread the virus and adults, well “we now just dont have any data”
@Vladimir Macro: As usual you make strong claims without supporting evidence. The fact is there is no definitive conclusions about asymptomatic patients spreading the disease because it is so difficult to study this either in children or adults. On this point you will find conflicting evidence on either side but we will know in time.
The problem is you are claiming the WHO is saying “asymptomatic people do not transmit the disease”. You have said this over and over and it is not true because the fact in no one knows. So stop spreading disinformation, find something else to do with your time.
@Bob Rock: and the one time they did say it (in early June) they retracted it the next day. You know this because I replied to you two days ago about it providing evidence but you simply ignore it.
@Carl: Dr Tony OK, but Simon? You’ve got to be joking. All Simon did was repeat what the medical experts said. That is NOT enough to redeem him for all his other stuff ups and ineptitude
@Carl: holohan has blood on his hands from the cervical check scandal. It was him who wanted to hide it. Him. Tony holohan. And because of his actions, mothers had to say god bye to their children and never see them again. Tony holohan. Dont forget that name. Is that what you call a hero?
This is purely political, very little community transmission. Clusters are in meat plants and direct provision centres. They should be testing and tracing not crippling counties. Who’s going to enforce this? Why aren’t they locking down Dublin so?
@David Clements: Show me your stats for this please. Very little community transmission in these counties. What the gov are not doing is closing these facilities and isolating those infected and traced. It’s a hollow move for political cosmetics.
@John O’Brien: I’m gonna go with that most of the people in Dublin were so worried about the virus they followed the guidance more than people down the country, i know I was more lax outside m50
@john flynn: The clusters are in meat plants and direct provision centres. Community transmission is no worse than anywhere else. These measures are cosmetic to satisfy those with only a superficial understanding of whats really happening. The lack of comprehensive testing at these facilities has led to this.
@John O’Brien: I live in Offaly but my doctor is in Tipperary . because I live in village close to the town closest to me which happens to be in Tipperary. We also have to attend Limerick hospital due to services being cut here . so in fairness its bit ridiculous considering the outbreak in Offaly is at the other end of the county . which is closer to Dublin than to me.
@hard yaka: Athy to secede. We’ve had enough of Dubs up North. Draw a line at M7 and M9, close the exits. Carlow, Laois can make their own areangements.
@Tom Anderson: sorry Tom its 23km from celbridge and 30 km from leixlip Malahide is also 30 km from leixlip for reference. People in leixlip primarily work in Dublin or in the local community. Most wouldn’t have a clue about timahoe. My point is the size of the area its from North kildare to west offaly to south Laois. Its a huge amount of hotels pubs cafes to be tarred with the one brush. People in leixlip village can walk 5 mins to dublin for a pint but the pub a 5 minute walk the other direction is letting staff go again. I just wish common sense would prevail but civil servants get paid no matter what so why would bother to look closer into it.
So basically the people of Kildare, Laois and Offaly are having their movements and freedoms restricted because of the greed of the owners of these meat processing plants, their ties to the government and the exploitation of low paid immigrant workers forced to live in close quarter conditions, is this going to be a trend now restricting citizens movements and blaming them when it’s big business with close ties to the government causing it.
@Paul: They are very strict with hygiene at factories, however the spread might be because of the low temperatures that may help the transmission of the virus (this does not bode will for winter) and that workers have to get close to each other and shout to be heard over the noise of the machines.
“A more unexpected setting type is perhaps food processing plants, in which we identified clusters of up to 518 cases (Cannon, 2020). These plants have been the source of clusters in multiple countries. It is possible that the cold atmosphere in this setting has facilitated the spread of the virus (Molteni, 2020). Other possible explanations include the close proximity of workers for prolonged periods shared welfare spaces, as well as the need to speak loudly to communicate over the noise of the machines, which could lead to an increased projection of viral particles. Another explanation is that we may not be seeing clusters from other manufacturing settings with similar working environments, as fewer have been in operation due to lockdown guidelines during the pandemic, whereas food production has continued.
Another reason for spread in food processing industry may be worker’s accommodation, dormitories, direct provision centres, where hygiene and social distancing measures are not or cannot be enforced due to cramped living conditions.
Leclerc, Q.J., Fuller, N.M., Knight, L.E., Funk, S., Knight, G.M. and CMMID COVID-19 Working Group, 2020. What settings have been linked to SARS-CoV-2 transmission clusters?. Wellcome Open Research, 5(83), p.83. https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/5-83/v2
@Paul: People want cheap meat and Without going into how people have other things to spend their money on like rent, mortgages, very expensive electricity, very expensive insurance, broadband the list goes on. It all comes down to the price in the shops,
@Michael Duckster: I’d gladly go without meat if it meant not having my freedom restricted every couple of months because of greed and exploitation for profit.
@Paul: Food processing factories are using thermal cameras scanning workers arriving at work, they also have hand sanitizing stations, and workers wear gloves and masks. But you’re right, it’s not enough. It probably will never be enough. Also seems that food factories are terrified of testing, finding there’s an outbreak and getting shut down.
Significantly, these clusters were found only after people in Direct Provision centres tested positive and further cases were found at the factories they work at. They didn’t find the clusters by testing the factories.
That said, transmission occurs outside work and in work; in shared accommodation (the company has no control over) and there’s also a risk of spread at work because workers get too close and shout at each other over the noise of the machines.
@The Upside-down Triangle: The State has never faced such a pandemic. We seem to have learned a lot from the first wave to deploy tactics and resources better for new outbreaks. That’s a good thing.
@The Upside-down Triangle: . Dublin was the epicentre of a national community transmitted outbreak with cases popping up in the hundreds everywhere . These counties are now experiencing significant clusters alone while eff all cases are emerging anywhere else, including Dublin
@Aaron O’Leary: I’d just wonder that if there was a spike in cases in Dublin would they lock down Dublin only? I don’t think so. With regards the nationwide lockdown it felt like measures that were necessary for Dublin (with half of cases) were being applied to the rest of the country, which wasn’t necessary. Like other less affected counties could have opened up earlier.
@Craic_a_tower: I’m very educated and knowledgeable, do having anything specific to say about the subject or just ambiguous statements that mean nothing?
@The Upside-down Triangle: no you aren’t. Already explained above and you are still arguing. The entire country was locked down so no isolation of Dublin required there is now a flare requiring a local lockdown. I am no expert but this is so blindingly obvious I fear for the intelligent of the general population. This is not “old man and the sea” this is “old man and a puddle” and you aren’t transporting a fish
@Craic_a_tower: thanks for letting me know I’m not educated, I wasn’t aware of this. I haven’t argued with anyone, simply having an adult discussion, surely you can differentiate? If anything you are the childish one with troll-like replys to me trying to goad me into a petty spat. I never fall for trolls like you. Maybe you need to take a look in the mirror and realize the only ignorant one here is you.
@The Upside-down Triangle: angry at stupidity and wilful ignorance is really not the same as forgetting what an adult conversation is. To be an adult require measure and reasoned thinking. Your posts have not possessed this seemingly obvious qualities. So I say will all positivities, the youth are our future and the will remember this time. AIDS changed the world this may easily do the same, have a look of the comments back then. You will be on a particular side and do you really think it will be the good side?
@barry moore: Only a minority now – but the more the powers are abused, the more resistance will grow. The vocal ones are not the damaging ones, those that quietly start to ignore the advice alongside the mandatory restrictions with no fuss are where the problems will come from. Locking down a county because of clusters in meat factories or DP centers is not targeted – its big, visual, and smacks of panic – what other decisions are the same?
@Stephen Fitzgerald: They can bring in checkpoints like we had for the country wide lockdown. People need to suck it up if we want to avoid another major outbreak and country lock down.
@Stephen Fitzgerald: ah yes but the constitution also says that the right to movement can be restricted. 3 counties have had their movement restricted. Hence why movement was only ever restricted 2km 5km and so on
@Sarah Connor: You actually don’t have to speak to a guard at checkpoints, its covered under freedom of movement, you do need to supply a driving licence thats all. You seem to think a few clusters are the next major outbreak – they’re not. Lock down won’t work again, people have been fairly patient up to now even with the ever moving goal posts ICU numbers unchanged lock down was to protect health services from being overrun, nothing more.Only so far you can push people till they push back.
@barry moore: Simple way around that would be to use Article 40.6.1.ii im assembling with family or friends. Only restrictions are around Leinster House i believe.
@Stephen Fitzgerald: and you share a link to the article on freedom of movement in the Bunreacht na hÉireann you are quoting from please. I fancy a bit of light reading for the evening
@Stephen Fitzgerald: you might not have noticed the “in accordance with law” bit. This means that movement is guaranteed once it’s within the law, meaning the Dail can legislate to limit that movement which they have.
@barry moore: Article 40.6.1. I believe the only restrictions on this relate to the area around the houses of the Oireachtas and even as such the must be a dispersal notice. Obviously you can’t assemble on private property without the permission of the owner, but with friends and family you should be OK unless they don’t like you.
@Paul: You may not like it but provided the assembly is peaceful the guards can’t actually do a thing, the emergency powers were part of a national emergency which has since been revoked as its no longer national, start treating people differently – if I’m not mistaken thats discrimination.
@Stephen Fitzgerald: the Minister for Health can reintroduce the restrictions with a signature. You’ve gone from saying restrictions were unconstitutional to that they were revoked, the latter being correct. I assume you agree they are and were constitutional so.
@Stephen Fitzgerald: as the full article says yes. Once its done in accordance with the law. Should the government bring in a law saying you cant for two week then no. At the moment the government has requested that people living in 3 Countys follow certain rules for two weeks. If the people care for loved ones, families, friends, work mates they could follow the request and protect each other. If its not followed then the government well look to bring in laws and force it. Cant say they won’t it was done in March and April.
@Paul: Just to get one thing straight, I do understand people being cautious but my risk is different to yours. The powers the minister for health gave were unconstitutional the laws that were mentioned (to be taken in good faith) are related to violence, bearing arms etc. Freedom of assembly once peaceful can only be restricted around the houses. There is a reason the minister for justice didn’t get involved. Laws cannot supercede the constitution without our permission its what makes our country great.
@Stephen Fitzgerald: ammmm you’ve lost me completely. The Health Act 1947 as amended allows the Minister for Health to bring in restrictions which limit the movement of people. This is lawful as was upheld by a recent case in the High Court. You’re opinion or interpretation of the constitution is incorrect.
@Paul: taken from the hands of medical professionals (at the check points) if memory serves me, and given to a non medical/not even fully trained guard. Bit of a stretch dont you think? Given how accountability is in this country and how crazily expensive it is to challenge these draconian measures its not surprising. As for the case (if you can call it that-one woman and man trying to peach and increase their oddly strange understanding of things) that as far as I’m aware will end up going before the CoA, but that said if the go in as ill prepared as they did ro the high court the result will be the same. Why were their supporters not dispersed – freedom of assembly
@Stephen Fitzgerald: if it was unconstitutional how come the courts said i was constitutional? Irish Laws exist because of Bunreacht na hÉireann and they work together. As 40.6.1ii states. Freedom of assembly is legal once its within the law. This we agree on. “Within the law” is the important part. The minister for health has the power to bring in laws to limit free assembly. In the constitution it says that Freedom on movement can be restricted. we never have been on complete full lockdown we have been restricted.
@barry moore: it also states it can only be restricted around the houses, the laws to which you reference were based on non peaceful protests as apposed to peaceful ones (taken in good faith), while I do enjoy debating the finer parts of our constitution im off out for the evening (completely covid safe and free). I do understand that people would like to change our constitution but that requires our permission and any draconian measures must be put to the people, these decisions are far to big and far stretching without being put to the people.
@Stephen Fitzgerald: its you who the article not me. The restrictions around the Oireachtas is in place at all times and are for protests correct. It have provision it there for the laws to be extended. And the minister for health can and is going to be Sunday night make it law to restrict movements and gatherings in the 3 county’s. If cases continue to rise in other parts the same will happen.
Absolute joke of a decision, they wouldn’t do it if it was Dublin, Cork or Galway. Good luck trying it police it. It’ll be the same as the 14 day quarentine from abroad, non existent.
@DK: Shouldn’t be hard to get checkpoints back out. They did mention we may go back to phase 2 if the numbers go back to over 100 per day, so that implies they would do it if it was in one of the cities. Hopefully people can follow the 2 week restrictions and we don’t have to lock the whole country down again.
@DK: agree. I live in Offaly but my doctor is in Tipperary . because I live in village close to the town closest to me which happens to be in Tipperary. We also have to attend Limerick hospital due to services being cut here . so in fairness its bit ridiculous considering the outbreak in Offaly is at the other end of the county . which is closer to Dublin than to me.
@Roibeard Ó Riain: Care to give any other details on your comments that are clearsy just intended to promote outrage at a time when public cooperation is essential to save lives.
Doesn’t the word “either “ usually refer to 2s. Journal said “either of the 3 counties” . Probably not the Journals fault , they were only copy/pasting as usual
@Brian Murray: but those that can be will carry them. It will be the same when (if) the vaccine v becomes available. It might not be fair and is not the fault of those who’ve done everything right but this is what we’re facing for the foreseeable future.
Migrant/zero contract hours getting fair treatment might be one positive that comes from this.
@Brian Murray: it cant be and wont be unless people do it themselves. the fact is the authorities knew there were clusters in meat factories and didnt put in or force owners to put in testing regimes and I doubt there were any covid precaution checks either.
this was mostly preventable they just didnt bother.
Wont work and won’t be adhered to
Tokenistic as usual
If you live in Leixlip , Celbridge or Maynooth you’re a stone’s throw from Dublin
If you’re on the Laois side of Carlow town you aren’t supposed to shop in the town you live in because of an arbitrary line?
Not withstanding the 8-10 town the stradle the border and indeed cross at points the Kilkenny/ Carlow Laois border
Same applies to Offaly
I expect a descendance of Kildare residents on Dublin Gastro pubs this weekend
@Luke: Needs to be check points on all surrounding roads. Plenty of free Gardai around now given there’s none required for sports events and festivals.
@Luke: Surely they can bring back emergency measures if required. Dont know what all the moaning here is about. It’s 3 counties for 2 weeks, yes it’s a pain for people and business’, but it’s better than having a major outbreak and total lock down.
@Luke: yeah my house is in laois and my garden shed is in carlow. I can’t cut the lawn now cos I can’t go to carlow to get the lawnmower. Alas this is life living on the border
Unless the guards are going to place a blockade on these counties this is not going to work and tbh I can’t see that happening,and what exactly is essential travel,most people would say every journey is essential,real problem lies in factories and processing plants,living conditions and travel arrangements of these workers,why not address these issues and have unannounced audits on these places of work,another example of ticking a box on a form by this government,by the way i am from Dublin and have no vested interests but it is wrong to make everyone suffer because these companies won’t put in the right procedures to deal with the pandemic.
Absolutely disgraceful, the good people of Kildare are being penalised because of the recent outbreaks in certain factories. We are going to lose another holiday, These factories are a national disgrace. Fuming.
What nonsense… city west is being paid 25 million a month .. all cases sent there for 14 days .. end of story.. but it’ll be used as an agenda as usual by this government
I can’t see this having much of an effect, are there going to be the likes of garda checkpoints on the road in these counties as there were nationwide in March/April?
This is what happens when you have zero leadership running the show. We just have people who care about nothing only themselves, thier Salary, pension & thier expenses running this country. They are not fit for the jobs they have and so they make it up as they go along. What could wrong ???
108 comments and this article has been published 28 minutes ago. With a particular group of posters promoting a particular message and garnering more thumbs up than anyone else in very short period of time. This comments section in being brigaded.
Everyone, you are reading posts from anonymous posters on a news website that offers news for free. Expect disinformation!
They’re saying essential travel only in these 3 counties yet retail shops like kildare village will still be mobbed by people travelling long distances. Where is the logic ?
@Irish Sean: agree completely. This is ridiculous. How can you leave these shops open? You are essentially giving out a message that it’s okay to go to these shops otherwise why would they be open and at the same time saying essential travel only. Farcical. If the lockdown is required then lock it down properly to reduce the time required.
I have been considering booking a hotel stay in Laois in about 2 weeks time. So glad I decided to delay making the booking. Tough times balancing all of this, really difficult for those 3 counties.
And will people living in these counties adhere to the guidelines when their neighbours have more freedom, I somehow doubt it, with certain people anyway! Time will tell.
Utterly ridiculous.
The Govt have had plenty of time to get a grip on this and come up with a structured and manageable exit plan. They got it wrong, and now we’re heading for another lockdown, where the many will suffer because of the actions of an irresponsible few.
@Brian McAll: this is part of the plan to covid19 and was all along. Leo said that local lockdowns could be possible. Surprise its just happened. What would you have advised them to do instead?
Those how follow the guidelines should make it socially unacceptable for people who won’t.
@Brian McAll: there’s no accounting for people’s stupidity, factory owners not obeying guidelines, house parties, no mask wearing, no personal hygiene, people traveling to Spain, Portugal and other countries not on the green list. It’s not possible for any government to eliminate the virus, only the population can do it.
Residents are only advised not to travel whats that about, tell them they cant travel End of, sure lots of ppl from those counties could be vacating all over the country over the nxt 2 weeks, typical ruling, making another bollox of of it again.
Not sure what’s so hard to wrap your heads around.
First wave. National lockdown…..that’s simply what pretty much every single country bar China has done.
Second wave/surge. Localised lockdown
Dublin isn’t in the throws of such a surge yet therefore does not need locking down.
Jesus H Christ. Get a grip.
The government won’t have to enforce the lockdown for responsible citizens. Enforcement will only be required for the few who think they are bullet proof right up to the time they get the virus and then bleat about how good the front line staff were in putting their lives on the line to look after the selfish fools
Since the pandemic began they have had 48%(overall) they didn’t have that figure all at once. That’s completely different then 75% of all cases in one day from effectively 2 counties.
Stop talking muck.
Suitcases packed ….nowhere to go tomorrow….second time a holiday house had to be cancelled since April.
But it’s worth it…. if schools can benefit from the best Public Health learnings from the clusters in meat plants. Our children need their school life back for as long as possible between lockdowns.
Also the smaller pubs in the country should be allowed to open
It not as though they will be packed.its been years since a country pub was full .Another thing that was taken from country people by that A**hole Ross
What is the logic behind this? I am responsible the gov is not. I think there is a prisoner on the loose as I saw a police helicopter in the sky they are looking for someone
Powering through and praying: Our readers' stories about the GP crisis in Ireland
9 hrs ago
9.6k
43
Holy Show
Opposition mulls confidence in Ceann Comhairle as Tánaiste criticises 'unseemly' Dáil scenes
Updated
51 mins ago
4.0k
31
speaking time row
Michael Lowry says he was telling Paul Murphy 'to sit down with my fingers'
17 hrs ago
57.0k
115
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 160 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 142 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 112 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 133 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say