Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Billionaire's soon-to-be ex-wife requests $1 million per month child support
The expenses include $6,800 a month in groceries.
2.23pm, 24 Feb 2015
40.4k
93
THE WIFE OF a US billionaire is claiming $1 million in child support which includes $6,800 for groceries and $300,000 for a private jet.
Ken Griffin, who has an estimated net worth of $6.5 billion, filed for divorce from his wife Anne Dias-Griffin in July last year – while his wife was away on holiday with their children, Business Insider reports.
Advertisement
She first tried to claim the $1 million in living expenses as part of marital maintanence but this attempt failed and Dias-Griffin is now making a plea for the monthly payment as child support.
A breakdown from Page Six shows she is asking for:
Under the terms of the couple’s prenuptial agreement, the woman has already received around $40 million. However she has petitioned for sole custody of their three children, who are all under 10, and an equitable division of their assets.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Its up to him to provide her and the kids with a life they are accustomed too. To the average joe thats a crazy amount. But to her and him not so much.
Why should it be up to him to provide her with the life to which she’s become accustomed though? She couldn’t keep him happy, so he’s given her the flick – time for her to provide for herself now, not live off a man she managed to get down the aisle once upon a time. These divorce settlements make women appear weak and dependant, yet will generally be supported by feminists seemingly completely blind to irony. He can provide for the kids, she should be left to starve if she can’t provide for herself, much like a divorced man would be.
She already got 40 Mil, more than enough child support for an entire lifetime. Unless she had some input or assistance towards his fortune, she shouldn’t get another cent.
Thats what you sign up for when you get married and have kids. The high earner provides for the family. Same when they split up. Be the high earner male or female.
That is the problem, in Ireland too, people getting accustomed to getting stuff like water for free, ask them to pay the cost and all hell breaks loose. Besides which doesn’t it turn her into a bit of a doubleu-hore? Is marriage not institutionalised rape and patriarchal prostitution?
No it’s not Lily. There is nothing in the wedding vows which says “I’ll love you until the marriage fails, at which point you can clear me out for everything I own”. This woman has nothing but dollar signs in her eyes, and is probably desperate at the fact that the lifestyle she knew is going to be over (because lets face it, any man with a fortune and a bit of sense is going to stay well away from her now). Hoepfully the court see it the same way and laugh her out of it.
So what. He gives wife 40 mil (thats hers not the kids).
She has sole custody of kids. Now what daddy pays zilch for his kids. Leaves his ex pay for everything for the kids, school, food, heating, medical, trips and so on.
He still has to pay for his kids to live in a lifestyle they were accustomed too.
No its not lily. It’s out and out greed. I’d be asking a judge to put the money into a fund of some sort for the little ones and leave the tart without!
No he doesn’t. He is expected to pay an amount that will prevent his children living in poverty or having to go without food. Maintenance is not a continuation of the good life, it’s a payment to ensure their basic needs are met and there is no kid who needs or deserves a $400000 holiday. And my heart really bleeds for the greedy cow, how could she possibly be expected to pay for school, food, heating or doctors with 40 million? The poor thing, it’s awful so it is.
Where’s this “accustomed to” nonsense coming from? There is no law in any area that demands people be provided what they were once accustomed to. He should have to provide for the kids, but the same as I should have to provide for mine – 500 a month per child should be more than enough. Of course he can go above and beyond and provide infinitely more for his kids of he so chooses, but the law should not be distinguishing the requirements of children based on the wealth of their father – that’s disgusting and flies in the face of the notion of equality before the law.
The man should still pay for his kids, I agree. However, that should be based on the children’s needs, not the father’s wealth. Do you think his kids should be “legally entitled” to a better standard of living than my kids? If so, what other areas of law should the offspring of the wealthy be afforded legal advantage? Say one murder and one rape allowed for anyone whose parents have a 7 figure net worth?
For the courts to declare that these kids should enjoy a better standard of living than any other child is disgusting, it is favouritism, and it runs counter to equality before the law, perhaps the most important cornerstone of western justice systems.
Half for private school, half for food, half for holidays (some places cost in excess of 10k a night given that his a billionaire and wouldn’t say in a place that cost 100 euro a night). half for clothes (designer clothes since I doubt his kids would wear pennies stuff) and sone kids can’t be seen in the same outfit twice. Would they fly commercial since they used a private jet before? So half of private jet? Half towards hobbies and clubs and such.
It all adds up.
How many kids? 3…
Im sure they will dwindle it down a bit. But to be honest I don’t blame her. He signed the pre nup so did she. But the kids should never be part of the pre nup.
Lily, so you think the law should recognise the fact that his kids wouldn’t be eager to wear pennies clothes, but mine should be happy in such attire. Same logic – shouldn’t more plush prisons be constructed for wealthy convicts, who would not be accustomed to the more rustic surroundings of Mountjoy or Wheatfield?
That’s exactly what it is lily. My kids are accustomed to a certain standard of living, a standard that would be drastically reduced if I were to lose my job. Why should my kids suffer just because I lost my job, shouldn’t they continue to be provided that to which they have become accustomed?
It is madness to try and legislate for continuity of lifestyles when such continuity can never be guaranteed in normal life. If this man did a Sean Quinn and lost his fortune, should the taxpayer provide his kids with private tuition and aeroplanes, or how much exactly do you want to shield kids from the basic reality that sometimes things change for the worse?
Bull lily. His kids will live a brilliant life with the 40 Mil she already got. plus he is their father and will no doubt spend plenty of his own money on them.
You’d swear they were made orphans with what you are saying. He doesnt want to pay because he knows she’s a gold digger who wants to be kept for the rest of her life without working.
Why is she the tart? There is no evidence to suggest she’s done anything wrong? All the people saying she’s a greedy so and so, in same situation would you be prepared to allow the other half to swan off while you have to change your lifestyle because they decide to end the marriage? Given that you didnt want to end the marriage in the first place. Not an easy situation for anyone to be in. Just because there’s a humongous amount of money doesn’t make it ok.
So what he shouldn’t pay half towards his kids schooling. Or pay half of their medical bills.
His loaded let him pay for his kids.
Here in Ireland there are different levels of maintenance according to the higher earners wages and bank account. There is no ‘one size fits all’ regarding maintenance.
No difference here, with this case. Why should he not pay since he can afford too?
Most people moan they cannot afford to pay maintenance. Yet here they say he shouldn’t pay maintenance cause his loaded beyond belief.
Lily, she wants 12 million a year to pay for his half. How will she pay her half? At 12 million a year, her 40 million will last 3 years. What then? Will he have to pay 24 million a year?
If she goes im asking for a reasonable amount it will probably be dropped. Go in asking more hoping to get a reasonable amount.
Bartering if you will.
Im not defending her because she is female. In many of my posts I used high earner (gender indifferent) because if she was the billionaire and he had 40 million and had sole custody I would say she needs to pay maintenance. As would every guy on here.
But no because she has a vagina, she is a gold digger and greedy.
My brother pays 25 quid a week maintenance from his minimum wage job in the UK.
Nobody is saying he shouldn’t pay maintenance, of course he should! It’s the amount that is disgusting. Can you honestly say you would need 1 million in maintenance each month to provide for your children whilst also having 40 million in your own account?
People need to adjust to changes in life circumstances and 99.9% of them don’t have the luck to have 40 million in their bank account when it happens. Simple fact is, he should definitely be paying a maintenance but she should also drastically reign in her lavish taste in luxuries (6800 a month on fcuking groceries!!?)
If that is what she was paying on groceries before the divorce? Then yes.. (I’m sure they would have bank records for grocery shopping)
Caviar is very expensive. 9oz = $1.5k
Delighted someone else agrees he should pay maintenance. He has over 99% more in his bank account than she does.
She probably won’t get 1 million a month, she knows his lawyers will fight any figure she gives so better to give a high one to work it down than a low one and have it wiped down to nothing.
Lily, don’t forget she also wants sole custody of their kids. For me that’s more of an issue than what she wants to continue pampering herself on his money for the rest of her life or until the kids are 18/21.
Also no one contests he not pay child support, but her 16 page list including the 2k in stationery which will be annually I’m assuming and the 60k for office staff, she is filing for everything under the sun she can think of. So no, if I was a judge or had deciding control, their kids would be well looked after and she will get so many million depending on the length of the marriage but when she is clearing making up extortionate figures for things none child related she can quickly hump off.
He filed for divorce when she left for holidays with her kids. Now in all Fairness if he didn’t want her to have custody, he should have done it while she was home. It was a bit sly. She should have stayed on holiday.
The outpouring of support for this poor BILLIONAIRE is incredible. It’s pittance to him.
She’s greedy, but he’s (the money hoarder) not? Okay.
Anyone know why they’re splitting up?
God Lily, did you get badly burned by someone. The kids are entitled to good education, accommodation and nutrition. Not private jets, 160k holidays per month and caviar and lobster dinners. Your assertions is ludicrous.
In Denmark the Government calculates the cost of providing for a child annually. This is the amount that must be paid in child support. Private schools, private jets and the like are agreed on by the parents out of court. Atleast thatway the kids are looked after and aren’t used as some sort of ticket to an early retirement.
So a billionaire’s children should have a legal entitlement to a better standard of living than the children of poor people? Piketty didn’t go far enough in his analysis it seems.
This lady has asked for $12M a year child support from a man who had a $900M salary last year. They are both Harvard graduates and hedge fund managers. She founded her own. She put herself through Harvard as a security guard and was hired by Goldman Sachs and George Soros. The donate more than the $12M a year to charity. It seems she has a very good case for saying that her personal earnings are at least $12M less than they might have been had she not born their three children.
Something tells me that this lady does not intend to spend $1 million a month in child support payments, should she receive it, solely on her children.
Folks calm down it’s the US so normal rules , morality legality or societal norms DO NOT APPLY!
He must have agreed to give her minimum $40M on divorce as per the Prenup. Where I’m from a Premup is enforceable as a contract which itself impinges on the later contract of civil marriage and whatever is in the Prenup rules, end of !
If she is permitted to step outside their joint Prenup and extract more of his sole wealth then he needs to look at suing whoever drafted the Prenup as it should be righter than an ducks a*** !
Talking of farmyard animals WTF wants to be buying oats for a dead horse anyway no mattar how much roubles they have to spare or how nice a horse she used to be ?
Just asking like !
Grand. Give her the money for child support. But put restrictions on it so the money is only spent on the children. She already receives alimony, this money should be kept aside for her children. And she should not have sole custody.
It’s all pretty unsavoury, but, as minors, children from any past marriages should be entitled to the same standard of living as any of his or her future children would have, even if that is far in excess of their needs. That should apply whether the parent is earning $900 a year, or $900 million a year.
My name is Mrs. Jason Destiny,From USA ,and I’m
happily married with a lovely husband and two
children.I had a very big problem with my husband
few months ago,to the extent that he even packed his
things away from our house. He left I and and my kids
for almost 5 months,and i tried all my possible best
and effort to bring him back.I discussed it with a very
good friend of mine,and he gave me an advice
concerning a spell caster, that he is the only one that
can handle my situations and problem,that he’s
always ready and able to do anything related to spell
casting and helping of the needy, Pls every every one i
would like you all to contact him with his email
address,which is as follows.lovethlovespell@yahoo.com I
never believed in spell casting,but My friend
convinced me and i had no choice than to follow my
friend advice,because i never dreamed of loosing my
lovely Husband. And i contacted him with his email
address,and i discussed with him all my problems and
worries and so surprisingly,he told me that I’ll get my
husband back a day after. I didn’t believed Him, until
when i got home,the next day,my husband called me
to inform me that he is coming back home…..So
Amazing!! That’s how i got my husband back through spell
casting and our relationship was stronger than ever.
One of the price i was asked to pay was to tell it to the
people around me that problems like this,can always
be solved by Dr Paul. So! my advice to you out
there is to visit this same E-mail address,and tell him
your problems too,if you are in any condition related
to love issue or getting your ex back or and problem
at all, pls Contact him and have a happy life. you can
contact him via email (lovethlovespell@yahoo.com)
or call him +2348101733265
Rules for car advertising, more energy-efficient buildings: What's in the new Climate Action Plan
2 hrs ago
2.9k
48
trade diversion
China will not flood Irish and European markets with goods, Ambassador says
1 min ago
0
0
US Tariffs
Trump namechecks Ireland again as he suggests pharma import tariffs may be imposed soon
Updated
10 hrs ago
51.5k
120
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 168 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 113 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 149 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 117 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 84 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 84 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 138 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 63 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 78 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 86 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 49 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 95 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 102 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 73 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 54 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 92 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 72 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say