Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
AN ARMY BOMB disposal team rendered safe a viable improvised explosive device (IED) in Tallaght, Dublin, this evening.
The Defence Forces deployed the team in response to a request from gardaí after a suspect device was found at a private residence in the Deerpark area.
Advertisement
A cordon and road closures were put in place for public safety, while a number of nearby houses were evacuated.
The device was made safe at the scene without the need for a controlled explosion and was brought to a safe military location for further examination. All component parts and items of an evidential nature will be handed over to the gardaí to assist them with their investigation into the incident.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
When reading Glen Greenwalds book about getting contacted by Snowden and filing the stories about the PRISIM programmer etc…I felt a strange sense of nationalistic pride.
Ireland does not engage in mass surveillance (we were not mentioned in any of the documents about Europe) n even in the troubles never became what they are turning into now.
We live in a free country. I took that for granted until I started reading about the true extent of the US/UK out of control big brother state.
If the Garda Special Branch wants to search your tablets laptops papers..they need a warrant. We don’t intern people (even the internment provision of the OASA act for emergencies has an appeal to a 3 judge panel), we don’t torture suspects, we don’t engage in targeted killings, and even during a state of emergency the state cannot put you to death. We respect our constitution as vigorously as the US ignores its own.
For all we complain, and there’s much to gripe about, at least were not becoming the dark police state the US is.
I just hope to God we stay this way/I’m not wrong.
We’re just pawns that’s why.. the Irish government would give over any and all information if requested by the US government. Your ‘nationalistic pride’ that we aren’t part of the surveillance scheme is misplaced. The fact of the matter is Ireland is just a small, insignificant country (much less than many US cities) and that is why we weren’t mentioned…
There is a big diff between your gmail/slkype to an American being scanned n recorded and us turning into the US.
My pride comes from knowing if the govt locks me in a cage Gitmo style the courts would free me absent hard evidence of wrongdoing.
°It comes from knowing our polices authority comes from community’s respect for them not from fear or armed force + that even when they use their firearms someone rarely gets killed.
°It comes from knowing nobody at G2 can do a search on my name n have all my past chats n info to blackmail me with
°It comes from watching Vincent Brown and knowing we don’t have the preening ‘too close to power’ bias of the US press and that we would not threaten a journalists spouse with jail for not opening access to his laptop in an airport as retaliation for their spouses story, as they did with Greenwalds partner
°It comes from knowing if I wanna protest at a party conference I’ll b allowed n I won’t b put in a razor wire cage like in the US (google ‘free speech zones’ even the name has Orwellian chill)
I’m without a doubt the most critical contributor here of the Irish state, I’ve called us a neocolony, a failed state and I’m writing a book that suggests the rots so deep we need to dump the whole thing n start over..but I’m a damn proud citizen when I see these contrasts.
The “pride” thing is a bit far though. Does the UK really do what you mentioned? You’re just picking the worst parts of the US. Lots of other countries (Holland, Sweden, Germany, France etc) also don’t behave like the US in these matters.
Ireland is a very small country but we really do just bow to UK and US interests. More so than Sweden, Holland etc. so you’re pride is honestly ridiculous. It can be summed up as: I’m proud to be 1) Not the US and 2) a small, insignificant country. Lots of countries meet this criteria…
The journalists spouse example was at Heathrow Airport.
So they seized this guys partner as he was going through an airport, to intimidate Greenwald into stopping his reporting, threatening him with jail etc. The longest detention in standard immigration screening is never longer than an hour in 97.2% of cases, they kept him for 9 hours with zero evidence of any actual wrongdoing. Attempting to intimidate the press into silence is one of the many hallmarks of a police state.
We think of the UK as a very benign power because we share so much culturally with them. An Irish tracksuit brigade head and a Brit ”scally” are identical, a south Dublin rugby jock and one from west London are identical but for their accents, we watch the same TV shows, share the same cultural references with south park, the simplsons etc but you gotta remember the UK is one of the ”five eyes” part of a global survalance network that before the Bush-Blair era was focused on terrorism (with a few economic exceptions) but is now part of this hydra of a big brother system. They do not have a constitution…really think about that…there is no constitution within very very very very broad grounds the UK govt can do anything it wants and it’s courts are FAR more deferential to govt power than ours and even the states are.
Remember what they did in the north, the wonton torture etc google ”Operation Demetrius” you will see how innocent people were locked up in dungeons after soilders crashed through their houses at 5am.
There was an incident at an Iraq war protest that was utterly bizzare and chilling, the police intercepted the two coaches on their way to a site, surrounded them, and forced them to travel with them to a protest site the police had selected miles away from their own chosen site, when the people tried to get off the bus the police beat them and shoved them back onboard even holding the doors closed!
As to the other countries sure…absolutely, Switzerland etc don’t have these abuses, I DID NOT SAY IRELAND WAS UNIQUE I just said I was proud we were not turning out like the US and UK.
We may indeed not be unique but we are in a very very small club of countries that has real genuine republican traditions.
We do not ”bow” to the US thats utter nonsense, let them f___ing refuel planes as we do Russian planes and every other planes thats not ”bowing” to anything, we did not participate in the Iraq War or even the legal and perfectly justified Afghanistan war.
We bowed to nothing.
@Tony that made me breathe a sign of releif…I was half braced, after my flag waving rant, to see IRELAND ENGAGES IN GAG ORDER WITH THE US AND UK TO SUPRESS EVIDENCE OF NEW RENDITION PROGRAMME.
I would have just crawled under my bed and not posted for about 5 years.
@Ryan Some good points there and I wholeheartedly agree RE Britian and their potential power over their “subjects”. Their lack of constitution etc is a disgrace and monarchy a joke.
It might surprise you that the UK is perhaps worse than the US for the spying capabilities. GCHQ has more sweeping powers of mass surveillance lacking constitutional safeguards, not only on foreigners but even its own citizens.
As for Ireland, I often feel we could do with an annual reminder (Independence day/ Constitution day) that the liberties we enjoy were very hard earned. The further a country gets from its liberation, the more complacent it gets in sacrificing liberty for security it seems. We also need to get off the US foreign policy bandwagon.
I travelled regularly between Belfast and Glasgow in the late 80′s as I was at college in Glasgow. It was a nightmare. It was a nightmare. Anyone travelling as Irish was immediately a suspect. Special ‘terrorist’ room before travelling back. Regular stop and searches. As soon as I said my name straight away, can we check your bag etc. My experience was nothing compared to that of males you were often detained for hours, even days. No respect for Britain and civil rights.
Don’t be so naive. Our constitution has been eroded and EU law supercedes it. Have a quick read of the amendments in our constitution and you will see it is pretty worthless. Once the EU gets its federal union you can kiss goodbye to our beloved constitution. I’m pro-Europe but Anti-EU. I wish to see the collapse of the EU and just go back to basics of being trading partners with fair rules.
@Ian EU law superceeding our laws , NOT our constitutions, that’s a very important disctinction. I means an EU directive overrides our law…sure…but it only does that in an area we CHOOSE to pool power in. That was the peoples democratic choice every single step of the way and we had eyes wide open and vigirous debates on it.
I’m getting really sick of the hysteria and EUSSR references they’re utter nonsense, the EU has it’s flaws but it’s not a big brother monster, it’s a tiny weak hobbled power structure, and it’s nothing near a federal state it does not even have a single leader yet.
I don’t even know why you would bring the EU into a my point, the EU has never engaged in Big Brother surveillance in fact the EU bodies have been the victims of it.
There are real and serious threats out there to our liberties and it does not help the public discourse when people begin ranting about the EU and the Bilderbergers and the bio chip implants all those separate things are phantom threats, warrentless spying, rendition etc are real tangible real life threats
There is nothing the EU is doing to force us into anything I stood proud about above, NOTHING.
They don’t spy, they don’t kidnap, they don’t torture…they do some dodgey trade deals…an issue…sure..they’re hypicrits on free trade…sure..but I can debate that with them in my suit with a mocha-chino in front of me nice and calm, I can’t do that with the CIA guy stuffing me into a van because I share the same name as someone on a watchlist and he got his wires crossed nor can I do it with the NSA as they hoover up who I been talking to on Facebook learning what secrets my friends have etc.
The EU irritates me, it does not WORRY me the way the NSA does.
A federal EU, would, IMO be a vast improvement over the monstrosity we have now, it would have more clearly defined powers, a single elected leader a clear constitution
Ryan… EU law supercedes our constitution. It is in our constitution. We’ve been lied to and misled by our own government and the EU to get the Lisbon treaty passed and the Stability Treaty. The EU cannot be trusted just the same as the US.
6° No provision of this Constitution invalidates laws enacted, acts done or measures adopted by the State, before, on or after the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, that are necessitated by the obligations of membership of the European Union referred to in subsection 5° of this section or of the European Atomic Energy Community, or prevents laws enacted, acts done or measures adopted by—
i the said European Union or the European Atomic Energy Community, or institutions thereof,
ii the European Communities or European Union existing immediately before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, or institutions thereof, or
iii bodies competent under the treaties referred to in this section,
Ryan,
I would imagine one Mr. Ian Bailey might disagree with your assertion that we live in some kind of blissful Utopia of modern justice that respects the right of any individual to be investigated in a fair and reasonable manner.
In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if Ian Bailey wishes that he never ever set foot in Ireland – a country whose police force, up until two recent high profile resignations anyway, could happily do away with due process as long as they “got their man” on the basis that “Jaysus yeah, sure he has a guilty look in his eye – now just let’s do what we need to do to nail him”.
A traitorous, treacherous organisation that put many lives at risk. And probably cost lives. Assange is a coward. He should hand himself over to the Swedish authorities. Face the charges, not hide behind diplomatic walls.
Wesole some of us here have a habit of only posting on stories whos topics we know a lot about, some of us do know what were talking about.
One of the classic methods of attacking whistleblowers, be it in industry, politics whatever is to get people to diver their attention away from WHAT is being reported and cause the discussion to be about WHO is reporting it. Since nobody out there, absolutely nobody, has zero skeletons in their closet, or at the very least everyone has SOMETHING they’d not want made public, an embarrassing decision/habit/sexual fetish whatever, a mistake in their past…they then assassinate their character and their cause by association (”you’re not with HIM are you??”)
Forget about the made up charges on Assange, lets focus on what they reported, and it was highly disturbing criminality and unethical esponage by the worlds most powerful country. The US does not need to tap Merkels phone to protect national security, so what are they doing it for? To get economic information they can use in trade talks, that’s not what a national security agencys for, they should not be wasting their resources trying to get a slight edge in trade talks when they ought to be focused on terrorism and North Korea/Pakistans unsecured nukes etc
Im with Joe its all a false flag , you might think your looking at the Journal but in reality its all a US backed homsexual Jewish conspiracy to steal all of our red lemonade, thats whats REALLY happening , lucky we have people of Joes intelligence to foil these government agencies. Russia Today should give you a slot mate your hilarity is wasted here !
No-one foxes with our Red Lemonade …no-one !
Joe – to arms our red lemonade is under threat !
Russia today is at least an alternative ; I am off the opinion that if the shit hits the fan then Vladimir, Elizabeth , Francois, Barrack, Benjamin and a whole host of “leaders” and their inner circles will all go to a safe zone , play golf and not give a flying pig about the rest of us ; they keep meeting and shaking hands and smiling and they are supposed to hate each other , or more importantly we are supposed to follow their lead and be afraid of the big bad wolf which is always the other guy funnily enough and every single security agency exposed as being little more than a bunch of spying bigots trained on religious or loyalty grounds !
Probably just an excuse for some form of a perverted orgy every time they meet up for “high level” discussions ! Glorifed speech readers the lot of them !
Today, 29th July 2014 WikiLeaks releases an unprecedented suppression order by the Australian Supreme Court in Melbourne, Victoria, made on June 19th 2014, with regards to a multi-country, multi-million dollar corruption case. The supression order forbids any discloures, by publication or otherwise, of any information relating to the court case by anyone, including the Australian media,
4 hours? Screw that, im going to bed. P.s. – If its proof that Aliens exist and the worlds major governments have being covering it up, please wake me (put the kettle on first). cheers
The fact that they have not leaked the aliens thing should tell you a lot.
It’s not that they don’t exist, they’re probably out there according to the Drake equation, but if a culture is advanced enough to travel the stars and get around the light barrier why would they bother their arse with a small developing backwater like us? I can see them doing some astro-sociology on the QT but kidnapping us and doing experiments?
It also does not seem to stop the 911 truthers that wikileaks has mentioned no hint of an inside job being set up. They could not hold the Watergate conspiracy closed, a third rate burglary of an office building, and it all came crashing down because of the wife of the AG…but they’re going to hold high treason by the President, VIce-President, Secretary of Defence etc a secret? Riiiight,,,,
Ryan …it has to do with cosmology and other things I won’t go into here , but aliens as we understand them is not how it works …the Martians are in charge in one sense but they didn’t get here on a ship !
It’s too complicated to explain here ….
I know I have been “at you” but will you please answer this question ; In light of the recent atrocities in Israel would you personally vote for Ireland to join Nato ? Forget all our arguments a simple question..
I will answer the same first and give you my reasons .
No – because America supports Israel and that in turn would ally us to Israel through Nato ; Obama’s speech about Nato in Poland I think it was reiterated that same shit that turned an assassination in 1914 into the loss of 37 million lives .
I respect your right not to answer and your right to see it differently – but this is my angle and I firmly believe history will repeat itself until we break the cycle ; alliances is a very important part of the cycle i.m.o. !
Where do you get this idea being in NATO makes us the US’s buttboys?
France and Germany are in NATO, so were a dozen other countries that opposed US actions like the Iraq War, NATO is a mostly defensive alliance. The collective security thing is what the UN was set up for, one gets attacked, we all protect and help the one who was attacked and turn on the aggressor.
We have no air force, leaving us open to a dozen nightmare scenarios that we could not deal with, and asking for RAF help would kill vital time. A squad or two of jets would cost around 2-300 million. We are not willing to make room for that in our budget ATM, so we lay naked and open to say a hyjacked jet coming from the west attacking a nuclear plant on the Welsh coast and causing a Chernobyl right on our coast. Joining NATO gets us allied air patrols and that problem solved, under a similar deal to Iceland (who also didn’t have an air force). We’d have joint training missions that would be very beneficial for our military., Shannon could become a NATO air base that would be HUGE investment for the region esp if Cork naval base was expanded as well.
The other NATO members are condemning Israel so thats not a valid fear.
We ought have a referendum on NATO v REAL neutrality and make a CLEAR choice one way or the other. If we pick neutrality no foreign military forces ought to be on our soil and we need to invest in our OWN national defence the way Sweden does.
Thanks Ryan the last line explains it to me ; cheers dude ; sorry for yanking your chain ..
It’s just that we share different views on what NATO are .
Just one thing you might consider ; what other than “condemning” Israel have these Nato countries done ; have they moved for sanctions have they expelled diplomats ….
and one other thing ; you point to wales being a possible nuclear threat , let’s say it happens , do you not think that Shannon as a NATO hub would not be the same thing ?
To push Ireland to making money out of military is the same as loading the guns of Israel as far as I ma concerned …. you may not see it that way , but remember the ARMS RACE was the cause of two world wars , to be part of it is to invite our destruction i.m.o.
Being a NATO state, even if we had Cobh turn into a NATO naval base, and say Shannon and Baldonnel turn into NATO air bases would not necessarily make us a target.
I’ve no time for Islamic terrorism in any form, but their gripe is with the Americans and anyone who supports them in attacking muslem land (As they see it, the reality is more 3D of course), and we’d not be doing that, being in NATO does not = blind US support.
As OBL himself said ”why do you think we do not attack, for example Sweden?”.
The nuclear reactor example is something I worry about because it could cause unspeakable devestation, and in the aftermath of that kind of attack 200m on a squad or two of fighter jets would seem like small change, since the cleanup bill and costs of such an attack would run well into the billion.
Whereas, even if NATO bases here were attacked, they’d be attacked by conventional bombs, truck bombs etc, stuff infantry guarding the bases are quite capable of dealing with.
I think you need to stop dragging Israel into it, it’s a separate issue, unconnected. I would never say money/investment should be the SOLE reason for making a millitary decision or supporting millitary aciton, never, or that it should rank above the rights and wrongs, what I’m saying is that if we are going to join, then it would be an added bonus.
Again keep in mind NATO membership does not mean participation in every operation the US does, as a member we can block NATO missions too that could be used to halt agression as much as adding to it.
On the topic of making us a target, you might want to consider this. As you’ve already figured out I’m very into this kind of stuff, even more than sociology and economics which was my main area of study. In reading up on nuclear warfare I came across some declassified Soviet documents (declassified by exwarsaw pact states not Russia) and you may be surprised to learn that in the event of a nuclear attack on NATO at least 3 nukes were slated for Ireland. One on belfast, one on Derry and at least one on Dublin (there was discussion on lobbing two small ones in, one at the port one at the airport). Shannon was getting conventional bombs as was the navy base. Our neutrality was not gonna protect us. Why would they bother you might ask?
We’d aid in UK recovery post-strike, and they wanted the USSR to recover first. Simple. Brutal.
Tell that to the Spanish Ryan ; the bombing there wasn’t long getting Spanish troops withdrawn from the U.S. led war and no bombs there since a s far as I know .
I’m not “dragging Israel into it I am merely pointing out that it is very handy for America to be aligned to countries that say the right thing but who then do s.f.a. in real terms about it .
What I read from the Russian plans is this ; they did not see the west of Ireland as a threat … but turning Shannon into a Nato hub would change that battle plan would it not ?
America had military plans to invade Britain in the 20′s ……
with relation to your contention that Ireland would not necessarily join every operation ; we have soldiers stationed in Africa in direct contravention of our Constitution …so do you think our leaders are that savvy when it comes to keeping Ireland out of harm’s way ?
My preffered option is the Swedish model of Neutrality and I see no reason why we can’t ; The C.I..A are noted for suitcases of cash Ryan …I’ll say no more , you can have the last word if you want !
But I will finish with this very simple saying ;
If you play with fire expect to get burned ; “you” in the general ,excuse the pun, sense .
The Spanish were bombed because they were active supporters of the Iraq war…but being a member of NATO did not automatically mean you supported it.
How can you read that from the Russian plans? They do see us as a threat, they recognized the reality that we were an economic and political (if not millitary) strategic ally of the US and UK and would help them recover post-war. Remember we had a large agricultural surplus, lots of free space, the north-east wings blowing the UK fallout away from us…post-nuclear exchange we would have been one of the best off countries in Europe/western world, and we would have helped the US and UK recover, they knew that, so by nuking our main port-airport and attacking our two western atlantic bases, they removed that threat
Western bases would have been critical for Operation Reforger even before a NATO-WP war went nuclear, and even more so after for aid and resupply for Europe.
There is nothing in our constitution about neutrality, just that we can’t join a military alliance without a referendum. The African troops were peacekeepers in 90% of cases. The only exception was the Rangers we sent when a sharper tool was needed to pacify the rebels harassing innocent people, and they did an excellent job, p1ssing their pants at the mere mention of the Rangers coming.
I don’t understand this notion of being ALL on one side, regardless of the specifics, or ALL on another, if the facts and reality is split both ways. You have to be universally pro -US and anything that it does OR you have to b1tch about everything they do in every instance.
F__k that, I’ll go with the facts, the reality and the logic of each case by case.
NATO membership makes sense, big brother does not.
I can hold both opinions without conflict.
Ryan ; Article 1 guarantees out neutrality through our commitment to traditions , the Lisbon treaty confirmed our neutrality and our corporation tax ..you may be too young to know this !
our Dail is very clear on our neutrality and yet you seem to keep making this point …I can’t understand why … but anyway you have your opinion and that is all it is – no offence but it is wrong and that’s not a criticism but a fact , you can ignore it if you wish !
One last point ; if you contend that Ireland is not neutral again then we will agree to differ , but I know we are and I don’t tell lies on such important things , not accusing you of being a liar for we all make mistakes !
I will get a paper copy of the Irish constitution that confirms it for you …the ammendments to guarantee this are not on the online one …..
remeber ryan when one uses common search engines ones one only searches about 1% of the interweb ! …if you rely solely on the internet then you are not getting the full picture !
Article 5 is only when a member is attacked and ti’s only been invoked once.
Once.
It’s not that if one goes to war we all go, it’s if one is ATTACKED we help them, that means for example after 9/11 we might have sent special forces to Afghanistan to help hunt for AlQaeda…hardly the most radical proposition in the world, sending 25-50 guys..
NATO kept western Europe safe from the spectre of Soviet attack from the 50s right up to the late 1980s. Without that we might have ended up with a v diffrent Europe to what we have now. Imagine the only real supermarkets being open only to the elite, shortages of bread and other essentials with a q around the block for it, not knowing if it will b there at the end of the que. Imagine you want to oppose the main party and for that can get sent to prison.
You think if we had taken the suggestions of the ant-war movement and removed the nukes from Europe, had France and the UK disarm their nukes, the US theatre nukes withdrawn, demobilizing the BOAR…that they’d not have tried to push inward and taken over? Of course they would, be real, any powerstructure esp one as fanatical as the USSR is going to take that opportunity.
NATO was and is a good thing.
world war 1 only started once and world war 2 only started once Ryan ; once is enough to catch a bullet for corporation mundial !
ryan did you look at Obama’s speech ?
Meds related insomnia has me up debating neutrality with a stranger at 3am..sigh…well….I’ve been in politics since I was a young teenager I remember Lisbon, and the lies, just fine.
The gaurentees with the Lisbon and NIce treaties were legally meaningless ‘clip ons’ nothing more.
Article 1 has no mention of foreign policy, there is another section that commits to pacific settlement of disputes, who we’d be in one with though I don’t know…
Article 29 opts out of the EU common defense…that’s it, there are no references to neutrality in the constitution.
The Lisbon treaty requires us to progressively improve our military capacity.
I keep making the point for one simple reason: NEUTRALITY IS NOT IN OUR CONSTITUTION, THE WORD NEUTRALITY DOES NOT APPEAR, NO OTHER WORDING THAT COULD BE INTERPRETED AS NEUTRALITY APPEARS EITHER.
I also keep making it because:
1. Contrary to what people think, we did not set out to be neutral from the get go, and the neutrality policy evolved from a childish distaste for being on the British side in anything.
2. We tried to set up a separate defense treaty with the US when NATO was created (for reason1) and were rebuffed, sore and hurting, like the geek knocked back from hanging out with the cool kids table we basically said ”oh yeh well…er…we totally wanted to be neutral anyway so there! we don’t need to be in your cool club!”
3. Our policy in WWII war born out of reason 1 as well, as well as hedging our bets to see if a defeated UK might be pressured into returning NI to us.
The policy has an inconsistent and poorly defined history, riddled with total hypocrisy and lacking any of the attributes (like a 3 branch millitary) normal neutrals have.
Not sure what the search engine thing means..
Our neutrality may be a (loose, half arsed) govt policy but it’s not in the constitution, it’s never been voted on, and it’s never been properly defined. The word neutrality is not in the constitution.
ryan for someone to be interested in politics and not interested in a breakdown in propaganda and how it works is somewhat strange i.m.o. but as you said it’s late ..anyway good night !
Dermot the arms race was largely the result of, not the cause of, two world wars.
It may not feel like it at the moment but the principal of mutually assured destruction has led to a period of relative stability between the world’s superpowers for the past 70 years. Yes, there was the cold war – now re-ignited – and a series of (relatively minor on a global scale) proxy wars, but each superpower knows what the consequences of all-out warfare would be.
Maybe it’s time we just accepted…MH370 was a normal crash…Diana had an unfortunate car accident (you don’t become accident proof because you’re famous)…JFK was killed by a deranged nutcase and 9/11 was a bunch of p1ssed off Islamic terrorists not an inside job..
If the major conspiracy theories were going to come out they’d be out by now.
1) The super injunction covers four countries. One must be the UK (“the super-injunction” centre of the world), the others are likely to be other Commonwealth countries – Australia, Malaysia and finally, New Zealand.
2) What have they got in common ? – Rolls Royce (UK), Malaysia (Air Malaysia), Australian (Indian Ocean Search) and New Zealand (“New Zealand oil worker fired from job after reporting a fireball over South China Sea”.
Interesting Stephen, I’d throw America in there with some experimental weapon or Diego Garcia, has to be about MH370 though doesn’t it?
Or maybe it’s the super secretive TTIP agreement?
It’s a big story, a multinational cover up of corruption where an Aussie court is gagging foreign heads of government (where the hell do they think they have the power to do that???)
It’s just that after the NSA revelations everything else is going to seem less shocking, I’m personally glad it was not something to ‘out boom’ the NSA revelations, my faith in the worlds political leadership is already in the sewer since were living in the world the Robocop movies portrayed back in the 80s, something to ‘out boom’ the Snowden revelations would just make us all wanna open our wrists.
See Mick you’re missing the point with that fake moral equivalence.
Russia and China never set themselves up as a beacon of light and hope.
They never made hammy speeches talking about how their countries unique tradition of constitutional democracy, checks and balances , enumerated powers and free press then went on to violate all of those principles blatantly, then continue to lie about it even after they’d been caught.
We expected no better of Russia and China, we expected more of the US. The US was meant to be the place where the police could not boot your door down without a warrent, where the state did not behave like the Stasi but only survaled people they had reasonable cause to think were up to something, where the governments powers were limited and controlled..
As always with the US it’s the hypocrisy that is their undoing
Mick …. I was heavy handed earlier – apologies – you know me – I went of on one !
If I may- all spies no matter what country they are from are by the very definition of their trade not nice people, Russian spies , Iirsh , English, Scottish Nigerian , American spies ….. wherever !
Ryan. The point I am making is Wikileaks have an Anti Western Agenda. All of their time and energy is aimed Westward. Never once have they even tried to expose what Russia or China are doing. It’s as if they didn’t exist. Yet both have massive Intelligence Apparatus, both do things that have a global impact but Wikileaks completely ignore them.
I read People on here crying about the NSA or GCHQ listening to their phone calls or reading their e mails but never give a thought to that if those two can do it so can the FSB or China’s MMS.
Mick consider this to your point above – why would china or Russia spy on us – we are no threat , but America sees us a vital cog in a NATO jigsaw – that’s the way I see it …
Maybe there’s a WikiLeaks for Russia and China as well .
Two points about Russia and China ….. Russia is in the Ukraine “defending its borders ” the Russians have dealt with first Napoleon and then Hitler ; who killed 20 million Russians – do you expect Russia ever to respect incursion into their sphere of influence after 20 million of their citizens were killed . The death toll in the Crimea was miniscule compared to other invasion s we have seen under the American flag.
China is doing a fairly good job at fighting corruption in its Civil Service .
Are Russia and China babes in the woods – not for one second but the West is no beauty either !
No point in replying to Mick, he can’t see it won’t see it, the blatant hypocrisy of a nation that claims to be the greatest on the planet, the protector of the world against all evils, with it’s plundering of nations, bully boy tactics, subversiveness, duplicity, operation gladios: propagation of terrorist groups, and that’s not even looking at the usurping of it’s own people, list could go on and on, the America that we all grew up believing to be this beacon of everything that’s good in this world was long infiltrated by some very sick people, Mick knows this but he couldn’t give two sh!ts he loves it, time for the reset button.
I think the rest of the world sees the hypocricy of the US, but does that mean that human rights abuses by China, Russia and others shouldn’t also be highlighted?
Mick is right about wikileaks having an anti-US agenda though. Case in point – how the “Collateral Murder” video was edited to deliberately withhold some of the context and mislead the viewer.
Dermot. Do you think all of the Chinese and Russian Espionage is only about Politics. Ireland is one of the world leaders in Pharmaceutical R&D we are also up there with the big boys in IT R&D. The Chinese have probably the world biggest Hacking program going for industrial espionage. You think the Russians aren’t far behind?
Look at Snowden. Who did he run to first. China. He thought that they would take him in set him up in a nice villa somewhere like Shanghai. They took him in took all the info he had and tossed him away like a used condom. So he ran to Russia. And you can bet the FSB got everything the Chinese got. And the only reason they didn’t toss him out to was just to piss of the US.
Then look at Assange. He set up a vulnerable mentally ill young man in the full knowledge of what was going to happen to him when he was caught. But Assange didn’t give a shi t. And where is he now. Holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy after jumping bail and costing people that thought he was a friend their home because they put it up as collateral. Assange only ever cared about the glory of Assange and his personal likes and dislikes. And because he had some hair up his arse about the US and the West that is what Wikileaks was set up to aim at.
.
@Mick the point is CHina and Russia were known to be police states, the US was supposed to be a beacon of light. liberty and republicanism, not a big brother police state.
As to the Snowden point I’d encourage you to look past the filter and actually read Greenwalds book, No Place To Hide, and you will discover the real reason Snowden choose Hong Kong, cos it was autonomous from the Chinese govt and had a history of protecting people from the powerful.
You are factually incorrect about the information ,flat out, they did not take one iota of information out of Snowden, he never met with any Chinese intel people, and every single iota of data he brought with him was NSA-standard encrypted which the Russians can’t break nor can the Chinese, he even invented some new ways to encrypt them himself as a double protection, also bringing laptops that don’t connect to the net so there was no way they could even get the coded data and work on it later.
So that’s just wrong, you don’t get to have your own facts, facts are independent.
Wikileaks does not have an anti-US agenda, they have an anti hypocrisy agenda, and thats the distinction, it’s no great shock to us that the Russian regime is abhorrant, and we didn’t need leaks to tell us that…it WAS a shock to learn it about the US, the US were meant to be the good guys.
Did Assange set up the soldier or did the soldier go to him ?
Mick as far as I’m concerned it’s the citizen of every country against maniacal control freaks they are each as bad as the other , but if I ma “anti-American ” , a which I ma not then it is just that they are influencing our Government more it would seem and don’t worry I see Conor Lenihan working in Russia ….
Mick America in principle is the best of them , their constitution is a masterpiece but not unlike our own those who are mean to use it as a guide are way off the reservation when it comes to its application .
Mick I may be wrong but it seems all these leaders exist to cause a sense of confusion so that you and I and more like us will discuss it all day every day and not do anything about it !
Anyway have a good one and watch out for the leperacains ! ….I saw Darby O’Gill for the first time over the Christmas and I can’t get the little fellas out of my head and they riding around on horses the size of cats ; the funniest thing I have seen in ages !
This is what they do with a whistleblower…make it about the personality not the cause. That is why Snowden does no interviews on TV networks, he didn’t want it to be about him, but the debate on how far we want the national security state to go.
Lets talk about the issue, the personalities are not important, I don’t care if Assange gang raped 100 chimpanzes or Snowden is poly-sexual and a secret freemason, it’s the issue and the facts that matter to me.
“China and Russia are known to be Place states”
So that makes it ok then? Give them a free pass. Don’t hold them up for pubic scrutiny is that it?
How are they ever going to learn if nobody chastises them. The thing a Police State fears the most. Is the World knowing what they are at.
The chap is a hero. Uncovered some really heinous stuff. That video of the US soldiers killing the journalists waving the white flag and no one was ever brought to trial. Sickening.
Not going to tell us anything we don’t already know , same as last time when all we really learned is that the Obama administration thought Merkal was a bit of a cant. Who knew ?
Leading Kinahan figure Sean McGovern charged with murder and directing organised crime group
7 hrs ago
18.8k
aughinish alumina
An Bord Pleanála raised concerns over use of ChatGPT for inspector's report into Limerick plant
Eoghan Dalton
3 hrs ago
1.6k
ciaran mullooly
Irish MEP used AI to write open letter about Gaza which quoted Swedish House Mafia
21 hrs ago
52.6k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 197 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 137 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 177 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 139 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 101 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 102 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 47 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 43 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 161 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 73 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 96 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 102 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 45 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 60 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 29 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 112 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 115 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 84 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 63 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 107 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 90 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say