Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
LAST UPDATE | 10 Feb 2022
BORIS JOHNSON HAS refuted criticism from a former UK prime minister over his handling of gatherings in Downing Street.
Earlier today, former UK prime minister John Major criticised what he called the “brazen excuses” issued over partygate allegations.
The Conservative launched a scathing speech today as Johnson refused to say whether he would resign if he is fined by police investigating alleged breaches of coronavirus regulations.
Major said ministers had regularly been sent to “defend the indefensible”, making the Government look “distinctly shifty”, as he suggested MPs have a “duty” to act to restore trust in politics.
During a visit Warsaw later today, Johnson responded to Major’s assertions.
He said the idea he had damaged the UK’s standing was “demonstrably untrue”, pointing to his diplomatic efforts on Ukraine.
Johnson is expected to be among the more than 50 individuals in No 10 and Whitehall who will receive legal questionnaires from officers working on Operation Hillman, the probe into the parties.
But he deflected questions about whether he will quit if UK police issue him with a fixed penalty notice over any possible breach of coronavirus regulations.
Speaking in London earlier today, Major said “deliberate lies to Parliament have been fatal to political careers” and “must always be so”.
“At No 10, the Prime Minister and officials broke lockdown laws,” he told the Institute for Government.
“Brazen excuses were dreamed up. Day after day the public was asked to believe the unbelievable. Ministers were sent out to defend the indefensible – making themselves look gullible or foolish.
Collectively, this has made the Government look distinctly shifty, which has consequences that go far beyond political unpopularity. No Government can function properly if its every word is treated with suspicion.
A longstanding critic of Johnson, Major said trust in politics has hit a “low ebb, eroded by foolish behaviour” while “too often, ministers have been evasive, and the truth has been optional”.
Major, who led the UK from 1990 to 1997, stopped short of directly calling for Johnson’s resignation right now, suggesting he would await the verdict of the Metropolitan Police inquiry.
But asked if any leader found to have broken the law should resign, he responded: “That has always been the case.”
In Brussels, Johnson said he would not outline how he will respond until the police investigation concludes as he was questioned about his political future during a press conference with Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg to discuss Russian aggression against Ukraine.
“That process must be completed and I’m looking forward to it being completed and that’s the time to say more on that,” the Prime Minister told reporters.
Pressed a second time, Johnson replied: “I understand but we’re going to wait for the process to be completed.”
Further Conservative MPs are poised to call for a vote of no confidence in the Prime Minister if he is fined, or further damaging details emerge from the Sue Gray inquiry.
The Metropolitan Police said it will be dispatching the questionnaires by the end of the week as officers consider whether to widen the investigation to cover a Christmas quiz in No 10 in December 2020.
Police are reconsidering their decision not to include that event after a photograph emerged of Johnson and colleagues near an open bottle of sparkling wine.
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick suggested some of those being contacted by officers will end up with fines.
“Clearly, some, but probably not all, of those people may very well end up with a ticket,” she told BBC Radio London.
The UK Prime Minister’s official spokesman said Johnson had not been contacted by police and that he would not receive “bespoke personal legal advice” from Government lawyers.
Adam Wagner, a lawyer who has been examining Covid-19 regulations, described the dispatching of questionnaires as “very significant” because it means the police think they are approaching a point where they can start issuing fines.
The human rights barrister told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “It sounds to me, although I haven’t seen the letters, that they’ve decided that relevant gatherings were potentially a breach of the regulations and now they’re asking people ‘Did you have some sort of reasonable excuse?’, which, in law, would effectively be a defence for being there.”
Wagner said a fixed penalty notice is the most likely punishment that would be issued by police as they investigate 12 gatherings.
With Johnson alleged to have been at up to six of them, the lawyer suggested breaches would tot up cumulatively so the Prime Minister “could still be in line for over £10,000 (€11,862) worth of fixed penalty notices if they accumulate”.
Defence Secretary Ben Wallace acknowledged that more damaging photos of events could be leaked in the coming days.
“Yes, there could be a photograph tomorrow, the next day or the day after – that’s clearly what’s behind some of the people’s motives,” he told Times Radio.
An interim report last week by senior official Gray disclosed that police are investigating 12 different events at No 10 and Whitehall over the course of 2020 and 2021 for possible breaches of Covid rules.
They include the notorious “bring your own booze” event in the Downing Street garden in May 2020 attended by Johnson, and a gathering in the Prime Minister’s official flat in November 2020.
The Met said the Operation Hillman team are continuing to examine more than 500 documents and 300 images provided to them by the Cabinet Office and will be seeking further information to assist their inquiry.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Cue the Stoners defending drug use and wanting it legalised.
@Abdul Abhaile: Can you give one good reason why it should remain illegal?
@Tomaldo: Did you even bother reading the article and you want a reason why it should remain illegal?
Jeez, Stoner’s brains really are wired differently.
@Abdul Abhaile: I read it twice. Jim Walsh (Dept of Health) said we should treat it a as health issue, not justice, the guy from Portugal said we’ll never have a drugs free society and there never has been. 6 out of 10 deaths were caused by benzodiazepenes (legal), twice as many as cocaine, 3 out 10 Methadone (legal) and more from prescription drugs. There are no plans to ban any of them and rightly so. Can I have some of what you’re smoking.
@Abdul Abhaile: btw you didn’t answer my question, you mentioned the article which backs up my opinion that they should be legal.
@Abdul Abhaile: the only thing stoner, is your Stone Age attitude . Why not suggest burnings at the stake or tarring and feathering .
Alcohol poses more danger .. oh wait, but they are well looked after by lobbyists
Why are so many resorting to drug taking, are their lives so miserable that they are trying to escape reality some of the time. Past generations suffered wars, sickness, hunger , poverty lack of opportunity , forced emigration and they coped , what’s wrong with people. Why do they think it’s ok to make criminals rich by buying the stuff.
@Aine O Connor: they didn’t cope, they used alcohol, drugs , food , sex and lots of other things to take away the pain . Drug use isn’t some new thing, drug use has been around as long as humans have been around
@Aine O Connor: they didn’t cope, they used alcohol, drugs , food , sex and lots of other things to take away the pain . Drug use isn’t some new thing, drug use has been around as long as humans have been around Cee
@Aine O Connor: Enjoyment is the reason. I don’t think it’s ok to make criminals rich, that’s why I’d love to see legalisation tried.
@Aine O Connor: Many of the addicts you walk past in the city every day are child abuse victims. Children of generations of abuse victim unfit parents, etc. It’s a part of our cultural heritage.
@Aine O Connor: This is a reflection of the vast minority, the majority of recreational users move on with their lives.
While speaking, an individual proposed that only those with expertise in the field should have a say, and the issue should not be politicized. However, I respectfully disagree, as it is a crucial political matter.
Must be FG FF and The Greens fault that people use cocaine and heroin
@Peter: well their policies have directly lead to deprivation, criminality increasing and all the things that make up the ingredients of drug misuse.. so yes FFG are directly responsible. Martin and Varadkar do not give two hoots about us Irish
The reason why cannabis was made illegal was by fake news by the rich newspaper magnets in America long ago who owned forests so they could print their papers and didn’t want the hemp plant to be used
No one has ever died from a cannabis over dose, yet because it remains illegal in this country it gets first mention in terms of toxins found. The language around this is almost embarrassingly bias, especially when “excluding those attributable to alcohol alone”… completely ridiculous, propaganda almost.
Funny how alcohol is left out of the debate, the biggest killer of them all. Your a criminal for smoking a joint at home but its OK to drink 10 pints and fall around the streets abusing people. Hardly an independent forum either with the make up of the panel. People take drugs including the biggest of them all booze because they enjoy them. We should be concentrating on making them safe, ensuring kids don’t get their hand on them (although we failed on the alcohol front) and having controlled sale via head shops where the state will get tax from the sale of same and at the same time take the market away from the mafia.
The report clearly refers to the cause of such deaths as poisonings, converting them to overdoses is wrong and inaccurate. If someone injests Paraguay,for example, intentionally or accidentally it is not an overdose.
@Pato: agree, they are just inflating the figures to justify their forgone conclusion.
Judge’s are putting dealers back on the street with lenient sentences. Time to cut the head off the snake.
have your say