Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Boris Johnson (file photo) PA Images

Johnson’s wait continues for report into No 10 parties which could be key to his future

The announcement of a Scotland Yard investigation into some of the alleged parties has complicated the process.

LAST UPDATE | 27 Jan 2022

BORIS JOHNSON’S WAIT for the findings of an official inquiry into lockdown-busting parties in No 10 and Whitehall continues, with the UK Prime Minister insisting he was not responsible for any delay to the report.

The highly anticipated document from senior civil servant Sue Gray could be pivotal for the Prime Minister’s future but it has yet to be submitted to No 10, with legal and human resources officials scrutinising it before it can be sent to Downing Street for publication.

The announcement of a Scotland Yard investigation into some of the alleged parties – based in part on the evidence uncovered in the Gray inquiry – has complicated the process, with police and officials wrangling over anything which could prejudice a criminal case.

The Prime Minister travelled to North Wales rather than wait in No 10 for Gray’s report to arrive.

Asked if he had been involved in delaying it, Johnson told reporters: “Absolutely not but you’ve got to let the independent inquiries go on.”

He said “of course” it would be published in full, but officials have made clear that is only the intention of No 10, as they are not yet aware what the format will be and whether any sensitive personal or security information would need to be redacted.

Johnson’s official spokesman said “we are in no way seeking to block the report” and “it remains our intention to publish the report as it is received from the investigation”.

The Commons adjourned for the day today with no sign of either the report or a statement from Johnson.

The UK Prime Minister has committed to making a statement to MPs once he has received the report and this remains a possibility tomorrow, even though no government business is scheduled in the Chamber.

But Gray’s report, which had been close to finalised, has been held up by the legal checks it is now going through, raising the prospect of the process dragging into next week.

Full report 

UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said today that she expected the report to be published in full, but could not say when it would be made public.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer told the PA news agency: “The Sue Gray report needs to be published in full and as soon as possible.

“And I mean in full – not redacted, not edited, not a summary, not parts left out. In full.”

He said that after the sacrifices made by the British public during the pandemic “the least that they’re entitled to is the truth about what the Prime Minister was up to”.

Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle also told the PA news agency: “Of course I expect the report to be printed in full, I expect MPs to be able to read that before the statement.

“I want them to be informed, to ask the right questions, and to have a debate and questioning of the Prime Minister, who quite rightly has said ‘I am coming to the House of Commons, I am coming there first’.

“Well, let’s make sure that whether it’s the opposition or MPs from the Government, that they have sight of that statement before it’s made.”

With the majority of Tory MPs waiting for the report before passing their own judgment on the party leader, allies of the Prime Minister rallied around him.

Possibly triggering an election

Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries became the second Cabinet minister to warn that ousting the Prime Minister could trigger a general election.

This could leave many Tory MPs, particularly those in the Red Wall of former Labour heartlands won in Johnson’s 2019 landslide, nervous about keeping their seats.

There is no requirement for a new leader to hold a general election, but Dorries said previous handovers, such as Tony Blair to Gordon Brown, had taken place in “different times”.

Writing on Twitter, she said: “Blair as example of why we won’t need GE is wrong.

“It was yonks ago Blair to Brown smooth pre announced handover, no leadership election.

“Brown was still pressured to go, bottled it and then lost. V different times pre rolling 24hr news / social media.”

Her comments echoed Jacob Rees-Mogg, the Commons Leader, who said the UK now had “essentially a presidential system”, so any new leader would need their own mandate from the electorate.

In the Commons, Rees-Mogg said: “The reality is that the British elector looks to a leader, and it is very pleased with the leader that it has got.”

If the outcome of the Gray report is significantly damaging, Johnson could face a revolt from his own MPs, who may choose to call a vote of no confidence.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Nora Creamer
View 14 comments
Close
14 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds