A FORMER CEO of the well-known charity Bóthar David Moloney has admitted to misappropriating large amounts of monies donated to the charity for his personal use, the High Court has heard.

Earlier this month Bóthar, whose activities including aiding poor farmers in developing nations through donations of livestock, secured a temporary High Court injunction freezing the assets of Moloney, who resigned his post as the organisation’s CEO in February.

Moloney had initially denied any wrongdoing, however when the matter returned before the High Court today Frank Beatty SC for Bóthar said his client had been furnished with a letter from its former CEO where he makes several admissions of wrongdoing regarding the charity’s monies.

Counsel said that while the order originally obtained against Moloney had prevented the former CEO from reducing his assets below a value of €465,000.

Arising out of the admissions, counsel said Bóthar wanted that figure raised to €769,000. Mr Justice Senan Allen agreed to amend the freezing order,

Counsel said Moloney had admitted to his clients that both he personally, and Bóthar founder the late Peter Ireton, had personally benefited from monies donated to the charity.

He admitted that these monies included approximately €200,000 that the charity believed was donated to projects run by an order of Roman Catholic Nuns in the African nation of Tanzania between 2013 and 2018, which the order never received.

Other monies they benefitted from, counsel said, was €34,000 donated to a project in Kenya in 2015, which the Catholic order involved said it never received.

Moloney also admitted misappropriating €127,000 which was paid to an English company called Agricultural Innovation Consultants Limited for services it provided in relation to purported projects in Rwanda, which were never carried out.

He admitted that in 2016, €100,000 of the charity’s money was fraudulently paid in a pension fund he set up for himself. He also admitted that €10,000 of Bóthar’s monies were used to pay for a hayshed on his own personal property.

He also admitted getting paid addition monies on top of his salary of €44,000 that he should not have received, and personally benefitting from expense payments he claimed from Bóthar.

Moloney also admitted that he and other staff at the charity benefitted from Christmas bonus payments, which in 2018 amounted to €19,000 that were not authorised by Bóthar’s board.

Counsel said while the admissions were welcomed, Moloney had not given his client other information it requires including where the money has gone, and details about his assets.

Marguerite Bolger SC for Moloney of Clino, Newport, Co Tipperary, said when the matter was previously before had denied all allegations of wrongdoing.

However, he has since made some very, very admissions, counsel said. He was now willing to fully co-operate and was consenting to summary judgements being made against him.

Counsel said that while he has made admissions in relation to the 2016 pension he set up, two other pensions set up in 2006 were legitimate, counsel said.

Moloney, counsel said, lives a modest lifestyle and his only income is social welfare. The court also heard from lawyers representing Olive Moloney, Moloney’s wife.

While it was accepted that she had no hand, act or part in her husband’s activities she was concerned about the effect the orders would have on her own assets, including bank accounts, and any assets of his that she has a joint interest in.

The court heard that she may have to be joined to the proceedings where Bóthar seeks certain orders against Moloney as a notice party, or bring proceedings against Moloney.

Bolger said it was Moloney’s intention to support his wife.

Beatty said that his side, which wants full transparency in all matters relating to Moloney, would not be happy for any part of this dispute to end up as a family law issue between the Moloney’s which would be heard in camera.

Mr Justice Allen said this was a complicated dispute. He was satisfied to increase the value of the freezing orders, and directed that Moloney provide the court with a statement of his assets and details of where the monies have gone by May 4 next.

He said that it would be premature for Ms Moloney to be joined at this stage to the action, but gave her permission to bring any motions she requires to bring.

The judge, who noted her concerns about the impact of the freezing order would have on bank accounts she holds, said the orders did not apply to accounts in her own name. but did apply to any joint accounts she jointly has with her husband.

In relation to any future proceedings between the Moloney’s, the judge said that Bóther as a notice party may make an application to have those actions heard in public.

Bóthar claims in its proceedings that an ongoing investigation into his conduct has revealed that he is “guilty of an egregious breach of trust and an appalling dereliction of his duty to Bóthar and the beneficiaries of its charitable objects.”

Moloney has worked with Bóthar since 1995, and was its CEO for eight years. He was suspended from his role after concerns were raised about his actions, and resigned earlier this year.

This resulted in the charity seeking “mareva’ or freezing type orders against Moloney.

The action was made returnable to date next month.

Comments are closed for legal purposes.