Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The case was settled privately between the two parties. Alamy Stock Photo

Boy with Asperger's who was told to remove his hood inside a store settles discrimination case

An employee of a store in Dublin told the boy to remove a hood he was using to help with sensory sensitivities.

A 16-YEAR-OLD BOY with Asperger’s Syndrome, who was asked to remove his hood after entering a shop, has settled a discrimination case in the Workplace Relations Commission.

The boy, who wears his hood as part of a number of developed strategies and skills to help with sensory sensitivities, was visiting the store with his father in Dublin city centre when a member of staff asked him to remove his hood.

According to the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (IHREC), who provided legal assistance to the young boy, the boy’s father informed the staff member that his son had a disability that required the wearing of a hood but was nevertheless asked to leave the premises.

The pair left the store, despite informing the staff that their behaviour towards them was discriminatory, and a complaint was filed with the WRC discrimination under the Equal Status Acts.

According to the commission the boy and his father were escorted from the store, which left them feeling embarrassed and upset.

With legal assistance from the Commission, that complaint has now been privately settled on terms satisfactory to both parties.

Sinéad Gibney, Chief Commissioner of the IHREC said:”A one-size-fits-all store policy clearly places vulnerable people at a disadvantage, especially those with a disability. This is particularly the case where there is no attempt to provide reasonable accommodation for the service user.

“Not all disabilities are visible,” she added.

Gibney added that the case demonstrates the importance of taking a human rights and equality approach towards the development of policies so all customers can be accommodated for.

“I am delighted that the young person in this case has reached a settlement that he is happy with and wish him well in his future,” she added.

Comments closed due to legal reasons.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds