Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock/Dusan Petkovic

Wearing brown shoes with a suit could lose you a job in banking

A new study has found senior managers in the banking sector dislike brown shoes due to their lack of ‘polish’.

JOBSEEKERS LOOKING FOR work in some of the world’s top financial institutions could be overlooked if they decide to wear brown shoes to their interview.

Senior managers believe wearing brown shoes with a suit is unacceptable, according to a UK government-commissioned report by the Social Mobility Commission.

The reasons for disliking brown shoes? The lack of “polish”, apparently.

The report states that those in corporate finance have an inherent dislike for brown shoes with suits, both in the UK and in continental Europe.

“Loud” ties and ill-fitting suits also fall foul of “opaque” codes of conduct, said the report.

Corporate finance

“Some bankers in corporate finance may ‘get away’ with wearing brown shoes perhaps, for example, if they are sufficiently senior,” it stated.

Managers are also placing as much importance on dress and speech as their skills and qualifications.

While it stated that addressing the issue of dress codes may seem “superficial” it can have an impact on whether individuals are hired or not.

Some firms only hire those who “fit in”, it said.

The report quotes that applicants from a “non-privileged background” often “don’t have a haircut… their suit’s always too big… they don’t know which tie to wear”.

It adds that individuals from non-privileged backgrounds may not have access to relevant networks which can provide prior instruction in these requirements ahead of interviews, which places them at a relative disadvantage.

The report quoted one candidate, from a “non-privileged background” describing the feedback he received after an interview.

He said you’re clearly quite sharp, but… you’re not quite the fit for [this bank]… you’re not polished enough… he looked at me and said, ‘see that tie you’re wearing? It’s too loud. Like you can’t wear that tie with the suit that you’re wearing’.
What kind of industry is this where I can be told that I’m a good candidate, I’m sharp, but I’m not polished enough?

Alan Milburn, chair of the Social Mobility Commission, said it was “shocking” some investment bank managers still judge candidates on whether they wear brown shoes with a suit, rather on than their skills and potential.

Read: Government to meet to finalise appeal on Apple tax ruling>

Read: TV licence required to watch BBC iPlayer in the UK, but no such rules on the way for the RTÉ Player>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Christina Finn
View 59 comments
Close
59 Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds