Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File image of dreadlocks Shutterstock/Maria Bobrova

California becomes first state to ban discrimination based on hairstyles

The new law means schools and employers can not discriminate on the grounds of hairstyles such as afros or dreadlocks.

CALIFORNIA HAS BECOME the first US state to ban racial discrimination based on hairstyles.

A new law passed on Wednesday ensures afros and dreadlocks can be worn in all schools and offices. 

The law is primarily aimed at protecting the rights of black Americans who favour the distinctive cuts, and was passed unanimously by both state chambers, and is due to come into effect on 1 January. 

The law was introduced by Los Angeles democrat Senator Holly Mitchell, who is herself black and frequently wears microbraids.

“This law protects the right of black Californians to choose to wear their hair in its natural form, without pressure to conform to eurocentric norms,” the state senator said.

“For us, it is a symbol of who we are,” she added, describing her own decision to adopt the hairstyle as part of a “social and political statement to the outside world.”

California Governor Gavin Newsom, who signed the bill, spoke of a high school student who was forced last December to cut off his dreadlocks before a wrestling match or forfeit the bout. 

“The student was made to choose whether to “lose an athletic competition or lose his identity,” said Newsom.

“That is played out in workplaces, it’s played out in schools — not just in athletic competitions and settings — every single day all across America.” 

According to the bill’s text, hair “remains a rampant source of racial discrimination with serious economic and health consequences, especially for black individuals”.

Employers will still be permitted to require employees to secure their hair for safety or hygienic reasons.

New York City adopted similar legislation earlier this year.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
40 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds