Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
So today we’re asking, Do you think campaign posters actually make any difference to how people vote?
Poll Results:
No (7034)
Yes (1791)
I don't know (463)
Advertisement
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
I’ve always thought that Election posters, if we really need them at all, should only be allowed to be placed in designated areas. Putting them on every lamp post, some times 3 or 4 on the same pole, is an eyesore, not to mention potentially obstructing views for those driving.
Not normally but the ‘no’ posters have managed to offend so many different sections of society, I think in this case they may have influenced some people to vote, and to vote ‘yes’, ironically….
Generally though they are just ugly, expensive, environmentally-unfriendly, leaving-plastic-tags-behind-on-lamposts eyesores.
Need to follow the example of the Dutch & have temporary bill boards erected that are brought down after the election. NO posters are allowed anywhere else & the posters can not exceed a certain size. Would do away with this nonsense overnight………..
You even get posters on traffic light poles which is not only dangerous but against the law. If we had proper enforcement of the laws governing this then they might think twice about where they stick them.
I was voting Yes regardless, however the sickening No posters makes me wish I could vote Yes twice ( just to note I don’t condone their removal, I just feel they should never have gone up).
Sergeant, it’s not a matter of denying anyone their rights to free speech. The “No” posters, however, are deliberately misleading and contain misinformation. This referendum has nothing to do with children, biological or otherwise. That matter was taken care of in February.
No Tony, it’s fact. Furthermore, a lot more than Scarlet are aware of that fact. Including ex president, Taoiseach, Tainiste, all political parties in government, plenty of independents, myself, plenty of unmarried, single and adoptive parents… Oh the list could go on and on
TBH any election poster promising something to the electorate is misinformation. They always promise but never deliver. Removal of No posters is wrong and allows the No campaign to carry on their laughable ploy of being the victim. Once this passes we hopefully won’t have to deal with these horrendous views again in public. It serves a second purpose too, it lets society know who these people with archaic views are shining a light on abhorrent institutions such as The Iona Institute. For the sake of 3 weeks allow them to be on poles, it only unifies people against them. Like Homestore and More’s furniture, “once they’re gone they’re gone”.
Same difference. All politics are based on persuasion. As are laws. It they weren’t either cannabis would be legal or alcohol would be illegal. It’s about convincing someone to agree with your position.
Ban them all. Put up e-signage on selected poles that politicians can pay for at election time. For the rest of the year they can be used for local business or the local councils to advertise raising revenue for the council.
But that would involve some intelligent, forward thinking. Something that’s sadly lacking from local council level the whole way up to the head jesters in the dail. Self preservation is the name of the game, you know.
Well since the NO posters have nothing to do with the actual referendum itself, I think this will encourage people to vote YES. They claim to be ‘Pro-children’ when in fact they’re just anti-gay.
Yes Jay evidenced by the fact that so far nobody on the no side has been able to say how even one child will be directly helped by the no campaign or a majority no vote in the referendum
Those no posters have had a completely opposite affect for their campaign. Everyone is disgusted by them and they have encouraged people who weren’t bothered to vote to do so. (And vote yes)
Well, all the Child Protection Agencies, including Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (ISPCC) and Barnardos are calling for a YES vote. Why don’t the no side admit that they’re voting no because of their god or because they don’t see gay people as equals!
Should be all banned. Ugly sight especially coming up to election time. Seriously annoying to see the same politicians face on every poles for weeks. Do they think that by having their face looking at you every where you look is going to convince you to vote for them . ridiculous.
How they still allow the environmental carnage that is election posters, I do not know. It would take a very simple stroke of the pen to remove/ban election literature from lamp posts, and save millions in waste while allowing candidates to use other methods like, you know, meeting people you want to vote for you. Same with referendum posters… No one in their right mind would change it over the current yes/no posters, that mural on George’s street was a thousand times more effective, and no nasty threats involved.
Ban all Election and Referendum Posters, waste of time and money. How many people have been swayed by a pictures of someones mug or a message on a poster?….
The NO posters are a disgrace. The vote is on whether two people who love each other have the right to be ‘married’. Meanwhile the NO side are placing happy family posters all over the place. Their ideal picture of a man and a woman with a baby. These are insulting to any family where one parent has been lost. They are hurtful to the many couples out there who are struggling to conceive or who have lost children and they are insulting to any person who dreams of raising a child in a loving home. The NO side need to get a life. Anyone who believes that another couples marriage calls into question their own marriage is insecure. They should have more faith in their own marriage and leave everyone else to their own. There is enough fighting in the world without fighting for the right to deny people a loving marriage.
Dangerous feckin things. Sharp as a knife on corners and if they become airborne in windy weather, lethal !
I guess they can have an influence if a slogan or image registers with you. Your subconscious is bombarded with this stuff so it may come out in the form of actually making a decision.
People might think you’re joking but a few years back a friend of mine was struck in the eye by one that some toe rag launched into a busy street after a nightclub. It sliced his retina and he lost the sight in that eye. Maybe they should be banned. Just a pity we can’t ban toe rags too.
And I know straight allies who were previously apolitical who are so disgusted by these posters that they have joined the YesEquality teams who are canvassing door-to-door
When I approach a Referendum on any issue, I eagerly wait for the posters. The aesthetics of a poster are a major factor, design , colour and make up. I look at the visual imagery and the symbolism of the poster closely. I do a full and careful assessment.
My decision to vote is an entirely different matter. I make up my own mind based on a process of critical thinking. The posters are irrelevant to that thought process.
I’m surprised that anyone would consider a poster as a factor in their decision. Posters encapsulate and simple and a simplistic message. They are an exercise in impotence, futility and tradition. They harken back to a time when people had very little or no access to published media.
My area, where I live, is densely packed with No posters. It is a young and vibrant area. No one appears to give the posters a second thought, rightly so.
The question is probably not what people are answering. They don’t make a difference to how I (or most people here) vote, and rightly so. But you’re kidding yourselves if you think there isn’t ANYONE who is influenced by them.
Leave them up and untouched. More and more people,and quite a few younger people, are posting on social media saying how offensive they find the No side posters to be. That shows they have a strong opinion on the referendum and an even stronger desire to vote on it. That can only be a good thing,both for the Yes vote and for getting younger voters involved in future elections/referendums
I’ve yet to hear a cohesive logical argument from the No side. As a straight man why should i have greater rights than my fellow citzens because they’re homosexuals?
The No side would condemn people for their very nature!
The venom of Zealotry is evident on the most extreme side of the No campaign.
If that is not warning enough for the undecided well i don’t know what is.
Are you really letting the actions of a few unaffiliated people, acting independently and against the wishes of those who are the mainstay of that campaign, help to shape your view on a civil rights issue?
Your voting is swayed easily by other people’s actions? Jaysus Glen, you should have tougher skin than that, considering the amount of abuse you take on here.
In the Information Age, hanging one line posters off lampposts is similar to insisting on driving a horse and cart in the space age – perhaps our political class are descended from the Amish, it would certainly add some logic to their decision making process to anyone who truly understands the history of the Amish.
The posters are worse than littering, unsightly and regularly block views when driving. They don’t even supply accurate information and all of them should be banned.
I think they can influence people, but not always in the way intended. For instance all the ‘No’ sides posters have done is pi$$ off 350,000+ people who are raising kids on their own in this state.
On the plus side, they’re also a great opportunity to show how hollow the ‘No’ sides arguments are…..
I think that they will certainly influence how people vote and whether or not they vote at all. People who are not 100% sure of what the referendum is about could easily be influenced especially (possibly people fron older rural communities) people who do not have access to social media. I’m voting Yes but I fear that all the horrible unfactual No posters will have an effect on the outcome.
You have until Tuesday 5th May to make sure your details are in place. If you’ve moved house you have to fill out forms and have them signed at the local Garda station. Doesn’t matter whether you want to vote yes or no if you get turned away at the polling station.
They also might, just might, influence the thousands who don’t bother to vote at all, to decide to vote.
People who don’t bother to vote at all are often the most vocal when it comes to discussing everything that is ‘wrong’ in the country.!
@alan Fitzpatrick, can you tell us what exactly has the yes side done to change your mind? How do you feel about the no side making this referendum about children when the law already states that gay people can both adopt and foster. This referendum is solely about whether a gay couple can get civilly married.
People get overly passionate when their rights and human value and dignity are on the line. Add that to the disgusting lies that the no side have been pushing in order to get people to vote no, I wouldn’t blame the yes side for getting a little “aggressive”
Luckily for me Alan I wouldn’t let the actions of a few determine how I vote to affect many many more lgbt people. hence I’m voting yes. If you care about more than a couple of renegades you would vote yes too.
Generally I don’t think they make a difference. They are a waste of resources and unsightly. They should be banned or at the very least highly restricted to dedicated places.
During the student elections at Edinburgh Uni the candidates are restricted to attaching banners to temporary hoardings which are then removed once the election is over. Similar things happen in other European countries, I can’t see why this doesn’t happen in Ireland.
You won’t see a single lamppost destroyed with posters for the GE in the UK.
In the case of the disgraceful No posters in this instance, however, I do think they have encouraged many apathetic voters to vote yes.
Those disgusting no posters have reaffirmed my decesion to vote yes. Generally posters don’t influence me but these misleading vote no posters have. Those no posters will not influence many to vote no in my opinion more to vote yes than any.
I reiterate what I have already stated the other article on the same topic “No campaign poster defaced” and that is I believe that all election posters should be banned. They are ugly and are basically litter on poles.
Why does the Journal feel the need to post multiple articles on the same topic? STUPID!!!!
By that logic God endorses incest! Adam and Eve had Cain and Abel so how did they have kids? It’s all mythology the talking snake is the major give away.
@Brian The God of which you speak (if sky gods are your thing) more than likely created matter. To limit your sky God to only a few carbon based life forms is a wee bit innocent.
God clearly didn’t grant you the gift or original though, Brian.
Seriously the auld Adam and Adam line? You know Eve was his sister righ…. Oh! So that’s where that whole marrying one’s sister thing comes into it. I’ve been wondering,
Atticus, I think the people with wings are a bit of a giveaway too..
Also, wasn’t Eve essentially a clone of Adam? In which case Adam was mating with himself, that’s incest on a whole new level, never mind their sons who either procreated with their mother or with apes, so perhaps that story is condoning bestiality too?
Th no posters are sickening unrelated propaganda and even if might sway have no link whatsoever to what we’re voting on. They have no right to be up, sorry but the no side should find a legitimate reason to oppose the motion, put that in writing on posters. Their problem is there is no fair reason to push ahead with opposing equality in this republic finally.
The poll question is generalised but talks about this upcoming referendum. As a general question, yes, I think it could make a difference with the undecided but it all depends on the subject. For this particular time, I think it makes no difference.
I don’t think they make much of a difference to how people actually cast their vote especially not for referedums but I’ve worked on campaigns and people genuinely do not know there is an election until the posters go up and some people will vote for candidates that they recognise from posters especially now that the pictures are on the ballot papers.
The main point of the Yes campaign is that this referendum has nothing to do with children. In the main, that is correct. However, a secondary effect of this proposal is that it will give same sex married couples, regardless of any and every sexual orientation, the same legal recognition to adopt as a heterosexual couple.
In other words we could have a transsexual / transgender couple of any mix calling for equal rights to adopt.
No I have no issue with anyone’s sexual orientation. I feel it should be respected. However I’m not comfortable with them adopting children. They may be very loving but is it suitable parenting where daddy dresses up as a lady every day?
Think it wouldn’t happen?
Barnardos and ISPCC both came out today in favour of the referendum. The referendum isn’t about children or parenting, but insofar as a Yes result will affect children, these organisations state that it will be be a positive effect.
Perhaps you should look up the Child and Family Relationships act 2015.. I believe it already permits gay couples to apply to adopt.
Another thing you should probably take a look at is the adoption process and how parents are chosen for the child, because that’s what happens. It’s not about what the parents want, and no one is guaranteed a child from simply applying to adopt.
This might change your outlook on the referendum, which is about marriage – the legislation on this is separate.
Since the passing of the child and family relationships act Tom a gay couple who are in a civil partnership or who have been cohabiting for at least three years are legally on par with a married heterosexual couple in terms of applying to adopt the referendum will not impact on this
They are a ridiculous waste of money and an eyesore. Come time for the general election next year every lamppost in the country will be strewn with politicians faces. We should follow the lead of other country’s where politicians can pay to use existing advertising space, like billboards and bus shelters etc.
It’s hard to tell, really, because I think the vast majority of people once it was announced sort of knew what position they were on and I think, for the most part, that’s something that they’re going to be sticking to, regardless of whatever the opposition say.
However, the people in the middle, the ones who are undecided, they’re the ones that the advertising campaigns might make go one way or the other.
It raises people awareness of the campaign for both sides, and starts arguments on our journey to work….(Note the guy that arrived late in the office covered in plasters?) It was him pulling down the poster at O`O’Connell Street.
People say it doesn’t influence them but I think it does subliminally. For example in the Nice I referendum there were hardly any yes posters and loads of no posters and it was a no.
I was undecided up till now.
But having analysed the morally dubious and downright misleading content of the Yes posters I’ve now made up my mind and decided to vote NO.
And I’m right.
After seeing how the no side have totally misrepresented what the referendum is about: marriage. And since all govt parties, trades unions and child protection agencies including: ISPCC and Barnardos are calling for a YES vote, I’m voting YES!
Posters are just good for reminding people there is an election coming up. Perhaps, if each party put some money in a pot to highlight the coming election and everyone would save a lot and the people would be informed of an upcoming election or vote
I don’t think they really work. Most people won’t change their minds. It is very rare for people to do that.
The strange thing is I have an issue with IVF and gay adoption.
IVF seems like a very selfish act and doctors are preying on people. It is poorly regulated so donors may have children who end up together.
Gay adoption is not an issue with gay people raising kids just the best home for a child should be picked. As far as anybody can figure out that is male and female together. Not saying single, gay, albino etc. are not good parents but the reality is a traditional family structure still comes out on top for a child’s well being.
Doesn’t mean I hate anybody or a bigot, what is best for the child is the key right not others rights.
Kal ipers there is strong peer reviewed evidence that same sex couples parenting is on par with heterosexual couples parenting and I have yet to see any reliable peer reviewed study which suggests heterosexual parenting is better. Just because it’s the most natural does not make it the best form of parenting. After all anybody can be a donor it takes a lot more to be a good parent.
But thats how adoption works!
The child holds all the rights in adoption, all decisions are made in the best interests of the child.
For example – when a child is surrendered, the extended family are the first considered, this is to try and keep the child as close to its natural family as possible. This might mean a gay aunt or uncle and their partner.
I’m sure it’s easy enough to understand why in this scenario the gay couple may be a better fit than a heterosexual couple who are complete strangers.
I’ve read of a case where the child up for adoption came from a sexually abusive background and wasn’t ready to be around males – in that case the lesbian couple who adopted her were the perfect fit.
The childs best interest is always primary in adoption proceedings, this won’t change :-)
There should be any need for Poster’s at all,
Everybody should VOTE NO. In the Name of God.
SSM is Against the Law of God, And His Teaching.
I Am Voting NO.
Ireland was the Land of Saints and Scholars.
Now it is the Land of Robbers and Nobbers.
People telling me what to do makes me want to do the opposite.
This ‘Yes Equality’ slogan is getting a bit tiresome. Can gays really claim that there’s ‘inequality’? It’s a bit like men claiming that there’s ‘inequality’ because they can’t get pregnant, or women complaining that there’s ‘inequality’ because they can”t take a p!ss standing up. Marriage was invented by religions and defined as being between a man and a woman. Why do gays want recognition from organisations that vilify them? Sure, they should have the same benefits and rights as regular people, but marriage, really? Seems like insecure people looking for assurance to me
This is untrue, marriage existed before man made religions. This is also not about matrimony in the holy sense it is a CIVIL marriage equality campaign and the men getting pregnant e.g. is silly, that is not biologically possible but it IS however possible for us to extend the right to marry to same sex couples as per (most western nations that began a dialogue on marriage equality.)
There seem to be two motives for putting up election and referendum posters:-
1. The efforts and time spent give people the illusion of participating in political activity.
2. Party vanity and saving face in competition with other parties and groups.
I favour the French system of designated poster boards in strategic areas of cities and towns. Each party or group can affix, for a limited amount of time, posters and numbered policy theses for passers-by to read if they wish. In France it is illegal to knock on doors of residences during election campaigns.
Surge in children receiving treatment for sexually harmful and abusive behaviour
Patricia Devlin
4 hrs ago
995
Onwards
Barcelona progress to Champions League final four despite second-leg defeat
5 hrs ago
2.4k
0
US Tariffs
Trump namechecks Ireland again as he suggests pharma import tariffs may be imposed soon
Updated
18 hrs ago
59.7k
130
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 168 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 113 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 149 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 117 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 84 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 84 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 138 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 63 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 78 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 86 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 49 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 95 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 102 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 73 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 54 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 92 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 72 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say