Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

FILE Shutterstock

"Nuisance" landfill odours lead to prosecution

Cavan County Council and Oxigen Environmental Limited were fined as they failed to ensure that odours didn’t cause a nuisance at Corranure Landfill on Cootehill Road.

A COUNTY COUNCIL and waste company have been fined after being prosecuted by the EPA over landfill odours.

At Cavan Circuit Court on 30 November, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) prosecuted Oxigen Environmental Limited and Cavan County Council for breaching a condition of an EPA waste licence between 14 February 2007 and 14 February 2009, contrary to section 39 of the Waste Management Act.

The prosecution was taken following an investigation by EPA inspectors and complaints from local residents.

Oxigen Environmental Limited and Cavan County Council pleaded guilty to failing to ensure that odours did not give rise to a nuisance at Corranure Landfill, Cootehill Road, Cavan or in the immediate area of the landfill.

There were 30 counts on the indictment and the company and the council pleaded guilty to sample counts.

On hearing details of the offences, Judge John O’Hagan convicted the company and the council and imposed fines on the two parties.

Cavan County Council was fined €10,000 per week for the 26 weeks from 14 February 2007 to 30 September 2007, totalling €260,000, while Oxigen Environmental Limited was fined €10,000 per week for the 78 weeks from 1 October 2007 to 14 February 2009, totalling €780,000

The Environmental Protection Agency’s costs of €40,000 were also awarded.

Read: DPP office “fully stretched” due to economic circumstances>

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
7 Comments
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute brendan fitzsimons
    Favourite brendan fitzsimons
    Report
    Apr 9th 2020, 11:45 PM

    They should simply cancel all traffic offences where no injury occurred and all TV licence charges.

    That would reduce some of the load.

    26
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tom Heffernan
    Favourite Tom Heffernan
    Report
    Apr 10th 2020, 12:33 AM

    @brendan fitzsimons: Hey Bren, one might think that you have a few penalty points on the way, or the lad with the TV license check, is hanging around your area! Wink,wink,

    22
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Stafford
    Favourite John Stafford
    Report
    Apr 9th 2020, 11:29 PM

    Public has to have acess to the hearings.

    Justice must be done but must be seen to be done.

    Can’t have public justice done in private for obvious reasons.

    I’m sure this will fail in an accused states it’s obvious flaws.

    At moment done with accused consent

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Belebop
    Favourite Belebop
    Report
    Apr 10th 2020, 9:39 AM

    Stephen, you might want to change the F for C?

    3
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds