Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
CLARE DALY HAS said that the upcoming property tax could be a ‘game changer’ which may cause serious problems for the Government.
The Dublin North TD told a meeting that the Government is weak and could break if put under pressure. “Labour, they’re nearly dropping like flies, [once] a week it’s nearly man overboard,” she said.
Speaking at an event organised by the Campaign Against Household and Water Taxes in Dundalk, Daly said that the Government’s ‘misnamed’ and ‘draconian’ property tax was a very serious assault on the living standards of ordinary people.
She said that the Government is trying to “bully and browbeat” people into paying the tax, and told the meeting that despite suggestions to the contrary, Ireland is not the only country in Europe which doesn’t pay property taxes.
“In actual fact we are probably the people in Europe who have paid the most in terms of stamp duty, in terms of development levies and in terms of the highest indirect taxation in Europe,” she said.
We have already paid. [People are] not interested in paying twice or three times in order to pay the debts of bankers and speculators because of this Government’s unwillingness to tax the wealthy in Irish society.
She called on people to protest in mid-April when “Angela and the boys” come to Ireland.
“[When] Enda and the lads are going around, how great they are, we want the presidents of Europe to see the real people of Ireland,” she said. “We want them to see the price [of] the pain they are inflicting on people.”
Daly said that the property tax was going to be a ‘game changer’ in terms of people’s attitude towards the Government.
“It’s going to be a step too far for people,” she said. “Already half the citizens in this state have less than €50 a month after meeting their essential repayment for their bills.”
Trade unions are a “bitter disappointment”
Daly also criticised the lack of response from the trade unions in Ireland, saying they were a “bitter disappointment.”
“There is no doubt that if these people were worth their salt, all they’d have to do was organise a dispute in Revenue [and] say [their] members are not deducting or taking that money from anybody’s pay packet,” she said.
Advertisement
“Sadly, [the trade unions] haven’t chosen to do that. They’re on the side of the establishment, they’re not representing their members.”
Also speaking at the event, Joan Collins TD said the property tax legislation had been drafted in a way which makes it very difficult for people not to pay and claimed that Ireland was now an “economic dictatorship.”
“You can see the hands of activists in this legislation. You can see the hands of Gilmore, Rabbite, Howlin,” she said. “People that would have fought against these taxes over the years.”
“You can see their hands in this legislation. It tries to cover all angles so that people will find it very difficult to resist,” Ms Collins said.
Clare Daly speaking last night (Photo: Christopher McKinley)
New political party
Daly also refused to deny outright that she is forming a new political party with Joan Collins saying “[It's] been our desire to see the United Left develop.”
When asked if that would mean a new party separate to the United Left Alliance with both TDs as the founders she replied “What do mean by new party as such?”
“We want to work to develop the idea of a broad left alternative,” she said. “Which was really [why] the United Left Alliance came together.”
“The experience has been that maybe the radical left groups have tended to try and concentrate on building their own forces rather than building the bigger project. So we think the bigger project needs to be built.”
“We do want to register the banner of the United Left and go out and build it in the way that it was supposed to be built when the alliance got together at the last election,” she said.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Remember the scene in Django where Candice asks the question why don’t his servants rise up and kill him. Servility that’s what. I do believe their are more of us than them and we can rip that ivory tower down in the morning. Fear and servility keep us mute and castrated. We could if we wanted just say no more. Go shaft yourselves FG/Lab
She believes that we should tax the life out of the country, nationalise pretty much anything that moves and establish a government much along the lines of Soviet Russia or Communist China.
We have not got the balls We’er all Armchair Warriors all we do is Moan Moan Moan and that is the way it will stay no matter what shit they throw at us. Wait and see f…..l will happen.
@david higgins……….. as opposed to fianna fail, fine gael and labour with a little help from the greens and the t.d.’s and their masters the bankers ………… 200 billion in debt and the bills keep coming ! ………….
what’s your plan …run the debt up to 400 billion, get in “With the lads” and get some sound share advice and get rich ? …just wondering and balancing your opinion!
She want to raise €20bn in extra taxes IN ONE YEAR to plug the deficit overnight.
It doesn’t matter if that money is all coming from “the rich” it still takes €20bn out of the economy. Most of the other parties are only talking about €3bn or so a year yet they’re the austere ones…..
@ David, that 20Billion “she wants to take out” would then be spent on services, healthcare, public works, education etc, it goes back into the economy in the form of wages, which then get taxed again and the cycle goes on and on…creating jobs and improving the economy and improving living standards.
Making €2-3bn of Austerity cuts takes the money out and hands it over to bondholders, never to be seen again…totally lost.
The Muinteoiri Europuppet Government are waving the big stick again.
“We are going to take the property tax out of your wages”.
and if that doesn’t work
“We are going to take it out of children’s lunch money”.
“Or steal it out of your granny’s heating money”
Take a look around Europe Mr Kenny.
And you will find that your fellow western European leaders don’t normally pilfer their people’s wages at source for these “property taxes”
I thought we were the good boys in the class Muinteoir Enda??
Stoogeen!
This government is too weak to try force their bank-bailout taxes on this fed-up, broke and angry country and they know it. People see through their threats and they are in serious trouble. Some unions are coming around to the campaign too which is great news.. which isolates the shameful, social-partnershipping Jack O’Connors of this world even more.
Good news about a new leftwing working class party. The need for it now is even greater than when the alliance was put together.
Ultimately, property tax will hit the people who spend into the pillar domestic economy. It should be abolished and replaced with cuts to spending and a wealth tax.
What is a property tax if not a wealth tax? If you mean capital or savings (which are already taxed), then people who can afford to will simply move these out of the jurisdiction. It’s much harder to dispose of property.
Exactly, instead of taxing the rich you tax the people who can’t afford to leave and then use the money to bail out foreign banks. I can’t understand why a socialist would have a problem with that….
But we do need it and we should have had it ages ago, instead we relied on houses sales for income and when they went bang the government coppers were fecked.
A property tax creates a sustainable income for the government,
This is exactly why other countries have it! So yes we should care what other countries have.
Property tax might work if you actually tax all properties, not just homes. You can own a 10million euro building on Grafton st and not pay a cent in tax on that. But we will tax council tenanancies. Those aren’t even an asset and at least SDCC have flagged that they will raise rents to pay for this. Please explain how that is good.
“A property tax creates a sustainable income for the government”
Oh dear where did we hear that one before… A property tax simply props-up a big government who spends money. Ireland abolished property tax in 1977 and became a LOW-TAX LOW-SPEND economy which is the reason we sustained so well until 2002 when the Euro currency replaced the Irish Pound. We lost control over monetary policy which helped propel a real estate bubble. This has nothing to do with a property tax because Ireland didn’t have a fiscal problem until it bailed out its banks. Our monetary policy was the problem. Now that we are in this situation, the proposed answer is simple:
1) Cut government spending (all the taxes in the world won’t solve anything if we don’t address our spending)
2) Roll back tax breaks e.g. company car tax rebates, the group companies tax break, tax anomalies, discretionary tax reliefs, and so on.
3) Abolish property tax and water charges and revert to gradually reducing all other taxes over a 5 year period
Our homes are not wealth.
Our homes do not earn a revenue stream.
Our homes are where we live with our families.
Our homes are our own! – why would we pay TAX-RENT on them?
Legitimate and just Taxes are those which have the support of the electorate.
This Home Tax-Rent Law does NOT have the support of Irish home owners.
This Home Tax Law is offensive, oppressive and exploitative. It is anti family.
————————————————————————————————-
EU Shanty Towns:-
16 million (16%) Americans live in Trailer Parks (US shanty towns) to try to avoid their oppressive home tax.
The French have the most repressive EU Home Tax ( avg €1800 pa) and the worst shanty towns as a result .
Regonald
We already have a wealth tax which imposes a charge of thirty percent on monies paid to cash depositors and holders of private pensions have had their capital base reduced every year for four years where present and future recipients of State pensions haven’t been touched.
Why the idiotic comments about how somebody looks? Do looks qualify people? With that logic all the great models should make brilliant politicians or what?
This is not a property tax. It’s a home tax. A property tax would tax large property/land assets. How much “property ” tax is due on a modest Semi D versus a country pile on 100 acres. Answers please?
A country pile, or a property valued at €1m pays €2,500.
A property valued at €500k pays €900.
Half the value but less than half the amount of tax.
Properties over €1 pay a higher proportion of this tax.
I’m not defending the tax, but I don’t get what point you’re trying to make.
If you own a commercial property you do not pay property tax. So that means if it is land with no house on it you are not taxed. In effect that makes this a home tax not a property tax.
@regonald …… I hope you are not trying to become a politician because it’s very important to offer an informed opinion , not a populist one! …the populism bit comes when you have been elected! ……
I base the assertion on political desire on the snappy photo….apologies if I’m wrong!
Eh no, Censored, you’re misrepresenting my point. I’m not saying that we’re the only country in Europe without a property tax, I’m saying that we’re the only country where a left-wing socialist would be against a property tax. Property taxes are normally opposed by right wing groups, or by libertarians as they’re seen as a tax on wealth. In contrast, left wing groups generally favour them, precisely because of this.
“that we’re the only country in Europe without a property tax”
We don’t need to jump on the bandwagon and replicate what “other countries” do – it’s called being independent minded. We are also different to “other countries”. We don’t need a property tax or water charges. Taxes are used to prop-up big governments with high spending. We need to become a low-tax low-spend economy.
Regonald, we already have property taxes. That said, I agree with your views on propping up big government. Nobody has ever escaped from a recession by increasing taxes.
@Censored, Well let’s first admit that you misrepresented my initial position. I don’t see how examining what the tax will be used for undermines this. However, I will entertain you, and say that the tax is to close the gap in the budget deficit which stands at 7.5% of GDP and has nothing to do with “bailing out bondholders”. So the tax won’t see an increase in services, but the opportunity cost of not imposing this tax would be heavier cuts. So if you want to link the tax to services as I think you’re going to do, then you can view the tax as an attempt to preserve or mitigate damages to services. However, linking taxes to services is a flawed argument as taxes may be increased or decreased for a variety of different reasons, e.g. to control inflation.
I think we should have heavier cuts. Taking more money from the productive sectors of the economy to prop up failed services is never going to work.
Also, I don’t think I misrepresented your position. It’s too easy to have a laugh at “socialists opposing property taxes”. Daly probably thinks the property taxes are solely to repay the debts created by the banking crisis. It’s not surprising that a socialist would be against this, especially since we already have property taxes and this particular tax will fall disproportionately on those who can least afford to pay.
I think cuts would hit the vulnerable more as they’re going to be on things like social welfare or the health service, education etc. I think the property tax attempts to be proportionate in the sense that the more your house is worth, the more you pay, so it hits the wealthier more.
1) Actually, property tax hits vulnerable more because most unemployed people live in their homes / their parents / spouses. Direct cuts to entitlement rates, in conjunction with a wealth tax, would help reassure everyone and help bring them on board, whilst compensate for a property tax.
2) Hogan is trying to shift his portion of the proposed rate setting away from him (or to be more precise, Fine Gael trying to shift their portion away from the people who can vote them out of office) feels like a breach of contract.
3) Personally, I “feel” something I’m paying out of pocket more than I feel the same amount deducted from my paycheck. (To take the property tax example, I like the fact that I don’t pay a cent when I’m at the doctor’s office, and didn’t have to give a second’s thought last Saturday when this kidney stone started torturing me before dawn to paying the hospital. I know my insurance will take care of that and I’m paying for that through payroll deduction so it’s not really “free,” but it doesn’t feel the same.)
4) There will be an economic and political impact if people suddenly had to pay a couple of hundred euro in tax on the currently “free” segment of the property market.
The attempt to separate the bank bailout from the budget deficit by the government claiming this money will only be used to fund local services is disingenuous and the same as claiming the USC ,water charges and property taxes are not new income taxes. It all comes from our income whether domestic or national. The money we are borrowing to finance banking and speculator losses is contributing to the gap in GDP by the thousands of jobs it has cost our economy , how many jobs would be created by this same money if it was used to stimulate our economy instead of throwing it down the black hole where the rest has already gone.
@Reginald: “Actually, property tax hits vulnerable more because most unemployed people live in their homes”
Eh I was under the impression that most people, in general, live in their homes?!
Also a property tax will only be paid by those who own property. Those who rent aren’t liable for it, and those in lower socio-economic groups are more likely to rent.
@Deobrah Kelly, you’re saying that our current account deficit is a result of the bank bailout, because it’s causing unemployment? How many people do you think would be unemployed now had we let all the banks collapse, causing people to lose their savings and have credit totally dry up, even worse than it is now?
I’m no fan of the bank bailout at all. I think we’re being made shoulder a burden that the rest of Europe should help us with seeing as their banks speculated by lending to our basket cases, but to think that we could have just let the banks go to the walls is crazy. And that’s what really annoys me about the ULA and SF. I consider myself to be left of centre, but their is no credible left of centre opposition in this country while the ULA and SF fail to get to grips with reality.
Silly comment. There was enough in the NPRF to guarantee personal savings in the actual banks that needed protecting up to €100,000 per account, which was what the top economists recommended and said was the smart move. Our banking system would not have collapsed. Europe would have been forced also to acccept its fair share of the loses in Anglo. We would have been in a much better place and would have retained most of the jobs that were lost as SMEs would have had a line of credit.
We need cuts, but not necessarily to front line service pay. And let’s face it, why are the jobs of front line workers so difficult in Ireland? Because they’re not properly equipped, have limited backup, and are expected to go far beyond the call of duty to cover up the multiple failures of the system that is supposed to be supporting them. We pay through the nose already to fund that system.
Simple example: we threw a lot of money into health during the celtic tiger. Did we get value for money?
“Social ownership” may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, or citizen ownership of equity.” (From Wiki) . So if we accept this definition together with an Irish context of of 83% home ownership ( again Wiki) then it is logical for an Irish socialist to oppose a property tax because here all classes are affected . It would also be nice if posters could debate what she says not what she looks like.
Whoever abolishes / repeals the Household Tax and equalises the daft Car Tax will win the next election.
The Irish dont seem to care about invasions of, their minds, their wallets even, to pay off private company debt but invasion of their Family Homes by a tax/rent from a Landlord Government …. now thats a horse of a different colour!
Sinn Féín successfully opposed and repelled water charges in the six counties. They don’t really support property tax up there either. But that’s another story you should be asking Westminster, David. It was Westminster who introduced it before Sinn Féín were elected policymakers up there.
Socialists have always called for taxes on property and capital. At last they’re getting a littke of what they said they wanted so stoo the whinging for god’s sake!!!!!
I read somewhere that the govt. are allowing the property tax to be a write of against the tax bill of landlords! ….this would make the tax deductible against P.A.Y.E. as one needs shelter in order to be available for work and earn an income………. so we’re all agreed then – no property tax!
Perfect !
Same aul blah from Daly as always. She only protests against proposals and never proposes any. Just to reiterate, she calls herself a socialist and then opposes a property tax….seriously like??
A property tax is NOT needed in Ireland. We should be cutting our spending, reduce tax breaks on the top 10 per cent, close tax anomalies and loopholes, and introduce a wealth tax.
Clare D is by far the most articulate politician in Dail Eireann and also the most sincere. I hope she starts a new party and that after the next election we get many more excellent TDs like her.
It may seem counter intuitive but there is another alternative because of the immense powers of the Revenue Commissioners.
First, it may well be the case that most residential properties are worth vastly less than people think. The tax itself, the mortgage arrears crisis and various other features of austerity are combining to drive down residential property values.
Secondly, most home owners should be able to identify particular factors, such as poor energy efficiency, BER Cert of C downwards, anti-social problems, defective construction etc, which will support a lower valuation.
Thirdly, every owner owes a duty to be as scrupulous as possible in getting the MV right and laying down a paper trail of getting the MVP right. If every home owner engages in intensive communication by emails, letters, phone calls, seeking inspections by the relevant authority, the resources may not be able to cope. The officials administering the scheme should be fully and intensively engaged with, appeal systems, if any should be fully utilised.
There are also many methods of depressing the value of homes. There may be rights of residence and maintenance in favour of family members, long term disadvantageous tenancies, planning problems, for example planning levies not paid by developers, roads and services not in charge, breaches of building regulations, breach of fire regulations.
Be aware that if you agree to a higher value than you should you will find that this will be the foundation for higher valuations in the future.
If you do not intend to sell within the next 5 years, there is a lot of scope for legitimately minimising the valuation of your home and it makes sense to engage in a time intensive and conscientious process with the officials involved.
Spend plenty of time on this to get it right. If everyone does so, it would be tragic, ahem, if the allocated resources collapsed under the intensive communications strain.
Add these two tick boxes to your household tax form:-
1. “I agree to allow my TD to confiscate my taxes and use them to pay off the debt of private companies, either directly or indirectly”
YES [ _ ] NO [ _ ]
2. “I agree to allow the Revenue Commissioners and its staff or agents to transfer my taxes to the exchequer to be used by TDs to pay off the debt of private companies, either directly or indirectly”
YES [ _ ] NO [ _ ]
I also asked Ms Daly to appear in he High Court for the people of North Dublin 12 month ago when I FIRST heard that the shareholder of PTSB Gp (holding Co) were lookig for mroe monye from the Govt befoer they would transfer theri shares in Ir Life . They waned more money from the central fund that dail deputies are there to protect for us.
The answer was NO.
She talked of costs.
Out of the 52 Billin drawn down the Govt paid 2 billion three hundred thousand over to Ir Life and Permanent. Paid in 2011 and anor 1,300,000.00.00 to Ir Life and Permanent Limited in 2012. Anor 9 billon paid out to banks or for bank capitalsiation in 11.
ASnd Ir Lifge sold for 1.3 billion to day apparently and more monye going out of this coutnry .
Not one TD has called for the Memo of Understnading to be produced to the dail for its approval
In my opinion ;- there is no need for anyone to pay P.T.S.B. mortgages because they provided the B+B loan to Anglo ..this was a criminal act and it’s illegal to make donations to criminals!
Stop paying it and let them bring you to court and argue that in front of a judge ….result – free house …just like that 230,000 house in donegal that the donegal people were going to shell 230,000 out for !
You won’t hear Pearse Doherty saying that ….republican?
my pet iguana is more of a republican!
Every night we read all the comments most get Green Thumbs the rest get Red. It makes no difference what colour they get all the comments in the world will make no difference to what is going on in this Country. Armchair Warrior Talk is still just talk, if things are going to change in this Country we need to stop talking ( moaning moaning moaning ) to one another and actually get off our complacent arse and do something constructive. We need to organise and protest in our Thousands all Over the Country to show this puppet Government that we will not stand for anymore hardship and pain. Jail the corrupt Politisons and Bankers and Developers that have destroyed this once Proud Country.
That property tax is one of the conditions that the EU made B Cowen sign up to when he entered the loan agreement for 67 Billion in 28 11 10 and u can access a Department of Finance Statement of the Joint IMF/EU Programme (laon agrement) for ireland published on the 28 11 10 a conditon of which is that
1 Ireland will capitalise the banks incl A Irish and IBRC – to highest intnl standards until they are ready for the markets as normal sources of funding and
2 The condition governing gth programme will be contained in a Memorandum of understanding.
The current govt entered into a Memorandum of understanding on the 17 5 11 – sets out the terms on whihc and the time for the capitalisation of the banks named incl IBRC and refers to progress on all the structural reforms incl Local Propperty tAX .
i DONT BELEIVE THAT MEMORANDUM OF uNDERSTANDING WAS EVER LAID BEFORE or Called to ther Dail by any TD incluidng Ms Daly under Art 29 5 2 of Bunreacht na HeIreann.
The ECB is now casting doubt on the legality of the debt swap deal engineered by the govt and central bank to make it harder for Irlelan to return to the markets as a sovereign borrower and back to the EU – I have told Ms Daly my beleie that ireland is in the grup of the EU wiht an actual debp of 52 billion drawn down since may 11 plus the additionsl 34 billion due on the promissory notes and this LPT is part of that deal.
She ahs still not answered my question was the memo ever called to the dail. Under art 29 5 2 which startes.
‘The State shall not be bound by an internationla agreement involving a charge n teh public fund unless the terms of the agreement shall have been approved by Dail Eireann’
So I am sorry Clare and Joan and all but when u are in debt to anor and part of the deal is this LPT tax and before u even implement u go and renege on part – ie liquidae a bank to be capitalised and chane the payment plan- well then assuming the deal is legal – my questio to u – not answered – u will get govt in tbl but also us the people -
How worried is Ireland's pharma industry about Trump's tariffs?
Eoghan Dalton
5 hrs ago
5.5k
28
trump administration
Top Trump advisor used Gmail for official business, adding to security pressures
7 hrs ago
8.6k
22
Speaking rights row
Verona Murphy wins first-ever Dáil vote of confidence in a Ceann Comhairle by 96 votes to 71
9 hrs ago
30.2k
108
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say