Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
“GO AND VOTE” is a mantra you’ll be hearing a lot today.
From broadcasters, and from candidates, whose only concern, of course, is that you take part in the democratic process, regardless of who you give your Number 1 to.
In countless Facebook posts, and a text message from your mother: Don’t forget to vote. Make sure you leave time to get to the polling station. EVERY VOTE COUNTS.
But throughout Irish history, there have been several examples of Dáil seats, even political careers, being decided by the ballot papers of fewer people than you could fit around a table in the Dáil bar.
Last time, Independent candidate Catherine Connolly lost out on the final seat in Galway West by just 17 votes and after a four-day recount.
Three Dáil seats in the last 35 years have been won by five votes.
In 1982, Fianna Fáil’s Dan Wallace was edged out by his party colleague Seán French after 11 counts in Cork North-Central.
In 1987, Tánaiste and Labour leader Dick Spring held on to his seat in Kerry North by just five votes, after six counts and a full recount, defeating Fianna Fáil’s Tom McEllistrim. Five years later, he led the party to its most successful election ever, and became Tánaiste again.
In 1989, former Louth Gaelic footballer Jimmy Mulroy lost out to future Justice Minister Dermot Ahern, by just five votes.
Eric Byrne (C) and Ben Briscoe (R) during the longest election recount in Irish history, in 1997. RollingNews.ie
RollingNews.ie
And Dublin South-Central in 1992 saw the “Ben and Eric Show” – when Fianna Fáil’s Ben Briscoe and Democratic Left’s Eric Byrne sat through what is believed to be the longest recount in Irish history.
After 13 counts, Byrne won the seat by 10 votes, but after 10 days of recounts, the result was overturned, leading the victorious Briscoe to famously describe the experience as “The Agony and the Ex-TD.”
In the following election, a political rivalry for the ages was born when the Green Party’s John Gormley defeated Progressive Democrat Michael McDowell by 35 votes, after a week-long recount in Dublin South-East.
McDowell vowed to quit politics then, telling reporters his decision was “irrevocable” and would take effect “whenever I get off the cross of this interminable recount.”
Five years later, he was back in the Dáil, and in 2007, Gormley got the better of him again, edging him out for the final seat by just 304 votes, making McDowell the first Tánaiste in history to lose his seat.
We talked to three politicians at the heart of two of the closest elections in recent memory, and found out what they learned from their roles in Irish political history.
‘An awful way to win, but a terrible way to lose’ – Limerick-West, 2002
Former Fine Gael TD Michael Finucane (L) and retiring Fine Gael TD Dan Neville (R) RollingNews.ie
RollingNews.ie
As close elections go, Dan Neville has them all beat.
In 2002, he won the last of three seats in Limerick West, edging out his Fine Gael colleague Michael Finucane, by exactly one vote.
The two men had what Neville somewhat diplomatically calls a “keen competition” within the party in Limerick West for more than a decade.
In 1987, the Fine Gael vote was split and both men lost out, with Fianna Fáil taking two seats, and the PDs the third.
Two years later, Neville – who is retiring as a TD this year – stood aside and was elected to the Seanad, clearing the way for Finucane to grab a Dáil seat for Fine Gael.
In 1992, Finucane retained it, with Neville failing to get elected and staying on in the Seanad.
In 1997, both were elected – the first time ever that Fine Gael took two out of three seats in traditionally Fianna Fáil-dominated Limerick-West.
Neville topped the poll, and Finucane was later made Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee.
“There were some battles won for him and some battles won for me,” Neville told TheJournal.ie this week, in the years leading up to what would be a contest for the history books in 2002.
Oireachtas.ie
Oireachtas.ie
From the very outset of the count, the two were neck and neck.
Neville had a lead of just 36 votes at first, before a swing in the second count left Finucane six votes ahead.
As an illustration of just how extraordinarily close the results were, when Fianna Fáil’s Michael Collins crossed the line on the third count, 183 of his transfers went to Finucane, and 184 went to Neville.
The gap between the party colleagues was narrowed to five votes.
“We were close enough,” Neville says, in his characteristically understated manner. ”But I was transfer-friendly from all other candidates.” This was to prove the difference.
On the fourth count, all the other remaining candidates – from the Green Party, Christian Solidarity party, and an Independent – were eliminated. Neville took 702 of their transfers, and Finucane took 696, leaving Neville one vote ahead.
Finucane ordered a recount, which began on Saturday night and continued for alost two days. The trend, however, was becoming clear by Sunday – Neville’s lead was widening – and on Monday lunchtime, Finucane decided to end everyone’s agony, and conceded.
The recount was cut short, and in the end, that six-vote swing in transfers on Saturday gave Dan Neville back a seat in Dáil Éireann by the smallest possible margin.
However, amid the nitty gritty of political rivalry, keen-eyed tallymen and half-stamped ballots that weekend, Neville was hurtled back into the real world.
The day of the election, my wife got a call to say her father was seriously ill in the nursing home. Then on the day of the first count we were informed he would not survive.
Neville’s father-in-law had lived with the family for 17 years, and while he and his son Tom (running in Limerick County in this year’s election) kept an eye on the count, the rest of the family spent the day in his company at the nursing home.
Then, on the Saturday, just as the count adjourned, we got a phone call that he had died.
“It was very, very personal,” he adds.
When I was elected, I took some of my colleagues for one drink, and then I went away to arrange the funeral.
There was no elation, Neville says.
Even with my supporters at the declaration, there was no triumphalism at all, there was just a very quiet clap.
Advertisement
This was especially so because of the agonising manner in which he had edged out Finucane, who ran again in 2007, but lost.
“It was an awful way to win an election,” Neville says. “But it was a terrible way to lose it.”
Finucane, who didn’t respond to our attempts to reach him for this article, never held office again after 2002. He remains active in politics, however, and was campaign manager for MEP Seán Kelly’s successful re-election bid in 2014.
The family bereavement surrounding Neville’s historic win in 2002 should provide some perspective for any candidates who come out on the wrong end of a long and painful count this weekend.
It is very, very traumatic for themselves and their family. They’ll feel especially for their families and their campaigners – the many people who worked so hard for them.
“I was there, and I came back,” he advises. “Don’t give up.”
Digging a ditch and watching cricket – Cork South-Central, 2002
Kathy Sinnott, who won (and then lost) the final seat in Cork South-Central, in 2002. RollingNews.ie
RollingNews.ie
With his livelihood on the line, and seven children to help provide for, John Dennehy sat at home in Togher all day and watched cricket.
It was Saturday, 18 May 2002, and the votes were being counted in the constituency of Cork South-Central, after the general election the previous day.
“I’m not big into cricket, but I think England were playing India, if I remember correctly,” he told TheJournal.ie this week.
It was probably the slowest thing I could find on television.
Dennehy, an incumbent Fianna Fáil TD, was a steel fitter by trade, and a former supervisor at Irish Steel, before getting into politics.
He won a seat in 1987, getting the second-highest number of first preference votes, but lost it to party colleague Batt O’Keeffe five years later.
After what he calls “a moment of madness”, he decided to throw his hat in the ring again in 1997, and won one of three Fianna Fáil seats that year, along with Micheál Martin, and O’Keeffe again.
At around the same time, with counting under way, Kathy Sinnott was digging a ditch outside her home in the village of Ballinhassig, on the southern edge of the constituency.
“I thought, ‘If I become a TD, no-one’s going to do this, so I better get it done’”, she told TheJournal.ie by phone from the US this week.
She had come to national prominence two years earlier as disability campaigner, successfully suing the state to secure the right of her adult son Jamie, who is autistic, to get a primary education, although the ruling was later overturned by the Supreme Court.
Oireachtas.ie
Oireachtas.ie
Dennehy was 549 votes ahead of Sinnott after the first count, and stretched his lead until Labour’s Brendan Ryan, and future Fine Gael MEP Deirdre Clune were eliminated on the sixth count, and Sinnott took the bulk of their transfers.
When she took 930 transfers from Simon Coveney, she was within 30 of Dennehy.
The Green Party’s Dan Boyle was elected on the 10th count, and most of his transfers also went to Sinnott, giving her the last of five Dáil seats by an astonishing three votes, at 4am on Sunday morning.
But that was far from the end of the story.
Dennehy recalls that Mick O’Brien – one of his supporters and the late uncle of Sinn Féin TD Jonathan O’Brien – spotted some irregularities with around 50 ballots, and called in Micheál Martin, who had topped the poll and exceeded the quota by almost 5,000 votes.
Fianna Fáil ordered a recount.
2002 file photo of Micheál Martin, who topped the poll in Cork South-Central, and came to the aid of John Dennehy during his recount. RollingNews.ie
RollingNews.ie
Sinnott remembers the future party leader supervising proceedings with an eagle eye, and “arguing until he was red in the face” over every last ballot paper.
“It was tense, very tense,” says Dennehy. “I tried not to get despondent or get my hopes up.”
“He was suffering incredibly,” is how Sinnott remembers it.
After losing his seat in 1992, Dennehy says he and his wife Philomena had experienced a certain degree of financial pressure, surviving off his pension from Irish Steel and having “no outside resources,” but he emphasises that her support for him was unflinching and essential to him.
“Kathy’s right,” he says. “There was a huge amount on the line for us.”
Despite the high stakes, the many hours of agonising waiting, and the knowledge that one of them would have to lose, Dennehy says “there was no animosity” between the candidates.
We never fell out. We kind of stayed close and watched the counts. There was concern for the other, I think it’s fair to say.
When she initially came out on top after the 10th count, Sinnott says she “felt bad about winning.”
But it was a consolation that I could put [John] out of his misery.
File photo of John Dennehy TD. Oireachtas.ie
Oireachtas.ie
On the Monday, however, the first recount reversed the result, giving Dennehy a lead of two votes.
The front page of the next morning’s Irish Examiner carried a photo of Sinnott and Dennehy embracing tightly, after his lead was announced.
And on Wednesday night, the second recount resulted in him winning the final seat by six votes.
“The relief was unimaginable,” he recalls. “I felt 10 feet tall.”
After that came the gratitude. He tried to track down some of those who had voted for him, and sent many letters of effusive thanks.
What amazed me was the answering machine at home – it was emptied I’d say 20 times.
I couldn’t believe the number of phone calls – people praying, lighting candles, you name it.
John Dennehy, who lost that election by two votes, before winning it by six, has a message for anyone thinking of staying at home today.
“If only six people – one carload – had stayed at home, I wouldn’t have been elected,” he says.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
'Ireland was very smart': Trump namechecks Ireland as he pledges tariffs on pharma imports
Keith Kelly
11 hrs ago
56.2k
148
Egypt
At least six people dead after tourist submarine sinks off Red Sea coast in Egypt
1 min ago
0
The Morning Lead
'Ireland was very smart': Trump namechecks Ireland as he pledges tariffs on pharma imports
Keith Kelly
11 hrs ago
56.2k
148
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 160 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 142 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 112 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 133 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say