Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
WHILE PASCHAL DONOHOE may have attracted most of the political attention in Leinster House this week, another source of discord has taken root in the Dáil.
A plan for land to be bought by investors for forestry in a deal between Coillte and a British investment firm has garnered cross-party criticism, as well as backlash from environmentalists and the sector.
Here’s a breakdown explaining the deal, why it’s controversial, and what happens next.
The deal between Coillte and Gresham House involves the purchase of both planted and unplanted land from private landowners to increase forestry cover.
Coillte is a semi-state agency that manages around 440,000 hectares of land, while Gresham House is a UK asset management company with an office in Dublin.
The deal between the two involves a new Irish Strategic Forestry Fund that is seeking investors to secure €200 million for the purchase of land and planting of forestry.
The forestry operations are to be handled by Coillte, while the land the forestry is planted on would be owned by the Fund.
Coillte has been restricted from buying land for new forests for 20 years due to EU rules on state aid funding – prompting calls for Ireland to push for a change to the rules rather than “outsourcing” the purchase of land to investors.
An investment director in Gresham House’s forestry division wrote an op-ed for the Irish Independent defending the deal, saying that it is “not in the business of forcing anyone to sell their land”.
“We’re not, as has been mistakenly reported, engaging in any form of privatisation,” Joe O’Carroll wrote.
“We will buy land, at agreed market prices, from farmers and non-farmers who want to sell. Anyone who has worked in forestry knows it’s a long-term investment that needs expertise, patience, market knowledge and a commitment to doing things right,” he said.
We’ll focus on biodiversity across the forests we acquire or create, with a strong mix of broadleaf species that ensures the climate resilience of our forestry portfolio.”
However, environmentalists, politicians and sectoral stakeholders have all expressed discontent with the proposal for several reasons.
Why is it controversial?
The Irish Wildlife Trust has criticised the plan, with campaign officer Padraig Fogarty outlining that there is a fear any investor “will just want to get the cheapest land that’s available” with the tree species that produces the highest return.
That species, sitka spruce, is non-native to Ireland and has been the target of criticism due to concerns it leads to a “monoculture” environment, impacting the biodiversity of the area it inhabits.
“From an environmental point of view, what’s most important to us is what anyone does with the land,” Fogarty said.
“Our fear is that they’re just going to plaster it with more plantations of Sitka spruce.”
A 2020 Noteworthy investigation found that Ireland has one of the highest rates of plantation forestry in the EU and the highest share of forest area dominated by introduced tree species, with large plantations of mainly Sitka spruce - native to North America – making up just over half of our entire forest estate.
Politically, TDs from across the spectrum are also staunchly against the plan.
During the Dáil’s first sitting last week after the Christmas recess, many used some of their speaking time dedicated to giving statements on the Climate Action Plan to voice their dissatisfaction with the forestry move.
There were calls for Minister for Agriculture Charlie McConalogue to intervene, with Sinn Féin TD Matt McCarthy saying the minister should instruct Coillte to halt the plan and state categorically that it would not permit taxpayer money to be used to “facilitate” a “land grab”.
People Before Profit TD Richard Boyd Barrett called the move a “disgrace” while Rural Independent TD Carol Nolan said that “stakeholders need to be listened to” and asked the government to step in.
The issue surfaced at the weekend among ordinary citizens too at the final meeting of the Citizens’ Assembly on biodiversity loss, which convened to discuss sector-specific recommendations to put forward to the Oireachtas.
Members discussed a recommendation suggesting that “State-owned woodlands should be recognised and managed as a strategic long-term national asset for the benefit of the common good”.
Sinn Féin is bringing a motion to the Dáil this evening demanding that the government stop the plan.
In a statement, TD Matt Carthy TD said: “The Ministers for Agriculture and Public Expenditure are the shareholders, on behalf of the Irish people, of Coillte. They can, and they should, instruct Coillte to immediately stall this plan.”
He said the motion would address “the underlying issues that have led to the collapse of afforestation by directing government to publish a new forestry strategy as a matter of urgency and ensure that the new strategy prioritises afforestation undertaken by local communities, farmers, landowners and public bodies above investment management ventures”.
Though the government is unlikely to back the motion, it will not be the last time it will be forced to confront the issue in Leinster House.
Tomorrow, Agriculture Minister Charlie McConalogue and Minister of State for Land Use and Biodiversity Pippa Hackett are due to appear before an Oireachtas committee.
The Oireachtas Committee on Agriculture, Food and the Marine will quiz the ministers about the plan at 5.30pm in a meeting that will be available to view online.
And on Thursday, two and a half hours have been set aside in the Dáil for a debate on Ireland’s forestry strategy.
At the same time, a protest - organised by an alliance of groups including the Woodland League, Friends of the Irish Environment, Extinction Rebellion and People Before Profit – is planned outside the Dáil to call for the Gresham House plan to be halted.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
If I’m reading that right, he was well within his rights to pursue that in court and deserved the compensation he got
Must have been some toilet visit concidering it aged him bout 30 year years in the process
I was wondering how the insurance on my train station was so high this year.
It’s PC gone mad!
Gone are the days when you could be dragged out of the jacks with your pants around your ankles, beaten by a Garda and sent home to you mother and be thankful for it.
Well there was time travel involved. The cubicle is obviously a portal of some description.:-?
Clearly a case for the Doctor, only a time lord can figure this one out.
I remember seeing one of those rail security guys kick and push a homeless man at Connolly one day for no reason at all. They are on some sort of power trip and get a kick out of pushing people about, some day they will push someone too far and god knows what could happen.
I’ve had the displeasure of meeting a few of these security guards, once at a hospital they flatly refused to get a wheelchair for my dying mum who was being admitted as a medical emergency because I was parked in the wrong spot. Second time was at a hotel in Dublin they started banging on the door accusing us of smoking and threatening us with fines, they obviously had the wrong room and no apology was forthcoming even after I showed them in. My eldest at the time had done a round the world trip he said the eastern bloc people are grand and friendly, just don’t put them behind a counter or in a uniform it’s then the Soviet in them takes over.
Since when is it the job of rail security guards to get a wheelchair for your mother at a hospital??
agree, far less serious but I recall one guy pulling me aside a day I forgot my student travelcard and deliberately embarrass me, got my ticket and wrote on it failure to produce I.D., thats fair enough but for no good reason shout and announce he didnt believe I was a student (yah I just got a backpack on for the craic) humiliating me in front of a busy train station and was pretty sure I saw them givin another lady a hard time on a diff occasion.
You stay classy there tam. I have some calamine lotion for that burn if you’d like to borrow it
What burn?
€10,500 for spending a penny……….
Hardly grounds for deportation??
The racist comment above mine was deleted the seems, you could’ve at least deleted mine so as as mine makes no sense now.
But Dave your comments never make any sense
He deserved it. Pity it won’t come out the “security” mans pocket.
Smoke rising from the cubicle and he pinching a loaf. Must have been a bad night on the Guinness
Heuston we have a problem!
I’ll allow anyone to kick the door in on me for quarter of the price
The toilets were one of the last few places you could have a sit-down in Heuston. Every time I go there lately they’ve removed more and more seating from the station.
And you wonder how insurance prices are going up?
They might be a tad smarter on who they employ the next time so.
Fell into shit and came out smelling of roses
“had gone to the rest room to use the toilet”
Rest room? Was he transported to the US?
Hopefully he will get over this horrific tragedy and buy an 05 volkswagon passat 1.6 l and get a holiday out of it in asia and use some of the toilets over there that have no doors on them and then he wont have to worry about anybody kickin the door in…..
€10.5 K. Wow.
Caught with his pants round his ankles.
Security guards coked up to the eyeballs themselves
Well lf was embarrassed before he must be glowing red with shame now.. nobody knew anything about it before… whereas now its on the internet… I suppose the money will heal his pain.. maybe he’ll spend half on counseling and the rest on the holiday of a lifetime..
Id say security work can be a tough job at times , trying to reason with awkward members of the public , some who are under the influence of drugs & alcohol , do godders & Bible bashers telling you the law , maybe it’s best to turn a blind eye to certain things !!
The ‘do godders’ can be troublesome hoors indeed.
So was he $hitting it before or after the security man barged in?
Often wonder why, when an incident like this is found proven that the private security thugs don’t personally loose their licence to work…….permanently!!!
It’d be an excellent incentive for them to behave reasonably when dealing with members of the public. All too often I’ve noted these very STT employees behave like Nazi boot boys
I don’t understand the logic in “Judge Linnane, who heard there had been several hours difference between the time Masterson said he had been defamed and the incident involving Kozlovas, said the defence case – that Masterson’s claim was a fabrication – had “evaporated” in the witness box when Kozlovas was called.”
Surely, it could be read the other way: Masterson’s case has evaporated.
They don’t seem to bat an eyelid the when there’s someone smoking crack on the redline luas.
Spend a penny to get ten grand good business
There are a few Luas and train stations like this in Dublin with under trained ‘security’ walking around dazed and confused looking for something to do.
Q
uite so.
have your say