Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
A NEW COMMISSION of Investigation tasked with examining the experiences of people who were boarded out as children should be set up as a matter of urgency, a number of survivors have said.
In recent months there has been much criticism of the fact the Government’s planned redress scheme excludes people who were boarded out, a precursor to fostering, and those who spent less than six months in an institution as a child.
If the redress scheme is not extended to include all survivors, there are growing calls for a new Commission of Investigation (COI) to be established.
The COI into Mother and Baby Homes included a chapter on the experiences of boarded out children. The COI found that, in some cases, children who were boarded out experienced some of the worst abuse recorded.
Tens of thousands of children were boarded out in Ireland across several decades, in a system overseen by the State. Some of these children have reported being neglected and physically and sexually abused.
In the State apology to survivors of mother and baby homes and county homes on 13 January 2021, Taoiseach Micheál Martin apologised “for the profound generational wrong visited upon Irish mothers and their children who ended up in a Mother and Baby Home or a County Home”.
Martin noted that some children who were boarded out “experienced heartbreaking exploitation, neglect and abuse within the families and communities in which they were placed”.
“This was unforgivable. The sense of abandonment felt by many of these children is palpable in the witness accounts. The circumstances of their birth, the arrangements for their early care, the stigma they experienced and the continuing lack of birth information, is a terrible burden in their lives,” he added.
Campaigner James Sugrue, who was boarded out with his two brothers in Co Kerry, was abused as a child and forced to do difficult manual labour on a farm.
Speaking to The Journal, Sugrue (70) said it makes no sense for the Government to say the State apology to survivors includes boarded out children but then exclude them from the redress scheme.
“In his apology Michéal Martin spoke about the treatment people suffered and the profound generational wrong that took place and how it shouldn’t have happened. But that apology does not include children like my brothers and I.
“We were sent to Killarney County Home, our mother abandoned us. We were at the mercy of the nuns and the State.
We were not included in that apology but, for argument’s sake, let’s say that we were. If Micheál Martin considered us to be part of the apology, how are we not included in the redress scheme?
“Where is the redress for children taken out of homes and boarded out, or children who were there for less than six months? There is no redress for them.”
Sugrue, who qualified as a solicitor when he was 50, said one way to address the issue is the establishment of a new COI into how boarded out children were treated.
“The Government needs to realise this is not going to go away. We’re asking Roderic O’Gorman and Micheál Martin to consider that a new commission is set up, or a tribunal, to deal with boarded out children.
Give us the right to put our statements forward – it can be in an adversarial setting if necessary but it needs to be done in a timely manner, not dragged out for five or six years.
Sugrue believes that a number of his human rights, and those of other boarded out children, were breached – such as the torture and abuse experienced by some people, forced labour, family separation and not being given the right to an effective remedy.
Article 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights deals with effective remedy and states the following: “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.”
Surgue said: “A number of our human rights were breached, as set out under the European Convention on Human Rights – torture, forced labour, separation from siblings.
Advertisement
“We have never been given the right to put our case forward. This will hang over the Government in some way or another until it is dealt with. It will come back to haunt them.”
If the redress scheme is not extended and a new Commission is not established, Sugrue will consider taking his case to the European Court of Human Rights.
Sugrue said he and other survivors are “not asking for anything more than other people have got” but they are tired of being “at the bottom of the pile”.
The approach, duration and findings of the COI into Mother and Baby Homes and related institutions has been roundly criticised since its final report was published in January 2021.
Sugrue said he knows some survivors may be weary at the thought of another Commission but that any future investigation must be set up urgently and handled in a more transparent manner.
Give us our day. A lot of people will have passed away if it is dragged out for years, many people have already passed away. A lot of survivors have said to me that they think the Government is waiting for more of us to die, that’s really how they feel.
“My brother died at 40, he suffered years of abuse as a child. I saw this quote the other day and it really struck a chord with me: ‘The dead cannot cry out for justice, it is the duty of the living to do that for them.’ I want to speak up for my brother. Do it now, the time is now.”
David Kinsella Órla Ryan
Órla Ryan
Sugrue is among the survivors planning to protest over the issue next week. He and others calling for the extension of the redress scheme, or for another Commission to be established, will hold a demonstration outside the Department of Children on Tuesday afternoon, prior to gathering outside Leinster House.
David Kinsella, who was born in St Patrick’s mother and baby institution in Dublin and later adopted, will also attend the protest. Kinsella said the current redress scheme is “despicable and miserly”.
He called on the Government to include boarded out children, as well as those who spent less than six months in an institution, in the scheme as many “suffered physical and mental abuse” and “unbearable trauma”.
“Stop treating survivors as second class citizens. Let us move on with the years or months we have left in our lives. Create a proper and more appropriate redress package and take out the six-month tariff,” Kinsella said.
He added that if the redress scheme is not extended, a new COI into boarding out should be established as a matter of urgency.
‘Don’t violate human rights’
Professor Conor O’Mahony, the Special Rapporteur on Child Protection, has been highly critical of the fact that boarded out children are excluded from the Government’s current redress plan.
In his second annual report as Special Rapporteur, published in January 2022, O’Mahony noted that the final report of the COI in mother and baby homes and related institutions “leaves little doubt that a considerable number of children in foster homes (whether “boarded out” by a local authority, or placed “at nurse” by a private individual or a charitable organisation) experienced ill-treatment amounting to inhuman and degrading treatment contrary to Article 3 of the ECHR”.
When making recommendations on the subject, O’Mahony’s report notes: “Any redress scheme which excludes children who were subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment, forced labour and medical experimentation in the form of non-consensual vaccine trials would be inherently defective and a denial of the right to an effective remedy.
“Moreover, redress for rights violations in foster homes should not be confined to children who were placed in foster homes as an exit pathway from Mother and Baby Homes or County Homes, but should encompass all children who experienced ill-treatment or forced labour in foster homes.”
The detail of the Mother & Baby Homes Redress scheme will take time to scrutinise, but I am incredibly disappointed that children boarded out in foster homes have effectively been excluded, in spite of significant evidence of neglect, physical, emotional & sometimes sexual abuse. pic.twitter.com/NgbeTJTdN4
Speaking to The Journal, O’Mahony said the current redress scheme needs to be extended to include people who were boarded out as children. He said he understands why some survivors are calling for another Commission to be held but, even if this happens, there would be no guarantee of a different outcome.
“If you’re going to look at having another Commission of Investigation you have to ask what is it going to do that hasn’t already been done? The purpose of a Commission is not to provide a pathway to redress, it is to establish facts. The facts about the boarding out system are pretty well established on foot of the Mother and Baby Home Commission.
“The report left very little doubt about the scale of abuse in the boarding out system and the inadequacy of the inspection regime. Another Commission could add more detail but there is already no room for doubt about the very often extremely serious neglect and abuse suffered by people who were boarded out as children.
“Commissions of Investigation are long-winded, very legalistic affairs. Would another one actually establish anything we don’t know already?
As things stand, boarded out children are very clearly not included in the redress scheme. Another Commission of Investigation would not in itself guarantee anything. It could sit for several years and then reiterate in more detail facts we already know. It could be another lengthy process which delays the issue for people - raising their hopes before dashing them once again.
Related Reads
Burials Bill: New law will allow for Tuam mother and baby home and other sites to be excavated
'I'll protest until I die': Call for 'forgotten' boarded out children to be given redress
Taoiseach rules out reopening redress scheme for mother and baby home survivors
O’Mahony said he understands why some survivors are calling for another Commission as it may seem like the only way to get some form of justice. However, he noted that the decision by the Government to not include boarded out children in the current redress plan was a political and financial one.
Even if another COI was held, it would still be open to the Government to make the same political decision, he said. The Government should instead extend the current redress scheme, he added.
This would, naturally, increase the cost of the scheme. However, he said payments made via a redress scheme typically cost much less than any payments the State would have to make if individuals took successful court cases.
Given the length of time that has passed since much of the abuse and human rights violations occurred – as well as the cost involved – it would be difficult for many survivors to go down this route.
“This is entirely in the gift of the Government, right now they could make a decision to include who were boarded out in the redress scheme,” O’Mahony said.
Part of the reason people who were boarded out are not currently included in the redress plan is that not all of them had a negative experience. He said that this reasoning doesn’t make sense, noting that not all mothers who spent time in a mother and baby institution had a negative experience, for example.
O’Mahony told us: “The practicability of who is eligible and who is ineligible for redress may make it more difficult to establish the criteria, but it is not an insurmountable obstacle.
“The fact that it could cost a substantial sum of money is absolutely no defence. If you don’t want to compensate someone for violating their human rights, don’t violate their human rights in the first place.”
‘Not possible’
When asked for a comment on the exclusion of boarded out children from the redress scheme, a spokesperson for the Department of Children told The Journal: “The Commission of Investigation examined the exit pathways for children from Mother and Baby and County Home Institutions and the Government is acutely aware that children who were boarded out in some cases experienced some of the worst abuses.
“For a number of reasons, it was not possible to make provisions for boarded out children in the Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme. However, if a person spent time in a Mother and Baby or County Home Institution prior to being boarded out as a child they may qualify for the Payment Scheme based on their time spent in an institution.”
The spokesperson noted that the COI’s final report included other measures “which will provide support and assistance to those who were boarded out as children”.
These measures include:
Access to birth and early life information as part of the Birth Information and Tracing Legislation which is being advanced
The provision of an ex-gratia payment to reimburse anyone who was boarded out and had to pay inheritance taxes for farms which they inherited from their foster parents
“Furthermore, this year €330,000 of funding is being provided for specialist therapeutic counselling services to persons who were boarded out or placed at nurse as children. This service is being delivered by Barnardos,” the spokesperson added.
Oak Consulting
Oak Consulting
Oak Consulting was tasked by the Government with gathering the views of survivors as part of a consultation process on redress in March and April 2021. In its report, the section on eligibility for the redress scheme states:
“The majority of those who participated in the consultation process supported a universal, inclusive scheme. The largest proportion of written submissions stated that all mothers and babies who resided in mother and baby homes should be eligible. For redress, regardless of the duration or year of their stay and regardless of whether children were accompanied or unaccompanied by their mothers.”
Oak received 444 written submissions as part of the process and 186 people took part in 17 online consultations.
The Oak report notes that just over a quarter of the people interviewed “believed eligibility should be inclusive of other institutions in which expectant mothers were confined during pregnancy and a similar proportion believed that eligibility would be further extended to include those subjected to coercive family separation outside institutions or who were illegally adopted/fostered/boarded out without adequate supervision and vetting”.
“To do otherwise it was stated would undermine the legitimacy of the scheme and fail to deliver a survivor-centred response focused on the nature and effects of the harm suffered by the survivors,” the document adds.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
Anyone who spent even a day being abused by those that were supposed to look after them regardless of whether they were boarded out or not should be compensated. There should not be a time limit. I can’t even imagine withstanding a day of abuse let alone 6 months so how can they decide that 6 months shouldn’t count! Absolute shame on those who would deny anyone a right to compensation for any form or length of abuse when in the care of the state.
White House scenes 'extraordinary and very unsettling', Taoiseach tells Late Late
3 hrs ago
28.9k
The Morning Lead
Who are the 32 politicians in the Dáil who declared themselves as landlords last year?
Stephen McDermott
1 hr ago
2.0k
Oval Office
Zelenskyy leaves White House summit after Trump claims he's 'not ready for peace'
Updated
3 hrs ago
82.5k
519
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 153 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 105 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 137 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 106 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 79 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 78 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 127 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 60 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 75 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 82 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 39 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 43 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 25 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 87 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 97 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 69 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 51 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 85 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 65 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say