LAST UPDATE | 8 Feb 2022

THE SISTER OF murdered MP Jo Cox has said she found the scenes of Keir Starmer being rescued from a mob “really upsetting” but all Prime Minister Boris Johnson cares about is how to “save his skin”.

Kim Leadbeater, who is Labour MP for the same Batley and Spen seat her sister represented, joined the widespread criticism of Johnson for his baseless claims about the Labour leader’s failure to prosecute Jimmy Savile when he was Director of Public Prosecutions.

She said: “I found yesterday really upsetting, it made me really angry, and we have to look at why it happened.

And I think, ultimately, the individuals who were part of that angry mob have to take personal responsibility, but we also have to be clear that things don’t happen in a vacuum. And while ever we have a culture of toxicity and aggression and lies in politics, we have to think about the consequences of that.

Starmer was bundled into a police car for protection near Parliament yesterday as he faced baseless allegations of “protecting paedophiles” and protesters shouting about Savile.

At least six Conservatives including a former Cabinet minister joined MPs from across the political spectrum in linking the harassment to the baseless claim Johnson made while under pressure over the partygate scandal.

Johnson had falsely claimed Starmer “used his time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile” while Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

Coming under renewed criticism, Johnson tweeted the “behaviour directed” at the Labour leader was “absolutely disgraceful” but did not address the nature of the abuse.

Opening today’s proceedings in the House of Commons, Speaker of the House Lindsay Hoyle criticised the “disgraceful behaviour” outside parliament. 

“I know it has been reported that some abuse was directed at the leader of the Opposition yesterday related to claims made by the Prime Minister in this chamber,” he said. 

But regardless of yesterday’s incident, I made it clear last week that while the Prime Minister’s words were not disorderly they were inappropriate. As I said then, these sorts of comments only inflame opinions and generate disregard for the House and it is not acceptable.

Tory revolt

Julian Smith, who previously served as Johnson’s Northern Ireland secretary, tweeted: “What happened to Keir Starmer tonight outside parliament is appalling.

“It is really important for our democracy & for his security that the false Savile slurs made against him are withdrawn in full.”

Former minister Stephen Hammond, one of the 15 Tory MPs to have publicly called for Johnson to resign over alleged Covid breaches, said he agreed with Smith, as did Robert Largan and Aaron Bell, who were elected in 2019.

Senior Tory Roger Gale urged Johnson to make a Commons apology today over the abuse which he feared could be the result of Johnson’s “deliberately careless” Savile allegation.

“It has, I’m afraid, played into the hands of some rather unpleasant people,” the MP, first elected in 1983, told the PA news agency.

“I think what he ought to do … is to go to the despatch box tomorrow to condemn the way Keir was treated and apologise.”

Tobias Ellwood, the Conservative MP who chairs the Commons Defence Committee, told the Prime Minister to “apologise please”.

“Let’s stop this drift towards a Trumpian style of politics from becoming the norm,” he added.

Officers stepped in to protect the opposition leader as the group, some protesting against Covid measures, followed him from outside Scotland Yard.

On at least two videos posted to social media, a man and a woman were heard shouting about Savile to the Labour leader, as he walked with shadow foreign secretary David Lammy.

Scotland Yard said two people were arrested on suspicion of assault after a traffic cone was thrown at a police officer during the unrest.

Lammy said it was “no surprise the conspiracy theorist thugs who harassed” Starmer and himself had “repeated” Johnson’s slurs.

But Conservative peer Peter Bruce Lilley, a former Cabinet minister, said “we’re all getting a bit precious about this”.

“Both sides are saying the person at the top of the organisation is responsible for what happens further down … both sides should probably apologise and stop making personal remarks,” he told BBC Newsnight.

Starmer apologised while director of public prosecutions in 2013 for the CPS having failed to bring Savile to justice four years earlier.

There is, however, no evidence that Starmer had any personal role in the failure to prosecute the man who was one of Britain’s most egregious sex offenders before his death in 2011.

Several Cabinet ministers – but not Chancellor Rishi Sunak – condemned the abuse without addressing allegations that Mr Johnson had helped whip it up.

The Prime Minister tweeted: “The behaviour directed at the Leader of the Opposition tonight is absolutely disgraceful.

“All forms of harassment of our elected representatives are completely unacceptable.”

Earlier in the day, Johnson played down reports of a rift with the Chancellor, who is tipped as the favourite to succeed him in No 10 if there is a leadership challenge.

Asked whether he has doubts about Sunak’s loyalty, the Prime Minister said: “Absolutely not.

“Everybody in No 10 and the Treasury are working together in harmony to deal with the big problems that the country faces and clearing the Covid backlogs.”

Johnson’s Downing Street shake-up got off to a rocky start as new communications director Guto Harri faced pressure over his lobbying for Chinese technology giant Huawei.

The Sun reported leaked minutes suggesting he asked former chief of staff Sir Eddie Lister which ministers could receive a “nudge” for his client in June 2020.

The next month, telecoms firms were ordered to strip Huawei equipment from 5G networks by 2027 over security fears.

While 15 Conservative MPs have publicly called for Johnson to resign, not all have sent letters of no confidence to 1922 Committee chairman Graham Brady.

But the true total of Conservatives who have turned against the Prime Minister is thought to be far higher.

The total number of letters submitted is a closely guarded secret but a vote of no confidence would be triggered if Brady receives 54.