Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
1000 PEOPLE A week are fed by Cork Penny Dinners, which provides food to the homeless, those of limited means, and those in need.
Now the charity is seeking food donations so that it can keep up its work. Last September, it announced a 300 per cent increase in people using the service, which provides dinners for 5c.
Florence Harrison of Cork Penny Dinners spoke to TheJournal.ie to explain that the charity is in need of basic pantry staples which will enable it to feed more than a hundred people a day.
Appeal
Having made an appeal earlier this week, she has been delighted to see “a flurry of donations” through its website.
We are delighted – we need it badly. We are now feeding 1000 a week – that’s a lot of people. I was appealing for food as well; some people obviously can’t give money, but if they’re a farmer they could give potatoes or milk.
Harrison said the number of people calling for food is “steadily rising all the time”.
The type of customer is changing as well. We would always have our usual homeless people on the margins. Now we are getting a higher percentage of ex-self employed people who don’t receive Social Welfare. That is a really frightening place to be. I’ve spoken to a few who’ve gotten over the hump, they just have to wait 12 weeks. They said if it was not for penny dinners they would not be able to survive.
While she is delighted that the service has such an important role, Harrison said:
In a way I would prefer to see our numbers shrinking because it would show there is not a need. We are getting women with youngish children, three or four children… it tends to be more during the weekend. It is tragic.
Advertisement
Volunteers
Cork Penny Dinners is completely run by volunteers, which Harrison said creates a friendly and open atmosphere – “the atmosphere changes because people want to be there”.
The atmosphere is very friendly and the people receiving the food dont feel it’s a favour. That’s so important.
Harrison is currently looking for a new premises, which must reach a number of criteria when it comes to location. They are raising funds for this – and hoping that a suitable place is found soon. Currently, the premises has one outside toilet for 150 people.
It’s not just those who are homeless who visit Cork Penny Dinners – it also serves as an outlet for those who live alone.
“They live alone and it’s a very good a bit of communication with others. It’s like a little social club but that’s important too. You’ve got to have communication. It’s a basic necessity.
Some of the customers even volunteer there themselves. “It just works very well like that,” said Harrison. “They tell me it’s a bit of giving back for what they’ve received.”
Donations
For those who would like to donate food, CPD is seeking basics such as non-perishables (ie tins of baked beans, gravy granules, custard), biscuits, and even tinfoil. “We use vast quantities of tinfoil - we give sandwiches to take away and they’re all wrapped in tinfoil and we double wrap them to keep them fresh.”
If you would like to donate food, or money, you can contact Cork Penny Dinners through its website or phone Florence Harrison (who is willing to collect food within a certain distance of Cork) on 086 8125509.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
If a ‘no’ vote is passed, they will run it again citing that people were confused by the ballot papers…they are more or less hinting towards that already. If a ‘yes’ vote is passed, well of course that’s grand for them, Europe will be happy
I’m in Laois- didn’t see confusion. Perhaps they’re preparing Charlie for their “mistake” in voting no. A “no” would be good – hopefully “thinking” and “outside the box” is taking off.
Angela, you are undoubtedly right. But they seriously need to look at ballot papers for referenda, which have caused confusion before now. The basic message – that the government always wants a ‘Yes’ answer – does not seem to get through, with all the legalese used. I heard of one woman who voted No, to say she wanted No Seanad! Also, if they “need” to rerun, they will need to give people something they want to vote Yes for, not a meaningless barrage of save 20m (a pittance, in the overall scheme), and fewer politicians (that would be good, if the ones left were also good), etc. It is unlikely to be rerun by this government, if they lose, so it depends on who wins the next Gen Election.
It’s going to be a no vote to the Seanad abolition. One thing is for certain – there will be no reform – no government is going to touch this issue again even with a barge pole.
There has been saturday voting, that makes no major difference to overall situation. It’s that people do not feel as involved in the outcome of Referenda and don’t make the effort. Most referenda have low turnouts.
There will be no re run. There has been complaints about there being too many politicians which cost too much. It is interesting to see that the people have endorsed that system.
Angela, you’re the one yesterday, saying ‘why bother’ – ‘puppet Germany government’ – ‘you’re vote doesn’t count’ – ‘pointless’.
The ballot papers were confusing, multiple people were asked ‘which was which’, the ballot paper should have been simpler:
Keep Seanad – Tick here
No Seanad – – Tick here
If it did have to be done again, I hope that the organizers at least have the decency to add a few options:
Keep Seanad
Keep Seanad and reform
Keep Dail
Keep Dial and reform
Online voting with PPS No.
People may not have endorsed the system about too many politicians costing too much – they are also saying they want a decent alternative, which they have not been offered (yet). Plus, the Dublin result does not determine the overall result, because Dublin often votes different to the rest of the country. It depends on how close it is outside Dublin.
Angela u are like a broken record. I get the feeling it will be a No vote and it will be accepted but I guess you will just delete your twitter account and rejoin under a new name so you can start spouting sh1t again
Well if they do let’s hope that all who voted stick to their guns this time and not let government bully them Into a yes vote !! I’m hoping everyone has learned rom the Lisbon treaty referendum.
I voted yesterday,instead of whinging on the Journal,but it does require a degree of intelligence and effort to try to come to a decision,not an easy option for everyone but one where the citizens have the power,not the vested interests.
I am more concerned about about the vast percentage that did not vote. In this referendum it looks like over sixty percent are not bothered to vote. Referendums should have a minimum percentage turnout to be valid. This is a major problem for the State leaders who are unlikley to solve the problem given that they would not take part in a public debate.
Angela, I’ve saved this article and yesterday’s in my favourites, this referendum will not be re-run, the cost of doing so a second time will almost outstrip the savings to be made from abolition of the Seanad, enough of the paranoid ramblings, this is not the same as an EU referendum that impacts millions of people for good or bad
One thing is for sure, if it’s a no vote Gilmore is going to be in serious trouble after the recent Lab vote meltdown. Humble pie for Enda. All this with a budget a stone’s throw away?
Whatever about confusing ballots, I don’t think you can really legislate for the kind of idiot who, as you say “voted No, to say she wanted No Seanad”.
i would not be surprised if this has a lot to do with Europe,if a YES vote is passed then the government can put into law anything they want without the people having a say .We need reform so there is no party whip and senators can vote how they feel and the people feel not the party line as it is now
It’s not about endorsing more politicians synops, for me it was about having a government who thought an educated electorate like ours would not be able to understand that they were giving us no choice at all in this referendum. The governments referendum question,”Should the Seanad be abolished?” or not which means reform the Seanad( real meaning) keep it the same way as it is which is not what people want. They obviously want a representative body that will police this or any government with a certain amount of power at least and maybe voted in through the popular vote possibly. Bottom line government gave us no proper question in this referendum and they got the sensed they deserved trying to be too smart
A poem by TheJournals resident poet ‘Lauren Masterson’
‘Yes or No’
Yes or no I’m waiting to see
I sit here and hope a no it will be
There is debate and confusion there is yes and no
Everyone has an opinion and is letting it show
Will a repeat vote be asked if Ireland says no
Some people think not but Angela thinks so
It’s hard to tell what our government will do
Will this be Lisbon treaty number two
No one knows what will happen, what way it will go
My friend Angela is hoping for a big fat no
All we can do for now is sit and wait
Get and journal.ie and have friendly debate
Another poem by TheJouranls resident poet ‘Lauren Materson’ dedicated to her muse, ‘LittleJim’
‘Oh little Jim, Oh little Jim’
Oh little Jim little Jim who went out to the club
He had a few drinks and a little bit if grub
On the dance floor he bumped into his mate called big Phil
Who pulled Jim aside and gave him a pill
Take this he said their bleedin great
So little Jim knocked it back and thanked his mate
Later that night Jim went home and felt happy
But he started to feel lonely and a little bit crappy
The door bell rang and made little Jim jumpy
He answered it and there was his friend lumpy
Lumpy was a giant dragon and was green and blue
He knocked on Jim’s door so he could use his loo
They ended up drinking and doing some shots
And rang around looking for some motts
But they weren’t successful so lumpy suggested they go for a fly
So little Jim climbed on lumpy back and they soared Into the sky
They flew through the clouds and Jim felt so good
But all of a sudden he was in a field and was covered in mud
He looked around looking for lumpy and realised he was indeed in the nip
Thinking about the pill it dawned on him it was all a big trip
I voted No Niall. It would appear that every single vote mattered a great deal. So I was wrong in one sense, but my rants and annoying self righteousness possibly prompted a handful to vote No just to spite me ;)
Those red thumbs are for me Lauren love, not you. Some people don’t like me here because I am not a sheep (mba mbaaa sheep talk) So do not take the red thumbs as any reflection to your poems :)
Some people just don’t appreciate a good poem written with raw emotion from the heart .if anything I hope it took their minds off the heaviness of the voting . These poems were requested by fellow readers. Jim asked me to do one on a random dragon. I am still taking requests. I feel inspired now to write one on red thumbing and the effects it may have on the receivers .
howya lauren
how about a limerick in honour of Enda
There was a taoiseach from mayo
who never thought we would say no
he refused to debate
but still thought he was great
?????
all help gratefully accepted to finish it
Angela,
You should be listening to Pink Floyd instead of Zeppelin.
Lauren,
Inspirational work, but please don’t be offended if I say Seamus Heaneys place in the Pantheon is safe…
I hope both of you are enjoying this wonderful sunny day.
Thanks cacilia … Ill definitely have more to come. I won’t let these red thumbers chad away my dreams of being the next top poet !! Anyway… Up the no voters !!!
Paul Roche the cheek off you
And you hurt my feelings too
My poetry is pure and from the heart
Stop being a Nasty little tart
You have deeply upset me with your comments mr paul
If you have nothing nice to say don’t say anything at all
Thank you for that ditty Lauren,
Reading it was, for sure, not borin’,
It was not my intent to cause offence,
Well, only to Enda, who’s a little dense.
To you, I say sorry for dissing your art,
Which I now see truly, comes from the heart.
and so david norris wants the seanad to remain elitist now does he ?????????
why and for what reason in any reality is that chain of thought ok.
get real or get a life norris your starting to sound like spoilt brat
It really felt like the Government didn’t want people turning out to vote , long established polling stations moved and little debate from enda kenny showed how little he thought of the referendum.
Green Monkey, the words “Court of Appeal” were on the ballot paper, were perfectly visible and it was a yes or no question. Anyone who got “confused” is obviously an idiot.
Kenny not engaging in debate didn’t show how little he thought of the referendum, the whole idea of scrapping the Seanad was his idea to start with. He debate on this for the same reason he doesn’t engage on any public debate, that is because he is incapable of doing so.
In fairness, all you had to do was read them to find out which was which. Id assume if you went to the bother of going to your polling station you could take a second to read and see which ballot paper was which.
Hmmmm Im not sure why voters were confused. You either approve of the abolition of the Seanad or you don’t. Tick yes if you do, no if you don’t. Its pretty clear. A monkey could do it.
I went to vote yesterday morning before going to work only to find they had moved the polling station! So I came home and had to haul my 14 month old baby and walk (as husband had car) to vote. Glad I did though.
No, had the old polling station on the polling card. Apparently it was on the radio but having spoken to a lot of my fellow towns people mostly wasn’t heard. :)
There is nothing confusing about the two votes. I went online and simply read the Journals and other online newspaper articles and it was clear. There was a poor vote because people are ticked off about bond holders not being burnt and the governments not putting up a fight for its people. The last thing we need is another commission gobbling up tax payers money. I voted because it matters but the general public don’t trust the governments decisions, and if in doubt do nothing comes to mind for many.
Are they starting this spin again.that people did not understand the ballot paper. so as to have a re run because we did not vote the way they wanted us to. remember the Lisbon referendum. Glad i voted No and had no problem with the ballot papers.
There was no confusion on the ballot papers if you read them, clear as day to me anyways. I think this is FG acknowledging defeat but blaming the wording rather than their dismal efforts in the campaign. Herr Kenny is responsible for this defeat it it turns out to be so, his inability to debate as leader of the country is reprehensible.
The only downside to this result is those weasels in FF will proclaim it as a victory for them.
Could be a Yes vote in Mayo … if it was a vote to bring in canibalism those mulla muppets would follow that Enda plank … either that or there just adicted to being on the losing side for everything
The words ‘piss-up’ and ‘brewey’ in a well known sentence spring to mind when thinking of this gombeen administration. The arrogance and contempt for both sides of the argument was breath taking.
Strange to think that in a polling station within 10 minutes, 14 people asked the question back to the ballot takers: “I want to vote NO the the first and YES to the second, which is which?”, yes they live outside Dublin, but far from stupid.
Angela, are you really that perfect, that your opinion always correct, that the government will re-do the vote. Did you print / design the ballot papers and have a insight view of how badly they were done?
14 million euros later and they cannot organise 2 pieces of paper with 2 boxes on them?
They insulted the electorate with taking a Yes vote for granted,don’t further insult them by saying they can’t tick boxes.
And shame on those who didn’t vote.
Charlie Flanagan tweeted that people were confused as to yes for what know to what. Granted. But it would have held if his own part leader and our Taoiseach went on rte / tv3 and explained it to the people. After all it was his own pet project to deflect away from budget 14.
They were confused about a lot of things Michael, they were also apparently confused how our system works in general, telling canvassers they wanted to vote no to ”protect democracy” apparently not realizing they were saying they wanted to protect it from the elected house, which makes no sense.
I think the YES camp made a balls of it’s campaign with stupid reasons offered like the petty savings when there were plenty of good reasons to abolish it, and they did a very poor job educating the non-politically savvy public about how the Senate actually works in practice as opposed to how it works in theory.
You’ll see now, as I said all along, you probably won’t get reform, and even if you do any reform will make the senate either a source of deadlock or a rubber stamp. It has to be one of those 3.
No good will come of this vote.
John I voted no but even I know Irish politicians no matter what party they belong to have one thing in common they have no morals or concept of what a resigning matter would be.
“Dublin might be a NO” ” everywhere else a YES” where the absolute fk are you making this crap up ? Only reports in so far putting a YES ahead are in wicklow and Cork … Laois-Offaly , Donegal, Meath East are NO’s of course far to early to take it either way , but go and stick your government bias BS reporting up your ass
‘confusing ballot papers’?! 2 referendums, 2 pieces of paper. Yes or no in each case. I’d worry about anyone who walked in and didn’t know what box to tick to reflect their choice – has to be a tiny percentage of the people that voted doesn’t it?!….. or maybe I just have too much faith in people’s ability to read!!
I think there’s mixed reasons for the No vote. I want to see reform along the lines that Prof John Crown has suggested & if there’s a sliver of hope that it may happen, it was worth voting No (even if it meant voting the same way as FF). Voting in protest at the government is a waste – the General & local elections are the appropriate protest grounds for that.
I too would dearly love reform Sara, and if only that option had been put before us, sadly it wasn’t. Therefore the status quo remains, and a house of little value continues in it’s existence.
You’re right. When Micheal Martin is Taoiseach in 2 1/2 years time, just 5 short years after being part of a government that f#*×ed this country, do you think he’ll offer a sniff of the wonderful reform he’s been spouting about?
I respect your opinion Norman, personally I feel however, that we are ill served by a mediocrity that passes for a political system, one that endlessly seeks to place it’s own existence and bullish behaviour ahead of the needs and rights of the people. They promise with words the deeds they never enact, this regrettably is the plight we are bound under.
James had Kenny started with serious reform of the Dail I would have voted yes, but every action before and after the election has been a lesson in lies and deceit by the same Kenny.I will not place give my trust in a liar, its that simple.
I didn’t vote yes on account of enda kenny, or his party. I am in sync with you Norman on the man’s ability, which is mediocre at the best of times. I honestly feel it matters not a hoot to him whether or not it passes, he will say I offered an opportunity at reform and the people rejected it. I voted yes to address a failing in our system, I can’t vote on it again as I am not one of those entitled to vote for the Seanad ordinarily.
A very bad day for Sinn Fein who should have run a No campaign highlighting Enda Kennys refusal to offer the people the option of reform on the ballot paper.
A campaign run along these lines would have introduced their policies to many people for the 1st time.
They need to look at their policy advisors and question how they thought rolling in with Fine Gael would in any way highlight them as a possible future alternative for government.
On the assumption that each polling station carried enough papers to cover entire electorate, think how much money was wasted by the 65% or there abouts who couldn’t be bothered. How many of this 65% are supported by the state each day.
Also means less than 20% of the people will make this call. Shameful really.
Disgraceful comments by Leo…“Most people aren’t that pushed whether the Seanad is reformed,” he says.
This is insulting to anyone that went out and voted. People have a myriad of reasons why they voted no…he has no right to dismiss a No vote as voter apathy. I voted because I want reform….and how can you reform something if it ceases to exist?
A person I know received 2 genuine voting cards. One with her maiden name and another with her married name. It wasn’t only a mistake in posting, but the two names were on the list in the polling stations ! (Only 1 was used btw) :P
Standard fare for an Irish poll. I’m still getting multiple polling cards years after leaving Ireland. They’re very creative: sometimes I’m John, sometimes Ian… Anything to bulk up the ballot box!
Enda stirkes again. Treats the public with contempt. Gets a kicking. The headline still says too close to call. Based on RTE reports it’s going to be a No. And a No by between 3 and 5 per cent.
Dublin looks like carrying a NO vote over the line. Politicians pay & pension reinstatement to previous levels will not be too many years behind.
Missed opportunity with an anti government vote taking precedent over getting rid of politicians.
So by your logic people voted no just to stick it to the government, pretty arrogant comment to make.
I voted no based on the information out forward by both sides.
The yes side was a populist piece of nonsense save €20 million (well maybe) and the person proposing the abolition of the Seanad not even willing to debate the issue.
Would this be the same government who’s Taoiseach refused – on more than one occasion – the opportunity to debate and put forward his views as to why this amendment should be carried? Would it also happen to be the same government who’s Tanaiste came out and pretty much insulted all of his fellow citizen’s intelligence by arrogantly stating that a ‘Yes’ decision was a “very straightforward” choice for people to make?
‘Cos if that’s the same government you’re talking about then an ‘anti government vote’ appears to be a fairly reasonable conclusion to this farce.
My views, the butchery of the consititution the unwillingness of Enda to debate.Lastly just that uncomfortable feeling that there was more to abolition than met the eye.
Agree with you on this , think its nothing but a protest vote , most people I know complain about politicians but here so many vote to keep 60 of the most useless . A chance to have a few redundancies in Kildare Street I really think it would have been good for the political class.
So you ‘no’ votes had a lot to do with the leader of the Government not engaging in a TV debate upon request by the leader of a small political party !!
My greatest sense of relief is for the Constitution of Ireland; it has not been dismembered. Let’s never allow Enda Kenny to make an executive decision again.
The first thing to be done now is to forever end the utter corruption of ‘repeat referendums’. The people themselves must get ahead of the government’s curve, and immediately demand that democratic mandates are respected and not undermined by extremists who ‘decide’ that it is their right to force and brow beat the electorate about how they ‘should’ have voted. I suggest anyone and everyone write to/ email their TDs to absolutely demand that no ‘re-run’ referendum occurs. Without wanting to sound alarmist, this behaviour in the past has seriously undermined voter confidence in the democratic process, not to mention perversing the course of democracy.
We must act now, individually and as citizens, to remind our elected officials that “confusion” excuses or otherwise will no longer be tolerated.
The people have spoken, Mr. Kenny. We’ve taken the unemployment, the utterly bankrupting nationalisation of debt while bond holders are protected. We’ve taken the introduction of water charges, the insulting and infra structurally-deficient demand for such high tv licences. We’ve listened as you explained the need for continued austerity and lack of serious investment. The cuts in education, public sector pay … All of which are for the ‘Common Good’.
The people have spoken. They chose to retain the Seanad, for the COMMON GOOD.
Now back off.
I happily voted no yesterday & am very happy that it looks like I’m not in the minority on this issue. We did not get a chance to vote for actual reform and the fact that our so called leader let others debate when he hid away whilst his govt campaigned on an agenda of lies says so much about his brand of dirty politics. Congrats to DDI for all their work on enlightening people on this issue. Leo now arguing that they lost because of a low turnout – deluded sanctimonious arrogant idiot.
Looks like Mr Norris can relax and keep drawing his Trinity pension that he didn’t work for, take as much time away from the Seanad as he likes so that he can double / triple job and fill in for radio / tv journalists / presenters who go on holidays. Did I mention that he gets a senators wage on top of all that? He epitomises the very reason it should be abolished. Disgusting.
There will be no rerun of this vote. Our ‘government’ have satisfied the wishes of their European masters by putting the proposal of abolishing the Seanad to the people. If we had said ‘Yes’ a little work would have to be done. By saying ‘No’, it means they have to do absolutley nothing, there will be no reform, as always this government will take the course of minimum effort. They produce a piece of legislation from the ‘down with this sort of thing’ school of politics, there was, as always,no interaction with the people, no effort to move the country forward, no open discussion, and after the vote? A quick nod toward ‘the people have spoken’, a shrug and a smirk, and a return to business as usual.
On the face of it,yes we have voted for more of the same. However if asked I beleive that the people, in my opinion, want what they were promised at the last election; reformed, open and accountable government. Will the Seanad be reformed as a result of this vote? Unfortunatley no, it will be more of the same, but with, what the government will claim, or ‘spin’ into mandate to justify it
OK a lot of people say that if voters just read the ballot papers there was no need for confusion. I think that makes sense especially if you’re an active voter and have self informed. However, in designing these papers you need to cater for those who have poor information or understanding about these constitutional articles. Think of all the students who know they should read all their exam questions but don’t!
From what I gather many people do not fully understand the implications of a yes vote and how that affects our rights as citizens at least there is a possibility of reform and reform that will work for the population.
Wait a minute, so it’s sheep for following the government and it’s sheep for opposing the government.
Man, it’s hard to not be a sheep I guess. I wish I was as cool as you are Tax Slave.
For once, people did the right thing and overcome the urge to “stick it to the politicians” and did the right thing.
Well if Enda wants us to vote yes, then we have to think – No. Because we all know that the no good b*****d is not out for our good, only doing what he is told in Europe. He was too thick to even take part in the debate.
Did anyone notice they removed that horrible blue flag from the dail ,just in case the peasants might think this has anything to do with the mob in brussels .This was an order from brussels to these politicians who would sell their mothers to brussels and their country .Well done to those who voted against the government machine who are lap dogging to europe
My partner was denied her right to vote last night. They would not give her in writing that she had showed to vote and that constitutional right was denied. The referendum was about our constitution. Unreal
Apparently she was removed from the register. So in essence she does not exist although she pays her taxes. The response was to check on Monday !!!!!! Voting over by then.
No Lauren. No voting card arrived. Apparently she was taken off the register because someone answered the front door one day and gave their details. So instead of checking with her she was taken off the register. However even if she is or us not on the register she should have been immediately put back on when it was shown that she did indeed exist and has voted in past. She is also squeaky clean around her taxes etc. anyway the staff were pleasant enough but would not give her vote nor acknowledge that she was denied the right. Close run but at least the voting dud nit rest on her single vote but it could well have
Great day for Direct Democracy ireland who along with FF where pushing for a NO vote.
The others have clearly been rejected – including Sinn Fein and the Socialists (whatever name or group they are trying to mask themselves under from month to month!).
Enda you’ve not pulled the wool over us Irish ..turn the result in your favour. you’re beaten by Irish people who see you for what you really are.. a dictator who doesn’t give two shits your fellow Irish man woman and child . Michael has had the last laugh… you’re the fool Enda for not going on for live debate…. who’s making a fool of himself Now… It’s time for you Enda to go back to Mayo and crawl under that rock formation you squirmed out from underneath. Its time now to put leadership under the spot light… Lets Abolish Enda from Daíl.
First time to comment on the Journal, although I read it every day, so relieved it was a no vote because of the lack of transparency as to the ramifications of the abolition of the Seanad
Japers, I thought I would never get to the end of the comments treat to add my cupla focal. Anyone would think that a Referendum had just taken place LOL. Seriously though; well done to all who voted NO. You have restored my faith in the discerning ability of the Irish electorate and you have saved our Seanad. Yesterday and today were good days work for the cause of greater Irish Democracy. In voting NO you have forestalled the most cynical attempt, in our nations history, to undermine the Houses of the Oireachtas. What would you have got in return? Promises of some alternative; that’s all: promises and you know how very good the present administration is at keeping electoral promises. In reality the NO vote was a YES vote for Seanad Reform. So, elected representatives ignore that message at your peril. If you head into the long grass and sulk we the people will see you at the next general ballot and we will speak louder that we did in this Referendum. Get on with it folks. The country is watching.
In this day and age there should be online voting …… If billions of euro’s can be transferred daily online , the time has come we should be able to vote online
This is a huge middle finger to these politicians who have betrayed our country,who have tried to feed our people to the wolves in brussels and germany .Make no mistake this was an order from the mob in brussels all across this bogus eu,destroy all second parliaments first ,then destroy all parliaments second ,then send in the technocrats from brussels .Ireland was deliberatly bankrupted ,call in the loans brussels think they own Ireland now .This is the Third rejection by Ireland to these gangsters in brussels ,its time to GIVE IRELAND BACK TO THE IRISH ,OUR COUNTRY IS NOT FOR SALE . Wake up labour ,ff and fg its time to withraw from the EU .That sinn fein advocated the abolishing of any second chamber was a huge mistake
I have to say whenever I have to fill out documents of importance I always seem to panic incase I get it wrong.. I’m not sure why but I’ve always been like that. I’m always terrified I’ll get something wrong. Without fail I always get a tiny bit nervous when going to vote. Yesterday I was in and out. It was easy to read and the instructions were clear and simple to understand. I’m fairly sure my 4 year old would have been able to fill out the paper on his own. To me ‘Confusion’ is just an excuse for those who just didn’t bother to vote and for those who want a re vote, seriously I don’t think they could make it any easier… Unless we attend a class before we vote and the teacher can go through it with us. And maybe go through our ABCs while they are at it.
A lot of the ‘no’ vote would have been from people like me. I think the Seanad is elitist and in need of reform or abolition, but a) I wanted to hurt a government that are hurting me and my family and b) right now there are senators in place who will articulate opposition to government austerity policies.
We get a chance of getting rid of 60 odd politicians who do nothing except cost money and generally delay only something. They have had fifty years to talk about reform but only when faced with abolition did they get off their arses. A cushy club of TDs who lost their seat or trying to gain one. Or somebody with a profile in a university or trade union.
But we look like keeping it out of spite to Enda hahaha to you Enda. But we are the mugs , because we will have to keep paying these rubber stamp merchants for ever and their replacements too.
Although I have grave reservations about the FG/Lab government I do honestly believe that redundancies in Kildare Street would be a good thing , then they might realise that joblessness affects people
Maybe if we had a proper vote calling, for reduced numbers in both houses of
Parliament i.e. reduce the Dail to 100 TDs, the Seanad to 30 seats all voted in by the people, abolish the party whips and finally scrap 80% of the local authorities ( why do we need 50 odd councils), then we would have had a better reform of irish politics, not this oh because we’ll save 20 million joke.
The next referendum should be to make it compulsory to vote in elections and referendums. Political parties only interested in where they can corner votes.
A lot more would be gained if voting was compulsory forcing political parties to engage more and follow through on election promises.
What will this mean for Enda Kenny’s leadership now that the Seanad referendum, in which he invested so much of his political capital, has been defeated?
Enda Kenny must resign over this. His credibility with the Irish people is in tatters.
Exactly whose opinion was portrayed in the opinion polls. Irish media cannot be trusted it is in the hands of this current government. Putin would be proud.
Well there you have it Enda. Most people don’t trust you to give you more power. They saw it was a knee jerk reaction on your part to losing out to Gilmore in a poll. You kept pushing it because of your ‘I’m always right mindset’. It’s the beginning of the Enda for you.
It is actually quite hillarious that Irish people wants to keep the government body that they have no direct influence on who is actually chosen to be in it. (Sorry not sure if what I wrote makes sense in English). Something unusual. It would make sense if the people of Ireland would choose each member of Senate during general election but in this case?
Can we have a referendum to ban FG from government, there agenda is to close to FF & it’s really a waste having so many politicians just trying to look better than each other rather than taking the country’s best interest serious. Just my opinion
There is alot of posts on facebook from people stating that due to an administration error they were refused their right to vote yesterday ! Even though they had voting cards and knew the people in the polling station personally. Is this the new way the government can pick and choose who votes or not? Or saving them having to do a re vote when the outcome doesn’t go their way ?
Yes, and I read that the moon landing didn’t happen either. Because who could have taken the photo of Neil Armstrong if he was supposedly the first one out of the lunar capsule? And the flag was blowing in the wind in the picture….but there is no wind on the moon !!!
Twice in as many weeks Dublin says NO to Inda. Add to this the disastrous showing in the Presidential elections, Inda is continuing a Fine tradition of making an absolute bollix of it! Another Fine Own Goal!!!
It is a shame that it was such a low turnout!.. In a few Months, I suppose we will have the ones who didn’t vote gripe!.. It is a sickener that we the TaxPayers have to pay for it. We could have saved ourselves some Money. But, it is too late now.
Ehh what was the confusion with ballot papers? If this are the ones that i’ve just seen above than i have to say that as a Polish person even i can understand it! Is this because of declining education levels?
A lot of the tallies are showing a win for the No side.
If the No side wins we won’t see any Seanad reform in this Dail term. That means another Seanad term is almost a certainty. Almost guarantees there will be no reform for at least 8 more years. But the people voted so what can you do.
Angela, you’re the one yesterday, saying ‘why bother’ – ‘puppet Germany government’ – ‘you’re vote doesn’t count’ – ‘pointless’.
The ballot papers were confusing, multiple people were asked ‘which was which’, the ballot paper should have been simpler:
Keep Seanad – Tick here
No Seanad – – Tick here
If it did have to be done again, I hope that the organizers at least have the decency to add a few options:
Keep Seanad
Keep Seanad and reform
Keep Dail
Keep Dial and reform
Online voting with PPS No.
Reading some of the posts which are positive with regard to the way we voted yesterday are good! but the question I would like to put out there woukd be is this government good enough to get this great country of ours off its knees?
I just mentioned on another forum that the Dublin football team is to be thanked for swinging the referendum result. The Yes side got its biggest kicking in Dublin where the electorate told Enda Kenny – we stuffed your football team, this is what we think of your referendum!
In terms of Irish politics and in the very best Northern Irish accent, ‘Dublin says no’! The masses have spoken. Perhaps the culties did not get the memo?
Totally agree with you JP that’s exactly why I voted no. People are always giving out that we are a country that doesn’t protest – well we just did with our votes instead of our feet. FG was for it so I was always going to vote the opposite and it didn’t matter what the subject was.
So it’s over, and one of the following is going to happen:
1. [most likely] the govt will spin this as an endorsement of the status quo and change nothing
They will just let the opposition call for reform and run out the news cycle clock until people stop talking about the issue, and be glad their failed Dail candidates still have a place to go.
2. They’ll propose token reform like opening the university seats, which won’t require a referendum.
lets say they did do reform though….second chambers are only ever one of two things
1. A source of deadlock if it can be controlled by the opposition with total gridlock, budgets not passing etc OR
2. A rubber stamp, which means that deep down nothing will have changed.
They won’t give you reform, but even if they do, it will be deadlock or rubber stamp.
If you want a higher turn out then tie it in with Arthur’s day, or whatever it gets rebranded as, and let people vote in the pub! The results should be interesting.
I voted no because Kenny and Gilmore proposed this referendum to abolish the Seanad. I also voted no to the other one, the new court of appeal. 99.9% of those who voted to set up this new gravy tain for barristers and solicitors could never afford to go to the Circuit court or High court never mind the new Court of appeal. It is only for those with serious money or free legal aid, not for you and me.
Thomas McGrath
Charlie Flanagan whingeing about the confusing wording on the ballot papers. He’s had weeks to comment on the wording and waits until the No vote is winning to speak out. Maybe he thought the “confusing wording” would help the Yes camp win. I voted No because I don’t trust that sleeveen Enda. He hid in the long grass and wouldn’t debate his pet project because he’s too dense to defend his own ideas. ( BTW, I’m not sure if the predictive text is the Journal site or my iPad, but how the f… Does a computer know what I want to say?. get rid of it.)
A victory for the ordinary Joe at last, smug Enda can go and lick his wounds while he tries to figure this one out. He can always blame Bruton as Director of Elections. That will teach him to mount a push against his leader. FG and Labour totally discredited, no idea what the electorate want, time for a reform of the Dail. Old school party politics are not working, we need honest politicians, people with integrity and ethics, not failed schoolteachers.
Looking at the comments it looks more like a vote no to stick one to Enda rather then vote yes to stick one to the whole political class.
I would say they are all quite pleased more sweeties for them.
Hopefully reform of the Seanad will be on the agenda come the next election. Glad it has been retained but it needs to more participation from the people – special interest groups need to be represented and it needs to reflect society in general, not just the elite.
I’m also hoping that people realise they don’t have to vote for FF, FG and Labour!
Great, we get to keep the Seanad!, more of the likes of Ivor Callaly and syrup head Donie Cassidy, and listening to David Norris spouting sh1te for the sake of gaining more air time, BRILLIANT!
well i voted yes and so no longer recognise the seanad it is an outdated british remider like the house of lords with no power but eats up lots of money by the well paid politicians who were voted out by the public but saved from the dole by giing them this ludricous waste of taxpayers money.
As far as im concerned we only have the dail no seanad
Everybody agrees the Seanad needed to be sorted. What Inda did was say I’m only giving you the option of keeping it or losing it. If you keep it I’m not making any commitment to reforming it. Keep it or lose it. That’s it. And by the way, I’m not debating it”.
A serious lesson in politics Inda. Don’t treat the electorate with such disrespect.
This referendum being defeated lies in the fact that enda kenny refused to debate what his government was proposing. As someone who has worked in the Seanad I can vouch that it is a total waste of the taxpayers money but how can anyone vote for something that our country’s ‘leader’ is too afraid to debate on national television. Disgraceful.
Any chance of another vote like the Nice Treaty one. Wasn’t it kinda where voting no meant yes and voting yes meant no. Come on lads give us a replay- we’ve already lost out on the Galway v Limerick debacle
Landlord trying to add monthly common area fee to bills despite earlier agreement with watchdog
Eoghan Dalton
6 hrs ago
5.2k
Independent Ireland
'It wrecks your head, there's so much to be done': MEP Ciaran Mullooly on his EU housing role
2 mins ago
3
fatal blaze
59 people dead following nightclub fire in North Macedonia
Updated
10 hrs ago
45.9k
43
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 157 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 109 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 141 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 111 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 132 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 60 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 38 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 90 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 97 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 86 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 68 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say