Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Grafton Street during lockdown. Leon Farrell/RollingNews.ie

Speculation mounts about Leaving Cert cancellation, and UK was 'ill-prepared' for pandemic: Today's Covid-19 main points

A new childcare scheme for healthcare workers has also been launched.

LAST UPDATE | 7 May 2020

HEALTH OFFICIALS HAVE confirmed that a further 29 people have died from Covid-19 in Ireland, bringing the total death toll to 1,404.

A further 137 cases of Covid-19 have also been confirmed here, bringing the total number of cases to 22,385.

During today’s briefing, Chief Medical Officer Tony Holohan said: “We have achieved our goal of suppressing the spread of the disease, it was not easy for anyone but there is no question that our collective effort has saved lives.”

Meanwhile, speculation is mounting that the Leaving Cert exams will be cancelled. 

Internationally, health experts have expressed growing concern that a second wave of Covid-19 deaths and infections could force governments to bring in more restrictions, even as China declared its risk level is low and New Zealand relaxed its pandemic shutdown.

Here are today’s Covid-19 main points:

Here are today’s international Covid-19 points:

With reporting by Órla Ryan

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
73 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute John Whelan
    Favourite John Whelan
    Report
    Jun 13th 2015, 9:48 AM

    People can be very precious sometimes

    93
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alien8
    Favourite Alien8
    Report
    Jun 13th 2015, 10:16 AM

    Like the last few articles on the EAT, they have no power, and take boths sides versions with equal credibility (i.e the employee and company can say anything unsubstantiated and it is taken as fact by the (usually ex-union) guy in the chair position). The employer is entitled now to go to a real court, and see if the unfair dismissal is valid, where by the employee not turning up for dismissal meetings and the company following due process will be taken into account. They have to with this against writing off work €7k.

    It should be easier for employees to go to proper legal entity to weigh up the facts of a case. Too often, the EAT “judges” in favour of the employee, only for it to be overturned in court. This is unfair to both the employee and the company, and the only purpose is to make the hundreds of “quasi-judicial” chairs feel a bit of power for the day.

    29
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alan Lawlor
    Favourite Alan Lawlor
    Report
    Jun 13th 2015, 10:31 AM

    Rather than being chaired by impartial people, it has a mix of pro-employee and pro-employer people. If your case is heard by one or the other, the outcome is decided by the prejudices of the person presiding on the day, rather than the facts of the case.
    If the parties have enough funds, the cases are nearly always appealing to the courts.
    The tribunals are a waste of time and money, but you must go through them to get access to the court

    27
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Alien8
    Favourite Alien8
    Report
    Jun 13th 2015, 11:27 AM

    I agree… It can go either way. In observations, all the reported cases are chaired by the pro-union adjudicators, but that is the ones where employees get the award (which tempts other employees to constructively get dismissed and take a case on the basis that there is a template for getting sacked and over 50% chance of getting a reward). This may be related to the non movable position of Kieran Mulvey in managing this charade.

    It also hides the cases where competent employees are genuinely bullied and harassed in work, and lose their case due to an opinion of a pro-employer chair. The whole system is a joke, and it’s history was just to remove cases from courts, and give unelected union and IBEC guys a bit of power.

    10
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds