Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock/FotoDuets

Low-income families faced losing up to 30% of earnings without lockdown supports, CSO says

A new CSO report says that supports such as the PUP prevented significant falls in household income.

LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS would have lost between 18% and 30% of their earnings during the first lockdown in 2020 were it not for new financial supports, figures suggest.

Covid-19 income supports such as the pandemic unemployment payment (PUP) played a significant role in supporting households, new analysis from the Central Statistics Office (CSO) shows.

Low income and high debt households benefited the most from pandemic income supports last year, the research published on Tuesday has found.

The CSO study looked at the debt sustainability of Irish households in the first three quarters of 2020, which includes the first lockdown and the eventual reopening of society.

It found that Covid-19 income supports, such as PUP and other wage subsidy schemes, prevented significant falls in household income.

For lower income households, income would have plummeted by between 18% and 30% in the year to quarter two, but instead fell by between just 0.1% and 4.2%, it found.

That is compared to drops of between 7% and 18% for those in the top half of the income distribution bracket.

The median gross income fell by 1.7% in the year to quarter two of 2020, when pandemic support schemes are taken into account.

Without the supports, the median household income would have fallen by an estimated 19.6% in the second quarter of 2020, when the vast majority of the economy was shut down.

In the third quarter, as people began to return to work, the median income would have fallen by 5.7% were it not for the income supports, the analysis found.

The pandemic supports also prevented a large rise in the debt-to-income ratios.

A slight increase in quarter two of 2020 brought the median debt-to-income ratio to 60.9% of gross income.

But without pandemic supports the debt ratio would have increased to 73% of household income, the report found.

The most indebted households, those in the 90th percentile, saw debt-to-income ratios increase from 342% to 376.1% in that period.

But without pandemic income supports, the report said the ratio would have ballooned to 552.3%.

CSO statistician Brian Cahill said: “The Covid-19 labour market shock is concentrated amongst lower income households.

“Without Covid-19 income supports household incomes in the bottom half of the distribution would have fallen significantly in the year to Q2 and Q3 2020.

“Higher income households would have seen their income without supports fall to a lesser, but not insignificant, extent.”

He added: “While lower income households had the largest relative benefits from Covid-19 income supports, the households that benefited most in terms of their debt sustainability included households with high debt levels; owner-occupied households with mortgage debt; households with two or more adults with children under 18 years; and households with a reference person aged 30 to 65 years.”

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Author
Nora Creamer
View 17 comments
Close
17 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds