Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
CONCERNS HAVE BEEN raised about dead bodies left on trolleys in the corridors of the mortuary at University Hospital Waterford.
According to a letter, first seen by the Waterford News and Star and the Irish Times, ”due to inadequate body storage and refrigeration facilities, most bodies lie on trolleys in corridors, often leaking body fluids on to the floor.”
The letter is signed by four consultant pathologists at the hospital who warn that bodies decomposing in the mortuary’s corridors lead to closed-coffin funerals, as well as “expose the public visiting hospitals to the odours of a postmortem room”.
Speaking on RTÉ Radio One’s Today with Sean O’Rourke show, one of the signatories of the letter, Professor Rob Landers said that conditions in the mortuary are “quite primitive”.
The conditions, I suppose to put it bluntly, pose a risk both to staff, visitors and public at the mortuary and they afford very little dignity for the deceased bodies that come down to us.
The letter calls for urgent remedial action at the mortuary and postmortem facilities, and was sent to Gerry O’Dwyer, CEO of the South-South West Hospital Group, which oversees University Hospital Waterford.
In a statement to TheJournal.ie, the South-South West Hospital Group said:
“University Hospital Waterford has recently received approval for a new replacement Mortuary Building. It is expected that the request for tender will be issued shortly with the expectation that construction will commence before the end of this year.
University Hospital Waterford is currently examining interim arrangements to address the issues raised.
Dr Landers had said that although funding for a new mortuary had been granted in the HSE’s capital plan in 2013, he had informally been told there was no intention to fund it until 2022 or 2023.
This afternoon, the hospital group updated their statement to say that it was a priority to replace the mortuary at University Hospital Waterford.
“This development is included in the Draft Capital Plan sent to the Department of Health for approval. We would expect to progress to selecting a contractor and commencing construction of a new mortuary in the final quarter of this year, with a twenty month construction programme.
“The design phase of the development has already been completed and the estimated cost of construction is €5m.”
Advertisement
Statement from Simon Harris
The Irish Patients Association said the incident was a “terrible testimony of how those deceased and their loved ones right to dignity in death have been violated”.
“We have called on the Minister for Health and the Taoiseach that as a mark of respect to the families of the deceased that they offer their sincere apologies,” the group said.
The group has also asked the Minister for Health to investigate how this happened.
In a statement to TheJournal.ie, Minister for Health Simon Harris said that he’s made contact with the management of University Hospital Waterford this morning, “who have assured him that they are to undertake interim measures while awaiting the replacement Mortuary Building”.
“The Minister also received confirmation from the HSE that plans for the new mortuary are at an advanced stage and it is expected the request for tender will be issued shortly with the expectation that construction will commence before the end of this year.
The Minister has made it clear to the HSE that this project needs to be progressed as a matter of priority and funding will be provided.
Reaction
Sinn Féin TD for Waterford David Cullinane said what was reported in the letter was “truly shocking”.
He said that the government needs to urgently invest in the mortuary and post-mortem facilities at the hospital.
Fianna Fáil TD for Waterford Mary Butler said: “The fact that four pathologists had to put pen to paper illustrates how frustrated consultants are with the way the health service is being mismanaged by this government. Even the most basic services are suffering.”
Labour Party Health spokesperson Alan Kelly said the reports were “horrifying”, adding that the HSE and government officials must “react swiftly” to the “appalling conditions”.
The conditions described by consultant pathologists in UHW make for absolutely grim, stomach-churning reading.
“A relative passing away can be an upsetting time for any family but to add the conditions in which relatives are getting bodies of loved ones back from UHW is surely adding indescribable levels of grief and hurt into families.
“The scale of the trolley crisis is already demoralising enough for the living, this type of practice must not be the norm for the dead too.”
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
112 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
@Paul Howlin: Not to mention the disrespect and distress to the families caused by having their loved one’s remains treated so shamefully,this shabby treatment will live with families for ever and only add to their grief and pain.
@Paul Howlin:
Squeezed out like a sponge for tax all of your working life and then left to expire without dignity on a trolley. It’s beyond shameful and a sad indictment on the nation that we let FFG away with such disgraceful behavior.
And it doesn’t stop there, inheritance tax will ensure that these bodies will be taxed again even in ground if they happen to leave any property behind.
@Milk The Drones: This is appalling management by the hospital – terrible practices that have become the norm – their management should accountable for this – but blaming the any government party is a far stretch.
@Anthony Clark:
No Fine Gael or Fianna Fáil apologist is ever going to tell me that we’re not a nation with excessive taxes and a blind indifference towards a decent health system and compassionate care of our sick and elderly.
Grabbing money to then waste it is not governance at all.
And pointing out the same inability of previous Ministers to correct it is to make excuses for it and accept the cycle. It’s this delusional defeatist attitude that suggests we ought to consent to it as some type of expected norm and to carry on voting FFG.
Where does the book stop in your opinion so?
@Dave Doyle: Give us any specific example of Fine Gael focusing on the destruction of the Health Service. They have just approved €2Bn for a new children’s hospital. Give us something specific please, not your usual vague nonsense.
@Anthony Clark: A lot of it is to do with the management. They have a new palliative care and hospice block being built at the moment why didn’t that money go to the mortuary and cardiac services, anyone who truely cared would have screamed from the highest point about the stupidity of building a hospice which is for dying people when they don’t have the facilities for the dead now. Plus who in their right mind would leave rotting bodies in the open in a hospital? Ticking time bomb.
@richard fennessy: Going on since 2004 Micheál Martin,Mary Harney ,Mary Coughlan, James Reilly, Leo Varadkar have all held the post of health minister since then with Simon Harris the latest. FF and FG have done nothing when in power
@CrabaRev: with the 2 billion its costing the state to build the children’s hospital there will be no health service left in Ireland because of it. they have to fund it from somewhere and like hogan with the water slogan it will be down to a trickle. The are now going to attach a private unit to the new hospital where consultants can hire theater’s or other facility in the main new hospital so there goes the public funded hospital, children with out medical insurance will be put on waiting list while others will get the full use of the facility. so much for a public funded hospital going straight into the two tier system and its not even built yet.
@Anthony Clark: rubbish and you know it! Edna Kenny promised to stop the trolly fiasco, didn’t quite happen. Your beloved FG couldn’t organise a piss up in a Brewery without screwing it up.
@CrabaRev: 2 Bn is way over budget and it probably won’t stop there. T You offer nothinghe reason the NCH is costing way over budget is because it’s being built to, and for, privateers specs.
Vague nonsense? You offer nothing trying to rubbish comments that point out the harm FG’s policies are causing to people and the services they depend on.
@Dave Doyle: Is that the best you have? Give me a specific example of what you are claiming. But you can’t, because you don’t have any. You are just spouting vacuous nonsense. Calling me “a FG’er” doesn’t change that.
@emer caffrey: Not all of the money was fundraised, only €6 million to be raised by Waterford Hospice they are at something like €4.6 million so far and the other €20 million will be paid for by the HSE. Hospice will only take up 2 floors and there was talk that there will be private wards. They are building this thing when they are shutting down wards in the main building and bodies left to rot in corridors.
@emer caffrey: Forgot to add the morgue is supposed to cost €5 million. That’s €5 million compared to €20 million. Then there is the Cath Lab another €5 million for that and that will save lives.
Harris does it again, scandal no. 46 under his watch and still he goes on…competence is overrated when you have the media training to just bang on about the winning the abortion referendum and empowering women whenever the next scandal occurs.
@Nathan Fulham: in all fairness, how can Simon Harris be blamed for this? As a member of the Irish health system workforce, I can tell you all of these failings are down to decades of flawed decision making and inadequate planning, not the last 4 years.
@Daniel Lehane: While the public sector staff remain untouchable the minister will get it, start sacking useless public service staff , if not he is in charge, he takes responsibility..
@MickN: The simply reality is that Public sector workers at all levels are untouchable unless you want the whole lot out on strike which will exacerbate the health service issues even more. For change to happen it has to be negotiated with their unions slowly and carefully. That’s just the way it is in Ireland unless somebody wants to take on the unions and no party or TD in Dail Eireann is ever going to take on the unions.
@davey boy: Charles Haughey. Not a stand up role model for politics in general but did a really good job as health minister. Maybe if his successors had followed in his path, we wouldn’t be in as big a mess now.
@Logan Shepherd: I beg to differ. In Limerick alone he closed down one major and very busy hospital which can in part be blamed for the massive overcrowding and largest number of people waiting on trolleys today.
@Donnachaín Ní Uallacháin: The overall consensus though is that he was a good minister for health.
I’m basing my opinion on the word of my mother who worked in health at the time, and also from recorded reports of his tenure in health.
@davey boy: ah lads you cant blame this one on the minister this is down to BASIC human consideration. No matter how busy a doctor/nurse/porter is they need to have consideration for the job they signed up for. We all have pressures in life but compassion should be a central focus for us all – the state cant be responsible for our own dignity management
Waterford hospital has been neglected badly over the last number of years it’s been down graded and massive budgets have been slashed with it plus the whole cardiac care negligence is frightening here in waterford.the south east region deserves better.waterford is the forgotten city in Ireland
@Jane: yup, and people fell for it. Yet another example of why in the vast majority of cases, a vote for an independent is a wasted vote. I’m not advocating any one party over another here – there are some that really grind my gears – but I’d still advise somebody to vote for even one if those parties then vote for an independent, if they want to see anything real done.
Can a refrigerated portacabin not be put onsite while the tender process and building of new unit is going on?
What sort of management is in the hospital at all?
@Jane: good point a few refrigerated containers would bridge the gap until such a time the new mortuary is build. Typical government response fix the problem when it’s broken
@In my opinion: If this is really a government level issue you would have to question what is the purpose of the HSE at all? Surely Government should be about health policy direction not about individual hospital management. In the long run maybe the HSE should be scrapped altogether and replaced with a slimmed down unit that is run directly by the dept of health.
@Paddy J:
The Government and previous Governments have done many things badly in relation to the health service. This though is clearly a management problem in University Hospital Waterford.
“HSE should be scrapped altogether and replaced with a slimmed down unit that is run directly by the dept of health”. So you want it to becomes an even bigger political football again?
There is no easy answer to the problems with the Health Service. If a decision is made to close a hospital, locals are out protesting. If a decision is made to open a new hospital all the ministers are out fighting for it to be in their constituency. Decisions of these type need to be made on a needs basis, and this will never happen when the politicians have any input into the Health Service.
@CrabaRev: 100% agree that this is a management issue with UHW. Sadly health is a total political football and agree again there is no easy answer. I have no answer.
As regards the HSE, I did use the words “in the long run maybe” in my comment. I take your point about politicians and health decisions and you are no doubt correct. My thinking was that if the Minister is going to be ultimately responsible as far as the general public (or is that just the social media lynch mob portion of the public??) are concerned for every little thing that goes wrong the dept of health may as well take the running of the actual service in-house.
@Patricia Cormack: That would be logical indeed Patrica but such a proposal doesn’t seem to be on the radar of any politician or political party, at least non that I can recall.
This Hospital was built in 1988 which is only 31 years ago and I am very surprised to hear that the Mortary Facilities are so poor. My daughter died in that Hospital in 2012 following a RTA and the trauma was bad enough , I would have gone completely crazy if this had happened to her body as well . Thankfully it did not.
Oh my, I feel absolutely for the families of anyone who has lost a loved one while at Waterford hospital. There can be no excuses for this. I’m shocked that this could happen.
Feel terrible for the staff and relatives, this is not good enough from the government, I know there are legacy issues but can’t keep blaming others. Cutting ribbons, rolling up their sleeves for the cameras, turning the sod, whooping and hollering about FDI, children in ‘family hubs’, dead bodies leaking fluids on hospital floors.
@David Jackman: Are you seriously telling me that you think managers at a local hospital cannot come up with a better solution than leaving bodies on trollies in corridors. Come on!
It’s that type of attitude that allows them get away with their incompetence.
@Fran O’Keeffe: FG are too bust keeping the recovery going to sort minor problems out. The saddest thing is the sheep will keep voting for their money grabbing, self-serving shysters unless they wise up at last!
@CrabaRev: It’s obvious the mortuary is not fit for purpose. All I’m saying is that local management cannot build a new mortuary without the capital spend from the government. If the government is not willing to do that and have no problem in the over spending of the children’s hospital. What can any of us do?
@David Jackman: I know they can’t build a new mortuary, but they obviously can come up with a better solution than leaving bodies on a trolley in a corridor.
This is absolutely horrific for any family to have to face a loved ones body decomposing in front of them .My god have people no shame this truly is the worst case neglect and insensitivity I have ever seen .
A nationwide complete and utter forking shambles, with not even a glimmer of an end in sight. I see that the new HSE boss doesn’t take up his post until 14th May, and wonder who on Earth is “running” things until then.
If this didn’t come out in the press today when was Harris going to announce the construction of the new mortuary. It’s amazing he announces it a few hours after it came to light on Newstalk.
@David Jackman: wonder what other surprises our rising star Harris has up his sleeve? How this muppet is still in a job is beyond me, failure is rewarded in Ireland.Keep the recovery going lads, we believe you………
The destruction of the Public Health Service is well under way. Dead bodies on trolleys is one of the last straws. The cost of the NCH is down to the privateers having the hospital built to their specification from public money.
How much more are people willing to take?
Another indication of the neglect of Waterford.The hospital hast been funded properly since Hulk Hogan decided the primary care hospital should be in his constituency in Kilkenny.Add to this WIT has had massive funding cuts and is been forced into a merger with IT Carlow to become a TU again playing to the Carlow Kilkenny crowd. Dont be surprised when Carlow is named as the headquarters of the TU even though Waterford is the bigger organisation. Also Waterford has had the least visits from the IDA over the last 5 years compared to the other cities. How much humiliation can the people of Waterford take ,
The claws will come out for Simon Harris again. Yes he’s incompetent but in all fairness he’s inherited possibly the most poisoned chalice there is in Irish Politics. In my life time I can’t think of one Health Minister who was actually effective in the role. The problems in our health system now span generations. They’re not new problems by any stretch. This is awful though. Imagine losing a close family member only to find they’ve been left decomposing in a corridor. It really sums up what honest hard working people mean in this country.
@Ross O’Donnell: “The problems in our health system now span generations”, if a problem lasts a year or two it’s a problem, if it lasts generations, it’s a policy. It’s that simple, we have a poor health service, despite how much money is thrown at it, because it’s what our government wants. The HSE with it’s added layers of management and complication, is by design. When the health boards were amalgamated to form the HSE it should have resulted in less admin and management, it resulted in more. It is a distraction, so the minister can point at the HSE and the HSE can point at the minister but nothing gets done, meanwhile we are paying more for less, the two tier system is moving further apart and privatisation of the health service is the goal and ultimate result of all of this
This is unacceptable! I’m lost for words. I’m reading this again and again, and I’m still can’t believe it’s happening in Ireland! My country! What the hell next. Will somebody please shut that health service down, and put someone in charge who can right the wrongs and make it work for the people who are paying for it. Stop making these appalling stories headline news for the whole world to see. I’m in the US, send I’ve read this on Facebook and Twitter. My deepest sorrow to anyone, including the staff of the hospital involved.
How does Harris still have a job? How can Fine Gael support him? How can Fianna Fail support Fine Gael? They are all equally responsible. Remember, this is how they will treat you as long as you vote for them. They have no reason to change. You will wait hours on a trolley for medical service and if you die you will rot in the hallway for days. These parties do not care about anyone other than themselves and they have proven this time and time again. If you do vote them back in, you will only have yourself to blame if this happens to you.
Imagine that happening to a loved one. The indignity is disgraceful. Day by day my love for this country takes a knock. Tune in tomorrow for more sadistic twisted story’s from our great nation.
The culture of neglect and arrogance in WRH has been self evident for well over 40 years. I used to put it down to the fact that the old hospital was fragmented with independent units doing their own thing. I thought that when the new hospital was built & opened in the 80s things would improve because of the fact that the whole hospital was under one roof ; but no, the same culture & practices remained, no sense of management responsibility and a poor standard of medical and nursing application.
In fact the design of the building and the lack of foresight applied was self evident from very early on and at this point in time is really beyond redemption.
Pull it down and start again!!
More of the same ‘we couldn’t give a fig about your family either alive or dead. It’s disgusting to treat families this way. Have the HSE NO HEART AT ALL ????
The HSE needs to be dismantled once and for all. What is the bloody point of preserving with this monstrosity? Another gift from FF and Michael Martin when he was minister for health.
The regions are being starved of funds. Waterford Regional Hospital is a major hospital FFS. CHRIST I’d hate to see the conditionS of the local hospitals.
Mass firings and no pay and pensions. Public servants have written contracts that state they must do their job effectively and efficiently. I like to see that tested in court if putting people on waiting lists to go in waiting list is doing their jobs or starving a major hospital of funds that the dead are decomposing.
An independent enquiry would only cost the Tax Payer. It is up to the HSE to get to the bottom of this, If the Minister doesn’t know what is going on then he should not be in this position. Surely the staff at the Hospital can speak up if its true.
An independent inquiry would only cost the Tax payer, its up to the HSE to get to the bottom of this, If the minister doesn’t know what is going on then he should not be in that position.
Money Diaries: An interior designer on €45K living in Leinster
1 hr ago
3.3k
5
News Fix
Here's What Happened Today: Sunday
1 hr ago
1.3k
Poll
Where do you buy most of your groceries?
10 hrs ago
37.9k
107
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 160 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 142 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 112 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 38 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 34 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 133 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 59 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say