Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
ADVOCATES FOR DEAF children have warned how mask requirements for primary-level pupils will detrimentally impact the development of those who are hard of hearing.
New measures which came into effect on Wednesday require those aged nine and older to wear face masks in schools, shops and public transport.
The move follows a recommendation by NPHET last week in response to high incidence of Covid-19 among five to 12 year-olds, and is subject to a review to take place in mid-February.
However, parents and advocacy groups have said that Deaf and hard of hearing children in primary school will be left behind by the requirement because it will leave them unable to lip-read.
Brendan Lennon, head of advocacy at Chime, says the measure will exacerbate socio-emotional challenges among Deaf and hard of hearing children if it becomes the norm.
“This has to do with being able to make friends,” he explains.
“The age of nine to twelve is a critical period, not just for learning in school, but to be able to engage with your peers, make friends, and have the craic.
“And if you can’t do that, you feel left out and isolated. You might develop long-term mental health and well-being issues that go with adolescence, which could have lifelong implications.”
Chairperson of Our New Ears Laura Grant, whose ten-year-old son James is profoundly Deaf and uses a cochlear implant, feels he has been “thrown under the bus” by the requirement.
She explains that the issue is not with her son wearing a mask but with all the people around him wearing them: her son will be unable to lip-read and will also have difficulty in picking up the sound of voices via his implant because face masks will muffle them.
“If a teacher – wearing a mask – asks a question to the class that’s put out to the floor, a hard of hearing pupil has not got a hope of hearing what the question is, or the response from pupils, who are also wear masks,” she says.
“When this was meant to be for two-week period, I thought ‘Oh my god, let’s just do our best for the next few weeks’. But now we’re looking at two-and-a-half to three months. That’s a whole term of school.”
Grant also says that her son began to worry about going to school wearing a mask, even before the requirement for primary pupils to do so was introduced.
“He’s worried about Friday because he has his spelling test. He’s saying: ‘How am I going to know what the teacher calls? How am I going to do my work in school?’
“What I’ve had to do, which I found really hard, was to message the class parents’ WhatsApp group and explain how challenging this is going to be for him, and to ask them to ask their kids to help James if they don’t think he’s heard something in class.
“We’ve spent last seven years trying to help him become part of the gang and part of his class. And I felt like I was making him different. I have to do this for him, but it broke my heart. I sat in the kitchen and I absolutely bawled my eyes out for 20 minutes.
“He’s just been thrown under the bus, I feel, by the Department of Education.”
Grant also clarifies that she is not “pro-mask or anti-mask”, but that she is wondering why other avenues of preventing Covid-19 circulating among school children haven’t been fully tried out.
“This is our fourth wave of Covid. They’ve had the opportunity to get HEPA filters sorted during the summer: it didn’t happen. What about putting screens put up in schools, which happened in some schools and not others?
“Why has this not been exhausted? The least vulnerable to Covid are taking the burden for everybody, especially children with special educational needs. It’s just appalling.”
Sinn Féin’s education spokesperson Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire said his party had previously called for children who are hard of hearing to be considered in any guidance around mask-wearing and possible exemptions around doing so.
However, he described as “disappointing” the fact that such children were not listed on exemptions to the guidelines.
“The Minister acknowledged that flexibility must be shown by schools in this circumstance,” he said.
“This is welcomed. However, we believe the Minister should consider providing funding to schools to provide masks with clear panels to the teacher and classmates of a child who is hard of hearing.
“This would allow the child to continue to lip-read and remain fully involved in their class.”
Labour’s education spokesperson Aodhán Ó Ríordáin said that the handling of advice to parents by the Department of Education this week was “absolutely ridiculous”.
“All of this should have been teased out over a number of days, possibly weeks, if this was deemed to be absolutely necessary,” he said.
“It’s been implemented, and now we have to chase all of these issues. It’s just poor communication after a whole litany of poorly managed situations, and principals and school communities are feeling completely disrespected.”
The Department of Education was contacted for comment, but did not respond to The Journal by the time of publication.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Great! The resulting 0.002% reduction in the live register as a result will show we’ve broken the back of this recession. Not too sound to negative about the development of cloud computing, data centres etc. in Ireland, but they’re not really labour intensive enough to make any real impact on our unemployment crisis are they?
These jobs bring money into the country and keep well educated people here. It’s not really the case that hog tech jobs like these aren’t labour I tensive enough, it’s more the case that most job seekers aren’t well educated enough for jobs like these.
Fergal it’s not a matter of not being ‘well educated enough’ it is a matter of having the right set of skills and capabilities for the job. It is pretty much common knowledge that people differ in this respect. You can hardly suggest that a person with qualifications in accountancy or law, isn’t well educated enough. They are just well educated in a different area. Similarly the lab scientist with a PhD…
“Not too sound to negative…”. Well, I’m afraid it does sound negative.
This post is really frustrating: there is a small company out there trying hard to create employment (on any scale), and the first response of some people is just begrudery. This company could be the next Google, or it may not: either way, at least they’re trying, and making jobs in the process.
Great! Just not “news”.
While job creation is a big priority, the micro level reporting of every job lost or created in the country is plain daft. If anything it has the opposite impact on the intention behind the announcements as they often reduce morale. How about the jobs are created and everyone just gets on with it?
The Argos announcement earlier this week of “800 jobs” was ridiculous as well – if they were 800 permanent jobs, then maybe a worthy news item. But most of these jobs will be for a few weeks, then announced again as new jobs next year.
The only time, even in the local or regional press, in the UK that I read about jobs lost or created or the really big eye-catching projects or closures of very large factories. These stories smack of politicians desperate for votes and pats on the back. When mostly it is nothing to do with their actions.
There is a difference between between sceptism and begrudgery. Am all for keeping well educated and skilled people working and spending in this country and fair play to this company in particular. However, at a macro level, I just wonder how many jobs in reality will be created by the latest wave of IT industry developments, which in simple terms appears to be based around innovative ways for storing and managing data. Compare it to the early 90s when the arrival of Intel, Dell, Microsft etc created tens of thousands of manufacturing jobs. Not all rocket science positions, granted, but employment at a serious scale. Correct me if i’m wrong, but the employment potential from cloud computing, data centre devleopment etc appears to be only a fraction of this.
You stand corrected ;) cloud computing isn’t just data management and storage; its everything that the web is based on nowadays – look at Youtube and Facebook, Google Apps, and Salesforce – there are thousands of jobs that rotate around cloud computing in Ireland and new jobs becoming available every day.
The jobs and employment are there, the skills can be learned and as this is the way that technology is moving towards with more and more systems in the cloud, the jobs will continue to grow.
10 jobs is probably only on the hardware/infrastructure level. A well managed DC has a ratio of 250 to 500 servers to 1 staff. Of course if the end “customers” of those 250 servers are in Ireland, then there could – potentially – be a knock on creation of jobs if the customers choose to use Irish developers.
On the flip side, a badly designed and managed infrastructure would need as many as 1 support person for every 30 servers. These are mostly blades by the way, with attached storage – would require a highly disciplined support person rather than just high skill. There are numerous companies now providing such services from Ireland, including Amazon and IBM.
Well, I might no live or work in Ireland, I’m an IT freelance professional though and I would like to express this single question: How many local IT freelancers or small IT service companies will be out of business given the expansion of cloud computing service providers and their services being sold even broader than their country of installation?
How many of those 10 job places will be held next year, given that growing competition will enforce cloud computing service providers to reduce job seats rather than increasing them?
I have just created ten jobs by driving my car into the front of a supermarket.
have your say