Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Jim LoScalzo/DPA/PA Images

Senate approves limiting power of Donald Trump to attack Iran

The bi-partisan vote was a rare exertion of authority from Congress.

THE SENATE HAS approved a bi-partisan measure aimed at limiting President Donald Trump’s authority to launch military operations against Iran.

Eight Republicans joined Democrats in a post-impeachment bid to constrain the White House.

The rebuke was the Senate’s first major vote since acquitting Trump on impeachment charges last week.

Trump is expected to veto the war powers resolution if it reaches his desk, warning that if his “hands were tied, Iran would have a field day”.

The measure, authored by Democrat Tim Kaine, says Trump must win approval from Congress before engaging in further military action against Iran.

Kaine and other supporters said the resolution, which passed 55-45, was not about Mr Trump or even the presidency, but instead was an important reassertion of congressional power to declare war.

While Trump and other presidents “must always have the ability to defend the United States from imminent attack, the executive power to initiate war stops there,” Mr Kaine said. “An offensive war requires a congressional debate and vote.”

The Senate vote continues a pattern in which Republican senators have shown a willingness to challenge Trump on foreign policy, a sharp departure from their strong support during impeachment and on domestic matters.

Congress moved to impose restrictions on US involvement with the Saudi-led war in Yemen last year after US-based journalist Jamal Khashoggi was killed in a gruesome murder at Saudi Arabia’s consulate in Turkey.

The bi-partisan vote was a rare exertion of authority from Congress, the first since passage of the War Powers Act of 1973 and Trump promptly vetoed it.

The Democratic-controlled House passed a separate, non-binding war powers resolution on Iran last month. The House could take up the Senate resolution later this month, House leaders said.

Two-thirds votes in the House and Senate would be needed to override an expected Trump veto of the war powers resolution.

Answering a claim by Trump that the measure would send a signal of weakness to Iran and other potential adversaries, Kaine said the opposite was true.

“When we stand up for the rule of law … and say ‘This decision is fundamental, and we have rules that we are going to follow so we can make a good decision,’ that’s a message of strength,” Kaine said.

“If we’re to order our young men and women … to risk their lives in war, it should be on the basis of careful deliberation by the people’s elected legislature and not on the say-so of any one person.”

Republican Mike Lee agreed and said he supports Trump’s foreign policy, including toward Iran, but said Congress cannot escape its constitutional responsibility to act on matters of war and peace.

As the Senate debate made clear, “there is abundant support for the United States taking tough positions with regard to Iran”, Lee said. ”And as part of that we want to make sure that any military action that needs to be authorised is in fact properly authorised by Congress. That doesn’t show weakness. That shows strength.”

Trump disputed that, arguing on Twitter that a vote against Kaine’s proposal was important to national security and pointed to the drone strike that killed Iran’s top general, Qassem Soleimani.

“We are doing very well with Iran and this is not the time to show weakness. Americans overwhelmingly support our attack on terrorist Soleimani,” Trump said. “If my hands were tied, Iran would have a field day. Sends a very bad signal. The Democrats are only doing this as an attempt to embarrass the Republican Party. Don’t let it happen!”

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

View 23 comments
Close
23 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute ianglen
    Favourite ianglen
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 7:23 AM

    Won’t matter. Laws no longer apply to him or his kin. He’ll veto it anyway.

    145
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Daniel Dunne
    Favourite Daniel Dunne
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 9:39 AM

    @ianglen: There is one set of laws for Republicans and none for Democrats.

    25
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mick McGuinness
    Favourite Mick McGuinness
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 7:19 AM

    He only wants war too make his billionaire friend’s richer, he’s not worried about the poor military men and women he’s sending to death.

    120
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Arya
    Favourite Arya
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 7:39 AM

    @Mick McGuinness: or the people, including children that die in war.

    98
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Mark Reid
    Favourite Mark Reid
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 2:47 PM

    @Arya: he hasn’t sent anyone to war? He killed 2 top terrorists. Trump campaigned against war.

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Arya
    Favourite Arya
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 7:15 AM

    The Republicans have been dancing to Trump’s tune. Now they want to show him who is really boss? That might be too late…

    60
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute ianglen
    Favourite ianglen
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 7:41 AM

    @Arya: He’s making it impossible for Republicans to defend him. He’s flagrantly and openly abusing his power and they have to try defend it.

    55
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Michael Dorgan
    Favourite Michael Dorgan
    Report
    Feb 15th 2020, 5:59 AM

    @ianglen: abusing his power, what nonsense

    1
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Jimmy Carroll
    Favourite Jimmy Carroll
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 8:59 AM

    4 years in power, no war, uf Killery Killton was President iran would be ash after 4 years, Obama set north Africa ablaze while in power

    30
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Furey
    Favourite Paul Furey
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 11:12 AM

    @Jimmy Carroll: And trump has so badly fractured the US with no one coming over them thar hills to fix it. Don’t forget what trump is doing for Israel, you will get your blaze some day….maybe soon! You may also still get you Iran of ash also.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute lambda sensor
    Favourite lambda sensor
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 8:41 AM

    Politics in the US is a mess. Far too much power vested in one office and a real difficulty holding that office to account. Trump often takes the position whereby he breaks the norms and lets the courts decide which is slow.

    23
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute ianglen
    Favourite ianglen
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 8:49 AM

    @lambda sensor: Trump knows there is *nothing* the Reps will do to stand up to him, a complete F U to everyone, daring anyone to stand up to him.

    25
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Furey
    Favourite Paul Furey
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 11:09 AM

    Congress and the Supreme Court are the other two branches of the US Government, along with the Executive (President and Cabinet) and all three are there to keep checks and balances in order. Trump owns one and ignores the other. Fascism is winning in the US and the Americans seem to be OK with this.

    World’s greatest democracy me ar5e!

    18
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Burn_the_Witch
    Favourite Burn_the_Witch
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 11:34 AM

    @Paul Furey: And what’s your opinion there Paul of the Dems refusing to use the Supreme Court to bring John Bolton in for witness testimony during the congressional impeachment hearings, as is their duty if they have any issue with Trump citing executive privilege over his private conversations with his staff? Instead they gave the two fingers to the third branch of government & went ahead and wrote up an article of impeachment, Obstruction of Congress, even though they knew it didn’t have a leg to stand on as they had avoided standard due process i.e. the Supreme Court. The desperation of that particular move was astounding & frankly embarrassing for the Democrat Party. Would you call what they did fascism, or is that a word you only use against those you don’t agree with? Hypocrisy much?

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Dave Hammond
    Favourite Dave Hammond
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 1:44 PM

    @lambda sensor: not to mention the pollution of politics with money – trumps fundraiser this weekend is 570000 dollars for two tickets to attend – remember all that horse shit about how he was so wealthy he would not need donations- people swallow any ol shit from him and not just dumb Americans

    5
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Stanley Marsh
    Favourite Stanley Marsh
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 10:14 AM

    You know what. The US is a basket case.

    A country of over 300m people the size of a continent with only 2 political parties and a reverence for the office of President verging on the Egyptian Pharaohs.

    It barley works when you have an intelligent, honorable, decent holder of the office but then Trump came along to shine a light on all its flaws.

    How could anyone think it’s a good idea to give one man and especially one like Trump control of the military??

    25
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Noely Kelly
    Favourite Noely Kelly
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 8:19 AM

    This man is a Narcissistic psychpoath, of that there is no doubt, but this has been set in motion long before him, it is a plan rewrite history and the geographical landscape .it’s all about the greater Israel Project
    G
    EN. WESLEY CLARK
    Well, starting with Iraq, then Syria and Lebanon, then Libya, then Somalia and Sudan, and back to care of it for them. But also a threat, because they knew that they were next on the hit list.

    https://youtu.be/SXS3vW47mOE

    19
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Burn_the_Witch
    Favourite Burn_the_Witch
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 8:41 AM

    @Noely Kelly: Well whaddya know, a list of countries without Central Banks.

    18
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute ihcalaM
    Favourite ihcalaM
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 11:10 AM

    @Burn_the_Witch: ????????

    Every single country on that list has had a central bank since the 1960s (or earlier). What exactly is your point?

    7
    See 2 more replies ▾
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Paul Furey
    Favourite Paul Furey
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 11:13 AM

    @ihcalaM: he hasn’t got one. Just throw anything out there, that’s what they do.

    7
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute chihuahua
    Favourite chihuahua
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 12:47 PM

    @ihcalaM: In the year of 2000 there were seven countries without a Rothschild owned or controlled Central Bank: 1. Afghanistan 2.Iraq 3. Sudan 4.Libya 5.Cuba 6.North Korea 7.Iran
    It is not a coincidence that these country, which are listed above were and are still being under attack by the western media, since one of the main reasons these countries have been under attack in the first place is because they do not have a Rothschild owned Central Bank yet. The only countries left in 2003 without a Central Bank owned or controlled by the Rothschild Family were: 1.Sudan 2.Libya 3.Cuba 4.North Korea 5.Iran The only countries left in 2016 without a Central Bank owned or controlled by the Rothschild Family are: 1.Cuba 2.North Korea 3.Iran
    Come to your own conclusion

    6
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute Tom McHugh
    Favourite Tom McHugh
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 11:08 AM

    Every time the US launches one of its proxy wars, it creates an avalanche of refugees that Europe have deal with on its doorstep. The remoteness of the American continent protects it from the first up issue. They will incite and support insurrection in any Arab state that does not bow to its authority with impunity.

    13
    Install the app to use these features.
    Mute kenneth clohessy
    Favourite kenneth clohessy
    Report
    Feb 14th 2020, 10:15 AM

    Abd President Trump will veto it as is his right #TRUMP2020Landside

    5
Submit a report
Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
Thank you for the feedback
Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

Leave a commentcancel

 
JournalTv
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions and subtitles off, selected
      News in 60 seconds