Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The Metro Hotel in Ballymun pictured after the fire Eamonn Farrell via RollingNews.ie

Calls for urgent renewal of 'outdated' city risk assessment report in light of Ballymun fire

Noeleen Reilly is asking Dublin City Council to immediately evaluate its risk assessment report.

AN EMERGENCY MOTION calling for Dublin City Council to carry out a renewed risk assessment report on the city in light of last month’s Ballymun fire is being brought forward tonight.

On Wednesday 21 March, a fire ripped through the top part of Ballymun’s 16-floor Metro Hotel – which is made up of 88 hotel rooms and 30 private apartments on the upper floors.

At least 12 units of Dublin Fire Brigade (DFB) and more than 60 firefighters attended the scene at the peak of the fire. Luckily, the building was successfully evacuated and no one was injured.

In light of the fire, local Independent councillor Noeleen Reilly is calling on Dublin City Council to carry out a comprehensive risk assessment on Dublin City as she said the current report is “alarmingly outdated”.

Dublin City Council’s Area Risk Categorisation Report was last updated in 2014.

In a statement to TheJournal.ie, Dublin City Council said: “Dublin Fire Brigade has carried out an Area Risk Categorisation in line with the national policy document Keeping Communities Safe issues by the Department of Housing.

“This process has been validated by the National Directorate for Fire and Emergency Management. This is supplemented by pre-incident planning. Dublin Fire Brigade is not aware of any issues with respect to risk assessment and the fire in Ballymun.

This matter is the subject of ongoing discussions at national level between staffing interests and national management representatives.

Ballymun in the assessment

Under the Finglas Fire Station section of the report, which covers the Ballymun area, Dublin City Council states that “Ireland’s only high-rise / high-density public housing project was built in Ballymun in 1966 with tower blocks ranging from eight to 15 stories”.

“As part of the Ballymun regeneration, this high-rise housing stock is being replaced with a mix of both traditional housing and apartment-like scheme,” it said.

The report does not mention the Ballymun hotel.

Commenting on the lack of acknowledgement of the hotel in the report, Reilly said: “The current risk categorisation for Dublin City is alarmingly outdated so much so that it makes no mention of any existing high-rise in Ballymun nor does it mention any hotels.

“There needs to be an urgent comprehensive risk assessment for Dublin City so the Dublin Fire Brigade are informed of what buildings exist in each area and what equipment is needed.”

Emergency motion

Reilly is bringing forward an emergency motion at tonight’s Dublin City Council meeting calling for this review to take place immediately.

The motion asks that the council acknowledges “the fantastic response of the Dublin Fire Brigade, as a result of their bravery and quick response”.

It also asks that the council “recognises that a comprehensive risk assessment on the city now needs to be completed which should highlight the deficiencies in manpower, equipment and training”.

Finally, it asks that Dublin City Council “acknowledges the kindness and generosity shown by the community in Ballymun and Glasnevin towards the victims”.

Dublin City Council contacted TheJournal.ie on Friday 13 April to include the following statement: “We do not agree that the document is alarmingly outdated.”

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
9 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds