Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
ROAD CHANGES TO divert through traffic out of Dublin city centre are expected to take effect from August, according to Minister Eamon Ryan.
The Dublin City Centre Transport Plan, announced last year, detailed plans to reduce the number of cars clogging up the streets of the city centre but not bringing any custom to businesses.
Changes to traffic management and road layouts around Westland Row and Pearse Street, Bachelor’s Walk and Aston Quay were forecast to come into effect this year.
Minister for Climate and Transport Eamon Ryan has now said the changes will be seen from August.
“I think people are going to see a transformation. They will see transformation this August when we take the through traffic out of the city centre. That’s going to make a huge change in Dublin,” he said.
The plan outlined that six out of every ten cars in the city centre are only using it as a route to reach destinations outside of the centre. Instead, that traffic “could be removed without impacting on the vitality and viability of the economic and cultural life of this area”.
Minister Ryan was speaking to reporters as the National Transport Authority announced €290 million in funding for local authorities to support the rollout of walking and cycling infrastructure in 2024.
Ryan told reporters he is “convinced” that Dublin and other cities and towns around the country will switch significantly to cycling when safe environments are created.
Advertisement
“Councils are starting to come around to reallocating space and making it safe to walk and cycle. It’s currently not safe. We have to make it safe, and as we do that we will see a change,” he said.
On managing local resistance towards cycling lanes, Ryan said that it’s important to listen to communities and make changes to plans if necessary but also that we “need to build now… we’ve done the listening, now we need to do the building”.
Transport plan
The plan proposed last year set out that Pearse Street from Westland Row to Sandwith Street would become a two-way road.
The left-hand turn onto Pearse Street for traffic travelling north along Westland Row would be restricted to public transport and cyclists, with a new right-hand turn created for general traffic at that junction.
Efforts to cut traffic in Dublin city centre are motivated by wants to both reduce congestion and decrease greenhouse gas emissions.
Emissions from transport must be cut by 50% over the coming years to comply with legally binding climate targets.
Thousands of scientists around the world have repeatedly warned policymakers that without immediate and substantial action to lower greenhouse gas emissions, the world faces a climate crisis devastating and irreversible consequences.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
117 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
Ryan needs to take a hike- If the problem is through traffic starting building two tier roads, underpasses, bridges etc to take that through traffic rather than just pushing it a few streets away
@You’re Not Serious: You’re living up to your name there!
Why in the name of all that’s good and holy would you want to emulate overpassess, underpasses and spaghetti roads that are seen all over to US and are proven to generate congestion? At enormous capital cost and disruption I would add.
How about following best practice, reduce the modal share of people travelling by private cars and using the destination (city centre) as a rat run. This is what we are seeing all over Europe, led by the Netherlands, Denmark and France. And it actually works for reducing congestion, improving air quality, increasing economic activity. With minimal cost and some temporary disruption as people adjust to the new set up.
He could at least halve the through traffic by encouraging drivers to Use the M50! And the Port Tunnel! We’ve done the building. Those toll roads are meant to bypass Dublin quickly and they have more than paid for themselves long since. Drop the tolls already and have drivers using the bypass roads to get past the city centre when it isn’t their destination.
@F Fitzgerald: exactly, scrap the M50 and port tunnel tolls and watch the traffic disappear from the city centre. They are too greedy and thick to do that though.
@Steve:
I’m not a regular traveller to Dublin but I have seen what the m50 gets like, not sure where you are going to fit all this extra traffic that you suggest will use it if there was no tolls.
@Steve: really? The tunnel brings you from Whitehall to the port. Where are these people going to and from that they go thru town instead? Same with those that you say would use the M50 if it was free. You know, that motorway which is actually free for large swathes and what you save on tolls would be more than offset by increased fuel
@P.J. Nolan: it will mean extra traffic for sure and that will have to be dealt with long term with new infrastructure. The issue is the city centre traffic, most of which is through fare. I know from people working in the docklands that they don’t use the tunnel as it’s too expensive, maybe once or twice a month at most. It’s ridiculous having such an expensive toll on a solution that would mean less people travelling through the city centre!
@SYaxJ2Ts: You obviously haven’t been to the docklands then recently, there’s literally thousands of office workers there! I know I have friends who commute in and out daily.
@You’re Not Serious: sorry to intrude but re Basketball: If they feel they must show up, then do so, but do the absolute minimum. No shots taken. No contact with the Zionist team of any kind. Let them win by a ridiculous score. Point made and team still in competition.
@Steve: I work there Steve. None of my colleagues (about 2.5k) drive to work. For starters you pay 35€ per day to park. Everyone either cycles or uses public transport. Granted it can be awkward to get to with an extra Luas trip down to The Point for many.
@Rua Rogan: But it doesn’t reduce congestion. London was voted the most congested city in the world in a Bloomberg survey in early 2023. Today, the advertising standards authority in London upheld complaints that adverts re ULEZ Benefits were misleading or not backed by scientific research. Lastly, This plan will force people to take longer journeys aka increased pollution!
@Fred Coloe: Not true re increased pollution. Taking a motorway or dual carriageway where traffic speeds are relatively constant and the need to break and accelerate is reduced offers better fuel economy and therefore reduced pollution. The downside is the reduced air quality in the areas surrounding the motorway – though it is at least more dispersed than localising in the city centre where people are walking/cycling and breathing in the poor air
@You’re Not Serious: roads have been built, they were the. Widened, expanded, new junctions upgraded, toll barriers removed and STILL, too much traffic in the city centre.
When I worked in the city centre, every company there used cycle couriers whenever possible to make smaller deliveries around the city centre. Simply because it’s far faster to send anything by bike than taxi.
Open more cycle lanes and this attracts schools, and students can cycle through the city.
Besides, residents shouldn’t need to run a car in a city the size of Dublin.
@james dooley: I live on the new one going through Fairview inbound to city centre. Stand there at rush hour in the morning and it’s a constant stream of bikes, it’s really amazing. And this is winter. More people will cycle if there are less cars around too.
Public transport would bring plenty of people to town to shop and spend money. It would bring families in for events and festivals.
All viable alternatives to endless lanes of cars trying to travel elsewhere.
(Last month I got chatting to a group of people waiting for a train to Maynooth. They’d had to get a train to Dublin to do so. There was no direct railway line, so all of the regular commuters have to divert to Dublin then out of Dublin – needlessly.)
@F Fitzgerald: Well that depends where they are coming from….Sligo train stops in Maynooth, East Coast stops in Connolly ……Cork ,Waterford, Galway and Limerick all Heuston.
Can’t see the needs of a few dictating and it shouldn’t, Dublin has 2 train hubs it’s normal to change at a hub , and I travel by train internationally.
@Cornelius Paul O Mahony: As someone who also travels by train internationally, you’re right, changing at hubs is normal and expected in a bigger system.
The element which the Irish Rail Network is missing is alternative intersections between the two networks which only coincide in Dublin.
There should be a handful of places where the South Railways intersect with the North.
Ideally, a line between Sligo, Galway, Limerick and something connecting Athlone and Mullingar would be ideal.
@Gerard Carey: Traffic lights in this city are an embarrassment and my 10 year old daughter could do a better job programming them. And don’t even start me on the proliferation of pedestrian lights in this rown, honestly on some roads they must be every 50 metres, not to mention entering and exiting roundabouts, it’s an absolute farce. Why also did they stop using zebra crossings, much quicker for pedestrians and transport alike. Do these clowns not also realise that public transport has to also stop at all of these pedestrian lights?
@Gerard Carey: most of the congestion is caused by… millions of cars. Even in places like Manhattan with perfect grids and sequenced lights the traffic still snarls up.
@Rua Rogan: Unfortunately, the lines are mostly single. I’m not defending Irish Rail, but we essentially are using the infrastructure left by the English.
I, too, get frustrated with the system as I need to go from Maynooth to Galway regularly, bus into Heuston, train to Galway, get off at Oranmore, getting home by train nah, bus that ” alights ” in Maynooth.
I simply can’t see where land could be found to double tracks let alone new connections. The cost would be in the billions.
@The Firestarter: to use the argument often cited by the ‘more cars brigade’: what will the elderly and disabled do if pedestrian lights are less frequent? Should they have to walk the length of a football pitch to reach a spot they can safely cross? Or perhaps dart between speeding vehicles?
If anything, crossing times should be increased, and more pelican crossings installed
@Gerard Carey: traffic congestion is caused by too many vehicles. Changing traffic light sequences will just delay different rows of traffic. The only way to reduce traffic jams is to Reduce traffic!
@Cornelius Paul O Mahony: but if you compare the rail network of 1922 with the rail network now, you’ll see it has significantly decreased. Also, the lines should all be electrified and not use diesel trains that are so loud you can’t have a conversation on the platform and also do their part in increasing air pollution. The public transport infrastructure in Ireland needs a serious overhaul, and while you’re at it, maybe put some roofs over the platforms so that people don’t have to wait in the all too frequent rain
@Gerard Carey: I agree – the traffic lights are a mess. Either they have no idea how to set the lights to achieve maximum efficiency OR .. or, they are deliberately setting them to achieve maximum traffic disruption to frustrate motorists in the hope they will abandon their cars. Some lights have been set at 5 seconds for motorists and usually 3 cars get through. This disruption has E Ryan written all over it
Or all of us should ask our TDs why we still don’t have a Metro to the main airport. It’s surrounded by car parks and after dark relies exclusively on private transport.
The nerves of Eamon Ryan to say that “Six out of every ten cars in the city centre are only using it as a route to reach destinations outside of the centre” Where did he get his stats from, who in their right mind would go through the city centre to go outside the city centre? Here’s an idea, widen the quay lanes to at least 3, build a METRO that connects the suburbs train stations like Adamstown, Swords, Tallaght and make the Dublin port tunnel free for everyone, let’s see… pay €20 per day to us the tunnel or suck it up and go through the city centre…
@J Ven: Adamstown has trains Tallaght has the luas Swords needs something the infrastructure is there, albeit with issues, the problem is vision, charging for parking at commuter stations is daft , but people also need to change habits, personally I think single passenger journeys need to be reduced, so 2/3 people in a car using the tunnel should be able to do so for €2 per trip……….it still needs maintenance.
@Cornelius Paul O Mahony: The big picture is that you need metro stations at the suburbs train stations if you want someone from Kildare or Wicklow to get to the destination. What do you do if you live in Kildare Town and have to go to Santry? That’s what metro lines connected to train stations are for, there are all over Europe designed for that purpose.
@J Ven: if driving you’d take exit 2 off the M50 and voila, you’re in Santry, otherwise take the 16, 41, etc. to Santry when you get to Dublin by bus or train.
Are 24 hour bus lanes justified? They result in less space for cars and more congestion. No wonder people are frustrated and puzzled when things like this are introduced but make no sense.
Makes complete sense to me. Why add to the lanes of cars trying to find parking in Dublin? All people need is to get to where they’re going, and reliable public transport does that much more effectively. That’s the whole point of Bus Connect – that anyone can regularly travel into Dublin and leave even if they’re working late, or socialising, without having to hire a car each.
For the increasing amount of 24hr bus routes under bus connects,
for the 24hr economy and
not least for people on bikes who use of them, and having motorists scooting up the bus lane to then close-pass the bike is a danger we can avoid. Merrion Rd on a Sunday morning being a perfect case in point.
@F Fitzgerald: let me tell you this I tried to use the bus on 16th December to get to Camden street. Three buses didn’t show up at all as I waited at my bus stop and on the way home the bus only went to Westmorland street. The bus service is a complete joke.
@Fred Coloe: it might come as a shock to you, but people living in the city centre suffocating in fumes, noise and a complete lack of and a relative lack of parks just might not be all Green voters.
I’d want to see all that for my home town, the things I see in other European cities when I travel rather than the filthy, dirty congested city it currently is.
@Fred Coloe: and very unscientifically -the comments here to this to me are 3 to 1 against the change, so all this talk about the vast majority-the Lycra has gone to their brains
Beautiful. Living in city center, Dublin is an absolutely tiny town and there’s no need for our obese population to be driving all over it. The congestion of cars is bad for everybody involved, people sitting in them and people forced to inhale their fumes.
@Sean Murphy: I don’t even drive, but I’m not shallow enough to complain about fellow human beings simply because some aren’t slim and may need to use a car to get to their destination.
SOOO… redirecting traffic in around in a circle is going to reduce emissions? People who don’t cycle probably won’t cycle.
Town is a mess with the traffic. Only a few years ago they put in the 1-way system hailed as a marvel for traffic flow.
Now here we are in 2024, putting back in 2-way streets cos it’s not working – just throw some ham at the wall and see what sticks.
The infrastructure is a joke in this country. I used to cycle around town – until a gaggle of wannabe rent-a-bikes upon you at the traffic lights, 9-abreast, jostling past you – out in front of traffic lights. An absolute nightmare as someone goes flying by on the outside and takes a sharp left into an on-coming LUAS. It was horrendous cycling around town.
Getting the bus – it was 2 hours to get from top of Pearse Street to Dame Street – I watched a movie, thought I was nearly home – then figured out where I was – nowhere near. I got off the bus and walked home, took 45 minutes, but bet I beat the bus.
This government hasn’t a breeze how to do this. Just trying different things, oh Japan did this in 2006 and it worked for them! Japan also filled in a sink hole in 72 hours at a major junction and had traffic flowing again – meanwhile, the council can’t even fill in a pot hole.
@G: unfortunately for you, my beloved greens will have many anti-motorist measures over the line already by the time they’re voted out, that’s their strategy, get in, get some things done, get out, sit back and laugh at you all stuck in traffic while we whizz by on our bikes
@eoin fitzpatrick: I’m a cyclist. I cycle every day from West dublin to Dublin 8. This will not affect my commute one iota. It will cause traffic chaos for many, many people who can not cycle into town or avail of decent public transport. Not everybody is as lucky as you, too, whizz around on bikes, but i suppose thats never something the Greens and their supporters think about, is it?
@eoin fitzpatrick: that is your problem Eoin. Bikes bikes bikes- all we ask is for a proper 1st world city option on the public transport option- bikes is NOT a public option
They can do what they like with the city centre . It’s an absolute eyesore . Was in talbot street / O’Connell street area last Monday night . Very scary place . Drugs being sold openly on the streets . People urinating openly . Gangs of youngsters flying around on electric scooters, is this what Ryan wants for the city ??
Out in D24 there are lots of new houses being built, but the few roads leading to them are being narrowed to make space for wide cycle lanes. Gridlock coming!
I live on the Northside and travel to Wexford through town it will add miles to my journey and a toll to not traverse town. Ryan will be gone next election
@eoin fitzpatrick: the chances of getting mugged in Dublin city centre is historically higher than many other places in Ireland, as for your snowflake comment you’re name calling has revealed that you have a lot class all of it low.
Green message to drivers “Pay, pay, pay. Put up with it & shut up. Any complaints will be dealt with by yet more of our traffic obstacles”. Don’t like it? Then f off.
If you want to reduce the volume of traffic through the city then you need to abolish the tolls on the M50 and Port Tunnel, etc. If people are going through the city to go elsewhere then it’s obvious they’re doing so to avoid the tolls…
Encourage and incentivise businesses i.e. head offices etc, to move out of the city to the suburbs. Where they’ll have more office space, more parking etc.
Many people have legitimate reasons to drive thought the city so no need to punish them while both sides could be appeased
@Noel Linnane: the suburbs have worse public transport. You’d make traffic way worse, just not in the core. There are a lot of people who work in the city centre who bus/train. Move their jobs out and you may well force them to drive
With regard to the latest arson attack on an empty property, how hard can it be for the Gardaí to set a trap for these knuckledraggers? It really doesn’t reflect well on Drew Harris that after 5 years of this happening, there still hasn’t been 1 person charged with arson. The cynic in me wonders why.
@Anthony Curran: because you either need physical evidence or something to be stupid enough to broadcast it online. These places are usually in areas with very little cctv etc
@Martin Mongan: If only there was some way to set up hidden cctv cameras around some of these properties. It’s not hard to catch them in the act if the desire is there.
People think we saved Dublin but we lost so much by the early 90s. We should of finshed off a revised version of the planed rd network, for example, between Artane roundabout and Donnycarney that small section of dual carriage way would make all the difference if built and there are many of these little sections throughout Dublin. With the revised plan we should of build the majority of housing along the coast between an up graded Dart line and the M1 motorway. Put higher rise in the dock lands got business from areas around Fitzwilliam Sq to relocate and return these to nice family homes. And the port tunnel free at peak times.
@You’re Not Serious: sure, whatever works for you, or it might encourage people not to drive into town at all, some will be inconvenienced but hopefully the majority will win out here.
The plans are good and mostly needed, the problem with Ryan and most politicians is that it’s 20 years overdue and only covers a 2km area where they have all the ingredients to make it work, 10 minutes in any direction from this area is a complete mess and due to get a lot worse. The governance of Infrastructure should be positive, something that helps the electorate with their lives and the lives of future citizens alas the majority of contemporary politics is negative with the idea being that a harder existence is somehow ‘better’ for society.
I live in the council flats behind Mark’s Church on Pearse Street, the roads/Streets he’s mentioned are not big enough for this plan, as a voter in this contiuceny, we weren’t involved or asked for our ideas, and this man is one of our TDs, so the green party leader is making a decision for me without asking me what I think
Happy with the plans for less traffic and open spaces. However, my concern is garda enforcement and visibility. The lovely open spaces could encourage criminal chancers to take advantage of tourists.
Is there a logical and sustainable garda and security plan in place for these places?
Anything has to be better than what we have right now, and, having worked in retail in the city center for 20 years, I can attest to the positive effect even partial pedestrianisation has had on business! I want to give this a go and see what happens.
Sorry to intrude but comments were closed re the basketball: If they feel they must show up, then do so, but do the absolute minimum. No shots taken. No contact with the Zionist team of any kind. Let them win by a ridiculous score. Point made and team still in competition.
Reducing traffic in the city is just moving the problem to the likes of the M50 which is already overburdened with traffic. This will result in cars spending more time stuck in traffic causing more pollution.
Public transport and alternative roads are not ready yet to accommodate this proposal.
Pedestrian hospitalised with serious injuries after being struck by car in Co Kilkenny
9 mins ago
447
PodcastThe Explainer
What has Adolescence done to highlight the dangers for children online?
20 mins ago
636
arctic reception
JD Vance says US take over of Greenland ‘makes sense’ during scaled back visit
Updated
14 hrs ago
52.2k
140
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say