Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
A MAN WHO had to wait five years to have his name cleared of “unfounded” abuse allegations was denied access to see his grandchildren, even though he was dying.
It wasn’t until after the man had died that his name was exonerated, but he was afforded the chance to see his grandchildren before he passed away.
Referred to in the report as Mr Lynch, it details how he and his wife initially had supervised access to their grandchildren who were in long-term foster care.
The Lynch family also had two teenage children living with them when an allegation was made (by the mother of the grandchildren) of historic abuse against Mr Lynch.
This access to the grandchildren was subsequently put on hold by the HSE (and then Tusla) on the foot of these allegations.
The gardaí were called in to investigate the claims and, after a file was sent to the DPP, it was determined that there was “insufficient evidence” to proceed with a criminal case.
Despite this, the HSE said it would be conducting an “internal investigation” into the claims. Two years after the original allegations were made, the HSE wrote to Lynch and told him that the claims were considered “inconclusive”.
At this time, however, no credibility assessment of the allegations had been undertaken by social workers and no risk assessment had been made in regard to Lynch’s teenage children living at home.
In other words, the allegation meant that Lynch couldn’t see his grandchildren, but still had his own children living at home.
When the responsibility for child protection services was transferred to Tusla, it was then that the Ombudsman became involved.
Tusla agreed to perform an independent assessment of risk but, due to Lynch’s failing health, he was unable to do the assessment.
“This was a very difficult case,” Ombudsman Peter Tyndall said at the launch of the report yesterday.
At this stage, years had passed and his health was failing. He was very ill and wanted to see his grandchildren. It took several interventions from this office to make it happen.
After the Ombudsman became involved, Lynch was eventually granted access to see his grandchildren.
He died some months later. At the time of his death, he had not been exonerated from this allegation.
More than five years after the original complaint was made, Tusla then acknowledged that the allegation was “unfounded”.
So what happened?
Tyndall identified that a key part of the long delay in getting this abuse allegation properly looked at and handled was the allocation of social workers to the case.
He said: “Part of the reason for all of this is Tusla did not have a sufficient level of social workers to meet demand.
There was a turnover of social workers on this case, and each time there was a handover… [it] leads to inconsistency and delay.
Advertisement
The Ombudsman called it a “classic example” of what happens when there are insufficient IT systems in place.
“This man died without his name being cleared,” Tyndall said. “It can be complicated and time-consuming to reach a conclusion in these cases.
But there were delays – it wasn’t pursued with sufficient urgency.
The Ombudsman said that, in highlighting cases such as this, it was important to see whether the delays here are simply a “once-off” or indicative of more systemic issues within Tusla.
In this regard, its audit of Tusla found:
Long delays in the allocation of cases involving allegations of abuse to social workers.
Long delays in contacting people who made allegations.
Long delays before interviews commenced with the person subject to an allegation of abuse and in concluding assessments.
Significant delays in responding to complainants.
In response to the “significant challenges” it faces in investigating allegations of abuse detailed in the report, Tusla said: “Tusla must delicately balance constitutional rights… Tusla must ensure that none of these rights is breached, while at all times remaining fair, impartial and objective.
The current legal framework with respect to managing allegations is inadequate and not equipped to meet both the needs of children and protect the rights of individuals against whom allegations have been made.
Anonymous allegations
In another case highlighted in the Ombudsman’s report, a man – referred to as Mr Smith – had complained about the way the social work department had handled an anonymous allegation made against him.
“This was a gentleman who worked with children,” Tyndall said. “An anonymous allegation was made to gardaí who notified Tusla. It took an awful long time to solve this case.”
When the case was referred by gardaí to social workers, details about the name and phone number of the alleged victim were not provided to Tusla.
“This meant that social workers had no means of contacting the alleged victim to conduct a credibility assessment before meeting with Mr Smith,” the report said.
Furthermore, in the report on the allegation “even the most basic information was lacking”. There was no information on where or when the alleged incident occurred.
It had been alleged that Smith had acted aggressively towards another adult in the presence of a child. Although this allegation was withdrawn, social workers still decided to interview Smith to inform him of the allegation and seek his response.
Six months after Tusla was told about the allegation, social workers sent a letter to Smith, stating that they wished to meet him regarding an alleged incident involving himself and another person.
“This letter caused Mr Smith considerable distress,” the report said. Tyndall expanded on this yesterday and said the man thought he was at risk of losing his job over this. Smith had to ring Tusla to find out more information about what was being claimed before the meeting.
In the wake of the meeting, social workers asked gardaí for contact details of the person who had made the complaint and, two months later, were provided with this information. A phone number, but not a name, was provided by the gardaí, however.
A month later, Smith was told the allegation was “unfounded”. The report said:
The social workers explained to Mr Smith that the assessment had taken longer than expected, as the alleged victim did not make contact with them. Mr Smith was understandably highly concerned about his garda vetting status, as this could have a major impact on his employment… Mr Smith’s life and livelihood was put on hold during this period of time due to the uncertainty about his garda vetting.
Instead of referring Smith to the garda vetting bureau, a social worker gave “information that was misleading”. After another two months he was told his vetting would not be affected because the allegation was “unfounded”. Smith was issued with a written apology by Tusla afterwards.
Tyndall added that, while it is Tusla’s job to safeguard children, it is for the gardaí to bring prosecutions.
Redress
At the close of yesterday’s press conference, a reporter asked Tusla’s director of quality assurance Brian Lee what redress was offered to Lynch’s family.
The question was not answered directly, and so it was asked a second time.
“A written apology and appropriate redress,” Lee said.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Imagine being caught between the HSE and Tusla.
Tusla concoct false allegations through clerical error then engage in long drawn out procedure before removing them while the HSE compound the problem further by insisting on internal reviews into false allegations while simultaneously failing to remove vulnerable children from foster homes when the evidence to support such claims are stacked to the ceiling.
An impossible country run by unaccountable white collar mandarins people by subservient plebs.
@Martin Byrne: Thats the problem though Martin, the people who make allegations are not held to account in any way whatsoever in fact they are free to make more allegations if they so wish.
Exploited care workers, vindictive persecution of whistleblowets, an inept and useless health service and now this.
All this while our politicians are clapping themselves on the back convincing themselves that they are doing an exceptional job running this country.
We can only aspire to come up to the standards of even a third world banana republic.
@Ger Healy: really? We are a pretty good little country, we have our problems and we should work to solve them, but implying constantly that we are the worst place ever in the history of humanity isn’t helping anyone, and it’s very clearly not true.
@Martin Byrne: I forgot to add homelessness, evictions, rich bond holders given back their bet money, and the corrupt and disconnected politicians.
I too, used to think we were a great country, not any more. I’m more ashamed of it now.
There are quite a lot of these cases currently out there and unfortunately there will be more. One thing that needs to be brought in is some sort of penalty for the person who makes these false accusations . These people ruin lives . And of course the system of investigation needs to be run much more professionally. The amount of people involved in these cases and costs is massive , no wonder the HSE budget costs so much .
Serious allegations need to be investigated quickly, effectively and efficiently. But since child abuse is a crime, why is it not An Garda Siochana, a dedicated and expert unit with adequate resources, which is charged with such investigations?
@Tony Daly: I don’t think Gardai investigate crime……..that’s why we have so many tribunals. Seriously tough when you read about the poor woman who’s case was left on a shelf for eleven years and even then nobody wants to investigate it and yet this false report goes on for five years you have to wonder wtf is going on.
@Mary Murphy: Mary, the Gardai do indeed investigate alleged sexual crimes and are obliged to do so in a timely and complete fashion (doesn’t always happen. I’m not naive) but that isn’t the problem here. The HSE and Tusla are totally separate organisations working from a totally different point of view. The Gardai try to accumulate enough evidence to present a file to the DPP to secure a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. The others are supposed to be ensuring the safety and well being of the children. So while the Gardai may have cleared him in 6 months it doesn’t stop the others continuing. I feel terrible for this poor man going to his grave with even a nagging doubt his legacy was tarnished. Maybe even sped his demise, who knows?
What happens to the Social Workers who appear to make a lot of wrong decisions. Are they moved to some other area to do more damage or promoted . Do we know? If you are being dealt with by one of these who made wrong decisions before I wood be very concerned.
@50 Pence: and what about the innocent.. The lying bitch that made these false statements should get ten years. This poor guy would have been hung years ago so maybe the what you call “liberals”have it more right. Try getting up yo the full euro you get nothing now for 50 cents.
There’s a special place in hell for those who would willingly make a false allegation of this nature against someone ! It’s the worst thing you could possibly accuse someone of.
I wonder when our esteemed government set up this quango (tusla) did they really believe that it would run more efficiently than the rest of the public sector? Too many idiots in too many big jobs. All members of a public service union that want more and more
I could have told them all this, without a review, or anything like that. When Social Workers moved over to the new Agency, nothing was changed, to justify it, just like when all the Health Boards because “The Health Service Executive”. What ” the System” was designed to do is not what it’s actually doing. Look at the various cases that we already know about; “Grace”, in the South – East, the Case a few months back where the Foster Parents had to fight the Social Workers to prevent the Children going back to Parents that were neglecting them. There needs to be a separation of complaints out of “genuine concern”, and those that are “vindictive”, or “malicious”. The latter needs to be dealt with, in the same way that people that abuse are dealt with, or are supposed to be dealt with.
Gaza at critical risk of famine, with one in five facing starvation
2 hrs ago
1.3k
Racing
'I feel the time is right': Jockey Rachael Blackmore announces retirement
The 42
17 mins ago
1.2k
4
Dublin
Garda killed at speed checkpoint in north county Dublin
Niall O'Connor
Updated
21 hrs ago
143k
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 187 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 126 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 165 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 129 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 91 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 92 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 44 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 41 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 150 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 69 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 88 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 95 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 40 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 56 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 29 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 107 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 111 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 79 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 60 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 100 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 83 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say