Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Dunphy was on the panel after fronting a report on the differences between government spending in France and Ireland.
The outspoken broadcaster was aiming to highlight the great social services on offer in France as opposed to Ireland where childcare and good healthcare are unaffordable for lots of families.
The report featured, among other things, Dunphy talking about how great France is while walking through a wine cellar.
RTÉ Player
RTÉ Player
Then we came to debate featuring the recently-released Paul Murphy and Dunphy on one side and junior finance minister Simon Harris and consumer journalist Sinead Ryan on the other.
But the only real show in town was Dunphy v Harris…
RTÉ Player
RTÉ Player
“France is a great country,” Harris began.
Then he proceeded to hammer France and outline all the things that aren’t great about it, including €50 billion of planned spending cuts over the next few years.
Channelling Dunphy’s bessie mate Johnny Giles, Harris noted:
“You need to look at each country on its merits.”
Dunphy’s response?
“You’re wrong on the facts, and you’re confused.”
Ouch.
RTÉ Player
RTÉ Player
Dunphy claimed that that in fact France wasn’t going to implement €50 billion in spending cuts.
Yes they are, said Harris and so it went on…
Advertisement
A short time later Harris noted that Dunphy had once described Ireland as “a dump”.
Not true, said Dunphy:
“I said it was a kip.”
An important distinction.
Then unfortunately, in the interests of fairness and balance, Claire had to let the other panellists speak and that was all fairly boring.
RTÉ Player
RTÉ Player
A few minutes later, Harris had a bit of a pop at Murphy and there was a brief row over that morning’s dawn arrest of the Socialist Party TD.
“I don’t think anyone is making political points out of this, except Paul,” he said.
This had Dunphy up in arms and he started talking about Clare Daly’s arrest before Claire (Byrne) brought it back to the main topic.
So, Dunphy started banging on about Greece and Spain and Harris looked a little confused:
RTÉ Player
RTÉ Player
Then the Fine Gael TD quickly got back to haranguing Dunphy:
“When you’re not describing your country as ‘a kip’ or walking through wine cellars…”
Dunphy was up in arms: “Would you mind not engaging in personal insults?”
So to finish off Harris had this zinger:
https://vine.co/v/OUp3nwHuPVK
The debate went on a few minutes longer, but the real match was all over.
After that Charlton dig, we have to give it to Harris on points, or as one tweeter pointed out:
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Harris made a salient point that Dunphy was representing himself as a neutral political commentator but has actually voted Sinn Fein numerous times in the past and is a Sinn Fein supporter. Dunphy did use the typical shinner line that that the huge drop in unemployment in this country is all down to Jobbridge.
You know Harris won the debate when all the best the whingers can come up with is that he was “condescending and arrogant”.
Smarmy and petulant would perhaps be more accurate to describe his leary performance…..was also interesting overhear his babysitting INM hack clearly prompt him as to Dunphys previous utterances of support for Sinn Fein despite its irrelevance to the topic but more an attempt at some sort of veiled slur as they would see it!!
Listening to Harris gives me a big dose of the pips. He didn’t get my vote when he ran in the European elections. Fine Gael must have a room full of files on everyone because when they are in a debate with someone all this dirt comes out. Enda can’t argue a point all you get is dirty snipes about their past. The same goes for Joan Burton and the rest of their minions. We are fed up with all this tripe its low low politics. As a correspondent has said Harris was only a gorsun when Charton was manager of Ireland so where this this dirt come from. I would suggest the Fine Gael dirty tricks brigade and we have plenty examples of their tricks in the past.
Ger you spot on Kenny when asked a question in the Dail goes on same personal attack Harris did. I bet he has cost Fine Gael thousands of votes because his manner and approach were a real put off. I don’t think he or any member of Fine Gael know we electorate exist and they don’t need our votes. Harris is a sore looser and he got very personal meaning he cannot stand up for Fine Gael austerity choices.
I’d say he has impressed his electorate – articulate and far sharper than Dunphy. All of his points were spot on and he was right to take Dunphy to task for calling this country a kip while espousing France, which has massive economic problems of it’s own, as some sort of utopia.
Always bend an admirer of Eamo but last night came across as an arrogant condescending bully who sneeringly resorted to inviting the support of the audience constantly when confronted with irrefutable facts.
Another distorted report of #CBlive from your reporter. Simon Harris was arrogant and condescending and had to resort to a cheap quip about Eamon Dunphy’s comments on Jack Charlton to try and get a hit. Harris was 4 years old when that took place.
cos he was losing, had nothing else to give but insult on a personal level. All of FG do that. They are trained in the book of personal insults when things don’t go their way. I’d be flattered to receive it, you know you’re winning then so just sit back like Dunphy did and smile at the idiot.
You can’t seem to park that bias at all. You make it seem like it was David vs Goliath. Dunphy gave as good as he got. Harris came out with egg on his face
I have a problem lately with this government and it’s not about the economy, jobs, health etc.
It is about the way they flitter people on talk shows, call people extreme and fire insults at people and introduced this 2-3 tier class society into Ireland. The FG side in particular is shifting further and further to the right with the arrests of protesters and it makes me wonder if we will in fact have an independent democratic election next year?
I see Hugh is using his pal Karls tweets to back himself up now.
Quickly becoming the John Waters of the journal.
Can’t believe I wasted my time reading that, can the journal start putting the authors name at the top of the article.
Life’s too short for this stuff.
Who is this Harris weasel. The squeaky little voice on him. He talked himself into a corner. Dunphy said less, was enough.
“you got a 6 minute video” lol well that was the point of the program otherwise you wouldn’t be there Harris. little coward, he was oiled up on what to say cos like Enda, knows nothing.
I think this interview really exposed Harris’s inexperience and immaturity. He became emotional and petty far too easily and made Paul Murphy look composed and professional. He strikes me as your stereotypical Fine Gael politician, putting his party before his people. He needs coaching on how not be wound up on live television!
Its a real shame there is an alternative way, a more human way, a better way to deal with the dept , look after the people first then service the dept, austerity is not the answer and never will be, Harris banging on how well the country is doing and all the improvements, but the burning question is for whom
Harris gave a q&a session on Facebook after the budget where he answered hardly anyone. Then wow and behold he got thousands of likes only they all nearly came from Bangladesh India and then claimed fg Facebook got hacked. Utter nonsense. Could not believe a word he says.
I watched a few moments of it and found it was just a point scoring slagging match.
Personally I don’t need to see the likes of this to make a decision on where my precious vote goes.
Totally agree Mike, the likes of Harris should be well able to side step reducing a debate about supposedly finding answers to problems, to a punch and judy show… but because he doesn’t have any answers, sure any auld type of distraction will do. And sure as the heading of this article says, sure it’s all very entertaining, right? Government….no answers, just pantomimes.
When you get personal, you’ve lost the argument. Dunphy would eat him without salt. I find it hard to even listening to Harris. Sounds like an overgrown schoolboy, whose voice has yet to break- is that getting personal? He’s just another Blueshirt puppy, who needs to get out more, and I don’t mean to a TV studio.
Harris thought the longer he talked the better he sounded he didn’t The government hung themselves yesterday with what happened to Paul murphy I like Clare but she seemed to to under orders from the top as regards her questions to Paul
Simon Harris came across as a wise ass disrespectful pipsqueak ignoramus.
He was an embarrassment , as a public representative .
He constantly interrupted and had just one agenda – to attack personally and with zero substance .
Is that the best FG can produce, as a spokesperson ?
O look the Journal saying that little weasel won the debate. No surprise there. Dunphy clearly won. That other bloke was crying nearly, and Dunphy is right. I said the weekend and I’ll say it again. This country is a corrupt coward filled kip. Just to regurgitate what I said. I only buy items ( not food item’s) from England (amazon) as there usually half price cheaper and mnmdirect for cloths. Much cheaper and your not giving money to Enda and ilk. I also work for cash is hand. Constantly working as I don’t RIP people off.
Teacher teacher he’s cursing. Do you know how many times people told me I was being reported. I lost count over the last 7 years. I don’t collect the dole and I pay for everything I need out of MY money. Once again. Coward filled kip.
@davedunne do you pay income tax on your earnings?
If you are working in the black economy then you are not paying the correct taxes required to fund and run this country and we could reasonably argue that you are in fact a rip off merchant!
Harris was quite effective….the truth is that Dunphy’s clip of the French Utopia didn’t stand up…and some of the audience clearly refuted it. Harris clearly has a bright future in politics…has the right mix of intellect and and practicality..also very good communicator.
It’s good to see someone like him in politics, young and articulate. From a modest backgound and no political dynesty to get him elected, just hard work. Much better than most in Dail Eireann.
…Yes Stephen and he’s just enough of a weird cretin type to make the skin crawl enough, not quite to know why, but to feel the condescension and the contempt for an ordinary man trying to tell him what policies should be reviewed, I mean, how very dare Eamon Dunphy, a lowly sports commentator who drinks wine (gasp) tell such a high up member of government to look again….well, I never. Resorting to dragging up something Emaon said on a previous show out of context…it’s all school debate team nonsense, did any of what was said by Harris offer a solution? You are admiring him for doing so well….I didn’t hear a solution last night, all he said was “yes we know we got it wrong in previous governments, and now is the time to fix it.” Thanks for that Simon.
Harris did well. Best thing about the show was that it didn’t descend into a shouting match. Claire Byrne is impressive too. I just wish the Garda hadn’t handed comrade murphski such a publicity coup.
Mainly because he frequently runs down this country Norman, a country that has made him reasonably wealthy. Ireland is far from perfect but it is still a good country and certainly not a kip. France is far from the Utopia that Dunphy tried to portray it as. His glasses would not be so rose tinted if he was working or running a business there.
You tell that to someone waiting for a cardiologist for their kid for 3 years Reg… did you watch the whole programme? Do you realise why people are angry, do you know what’s going on in this country? Just because things are good for you does not make it so for everyone, god forbid you go into bad health or have a few kids that need minding if you work on minimum wage here, you might actually change your mind then. It’s a kip for the ones being squeezed dry by the ones who get, but who don’t need Reg…wake up, the divide is wider than ever.
Answer me one question Ally. Did you vote for Fianna Fail (even once) during the period of of 1997 to 2007 when they were dishing out cash wholesale (SSIA, early childhood allownace etc) and reducing taxes when they should have been investing in schools, health, childcare facilities etc. Even once?
None of your business Reg, where my vote goes or what I did – this isn’t about me, you’re doing typically what a seasoned politician does when faced with the hard facts and questions ie. trying to turn it around on the constituents that vote (or don’t) for them. This is about making our representatives voted for or not) answerable to us, ordinary working people, (or not) who they are working for. I don’t want to be on the so called grown up version of school debate teams, I’d like to know how they’re going to tackle problems like sick people on never ending waiting lists for treatment and individuals and parents being crippled by a very unbalanced and unjust system of paying out and that is all.
Of course he’s entitled to it Martin. RTE seem to like to wheel him out, both on radio and TV for many things. You know what the say about opinions….every ar…………has one!!!
Yep Reg, I wouldn’t disagree with you there, and I’d say Simon was delighted it was Eamon, because it creates the right atmosphere to get that pantomime going….and Simon did exactly that.
Initially I thought Harris came across as a bit anal, and unnecessarily provocative. But he held his emotion better than Dunphy who seemed to lose his composure a little, and therefore the strength in his argument. I still don’t like Harris or him whittling out the minor compensations his party have brought in the last budget etc. But debater against debater… He looked like a better fighter.
Very Mr Burn-ish though!
Mary you’re talking about it as if it was a staged match, like a boxing match or something. It was meant to be a debate about how to improve on what social policies we currently have here, not a measure of who can keep the coolest, which is all politicians seem able to do….have a good verbal fight and not lose face. Personally I’d prefer someone who did lose their temper now and again if it meant they were passionate about something and actually got stuff done, not just someone who shows me they’re incapable of emotion….
It was just an opinion. Note the way I started with ‘I think’. That’s all it was. An observation. No need to criticise me for my observation. I’m just commenting on what I thought.
I didn’t criticise you at all Mary. I just made an observation in reply, less of the sensitive, this is a public domain here and all opinions count, you don’t just post yours up without getting arguments back, that is the nature of opinion.
Harris is the epitome of FG, a slimy, sneaky rat. He is just like dame Enda. Cannot answer a question without following a prepared speech full of personal insults. I hope this little rat loses his seat next time out.
Not sure how you came up with Harris “winning” as Eamo was constantly interrupted by Claire when he was making reasonable comments about the lack of social care from this Government.
I suspect the Journal knows what side it’s bread is buttered on… They know a large percentage of comments on numerous stories on this site are anti-government. Foster that, even channel it & there you have it… Click bait!
Harris reminded me of Ryan Tubridy, except with all the decency, empathy & charisma beaten out of him.
A dislikeable, obnoxious, weasel of a little man.
If he was there alone, just by himself last night, he would’ve lost the debate.
Judging from the comments here, O’Connell got the result wrong again- seems Dunphy won by a knockout, not ” Harris on points” . Have seen O’Connell on VB show. Not a good debater either. Dunphy would have him floored in round one.
Harris definitely had the edge.
He’s a young guy, the youngest Minister in the Dáil, as far as I know.
I reckon we will be seeing a lot more of him. He may come across as a bit nerdy and quirky but hey different is good. He’s one to watch …….
Had the edge of what? I didn’t hear any answers come out of his mouth. Do tell what solutions he offered you last night. So he’s good in a row? Yep that will fix the country.
Harris looked nervous and ranted endlessly throwing insults at anyone who challenged him. An insolent child best describes him. Seems to be the way FG/labour ministers conduct themselves in debate. Could this day get any better for Murphy! Yet another own goal for this coalition :)
I watched the little film Dunphy presented , it confused me
He was comparing a Fireman in dublin to a French worker in a completly different field , Why not compare fireman to fireman.
The Fireman in Ireland had a family income of 80k , didnt say if they wife had a job or not.
The Fireman related a story about how his kid has been waiting months for an appointment to see a cardiologist. That really confused me , as we were in a similar situation, our kid was ill, we couldnt wait for the public system so dipped into our savings to pay for the operation in the private system , 5k it cost and was done and dusted in a week or two….
We earn no where near 80k , is that fireman going to risk his childs health because there is a queue?
You clearly didn’t watch the film.
It stated the fireman wife because of childcare costs is working part time.They have been waiting 3 years for an appointment.
It didn’t delve into the rest of their financial situation so anything on my part or yours is an unsubstantiated guess.
Last nights debate only relevant if we could have had an example of France wasting 60 mil on consultants for a service for 3.5 mil of it’s citizens. We should also hear how much their tds make in expenses and pensions, and see if there are as many millionaires in Paris, relative to Dublin. Personal attacks only ensure that the argument is ultimately lost, regardless of it’s merit, made me cringe to see yet again the quality and intelligence of those in government.
Disappointed with some of the comments on this thread, judging Harris on how he looks and how he was probably bullied as a kid etc etc. In my opinion Harris accounted himself very well and stood up to one of the biggest bullies on irish tv and radio i.e. Dunphy. It was great to see Dunphy being put in his place for once. Dunphy changes his tune as quick as the wind changes direction, also he insulted all of us by calling the country a kip. He should be ashamed of himself. Also i was impressed with Claire Byrne, she is improving week on week.
Lukashenko: How Europe's last dictator figures in the thawing of US-Russian relations
10 mins ago
230
Kharkiv
Two killed as Russian drones target Ukraine’s second-largest city
13 mins ago
123
social welfare changes
If you lose your job and have worked for 5 years you'll get up to €450 a week under new rules
12 hrs ago
32.6k
71
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 161 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage .Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 110 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 143 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 113 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 83 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 39 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 35 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 134 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 61 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 74 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 83 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 37 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 46 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 27 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 92 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 99 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 72 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 53 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 88 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 69 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say